Primary posterior chamber IOL implantation in penetrating ocular trauma

The Effect of Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation Time on Visual Prognosis in Aphakia Cases After Open Globe Injury

Purpose

We investigated the effect of the time of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation on final visual acuity and other causes affecting visual prognosis in cases left aphakic after open globe injury.

Methods

The study included 62 eyes of 62 patients left aphakic after the repair of open globe injury between 2012-2019. Demographic characteristics, trauma zone, ocular trauma score (OTS), type of injury, time of secondary IOL implantation, final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications were recorded for each patient.

Results

The mean follow-up time of 62 patients was 25.05 ± 12.59 months. The preoperative BCVA was found to be 2.40±0.86 LogMAR, while the postoperative final BCVA was found to be 0.53±0.70 LogMAR (p<0.01). The mean interval timing of secondary sulcus foldable IOL implantation was determined to be 3.79 ± 4.04 months. No correlation was observed between secondary IOL implantation time and final BCVA (r= 0.140, p=0.319). Furthermore, when only pediatric patients were taken, an excellent positive correlation was found between the secondary IOL implantation time and final BCVA LogMAR (r=0.895, p<0.01). Multiple linear regression on final BCVA with age, revealed a significant model explaining 48.0% of the variability with younger age and better final BCVA with as significant coefficients (p= 0.007).

Conclusion

Although time interval between primary repair and secondary IOL implantation to correct aphakia does not effect final BCVA in adult patients, earlier surgery should be considered for amblyopia management in pediatric patients.

Intraocular Foreign Body: Diagnostic Protocols and Treatment Strategies in Ocular Trauma Patients

Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) are critical ophthalmic emergencies that require urgent diagnosis and treatment to prevent blindness or globe loss. This study aimed to examine the various clinical presentations of IOFBs, determine the prognostic factors for final visual outcomes, establish diagnostic protocols, and update treatment strategies for patients with IOFBs. We retrospectively reviewed patients with IOFBs between 2005 and 2019. The mean age of the patients was 46.7 years, and the most common mechanism of injury was hammering (32.7%). The most common location of IOFBs was the retina and choroid (57.7%), and the IOFBs were mainly metal (76.9%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that poor final visual outcomes (<20/200) were associated with posterior segment IOFBs (odds ratio (OR) = 11.556, p = 0.033) and retinal detachment (OR = 4.781, p = 0.034). Diagnosing a retained IOFB is essential for establishing the management of patients with ocular trauma. To identify IOFBs, ocular imaging modalities, including computed tomography or ultrasonography, should be considered. Different strategies should be employed during the surgical removal of IOFBs depending on the material, location, and size of the IOFB.

Secondary Sulcus-Fixed Foldable IOL Implantation with 25-G Infusion in Patients with Previous PPV after Open-Globe Injury

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of secondary sulcus-fixed foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation through a clear corneal incision with 25-G infusion in patients with previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) after open-globe injury, and to analyze postoperative outcomes and prognostic factors of treatment.

METHODS

Clinical data of 89 eyes of 89 patients with open-globe injury who underwent secondary sulcus-fixed foldable IOL implantation through a clear corneal incision with 25-G infusion after vitrectomy in our hospital between January 2008 and June 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The examinations before IOL implantation mainly included visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, direct and indirect ophthalmoscope, visual electrophysiology, corneal endothelium, B scan, ultrasound biomicroscope, and intraocular pressure. Five eyes underwent suturing of peripheral iris and 7 eyes underwent suturing of iris laceration simultaneously. The mean follow-up was 18 months with a range from 6 months to 8 years.

RESULTS

The mean interval between secondary sulcus-fixed foldable IOL implantation and vitrectomy was 2.8 months with a range from 2 to 6 months. The uncorrected visual acuity improved in all patients with a well-centered IOL ranging from 0.1 to 0.8 with the best-corrected visual acuity from 0.1 to 1.0 after secondary IOL implantation. The postoperative complications mainly included mild anterior chamber exudates in 10 eyes (11%), temporary IOP elevation in 12 eyes (13%), and recurrent retinal detachment in 5 eyes (6%), which were subsequently managed by surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The interval of 2.8 months between vitrectomy and secondary IOL implantation is an appropriate and safe option to correct aphakia in patients receiving vitrectomy for open-globe injury.

Combined pars plana vitrectomy and lens management in complex vitreoretinal disease

Concurrent cataract and vitreoretinal disorders are relatively common. Additionally, a considerable number of phakic eyes develop visually significant cataract following pars plana vitrectomy. The ophthalmic literature is replete with reports of a combined procedure consisting of simultaneous cataract extraction, intraocular lens implantation, and pars plana vitrectomy to treat a wide range of vitreoretinal disorders and co-existing cataracts. Historical concerns of increased risk of complications with the combined procedure have been shown not to be clinically significant. The combined procedure offers the advantages of a single procedure, including faster recovery time and cost effectiveness. Earlier reports of the combined procedure describe pars plana lensectomy and extracapsular cataract extraction as techniques for cataract extraction. Currently, phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable posterior intraocular lens implantation has become the preferred technique of cataract removal. With advances in instrumentation and surgical techniques, the combined procedure offers a safe and effective way to manage concurrent cataract and complex vitreoretinal disease.

