Ultrastructural and biochemical nuclear aspects of Eukaryote classification: Independent evolution of the dinoflagellates as a sister group of the actual Eukaryotes?

The enigmatic nucleus of the marine dinoflagellate Prorocentrum cordatum

The marine, bloom-forming dinoflagellate Prorocentrum cordatum CCMP 1329 (formerly P. minimum) has a genome atypical of eukaryotes, with a large size of ~4.15 Gbp, organized in plentiful, highly condensed chromosomes and packed in a dinoflagellate-specific nucleus (dinokaryon). Here, we apply microscopic and proteogenomic approaches to obtain new insights into this enigmatic nucleus of axenic P. cordatum. High-resolution focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy analysis of the flattened nucleus revealed highest density of nuclear pores in the vicinity of the nucleolus, a total of 62 tightly packed chromosomes (~0.4-6.7 µm3), and interaction of several chromosomes with the nucleolus and other nuclear structures. A specific procedure for enriching intact nuclei was developed to enable proteomic analyses of soluble and membrane protein-enriched fractions. These were analyzed with geLC and shotgun approaches employing ion-trap and timsTOF (trapped-ion-mobility-spectrometry time-of-flight) mass spectrometers, respectively. This allowed identification of 4,052 proteins (39% of unknown function), out of which 418 were predicted to serve specific nuclear functions; additional 531 proteins of unknown function could be allocated to the nucleus. Compaction of DNA despite very low histone abundance could be accomplished by highly abundant major basic nuclear proteins (HCc2-like). Several nuclear processes including DNA replication/repair and RNA processing/splicing can be fairly well explained on the proteogenomic level. By contrast, transcription and composition of the nuclear pore complex remain largely elusive. One may speculate that the large group of potential nuclear proteins with currently unknown functions may serve yet to be explored functions in nuclear processes differing from those of typical eukaryotic cells. IMPORTANCE Dinoflagellates form a highly diverse group of unicellular microalgae. They provide keystone species for the marine ecosystem and stand out among others by their very large, unusually organized genomes embedded in the nuclei markedly different from other eukaryotic cells. Functional insights into nuclear and other cell biological structures and processes of dinoflagellates have long been hampered by the paucity of available genomic sequences. The here studied cosmopolitan P. cordatum belongs to the harmful algal bloom-forming, marine dinoflagellates and has a recently de novo assembled genome. We present a detailed 3D reconstruction of the P. cordatum nucleus together with comprehensive proteogenomic insights into the protein equipment mastering the broad spectrum of nuclear processes. This study significantly advances our understanding of mechanisms and evolution of the conspicuous dinoflagellate cell biology.

Distinctive Nuclear Features of Dinoflagellates with A Particular Focus on Histone and Histone-Replacement Proteins

Dinoflagellates are important eukaryotic microorganisms that play critical roles as producers and grazers, and cause harmful algal blooms. The unusual nuclei of dinoflagellates "dinokaryon" have led researchers to investigate their enigmatic nuclear features. Their nuclei are unusual in terms of their permanently condensed nucleosome-less chromatin, immense genome, low protein to DNA ratio, guanine-cytosine rich methylated DNA, and unique mitosis process. Furthermore, dinoflagellates are the only known group of eukaryotes that apparently lack histone proteins. Over the course of evolution, dinoflagellates have recruited other proteins, e.g., histone-like proteins (HLPs), from bacteria and dinoflagellates/viral nucleoproteins (DVNPs) from viruses as histone substitutes. Expression diversity of these nucleoproteins has greatly influenced the chromatin structure and gene expression regulation in dinoflagellates. Histone replacement proteins (HLPs and DVNPs) are hypothesized to perform a few similar roles as histone proteins do in other eukaryotes, i.e., gene expression regulation and repairing DNA. However, their role in bulk packaging of DNA is not significant as low amounts of proteins are associated with the gigantic genome. This review intends to summarize the discoveries encompassing unique nuclear features of dinoflagellates, particularly focusing on histone and histone replacement proteins. In addition, a comprehensive view of the evolution of dinoflagellate nuclei is presented.

