Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli

Interhemispheric Integration after Callosotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Poffenberger and Redundant-Target Paradigms

The central role of the corpus callosum in integrating perception and cognition across the cerebral hemispheres makes it highly desirable for clinical and basic research to have a repertoire of experimental paradigms assessing callosal functioning. Here, the objective was to assess the validity of two such paradigms (Poffenberger, redundant-target paradigms) by conducting single-step meta-analyses on individual case data of callosotomy patients. Studies were identified by systematic literature search (source: Pubmed and WebOfKnowledge, date: 07.03.2022) and all studies were included that reported callosotomy case data for either paradigm. Twenty-two studies (38 unique cases) provided 116 observations of the crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD) for the Poffenberger paradigm, while ten studies (22 cases, 103 observations) provided bilateral redundancy gain (bRG) measures. Using linear-mixed models with "individual" and "experiment" as random-effects variable, the mean CUD was estimated at 60.6 ms (CI95%: 45.3; 75.9) for commissurotomy, 43.5 ms (26.7; 60.2) for complete callosotomy, and 8.8 ms (1.1; 16.6) for partial anterior-medial callosotomy patients. The estimates of commissurotomy/callosotomy patients differed significantly from patients with partial callosotomy and healthy controls. The mean bRGmin (minimum unilateral reference) was estimated at 42.8 ms (27.1;58.4) for patients with complete and 30.8 ms (16.8; 44.7) for patients with partial callosotomy, both differing significantly from controls. One limitation was that different formulas for bRG were used, making it necessary to split the sample and reducing test power of some analyses. Nevertheless, the present findings suggest that both paradigms assess interhemispheric callosal integration, confirming their construct validity, but likely test distinct callosal functions.

Interhemispheric transfer time and concussion in adolescents: A longitudinal study using response time and event-related potential measures

Introduction

Concussion in children and adolescents is a public health concern with higher concussion incidence than adults and increased susceptibility to axonal injury. The corpus callosum is a vulnerable location of concussion-related white matter damage that can be associated with short- and long-term effects of concussion. Interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) of visual information across the corpus callosum can be used as a direct measure of corpus callosum functioning that may be impacted by adolescent concussion with slower IHTT relative to matched controls. Longitudinal studies and studies testing physiological measures of IHTT following concussion in adolescents are lacking.

Methods

We used the N1 and P1 components of the scalp-recorded brain event-related potential (ERP) to measure IHTT in 20 adolescents (ages 12–19 years old) with confirmed concussion and 16 neurologically-healthy control participants within 3 weeks of concussion (subacute stage) and approximately 10 months after injury (longitudinal).

Results

Separate two-group (concussion, control) by two-time (3 weeks, 10 months) repeated measures ANOVAs on difference response times and IHTT latencies of the P1 and N1 components showed no significant differences by group (ps ≥ 0.25) nor by time (ps ≥ 0.64), with no significant interactions (ps ≥ 0.15).

Discussion

Results from the current sample suggest that measures of IHTT may not be strongly influenced at 3 weeks or longitudinally following adolescent concussion using the current IHTT paradigm.

Impact of unilateral stroke on right hemisphere superiority in executive control

In our previous study, we have demonstrated a right hemisphere superiority in executive control of attention, with the right hemisphere being more efficient in dealing with conflict for stimuli presented in the left visual field. However, the unique and synergetic contribution of the two hemispheres to this superiority effect is still elusive. Here, using the lateralized attention network test, we compared the flanker conflict effect for stimuli presented in the left and right visual fields in patients with an ischemic stroke in the right or left hemisphere as the unilateral lesion groups and in patients with a transient ischemic attack without an acute infarction as the control group. In contrast to the transient ischemic attack group, which demonstrated a right hemisphere superiority in conflict processing, there was no evidence for such an effect in both unilateral stroke groups. These results can be explained by our model proposing that there is bilateral hemispheric involvement for conflict processing for information received from the left visual field and unilateral hemispheric involvement for conflict processing for information received from the right visual field, resulting in more efficient processing for the left visual field, i.e., the right hemisphere superiority effect. When there is damage to either hemisphere, the responsibility of conflict processing will largely fall on the intact hemisphere, eliminating the right hemisphere superiority effect.

