Evaluation of results of the prostigmine-morphine test with quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy: a new method for the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia

[Sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia]

Sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia is a functional disorder of the papillary region which can lead to clinical symptoms due to functional obstruction of biliary and pancreatic outflow. Based on the severity of the clinical symptoms the disorder can be graded into three types (biliary and pancreatic types I-III). The manometric diagnosis of this disorder using sphincter of Oddi manometry is hampered by the relatively high risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Although papillary manometry is often carried out in North America, in Europe this is the exception rather than the rule. Manometrically, sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia is characterized by an increased pressure in the biliary and/or the pancreatic sphincter segments and can be treated by endoscopic papillotomy. This overview counterbalances the arguments for primary invasive diagnostics and a pragmatic clinical approach, i.e. papillotomy should be directly carried out when a sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia is clinically suspected. For patients with biliary or pancreatic type I, endoscopic papillotomy is the treatment of choice. In biliary type II sphincter of Oddi manometry could be helpful for clinical decision-making; however, the exact risk-benefit ratio is still difficult to assess. In type III patient selection and the low predictive value of manometry for treatment success questions the clinical usefulness of sphincter of Oddi manometry.

Postcholecystectomy sphincter of oddi dyskinesia--a diagnostic dilemma--role of noninvasive nuclear and invasive manometric and endoscopic aspects

BACKGROUND

Persistent abdominal pain after cholecystectomy is not uncommon. Sphincter of oddi dysfunction (SOD) is one of the causes for this entity. However, diagnosing SOD is often difficult. Sphincter of oddi manometry (SOM) is the gold standard. Because it is invasive and needs experienced person to perform, simple noninvasive imaging techniques are needed. Other invasive endoscopic methods also play an important role in difficult cases and before therapeutic intervention.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the charts of postcholecystectomy patients who presented with persistent abdominal pain and underwent quantitative hepatobiliary studies (QHBS) as per Sostre et al scoring protocol and simultaneous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with SOM between 2003 and 2004. Additional 6 studies with SOM data that had routine nonscoring hepatobiliary study (HBS) were later identified and were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 24 HBS studies (22 patients) were identified, 19 performed with scoring (Sostre) and 5 with nonscoring methods. ERCP results were available for 16 patients. SOM results were available for 10 patients. Of the 19 who had Sostre's QHBS, 3 were positive and 16 were negative. All 3 QHBS positive patents also had ERCP with SOM findings of SOD. Of the 16 negative Sostre's QHBS, 8 had ERCP with SOM of which 6 had SOD, 1 had no SOD, and 1 was inconclusive. Eight patients who had negative QHBS/ HBS did not undergo further invasive gastrointestinal procedures and were followed conservatively. The rest of 5 patients with negative HBS had ERCP with SOM findings of biliary and pancreatic SOD.

CONCLUSIONS

From our limited retrospective review, when QHBS by Sostre's is positive there is good correlation to ERCP with SOM. When negative, the agreement with ERCP with SOM is less. However, correlation of Sostre's QHBS is slightly better than nonscoring HBS. Hence, QHBS by Sostre protocol is a simple, noninvasive, and easy to use initial procedure in the management of postcholecystectomy pain syndromes and when positive can guide the gastrointestinal physicians to proceed to invasive ERCP with SOM with confidence.

Functional hepatobiliary disease: chronic acalculous gallbladder and chronic acalculous biliary disease

Chronic acalculous gallbladder and chronic acalculous biliary disease are considered functional hepatobiliary diseases. Cholescintigraphy provides physiologic imaging of biliary drainage, making it ideally suited for their noninvasive diagnosis. For chronic acalculous gallbladder disease, calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction during sincalide cholescintigraphy can confirm the clinical diagnosis and has become a common routine procedure in many nuclear medicine clinics. Published data generally confirm a high overall accuracy for predicting relief of symptoms with cholecystectomy. However, data also exist suggesting it is not useful. The discrepant results probably are caused by the various different methodologies that have been used for sincalide infusion. Proper methodology of sincalide infusion is critical for providing accurate reproducible results, minimizing false positive studies, and preventing adverse side effects. The most common causes for the postcholecystectomy pain syndrome are partial biliary obstruction secondary to stones or tumor and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The latter is a partial biliary obstruction at the level of the sphincter. This has long been considered a functional hepatobiliary disease because of the lack of anatomical abnormalities. Sphincterotomy is the present treatment; however, diagnosis requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincter of Oddi manometry, which has a high complication rate and is not widely available. The unique ability of cholescintigraphy to image biliary drainage allows noninvasive diagnosis. Different methodologies have been reported, many with good overall accuracy. Various pharmacologic interventions and quantitative methodologies have been used in conjunction with cholescintigraphy to enhance its diagnostic capability. Further investigations are needed determine the optimal methodology; however, cholescintigraphic methods have already a clinical role in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and will be used increasingly in the future.

