Differential effect of cholesterol on membrane interaction of charged versus uncharged 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists: A biophysical analysis

Are antibacterial effects of non-antibiotic drugs random or purposeful because of a common evolutionary origin of bacterial and mammalian targets?

Purpose

Advances in structural biology, genetics, bioinformatics, etc. resulted in the availability of an enormous pool of information enabling the analysis of the ancestry of pro- and eukaryotic genes and proteins.

Methods

This review summarizes findings of structural and/or functional homologies of pro- and eukaryotic enzymes catalysing analogous biological reactions because of their highly conserved active centres so that non-antibiotics interacted with bacterial targets.

Results

Protease inhibitors such as staurosporine or camostat inhibited bacterial serine/threonine or serine/tyrosine protein kinases, serine/threonine phosphatases, and serine/threonine kinases, to which penicillin-binding-proteins are linked, so that these drugs synergized with β-lactams, reverted aminoglycoside-resistance and attenuated bacterial virulence. Calcium antagonists such as nitrendipine or verapamil blocked not only prokaryotic ion channels but interacted with negatively charged bacterial cell membranes thus disrupting membrane energetics and inducing membrane stress response resulting in inhibition of P-glycoprotein such as bacterial pumps thus improving anti-mycobacterial activities of rifampicin, tetracycline, fluoroquinolones, bedaquilin and imipenem-activity against Acinetobacter spp. Ciclosporine and tacrolimus attenuated bacterial virulence. ACE-inhibitors like captopril interacted with metallo-β-lactamases thus reverting carbapenem-resistance; prokaryotic carbonic anhydrases were inhibited as well resulting in growth impairment. In general, non-antibiotics exerted weak antibacterial activities on their own but synergized with antibiotics, and/or reverted resistance and/or attenuated virulence.

Conclusions

Data summarized in this review support the theory that prokaryotic proteins represent targets for non-antibiotics because of a common evolutionary origin of bacterial- and mammalian targets resulting in highly conserved active centres of both, pro- and eukaryotic proteins with which the non-antibiotics interact and exert antibacterial actions.

Evaluation of Cytotoxic Effect of Cholesterol End-Capped Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide)s on Selected Normal and Neoplastic Cells

Purpose

Efficient intracellular delivery of a therapeutic compound is an important feature of smart drug delivery systems (SDDS). Modification of a carrier structure with a cell-penetrating ligand, ie, cholesterol moiety, is a strategy to improve cellular uptake. Cholesterol end-capped poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)s offer a promising foundation for the design of efficient thermoresponsive drug delivery systems.

Methods

A series of cholesterol end-capped poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)s (PNIPAAm) with number-average molar masses ranging from 3200 to 11000 g·mol^–1 were synthesized by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization from original xanthate-functionalized cholesterol and self-assembled into micelles. The physicochemical characteristics and cytotoxicity of cholesterol end-capped poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)s have been thoroughly investigated.

Results

Phase transition temperature dependence on the molecular weight and hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratio in the polymers were observed in water. Biological test results showed that the obtained materials, both in disordered and micellar form, are non-hemolytic, highly compatible with fibroblasts, and toxic to glioblastoma cells. It was found that the polymer termini dictates the mode of action of the system.

Conclusion

The cholesteryl moiety acts as a cell-penetrating agent, which enables disruption of the plasma membrane and in effect leads to the restriction of the tumor growth. Cholesterol end-capped PNIPAAm showing in vitro anticancer efficacy can be developed not only as drug carriers but also as components of combined/synergistic therapy.

Novel Vascular Biology of Third-Generation L-Type Calcium Channel Antagonists

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were developed as vasodilators, and their use in cardiovascular disease treatment remains largely based on that mechanism of action. More recently, with the evolution of second- and third-generation CCBs, pleiotropic effects have been observed, and at least some of CCBs’ benefit is attributable to these mechanisms. Understanding these effects has contributed greatly to elucidating disease mechanisms and the rationale for CCB use. Furthermore, this knowledge might clarify why drugs are useful in some disease states, such as atherosclerosis, but not in others, such as heart failure. Although numerous drugs used in the treatment of vascular disease, including statins and angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors, have well-described pleiotropic effects universally accepted to contribute to their benefit, little attention has been paid to CCBs’ potentially similar effects. Accumulating evidence that at least 1 CCB, amlodipine, has pharmacologic actions distinct from L-type calcium channel blockade prompted us to investigate the pleiotropic actions of amlodipine and CCBs in general. There are several areas of research; foci here are (1) the physicochemical properties of amlodipine and its interaction with cholesterol and oxidants; (2) the mechanism by which amlodipine regulates NO production and implications; and (3) amlodipine’s role in controlling smooth muscle cell proliferation and matrix formation.