Brain Lateralization: A Comparative Perspective

Comparative studies on brain asymmetry date back to the 19th century but then largely disappeared due to the assumption that lateralization is uniquely human. Since the reemergence of this field in the 1970s, we learned that left-right differences of brain and behavior exist throughout the animal kingdom and pay off in terms of sensory, cognitive, and motor efficiency. Ontogenetically, lateralization starts in many species with asymmetrical expression patterns of genes within the Nodal cascade that set up the scene for later complex interactions of genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors. These take effect during different time points of ontogeny and create asymmetries of neural networks in diverse species. As a result, depending on task demands, left- or right-hemispheric loops of feedforward or feedback projections are then activated and can temporarily dominate a neural process. In addition, asymmetries of commissural transfer can shape lateralized processes in each hemisphere. It is still unclear if interhemispheric interactions depend on an inhibition/excitation dichotomy or instead adjust the contralateral temporal neural structure to delay the other hemisphere or synchronize with it during joint action. As outlined in our review, novel animal models and approaches could be established in the last decades, and they already produced a substantial increase of knowledge. Since there is practically no realm of human perception, cognition, emotion, or action that is not affected by our lateralized neural organization, insights from these comparative studies are crucial to understand the functions and pathologies of our asymmetric brain.

Shared right-hemispheric representations of sensorimotor goals in dynamic task environments

Functional behaviour affords that we form goals to integrate sensory information about the world around us with suitable motor actions, such as when we plan to grab an object with a hand. However, much research has tested grasping in static scenarios where goals are pursued with repetitive movements, whereas dynamic contexts require goals to be pursued even when changes in the environment require a change in the actions to attain them. To study grasp goals in dynamic environments here, we employed a task where the goal remained the same but the execution of the movement changed; we primed participants to grasp objects either with their right or left hand, and occasionally they had to switch to grasping with both. Switch costs should be minimal if grasp goal representations were used continuously, for example, within the left dominant hemisphere. But remapped or re-computed goal representations should delay movements. We found that switching from right-hand grasping to bimanual grasping delayed reaction times but switching from left-hand grasping to bimanual grasping did not. Further, control experiments showed that the lateralized switch costs were not caused by asymmetric inhibition between hemispheres or switches between usual and unusual tasks. Our results show that the left hemisphere does not serve a general role of sensorimotor grasp goal representation. Instead, sensorimotor grasp goals appear to be represented at intermediate levels of abstraction, downstream from cognitive task representations, yet upstream from the control of the grasping effectors.

Interhemispheric Transfer Time Asymmetry of Visual Information Depends on Eye Dominance: An Electrophysiological Study

The interhemispheric transfer of information is a fundamental process in the human brain. When a visual stimulus appears eccentrically in one visual-hemifield, it will first activate the contralateral hemisphere but also the ipsilateral one with a slight delay due to the interhemispheric transfer. This interhemispheric transfer of visual information is believed to be faster from the right to the left hemisphere in right-handers. Such an asymmetry is considered as a relevant fact in the context of the lateralization of the human brain. We show here using current source density (CSD) analyses of visually evoked potential (VEP) that, in right-handers and, to a lesser extent in left-handers, this asymmetry is in fact dependent on the sighting eye dominance, the tendency we have to prefer one eye for monocular tasks. Indeed, in right-handers, a faster interhemispheric transfer of visual information from the right to left hemisphere was observed only in participants with a right dominant eye (DE). Right-handers with a left DE showed the opposite pattern, with a faster transfer from the left to the right hemisphere. In left-handers, albeit a smaller number of participants has been tested and hence confirmation is required, only those with a right DE showed an asymmetrical interhemispheric transfer with a faster transfer from the right to the left hemisphere. As a whole these results demonstrate that eye dominance is a fundamental determinant of asymmetries in interhemispheric transfer of visual information and suggest that it is an important factor of brain lateralization.