Birefringence and DNA condensation of liquid crystalline chromosomes

DNA can self-assemble in vitro into several liquid crystalline phases at high concentrations. The largest known genomes are encoded by the cholesteric liquid crystalline chromosomes (LCCs) of the dinoflagellates, a diverse group of protists related to the malarial parasites. Very little is known about how the liquid crystalline packaging strategy is employed to organize these genomes, the largest among living eukaryotes-up to 80 times the size of the human genome. Comparative measurements using a semiautomatic polarizing microscope demonstrated that there is a large variation in the birefringence, an optical property of anisotropic materials, of the chromosomes from different dinoflagellate species, despite their apparently similar ultrastructural patterns of bands and arches. There is a large variation in the chromosomal arrangements in the nuclei and individual karyotypes. Our data suggest that both macroscopic and ultrastructural arrangements affect the apparent birefringence of the liquid crystalline chromosomes. Positive correlations are demonstrated for the first time between the level of absolute retardance and both the DNA content and the observed helical pitch measured from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) photomicrographs. Experiments that induced disassembly of the chromosomes revealed multiple orders of organization in the dinoflagellate chromosomes. With the low protein-to-DNA ratio, we propose that a highly regulated use of entropy-driven force must be involved in the assembly of these LCCs. Knowledge of the mechanism of packaging and arranging these largest known DNAs into different shapes and different formats in the nuclei would be of great value in the use of DNA as nanostructural material.

Organization of the genome and gene expression in a nuclear environment lacking histones and nucleosomes: the amazing dinoflagellates

Dinoflagellates are fascinating protists that have attracted researchers from different fields. The free-living species are major primary producers and the cause of harmful algal blooms sometimes associated with red tides. Dinoflagellates lack histones and nucleosomes and present a unique genome and chromosome organization, being considered the only living knockouts of histones. Their plastids contain genes organized in unigenic minicircles. Basic cell structure, biochemistry and molecular phylogeny place the dinoflagellates firmly among the eukaryotes. They have G1-S-G2-M cell cycles, repetitive sequences, ribosomal genes in tandem, nuclear matrix, snRNAs, and eukaryotic cytoplasm, whereas their nuclear DNA is different, from base composition to chromosome organization. They have a high G + C content, highly methylated and rare bases such as 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HOMeU), no TATA boxes, and form distinct interphasic dinochromosomes with a liquid crystalline organization of DNA, stabilized by metal cations and structural RNA. Without histones and with a protein:DNA mass ratio (1:10) lower than prokaryotes, they need a different way of packing their huge amounts of DNA into a functional chromatin. In spite of the high interest in the dinoflagellate system in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, their analysis until now has been very restricted. We review here the main achievements in the characterization of the genome, nucleus and chromosomes in this diversified phylum. The recent discovery of a eukaryotic structural and functional differentiation in the dinochromosomes and of the organization of gene expression in them, demonstrate that in spite of the secondary loss of histones, that produce a lack of nucleosomal and supranucleosomal chromatin organization, they keep a functional nuclear organization closer to eukaryotes than to prokaryotes.

Architecture and evolution of dinoflagellate chromosomes: an enigmatic origin

Dinoflagellates are a highly diversified group of unicellular protists that present fascinating nuclear features which have intrigued researchers for many years. As examples, a dense nuclear matrix accommodates permanently condensed chromosomes that are composed of fibers organized without histones and nucleosomes in stacked rows of parallel nested arches. The macromolecular chromosome structure corresponds to cholesteric liquid crystals with a constant left-handed twist. RNA acts to maintain the chromosome structure. Whole mounted chromosomes have a left-handed screw-like configuration with coils which progressively increase their pitch. This helical arrangement seems to be the result of a couple of narrow strands coiling together. Chromosomes do not show Q, G and C banding patterns. However, a roughly spherical differentiated upper end (primitive kinetochore?) and two differentiated coiling regions, the upper one composed of two to three coils where a couple of sister strands run together and parallel to each other, and the lower one where sister strands run out of phase by 180 degrees angular difference along the immediate next turns, can be distinguished. The chromosome segregation into two daughter chromatids begins at the telomere that attaches to the nuclear envelope, follows along the chromosome axis constituting first a Y-shaped and afterwards a V-shaped chromosome, which packs the newly synthesized DNA inside the "old" chromosome. Dividing chromosomes remain highly condensed, and the diameters of the new chromatids and the undivided chromosome are similar, but the number of arches is twice as large in G1 as in G2. The nuclear envelope remains through the cell cycle and shows spindle fibers, which penetrate intranuclear cytoplasmic channels during mitosis constituting an extra nuclear spindle. These and other cytogenetic features suggest that dinoflagellates are a group of enigmatic protists, unique and different from the usual eukaryotes. In contrast, DNA sequence studies propose that dinoflagellates are true eukaryotes, closely related to Apicomplexa, and ciliates (Alveolata), suggesting that the unusual features of chromosome and nuclear organization are not primitive but derived characters. Nevertheless, dinoflagellates have reached enigmatic specific nuclear and chromosome solutions, extremely far from those of other living beings.