Voltage-dependent effects of barnidipine in rat vascular smooth muscle

The effects of the dihydropyridine nifedipine and its more lipophilic congener, barnidipine, were investigated in smooth muscle preparations from the rat in resting and depolarizing conditions. Both drugs relaxed precontracted aortic rings more potently in depolarizing conditions, barnidipine being more potent than nifedipine. Currents through Ca2+ channels in rat vascular smooth muscle cells (A7r5) and in isolated rat cardiomyocytes were reduced more potently by both drugs at a holding potential of -40 mV than at -80 mV. However, barnidipine and nifedipine were more effective in reducing the current in A7r5 cells than in cardiomyocytes. The IC(50) obtained in aortic rings and in A7r5 cells were similar for barnidipine but an order of magnitude different for nifedipine. The results show that, in depolarizing conditions, barnidipine was more effective than nifedipine. It is suggested that the higher potency of barnidipine acting in vascular smooth muscle is related to both a higher affinity to the inactivated state of vascular Ca2+ channels and to a more lipophilic property as compared with nifedipine.

Mechanisms of plaque stabilization for the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine: review of the evidence

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the consequence of atherosclerosis, a vascular disorder that is the leading cause of death and disability throughout much of the developed world. Certain cellular changes in the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque are characterized by a loss of normal calcium regulation. This observation has led to interest in a potential antiatherogenic role for calcium channel blockers (CCBs), independent of their effects on vasodilation. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) demonstrated that treatment with amlodipine, a third-generation CCB, in patients with documented CAD produced marked reductions in cardiovascular events as compared with placebo, without a reduction in coronary luminal loss. Amlodipine therapy was also associated with significant slowing in carotid atherosclerosis, an important surrogate marker for CAD, independent of blood pressure changes. The findings from PREVENT were remarkably consistent with another study known as the Coronary Angioplasty Amlodipine Restenosis Study (CAPARES). A reduction in the progression of carotid atherosclerosis has also been recently reported for lacidipine, another third-generation dihydropyridine CCB. These clinical findings have led to a renewed interest in potential plaque stabilization properties of certain CCBs, as will be systematically reviewed in this article. It is also probable that vascular protective agents, such as amlodipine may work in a synergistic fashion with other established treatments, including HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, to effectively improve outcomes in patients who are at risk for or have established CAD.

Mechanisms of atherosclerotic plaque stabilization for a lipophilic calcium antagonist amlodipine

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the result of atherosclerosis, a vascular disorder characterized by abnormalities in vasoconstriction and endothelial function, ultimately leading to partial or complete vessel occlusion. Because the atherosclerotic plaque is marked by changes in calcium regulation, there has been interest in a potential antiatherosclerotic role for calcium antagonists. In support of this hypothesis, a recent clinical study demonstrated in patients with CAD that treatment with the lipophilic dihydropyridine-type calcium antagonist amlodipine resulted in significantly fewer cardiovascular procedures and events. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) evaluated the effects of amlodipine on the development and progression of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary and carotid arteries in 825 patients with documented CAD. The results of PREVENT showed that patients receiving amlodipine had marked reductions in hospitalization for revascularization and unstable angina compared with placebo in a population consisting of either normotensive or controlled hypertensive patients. Ultrasound approaches determined that amlodipine therapy was also associated with significant slowing in carotid atherosclerosis-an important surrogate marker for CAD-over the 3-year period. This vascular-wall benefit associated with amlodipine treatment was not related to changes in blood pressure. The findings from PREVENT were consistent with a second reported study known as the Coronary Angioplasty Amlodipine Restenosis Study (CAPARES). These clinical results have led to an interest in potential plaque-stabilization properties of this lipophilic calcium antagonist. In this article, cellular and molecular mechanisms of action that may contribute to a beneficial role for a calcium antagonist in the treatment of atherosclerosis will be reviewed.