Intra and inter hemispheric dynamics revealed by reaction time in the Dimond paradigm: a quantitative review of the literature

In stimulus matching tasks requiring discrimination of two unilaterally or bilaterally presented stimuli (Dimond paradigm), a well established intrahemispheric processing bottleneck model predicts that an increase in task difficulty as measured by reaction time should provide an advantage to bilateral stimulations. The purpose of the current investigation was to review the entire relevant literature on the Dimond paradigm and identify the experimental variables which reliably yield such effects. Forty nine experimental effects compatible with the "intrahemispheric processing bottleneck" model and 26 contrary effects were found. Manipulation of the complexity of the stimulus matching criterion significantly produced intrahemispheric bottleneck effects. This effect was also significantly greater when non-target stimuli required heavier processing. These two findings support the intrahemispheric bottleneck model: computationally complex tasks seem to overload a hemisphere׳s processing capacity, an effect seen in the unilateral presentation conditions. However, manipulating the similarity of target stimuli produced contrary effects. Contrary effects were also obtained more readily when two physical matching tasks were compared. These two latter effects may best be explained as low level visual-perceptual limitations of interhemispheric transfer or integration.

Sex differences in interhemispheric communication during face identity encoding: evidence from ERPs

Sex-related hemispheric lateralization and interhemispheric transmission times (IHTTs) were examined in twenty-four participants at the level of the first visual ERP components (P1 and N170) during face identity encoding in a divided visual-field paradigm. While no lateralization-related and sex-related differences were reflected in the P1 characteristics, these two factors modulated the N170. Indeed, N170 amplitudes indicated a right hemisphere (RH) dominance in men (and a more bilateral functioning in women). N170 latencies and the derived IHTTs confirmed the RH advantage in men but showed the reverse asymmetry in women. Altogether, the results of this study suggest a clear asymmetry in men and a more divided work between the hemispheres in women, with a tendency toward a left hemisphere (LH) advantage. Thus, by extending the pattern to the right-sided face processing, our results generalize previous findings from studies using other materials and indicating longer transfers from the specialized to the non-specialized hemisphere, especially in the male brain. Because asymmetries started from the N170 component, the first electrophysiological index of high-level perceptual processing on face representations, they also suggest a functional account for hemispheric lateralization and sex-related differences rather than a structural one.

Bilateral redundancy gain and callosal integrity in a man with callosal lipoma: a diffusion-tensor imaging study

We investigated whether abnormalities in the structural organization of the corpus callosum in the presence of curvilinear lipoma are associated with increased facilitation of response time to bilateral stimuli, an effect known as the redundancy gain (RG). A patient (A.J.) with a curvilinear lipoma of the corpus callosum, his genetically-identical twin, and age-matched control participants made speeded responses to luminant stimuli. Structural organization of callosal regions was assessed with diffusion-tensor imaging. A.J. was found to have reduced structural integrity in the splenium of the corpus callosum and produced a large RG suggestive of neural summation.

How do our brain hemispheres cooperate to avoid false memories?

Memories are not always as reliable as they may appear. The occurrence of false memories can be reduced, however, by enhancing the cooperation between the two brain hemispheres. Yet is the communication from left to right hemisphere as helpful as the information transfer from right to left? To address this question, 72 participants were asked to learn 16 word lists. Applying the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm, the words in each list were associated with an unpresented prototype word. In the test condition, learned words and corresponding prototypes were presented along with non-associated new words, and participants were asked to indicate which of the words they recognized. Crucially, both study and test words were projected to only one hemisphere in order to stimulate each hemisphere separately. It was found that false recognitions occurred significantly less often when the right hemisphere studied and the left hemisphere recognized the stimuli. Moreover, only the right-to-left direction of interhemispheric communication reduced false memories significantly, whereas left-to-right exchange did not. Further analyses revealed that the observed reduction of false memories was not due to an enhanced discrimination sensitivity, but to a stricter response bias. Hence, the data suggest that interhemispheric cooperation does not improve the ability to tell old and new apart, but rather evokes a conservative response tendency. Future studies may narrow down in which cognitive processing steps interhemispheric interaction can change the response criterion.

Predicting inter-hemispheric transfer time from the diffusion properties of the corpus callosum in healthy individuals and schizophrenia patients: a combined ERP and DTI study

BACKGROUND

Several theories of schizophrenia have emphasized the role of aberrant neural timing in the etiology of the disease, possibly as a consequence of conduction delays caused by structural damage to the white-matter fasciculi. Consistent with this theory, increased inter-hemispheric transmission times (IHTTs) to unilaterally-presented visual stimuli have been reported in patients with schizophrenia. The present study investigated whether or not these IHTT abnormalities could be underpinned by structural damage to the visual fibers of the corpus callosum.