Lectin analysis of surface saccharides during the cell cycle in four dinoflagellate species

The surface glycocalyx of four dinoflagellate species were examined by fluorescent lectins. Cultures were synchronized by darkness for 82 h and changes in DNA content, cell density and surface sugars composition were monitored at 2 h intervals for 52 h in populations of four species: Alexandrium minutum, Gymnodinium catenatum, Prorocentrum micans and Gyrodinium impudicum. Lectin binding properties indicated changes in the glycoconjugate composition of the cell surface during the cell cycle. Differences in the lectin binding pattern among species were also observed. No detectable alpha-D-N-acetyl-galactosaminyl residues were found in A. minutum and G. catenatum at the cell surface and only small and irregular amounts of alpha-L-fucose were detected. However, large amounts of alpha-mannose, alpha-glucose, (N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamine)(2) and, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminyl were found during the greater part of the cell cycle of this species. P. micans only showed positive labeling when ConA was used, suggesting the presence of alpha-mannosyl and alpha-glucosyl residues. More complex sugars such alpha-L-fuc and alpha-galNAc were never observed or were present in low amounts. All the sugar residues analyzed were present in the cell surface of G. impudicum in significant amounts. Evidence was also obtained for internalization of WGA receptors in P. micans and its binding to the nuclear membrane.

Nuclear assembly of purified Crythecodinium cohnii chromosomes in cell-free extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs

Incubation of dinoflagellate Crythecodinium cohnii chromosomes in cytoplasmic extracts of unfertilized Xenopus laevis eggs resulted in chromosomes decondensation and recondensation, nuclear envelope assembly, and nuclear reconstitution. Dinoflagellate Crythecodinium cohnii is a kind of primitive eukaryote which possesses numerous permanently condensed chromosomes and discontinuous double-layered nuclear membrane throughout the cell cycle. The assembled nuclei, being surrounded by a continuous double membrane containing nuclear pores and the uniformly dispersed chromatin fibers are morphologically distinguishable from that of Dinoflagellate Crythecodinium cohnii. However, incubation of dinoflagellate Crythecodinium cohnii chromosomes in the extracts from dinoflagellate Crythecodinium cohnii cells does not induce nuclear reconstitution.

Cyclic expression of a nuclear protein in a dinoflagellate

Nuclei of the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii strain Whd were isolated and nuclear proteins were extracted in three fractions, corresponding to the increasing affinity of these proteins to genomic DNA. One fraction contained two major bands (48- and 46-kDa) and antibodies specific to this fraction revealed two major bands by Western blot on nuclear extracts, corresponding to the 46- and 48-kDa bands. The 48-kDa protein was detected in G1 phase but not in M phase cells. An expression cDNA library of C. cohnii was screened with these antibodies, and two different open reading frames were isolated. Dinoflagellate nuclear associated protein (Dinap1), one of these coding sequences, was produced in E. coli and appeared to correspond to the 48-kDa nuclear protein. No homologue of this sequence was found in the data bases, but two regions were identified, one including two putative zinc finger repeats, and one coding for two potential W/W domains. The second coding sequence showed a low similarity to non-specific sterol carrier proteins. Immunocytolocalization with specific polyclonal antibodies to recombinant Dinap1 showed that the nucleus was immunoreactive only during the G1 phase: the nucleoplasm was immunostained, while chromosome cores and nuclear envelopes were negative.

Phylogenetic relationship of the green alga Nanochlorum eukaryotum deduced from its chloroplast rRNA sequences

The marine green coccoidal alga Nanochlorum eukaryotum (N.e.) is of small size with an average diameter of 1.5 microns. It is characterized by primitive-appearing biochemical and morphological properties, which are considerably different from those of other green algae. Thus, it has been proposed that N.e. may be an early developed algal form. To prove this hypothesis, DNA of N.e. was isolated by a phenol extraction procedure, and the chloroplast DNA separated by preparative CsCl density-gradient centrifugation. The kinetic complexity of the nuclear and of the chloroplast DNA was evaluated by reassociation kinetics to 3 x 10(7) bp and 9 x 10(4) bp, respectively. Several chloroplast genes, including the rRNA genes, were cloned on distinct fragments. The order of the rRNA genes corresponds to the common prokaryotic pattern. The 16S rRNA gene comprises 1,548 bases and is separated from the 23S rRNA gene with its 2,920 bases by a short spacer of 460 bases, which also includes the tRNA(Ile) and tRNA(Ala) genes. The 5S rRNA gene has not been found; it must start further than 500 bases downstream from the 3'-end of the 23S rRNA gene. From the chloroplast rRNA sequences, we have deduced secondary structures of the 16S and 23S rRNAs, which are in agreement with standard models. The rRNA sequences were aligned with corresponding chloroplast sequences; phylogenetic relationships were calculated by several methods. From these calculations, we conclude that N.e. is most closely related to Chlorella vulgaris. Therefore, N.e. does not represent an early developed algal species; the primitive-appearing morphological and biochemical characteristics of N.e. must rather be explained by secondary losses.