Mechanisms of plaque stabilization for a charged calcium channel blocker in coronary artery disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) results from atherosclerosis, a systemic vascular disorder that is the leading cause of death and disability throughout much of the developed world. Because cellular changes associated with vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque are characterized by a loss of normal calcium regulation, there is strong interest in a potential antiatherosclerotic role for calcium channel blockers. This hypothesis has been supported by investigational studies conducted in well-defined cellular and animal models of atherosclerosis. In addition, several clinical studies have tested the benefit of calcium channel blockers among patients with mild-to-moderate CAD. More recent trials have shown reductions in cardiovascular events after treatment with amlodipine, a long-acting, dihydropyridine-type calcium channel blocker. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) demonstrated that patients with documented CAD treated with amlodipine experienced marked reductions in cardiovascular events compared with patients receiving placebo. Amlodipine also was associated with significant slowing of carotid atherosclerosis, an important surrogate marker for CAD, independent of blood pressure modification. These results have renewed interest in potential plaque stabilization properties of third-generation calcium channel blockers and their possible therapeutic role in CAD.

A comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol antioxidant activities in vitro

Carvedilol is a vasodilating beta-blocker and antioxidant approved for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. angina, and congestive heart failure. Metoprolol is a beta1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist. When carvedilol and metoprolol were recently compared in clinical trials for heart failure, each showed beneficial beta-blocker effects such as improved symptoms, quality of life, exercise tolerance, and ejection fraction, with no between-group differences. When thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) levels were measured in serum as an indirect marker of free radical activity, there were also no between-group differences. However, we had noted superior cardioprotection by carvedilol in comparison to metoprolol in ischemia and reperfusion models. We therefore examined antioxidant activity directly in cells and tissues. Here we show that in cultured rat cerebellar neurons, and in brain and heart membranes, carvedilol has far greater antioxidant activity than metoprolol, which is essentially inactive as an antioxidant in these model systems. The antioxidant activity of carvedilol could be explained by a greater degree of lipophilicity, as measured by its ClogP value of 3.841 as contrasted to a ClogP value of 1.346 for metoprolol. Alternatively, the molecular structure of carvedilol favors redox recycling, which the structure of metoprolol does not. Therefore, carvedilol could have additional pharmacologic effects that are favorable for long-term therapy.

Neuroprotective activities of carvedilol and a hydroxylated derivative: role of membrane biophysical interactions

Carvedilol is a vasodilating beta-blocker and antioxidant approved for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, angina, and congestive heart failure. SB 211475 (4-[2-hydroxyl-3-[[2-(2-methoxyphenoxy)ethyl]amino]propoxyl]-9H-++ +carbazol-3-ol), a hydroxylated carvedilol analogue, is an even more potent antioxidant in several assay systems. Carvedilol also has neuroprotective capacity with modulatory actions at N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and Na+ channels. In the present study, we demonstrated that in cultured rat cerebellar neurons, SB 211475 has 28-fold greater antioxidant activity than carvedilol, but is 2- to 6-fold less potent, respectively, at inhibiting neurotoxic activities at Na+ channels and at NMDA receptor channels. To determine a biophysical rationale for these differential activities, small angle x-ray scattering data were obtained from model lipid and brain membrane bilayers containing either carvedilol, SB 211475, or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. Electron density profiles revealed that the location of SB 211475 was restricted to the glycerol backbone/hydrocarbon interface and significantly reduced membrane width by 5%, whereas the time-averaged location for carvedilol and flunarizine also extended to the hydrated surface of the bilayer. Comparison of carvedilol with several dihydropyridines showed a correlation between high ClogP values (lipophilicity), Na+ channel inhibitory potency, and bilayer localization. The antioxidant activity of SB 211475 could be explained by restricted intercalation into the glycerol phosphate/hydrocarbon interface, creating an increase in volume associated with the phospholipid acyl chains, which would then become resistant to lipid peroxidation. Differential channel modulation may also be explained by these membrane structural results, which indicate that carvedilol and the less spatially restricted dihydropyridine molecules are more likely to inhibit transmembrane receptor channels.