METHODS

Thirty three schizophrenia patients and 22 matched controls underwent Event Related Potential (ERP) recording, and a subset of 19 patients and 16 controls also underwent 3T Diffusion-Tensor Imaging (DTI). Unilateral visual stimuli (squares, 2×2 degrees) were presented 6 degrees lateral to either side of a central fixation point. IHTTs (ipsilateral minus contralateral latencies) were calculated for the P1 and N1 components at parietal-occipital sites in current source density-transformed ERPs. The visual fibers of the corpus callosum were extracted with streamline tractography and the diffusion metrics of Fractional Anisotropy (FA) and Mode calculated.

RESULTS

While both subject groups exhibited highly significant IHTTs across a range of posterior electrode pairs, and significantly shorter IHTTs from left-to-right hemisphere than vice versa, no significant groupwise differences in IHTT were observed. However, participants' IHTTs were linearly related to their FA and Mode, with longer IHTTs being associated with lower FA and more prolate diffusion ellipsoids.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that IHTTs are estimable from DTI measures of white matter integrity. In light of the range of diffusion abnormalities that have been reported in patients with schizophrenia, particularly in frontal fasciculi, these results support the conjecture that schizophrenia is associated with abnormalities in neural timing.

White matter fiber degradation attenuates hemispheric asymmetry when integrating visuomotor information

Degradation of white matter fibers can affect the transmission of signals in brain circuits that normally enable integration of highly lateralized visual and motor processes. Here, we used diffusion tensor imaging tractography in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the specific contributions of interhemispheric and intrahemispheric white matter fibers to functional measures of hemispheric transfer and parallel information processing using bilateral and unilateral left and right visual field stimulation in normal and compromised systems. In healthy adults, a greater degree of bilateral processing advantage with the left (nondominant) hand correlated with higher integrity of callosal fibers connecting occipital cortices, whereas less unilateral processing advantage with the right hand correlated with higher integrity of left-hemispheric posterior cingulate fibers. In contrast, alcoholics who have compromised callosal integrity showed less bilateral processing advantage than controls when responding with the left hand and greater unilateral processing advantage when responding with the right hand. We also found degraded left posterior cingulate and posterior callosal fibers in chronic alcoholics, which is consistent with functional imaging results of less left posterior cingulate and extrastriate cortex activation in alcoholics than controls when processing bilateral compared with unilateral visual field stimulation. Together, our results demonstrated that interhemispheric and intrahemispheric white matter fiber pathways mediate visuomotor integration asymmetrically and that subtle white matter fiber degradation in alcoholism attenuated the normal pattern of hemispheric asymmetry, which may have ramifications for the efficiency of visual information processing and fast response execution.

Cortical Projection Topography of the Human Splenium: Hemispheric Asymmetry and Individual Differences

The corpus callosum is the largest white matter pathway in the human brain. The most posterior portion, known as the splenium, is critical for interhemispheric communication between visual areas. The current study employed diffusion tensor imaging to delineate the complete cortical projection topography of the human splenium. Homotopic and heterotopic connections were revealed between the splenium and the posterior visual areas, including the occipital and the posterior parietal cortices. In nearly one third of participants, there were homotopic connections between the primary visual cortices, suggesting interindividual differences in splenial connectivity. There were also more instances of connections with the right hemisphere, indicating a hemispheric asymmetry in interhemispheric connectivity within the splenium. Combined, these findings demonstrate unique aspects of human interhemispheric connectivity and provide anatomical bases for hemispheric asymmetries in visual processing and a long-described hemispheric asymmetry in speed of interhemispheric communication for visual information.

A coded VEP method to measure interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT)

Interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) is an important parameter for research on the information conduction time across the corpus callosum between the two hemispheres. There are several traditional methods used to estimate the IHTT, including the reaction time (RT) method, the evoked potential (EP) method and the measure based on the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The present study proposes a novel coded VEP method to estimate the IHTT based on the specific properties of the m-sequence. These properties include good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and high noise tolerance. Additionally, calculation of the circular cross-correlation function is sensitive to the phase difference. The method presented in this paper estimates the IHTT using the m-sequence to encode the visual stimulus and also compares the results with the traditional flash VEP method. Furthermore, with the phase difference of the two responses calculated using the circular cross-correlation technique, the coded VEP method could obtain IHTT results, which does not require the selection of the utilized component.