Dinoflagellates have a eukaryotic nuclear matrix with lamin-like proteins and topoisomerase II

Unicellular Dinoflagellates represent the only eukaryotic Phylum lacking histones and nucleosomes. To investigate whether Dinoflagellates do have a nuclear matrix that would modulate the supramolecular organization of their non-nucleosomal DNA and chromosomes, cells of the free-living unarmored Dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae were encapsulated in agarose microbeads and submitted to sequential extraction with non-ionic detergents, nucleases and 2 M NaCl. Our results demonstrate that this species has a residual nuclear matrix similar to that of vertebrates and higher plants. The cytoskeleton-nuclear matrix complex of A. carterae shows a relatively intricate polypeptide pattern. Immunoblots with different antibodies reveal several intermediate filament types of proteins, one of which is immunologically related to vertebrate lamins, confirming that these proteins are ancestral members of the IF family, which is highly conserved in eukaryotes. A topoisomerase II homologue has also been identified in the nuclear matrix, suggesting that these structures could play a role in organizing the Dinoflagellate DNA in loop domains. Taken together our results demonstrate that the nuclear matrix is an early acquisition of the eukaryotic nucleus, independent of histones and nucleosomes in such a way that the mechanisms controlling the two levels of organization in eukaryotic chromatin would be molecularly and evolutionarily independent.

Microtubule organization during the cell cycle of the primitive eukaryote dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii

The complete microtubular system of the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii Biecheler is described, as seen by confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy and labelling with anti-beta-tubulin antibody. This technique allowed us to observe the organization of the subcortical and internal cytoskeletons and the mitotic microtubular system, and their changes during the cell cycle. These observations are compared with those made in cryosections by light microscopy and in fast-freeze-fixed, cryosubstituted cells by electron microscopy. We show the organization of the cortical microtubules, and in particular of the thick microtubular bundles arranged as a three-pronged fork from which they seem to emanate. This fork emerges from a peculiar cytoplasmic zone at the pole of the cell and is in contact with the region of the kinetosomes, at the cingulum. During the G1 phase, only a single, radial microtubular bundle (a “desmose”) is observable in the inner part of the cytoplasm. One of its ends is near the flagellar bases and the other end is close to the nucleus in the centrosome region. During the S phase, the flagella drop off, the cell encysts and the kinetosomes duplicate. In mitosis, the cortical microtubules and the intracytoplasmic microtubular bundles do not depolymerize. The microtubular fork, desmose and centrosome double and migrate, while the divided kinetosomes stay in the same place. Later, the centrosomes organize the extranuclear spindle, which is connected to the kinetosome region by the microtubular desmose. The convergent end of the three-pronged fork seems to be in contact with the centrosome region. In early and mid-prophase, thick microtubular bundles pass through the nucleus in cytoplasmic channels and converge towards the two poles. Asters were never seen at the spindle poles. The channels and microtubular bundles in the spindle double in number during late prophase and lengthen in early anaphase. The spindle bundles diverge in late anaphase, extend to very near the plasma membrane and depolymerize during telophase. The cleavage furrow in which tubulin and actin are characterized appears in anaphase, formed by invagination of plasma membrane in the kinetosome region. The structure and rearrangements of the Crypthecodinium cohnii microtubular system are compared with those of other dinoflagellates and protists and of higher eukaryotes.