Combined lensectomy, vitrectomy, and primary intraocular lens implantation in patients with traumatic eye injury

PURPOSE

To analyse the postoperative anatomic and functional outcomes in addition to complications after combined lensectomy, vitrectomy, and primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with traumatic eye injury.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with traumatic cataract and posterior segment injury who underwent combined lensectomy, vitrectomy, and primary IOL implantation with a minimum follow up (FU) of 3 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen consecutive patients (all male) with a mean age of 42.8 years (range 17-82 years) underwent combined lensectomy, vitrectomy, and primary IOL implantation from February 2000 to January 2006. Postoperative FU ranged from 3 to 54 months (mean 17.6 months). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation ranged from 20/30 to hand movement and was worse than 20/200 in eight patients (61%). Four patients (31%) had blunt trauma with no globe rupture. Of the nine patients (69%) with a penetrating eye injury (PEI), eight had an intraocular foreign body (IOFB) with one retinal detachment at presentation. Four patients had primary closure at the time of the vitrectomy. All eight IOFBs were removed. Seven patients had additional scleral buckling and four intravitreal gas injection. BCVA at last FU ranged from 20/20 to 20/300 and was 20/40 or better in eight eyes (62%). All patients had an attached retina at last FU. One eye had further surgery for epiretinal membrane proliferation and ptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that combined vitrectomy, lensectomy and primary intraocular implantation can offer good visual rehabilitation in patients with traumatic cataract and posterior segment injury.

Primary repair and intraocular lens implantation after perforating eye injury

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcome after primary treatment of lens injuries with corneal or corneoscleral trauma.

METHODS

Ten eyes of 10 patients were retrospectively evaluated. There were no foreign bodies in any eye. After primary repair, an anterior chamber maintainer (ACM) was introduced through the inferotemporal corneal quadrant. Sodium hyaluronate 1.4% (Healon GV(R)) was injected, and the anterior capsule was stained with trypan blue 0.1% vital stain (Vision Blue) under the viscoelastic substance. After a capsulorhexis was created, the lens material was aspirated. The nucleus was delivered from the scleral tunnel, which was opened from the superior/superotemporal corneal quadrant. A conventional 21.0 diopter poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lens (IOL) with a 5.5 mm optic and overall diameter of 12.5 mm (Dr. Schmidth(R), Hannan Kibbutz) was implanted through the scleral tunnel. The scleral tunnel was not sutured, and the corneal entry sites were closed with stromal hydration.

RESULTS

The final best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was better than 20/100 in all patients, and 6 patients had a BSCVA of 20/20. The IOL was in the capsular bag in all patients at the last follow-up. The mean follow-up was 12.3 months (range 7 to 25 months). The main visually limiting factors were corneal scar, irregular astigmatism, and traumatic maculopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary IOL implantation in carefully selected patients with penetrating corneoscleral lens injury may yield visually rewarding results. The use of a vital stain to increase the visibility of the injured anterior capsule and of a closed scleral tunnel system with an ACM increased the surgical safety.

Visual recovery in unilateral traumatic pediatric cataracts treated with posterior chamber intraocular lens and anterior vitrectomy in Pakistan

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual recovery in unilateral traumatic cataracts in children treated with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and anterior vitrectomy.

METHODS

Sixteen children with unilateral traumatic cataract between ages 3-10 years (mean, 5 years 8 months) were treated with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and anterior vitrectomy. Surgery was performed between 2 weeks and 7 months (mean, 7.75 weeks) after injury. Follow up was between 9 and 29 months (mean, 17.9 months).

RESULTS

The most common postoperative complication was fibrinous uveitis, which developed in 4 children (25%). All eyes had a clear visual axis postoperatively; none required capsulotomy. The mean postoperative refraction was +0.9 diopters (range, +3.50 to -2.75 diopters). Three eyes (18.75%) had visual acuity of 6/9, 8 eyes (50%) had visual acuity of 6/12 or better, and 11 eyes (68.75%) had visual acuity of 6/18 or better. The cause of poor visual acuity was cystoid macular edema in one eye, macular scars in two eyes, and amblyopia in one eye.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral traumatic cataracts in children in whom aphakia is corrected with posterior chamber lens implantation combined with anterior vitrectomy result in good visual outcome, and we recommend this treatment modality in traumatic cataract in children.

Controversies in the management of open-globe injuries involving the posterior segment

There are numerous unresolved issues and controversies regarding the management of open-globe injuries involving the posterior segment. These areas include, but are not limited to, the following issues. Although vitrectomy has been shown to improve visual outcomes and allow retention of the eye in many cases, the extent of visual improvement is often limited because of the nature of the injury. Timing of vitrectomy surgery has been and will continue to be debated by proponents of early versus delayed intervention. The multiple features of acute ocular injury make it very difficult to interpret retrospective data regarding the most appropriate timing for surgical intervention. The use of prophylactic cryotherapy, in the setting of a scleral laceration with possible retinal damage, is not as controversial at present, as there is now sufficient data indicating that cryotherapy may actually exacerbate intraocular proliferation and worsen the situation. The role and benefit of a prophylactic scleral buckle is very widely contested, and it is not known if it truly decreases the risk of subsequent retinal detachment. Another area of debate centers on the use of antibiotics. When there is a known clinical infection, intravitreal antibiotics are the mainstays of therapy. However, in the absence of clinical infection, the use of prophylactic antibiotics and their routes of administration are quite controversial. Although there are significant data regarding the use of antibiotics in the postoperative setting, this information cannot be extrapolated into the setting of open-globe injuries, as organisms and virulence factors differ. Similarly, the use of vitrectomy versus vitreous tap in the setting of traumatic endophthalmitis is not fully resolved, although vitrectomy is used in most cases to repair concurrent damage from the injury itself. Finally, the placement of intraocular lenses in the acute trauma setting is controversial, as the risk of complications is quite high. Prospective, controlled clinical studies have not been done. This article reviews pertinent data regarding these management issues and controversies, and provides recommendations for treatment based on the available published data and the authors' personal experience.