Interhemispheric interactions and redundancy gain: tests of an interhemispheric inhibition hypothesis

In simple reaction time (RT) tasks, responses are faster when stimuli are presented to both the left and right visual hemifields than when a stimulus is presented to a single hemifield. Paradoxically, this redundancy gain with bilateral stimuli is enhanced in split-brain individuals relative to normals. This article reports three experiments testing an account of that enhancement in which normals' responses to bilateral stimuli are slowed by interhemispheric inhibition. In simple RT tasks, normal participants responded bimanually to left, right, or bilateral visual stimuli. In choice RT tasks, they responded to each stimulus with one hand, responding bimanually only when both stimuli were presented. Measurements of response forcefulness (Experiment 1) and electroencephalographic activity (Experiments 2 and 3) showed no evidence of the correlation patterns predicted by the hypothesis of interhemispheric inhibition. The results suggest that such inhibition is unlikely to be the explanation for enhanced redundancy gain in split-brain individuals.

Interhemispheric transfer time and structural properties of the corpus callosum

The present study examined how interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) is affected by interindividual differences in corpus callosum (CC) architecture. For this purpose the CC of 42 healthy male subjects was assessed by applying a combination of morphological and diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging to characterize the CC on macro- (midsagittal area) and microstructural level (mean diffusion, fractional anisotropy). Following the so-called Poffenberger paradigm, IHTT was determined with both reaction time measures and event-related potentials recorded in response to stimuli briefly presented to either left or right visual hemifield. Statistical analysis revealed significant negative correlations between mean diffusion and IHTT estimates derived from the P100 component (at O1/O2 electrode pair), particularly in the posterior CC subregion. Interpreting mean diffusion as an index of microstructural tissue properties, IHTT appears to be directly related to the structural integrity of the posterior CC.

Visuo-motor pathways in humans revealed by event-related fMRI

Whether different brain networks are involved in generating unimanual responses to a simple visual stimulus presented in the ipsilateral versus contralateral hemifield remains a controversial issue. Visuo-motor routing was investigated with event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using the Poffenberger reaction time task. A 2 hemifield x 2 response hand design generated the "crossed" and "uncrossed" conditions, describing the spatial relation between these factors. Both conditions, with responses executed by the left or right hand, showed a similar spatial pattern of activated areas, including striate and extrastriate areas bilaterally, SMA, and M1 contralateral to the responding hand. These results demonstrated that visual information is processed bilaterally in striate and extrastriate visual areas, even in the "uncrossed" condition. Additional analyses based on sorting data according to subjects' reaction times revealed differential crossed versus uncrossed activity only for the slowest trials, with response strength in infero-temporal cortices significantly correlating with crossed-uncrossed differences (CUD) in reaction times. Collectively, the data favor a parallel, distributed model of brain activation. The presence of interhemispheric interactions and its consequent bilateral activity is not determined by the crossed anatomic projections of the primary visual and motor pathways. Distinct visuo-motor networks need not be engaged to mediate behavioral responses for the crossed visual field/response hand condition. While anatomical connectivity heavily influences the spatial pattern of activated visuo-motor pathways, behavioral and functional parameters appear to also affect the strength and dynamics of responses within these pathways.

Now you see it, now you don't: Variable hemineglect in a commissurotomized man

We describe the case of a callosotomized man, D.D.V., who shows unusual neglect of stimuli in the left visual field (LVF). This is manifest in simple reaction time (RT) to stimuli flashed in the LVF and in judging whether pairs of filled circles in the LVF are of the same or different color. It may reflect strong left-hemispheric control and consequent attention restricted to the right side of space. It is not evident in simple RT when there are continuous markers in the visual fields to indicate the locations of the stimuli. In this condition, his RTs are actually faster to LVF than to right visual field (RVF) stimuli, suggesting a switch to right-hemispheric control that eliminates the hemineglect. Neglect is also not evident when D.D.V. responds by pointing to or touching the locations of the stimuli, perhaps because these responses are controlled by the dorsal rather than the ventral visual system. Despite his atypical manifestations of hemineglect, D.D.V. showed evidence of functional disconnection typical of split-brained subjects, including prolonged crossed-uncrossed different in simple reaction time, inability to match colors between visual fields, and enhanced redundancy gain in simple RT to bilateral stimuli even when the stimulus in the LVF was neglected.

Speeded right-to-left information transfer: the result of speeded transmission in right-hemisphere axons?