Molecular cloning and immunolocalization of two variants of the major basic nuclear protein (HCc) from the histone-less eukaryote Crypthecodinium cohnii (Pyrrhophyta)

Two clones that encode variants (HCc1 and HCc2) of the major basic nuclear protein of the dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii, were identified by immunoscreening of a cDNA expression library. The first clone carries a full-length cDNA with an open reading frame (HCc1) encoding 113 amino acids. The cDNA from the second clone lacks some of the 5' end, and the coding sequence is only 102 residues. The two proteins display 77% sequence similarity and their NH2-ends are homologous to the NH2-peptide of the HCc protein determined by P. Rizzo. The amino acid composition, which confirms the basic nature of lysine-rich HCc proteins, differs markedly from other known DNA-binding proteins such as histones, HMGs or prokaryotic histone-like proteins. No convincing homology was found with other proteins. HCc antigens were localized on C. cohnii by immunofluorescence, and by electron microscopy (EM) with immunogold labelling. HCc proteins are mainly detected at the periphery of the permanently condensed chromosomes, where active chromatin is located, as well as in the nucleolar organizing region (NOR). This suggests that these basic, non-histone proteins, with a moderate affinity for DNA, are involved at some level in the regulation of gene expression.

Dinoflagellates in evolution. A molecular phylogenetic analysis of large subunit ribosomal RNA

The sequence of the large subunit ribosomal RNA (LsuRNA) gene of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum micans has been determined. The inferred rRNA sequence [3408 nucleotides (nt)] is presented in its most probable secondary structure based on compensatory mutations, energy, and conservation criteria. No introns have been found but a hidden break is present in the second variable domain, 690 nt from the 5' end, as judged by agarose gel electrophoresis and primer extension experiments. Prorocentrum micans LsuRNA length and G+C content are close to those of ciliates and yeast. The conserved portions of the molecule (1900 nt) have been aligned with corresponding sequences from various eukaryotes, including five protista, one metaphyta, and three metazoa. An extensive phylogenetic study was performed, comparing two phenetic methods (neighbor joining on difference matrix, and Fitch and Margoliash on Knuc values matrix) and one cladistic (parsimony). The three methods led to similar tree topologies, except for the emergence of yeast that groups with ciliates and dinoflagellates when phenetic methods are used, but emerges later in the most parsimonious tree. This discrepancy was checked by statistical analyses on reduced trees (limited to four species) inferred using parsimony and evolutionary parsimony methods. The data support the phenetic tree topologies and a close relationship between dinoflagellates, ciliates, and yeast.

Molecular evolution of the 5'-terminal domain of large-subunit rRNA from lower eukaryotes. A broad phylogeny covering photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic protists

This paper summarizes the present status of an analysis of protist phylogeny using rapid partial sequencing of 28S rRNA. Data from 12 protistan phyla are now available and have been used to construct a tentative dendrogram based on a distance matrix method. The tree is robust and has considerable internal consistency. The following salient points are observed: a number of flagellate groups (particularly Euglenozoa) emerge very early among eukaryotes, whereas ciliates and dinoflagellates emerge late, suggesting that some characteristics that had been considered as primitive may in fact be derived. Both chlorophytic and chromophytic photosynthetic protists emerge very late in the tree, close to the Metazoa-Metaphyta-Fungi radiation, suggesting relatively late occurrence of the photosynthetic symbiosis. Taxonomic and phylogenetic information is also obtained within a phylum where rRNA of enough species are sequenced. A deep trichotomy is thus observed within the ciliates. The data are discussed with respect to classical protist phylogenies.

Early evolution of microtubules and undulipodia

A critique of both autogeneous and symbiotic hypotheses for the origin of microtubules and cilia and eukaryotic flagella (undulipodia) is presented. It is proposed that spirochetes provided the ancient eukaryotic cell with microtubules twice; cytoplasmic microtubules originated from phagocytosed spirochetes whereas axopodial tubules of undulipodia were transformed from ectosymbiotic spirochetes. A role in transport for microtubules in spirochetes together with a detailed scenario by which free-living spirochetes attached as ectosymbionts and subsequently differentiated into undulipodia is outlined. A mechanism for the continuity of motility in the form of "training" of the novel microtubular axoneme by the ancient spirochete motility apparatus is proposed. Transitional states (missing links) are unlikely to have survived. Constraints regarding the nature of the host cell are discussed. A corresponding flowchart of the early evolution of eukaryotes is presented in which plastids and mitochondria are polyphyletic in their origins.