Clinical significance of sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia

Sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia (SOD) is a functional disorder of the papilla region that can lead to clinical symptoms and functional obstruction of biliary and pancreatic outflow. Based on the severity of the clinical symptoms, the disorder is classified as one of three types (biliary or pancreatic type I-III). Diagnosis of SOD is hampered by the relative risk of endoscopic sphincter manometry to cause pancreatitis. Manometrically, SOD is characterized by increased pressure in the biliary or pancreatic sphincter segment and can be treated with endoscopic papillotomy. This review is an attempt to balance the arguments for invasive diagnosis with a pragmatic clinical approach in which papillotomy is performed if clinical suspicion and patient presentation support a dysfunction of the papilla. For patients with biliary or pancreatic type I, endoscopic papillotomy is the treatment of choice. In biliary type II, SO manometry may be helpful for clinical decision making; however, the ratio of risks to benefits is difficult to assess based on the present data. In type III SOD, patient selection and the low predictive value of manometry for treatment success raise questions about the clinical usefulness of SO manometry.

Effect of nalbuphine on the motility of the sphincter of Oddi in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Nalbuphine is an ideal supplementary analgesic drug for midazolam-induced conscious sedation during operative endoscopy because it has no cardiovascular effect and only a moderate depressive effect on respiration. However, no data are available as to whether nalbuphine is suitable as an analgesic drug during endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of nalbuphine on the sphincter of Oddi motility in patients with a suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

METHODS

Seventeen patients who were suspected clinically to have SOD after cholecystectomy were prospectively investigated. Five mg of midazolam was administered intravenously before the procedure to induce conscious sedation. After approximately 5 minutes of stationary sphincter of Oddi manometry recording (baseline), either 10 mg of nalbuphine or saline solution (placebo) was administered intravenously in random fashion and pressure was recorded for a further 5 minutes. Maximum sphincter of Oddi basal pressure and average phasic contraction amplitude and frequency were measured before and after the infusion of the drug or saline solution.

RESULTS

Nalbuphine administration effectively enhanced the sedation obtained with midazolam without any adverse effect. When the sphincter of Oddi manometric periods before and after the administration of nalbuphine versus placebo were compared, there was a significantly increased basal sphincter of Oddi pressure only in the nalbuphine group: respectively, 49 (18) and 77 (29) mm Hg (p = 0.003) versus 51 (24) and 49 (23) mm Hg (p = 0.9). The phasic contraction amplitude did not change in response to nalbuphine, but the phasic contraction frequency increased significantly, from 5 (3) to 8 (4) per minute (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Nalbuphine has a stimulatory effect on sphincter of Oddi motility in patients with a suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Nalbuphine should not be used as premedication before endoscopic ERCP if sphincter of Oddi manometry is to be performed.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should no longer be used as a diagnostic test: the case against

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has been used successfully in diagnosis of pancreatico-biliary diseases. Over the past decade, there have been tremendous developments in radiological technologies which have led to the emergence of new and less invasive modalities like endoscopic ultrasound and spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Understandably, the usefulness of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is being questioned primarily because of its potential attendant complications. Therefore, this controversial question needs to be debated in the gastroenterology community. In this article, we compare the efficacy of newer diagnostic tools with existing "gold standard" modality--endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and put forward our arguments in favour of a continuing role for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a diagnostic tool in certain circumstances.

Chronic Visceral Right Upper Quadrant Pain Without Gallstones

Patients with chronic visceral right upper quadrant pain without gallstones can be broadly categorized into two groups: patients with gallbladder dyskinesia, and patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). Treating patients with these disorders is often challenging to clinicians due to the difficulty at arriving at a definite diagnosis, and the lack of efficacy of various treatment modalities. The only real treatment option for patients with gallbladder dyskinesia is cholecystectomy; however, the results are difficult to predict in an individual patient. Patients with SOD can be approached according to a classification that at least partially reflects the underlying pathophysiology. Patients with type I SOD have underlying papillary stenosis, and benefit from empiric sphincterotomy. Patients with type II SOD may have muscle spasm as predominant pathophysiology; this group of patients benefit from sphincterotomy only if increased sphincter pressure is demonstrated by sphincter of Oddi manometry. Patients with type III SOD may have visceral hyperalgesia; a trial of antidepressants or a therapeutic trial with botulinum toxin injection into the ampulla should be considered prior to more invasive endoscopic therapy.

Humoral mechanisms and clinical aspects of biliary tract motility

This review is intended to summarize current information on neurohumoral regulation of the gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi motility under both physiological and pathological circumstances with emphasis on Hungarian contributions to today's knowledge. The mechanism of action of neurohumoral agents that interact on these segments of the biliary tract, and the explored details of the stimulation-contraction/relaxation coupling process of these substances, will be discussed. A modified classification of biliary tract motility disorders with new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches will also be provided. This information will aid understanding of the pathogenesis of motor disorders of the gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi, and will indicate possibilities for pharmacological exploitation in the treatment of diseases resulting from biliary tract motility abnormalities.

Diagnosis and treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a challenge from both the diagnostic and therapeutic point of view. There is much ongoing debate about the accuracy and usefulness of various diagnostic tests, as there is about the effectiveness of proposed therapeutic alternatives.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the past 15 years' literature was undertaken, using the Medline database and cross-referencing of major articles on the subject.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Endoscopic and surgical treatments result in similar outcomes, with considerable failure rates. The latter reflect the difficulties in accurate diagnosis and a lack of sound objective criteria for selecting patients for intervention. In addition, in some patients sphincter of Oddi dysfunction may be only part of a generalized motility disorder of the gastrointestinal tract.