Molecular organization of dinoflagellate ribosomal DNA: evolutionary implications of the deduced 5.8 S rRNA secondary structure

The 5.8 S rRNA gene of Prorocentrum micans, a primitive dinoflagellate, has been cloned and its 159 base pairs (bp) have been sequenced along with the two flanking internal transcribed spacers (ITS 1 and 2), respectively, 212 and 195 bp long. Nucleotide sequence homologies between several previously published 5.8 S rRNA gene sequences including those from another dinoflagellate, an ascomycetous yeast, protozoans, a higher plant and a mammal have been determined by sequence alignment. Two prokaryotic 5'-ends of the 23 S rRNA gene have been compared owing to their probable common origin with eucaryotic 5.8 S rRNA genes. Several nucleotides are distinctive for dinoflagellates when compared with either typical eucaryotes or procaryotes. This is consistent with an early divergence of the dinoflagellate lineage from the typical eucaryotes. The secondary structure of dinoflagellate 5.8 S rRNA molecules fits the model of Walker et al. (1983). Conserved nucleotides which distinguish dinoflagellate 5.8 S rRNA from that of other eucaryotes are located in specific loops which are assumed to play a structural role in the ribosome. A 5.8 S rRNA phylogenetic tree which is proposed, based on sequence data, supports our initial assumption of the dinoflagellates.

Tubulin evolution: an electrophoretic and immunological analysis

This paper summarizes a survey of the electrophoretic behavior of the tubulins of 23 species (mostly protists) as well as their reactivity towards 4 anti-tubulin antibodies (raised against two ciliate tubulins and two vertebrate ones). Some generalizations concerning the relative migration rates of alpha VS beta tubulin could be made, in particular the alpha/beta inversion, first described in Physarum was extended to several ciliates. Antivertebrate tubulin antibodies displayed a very broad spectrum of reactions, reacting with virtually all the species tested. They appear to correspond to auto-antibodies no exclusively directed against species specific determinants. In contrast, the two anti-ciliate tubulin antibodies displayed a narrow species specificity reacting only with a limited subset of protists. They were shown to be specific for a small number of immunological determinants present on ciliate tubulins. This allowed a rough evaluation of evolutionary relatedness between the various groups of protists analyzed. The results are discussed within the framework of a number of published phyllogenies and shown to be in striking agreement with some of the schemes.

The kingdom Protista and its 45 phyla

Because most recent treatments of the protists ('lower' eukaryotes comprising the kingdom PROTISTA Haeckel, 1866) have been preoccupied with either a 'phylogenetic-tree' approach or a discussion of the impact of possible endosymbiotic origins of major intracellular organelles, the overall systematics of the group, from taxonomic and nomenclatural points of view, has been almost totally neglected. As a result, confusion over contained phyla, their places in a classification scheme, and even their names (and authorships) is growing; the situation could become chaotic. The principal objective of the present paper is to recognize the taxonomic interrelationships among all protist groups; and it includes the specific proposal that some 45 phyla, defined and characterized, be assigned to 18 supraphyletic assemblages within the kingdom PROTISTA (itself redefined and contrasted with the other eukaryotic kingdoms recognized here: ANIMALIA, PLANTAE and FUNGI). Vernacular terms are employed for identification of the 18 assemblages, but defensible formal names are proposed at the level of phylum. None is presented as new: authorship-and-date credits are given to preceding workers on the taxonomy of the many groups involved. By presenting taxonomic characterizations as well as relevant nomenclatural data for each taxon described, a comprehensive scheme of overall higher-level classification within the kingdom emerges that may be considered to serve as a solid base or 'taking-off point' for future discussions. The 18 supraphyletic groups and their phyla (in parentheses and including authorships and dates of their formal names) are as follows: I. The rhizopods (phyla Karyoblastea Margulis, 1974; Amoebozoa Lühe, 1913; Acrasia Van Tieghem, 1880; Eumycetozoa Zopf, 1885; Plasmodiophorea Zopf, 1885; Granuloreticulosa De Saedeleer, 1934; incertae sedis Xenophyophora Schulze, 1904). II. The mastigomycetes (Hypochytridiomycota Sparrow, 1959; Oomycota Winter, 1897; incert. sed. Chytridiomycota Sparrow, 1959). III. The chlorobionts (Chlorophyta Pascher, 1914; Prasinophyta Christensen, 1962; Conjugatophyta Engler, 1892; Charophyta Rabenhorst, 1863; incert. sed. Glaucophyta Bohlin, 1901). IV. The euglenozoa (Euglenophyta Pascher, 1931; Kinetoplastidea Honigberg, 1963; incert. sed. Pseudociliata Corliss & Lipscomb, 1982). V. The rhodophytes (Rhodophyta Rabenhorst, 1863). VI. The cryptomonads (Cryptophyta Pascher, 1914). VII. The choanoflagellates (Choanoflagellata Kent, 1880).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)