Both reaction time (RT) and evoked potential (EP) studies have shown that interhemispheric transfer is faster from the right to the left hemisphere than vice versa. This has been explained either in terms of an asymmetry of callosal fibres or as a result of hemispheric specialization. Here we suggest that it may be due to greater activity resulting from a greater number of fast-conducting, myelinated fibres in the right hemisphere than in the left. Interhemispheric transfer times (IHTTs) were measured in 13 males by comparing latencies and amplitudes of N160 EPs ipsilateral and contralateral to checkerboard stimuli presented to the left or right visual field. IHTT estimates were obtained from three homologous electrode pairs. The shorter IHTT from right-to-left was associated with a concomitant increase in N160 negativity in the right hemisphere. There was no evidence from RTs to stimuli in each visual field to suggest that the right hemisphere was dominant for this task, suggesting that the faster speed of transfer from the right-to-left hemisphere may depend on faster axonal conduction in the right hemisphere relative to the left.

Early Visual Evoked Potentials in Callosal Agenesis

Three participants with callosal agenesis and 12 neurologically normal participants were tested on a simple reaction time task, with visual evoked potentials collected using a high-density 128-channel system. Independent-components analyses were performed on the averaged visual evoked potentials to isolate the components of interest. Contrary to previous research with acallosals, evidence of ipsilateral activation was present in all 3 participants. Although ipsilateral visual components were present in all 4 unilateral conditions in the 2 related acallosal participants, in the 3rd, these were present only in the crossed visual field-hand conditions and not in the uncrossed conditions. Suggestions are made as to why these results differ from earlier findings and as to the neural mechanisms facilitating this ipsilateral activation.

Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm)

Spatial-compatibility effects can be obtained in simple reaction time (SRT) provided that spatially distinct responses are frequently required. Since this effect is limited to trials with relatively long reaction times (RTs), Hommel (1996b) proposed that if the response does not occur shortly after stimulus detection, then the spatial code of the stimulus can interfere with that of the response. A series of experiments is reported showing that (a) spatial compatibility in SRT to lateralized stimuli is not an alternative, but rather a complementary, explanation to interhemispheric transfer time (contrary to what Hommel surmised), and (b) the spatial compatibility component is essentially limited to the first trial after shifting response preparation from one-half of the visual fields to the other, suggesting a mechanism akin to an orienting response.

Redundancy gain in simple reaction time following partial and complete callosotomy

Four subjects with partial or complete section of the corpus callosum were tested on simple reaction time (RT) to visual stimuli presented either singly in one or other visual field, or simultaneously in both visual fields. The subject with posterior callosal section showed evidence of redundancy gain with bilateral stimuli beyond that attributable to probability summation ("enhanced" redundancy gain), and prolonged interhemispheric transfer. One of the two subjects with anterior section, like normals, showed little evidence of enhanced redundancy gain, and no evidence of prolonged interhemispheric transfer. The other did show some enhanced redundancy gain at the fast end of the RT distribution. These and other results suggest that the posterior corpus callosum provides the principal route or routes of interhemispheric transfer of the information required for simple visuomotor responses, and is also responsible for the much reduced redundancy gain in normal subjects relative to that in split-brained subjects. The subject with complete callosal section was unusual in that he responded only very rarely to stimuli in the left visual field (LVF), yet he showed markedly reduced RTs to bilateral relative to right visual field (RVF) stimuli.

Effects of handedness on tactile temporal order judgment

We examined effects of handedness on the judgment of temporal order of successive taps delivered to both hands. When the subjects' arms were uncrossed, the temporal resolution (84% correct responses) of right-handed subjects (52 +/- 4 ms, n = 16) was significantly better than that of left-handed subjects (83 +/- 9 ms, n = 16). When their arms were crossed, both groups tended to invert their judgment to a similar extent at intervals as long as 200-300 ms. In the arms crossed condition, right handed subjects inverted their judgment more often in response to left-hand-first stimuli than to right-hand-first stimuli, whereas left-handed subjects did not show the same asymmetry. We infer that hemispheric lateralization, which is generally stronger in right- than in left-handed subjects, contributes to the relatively better temporal resolution of right-handed subjects in the uncrossed condition, as well as to the asymmetric effect of stimulation order in the crossed condition.

Redundancy gain in the acallosal brain

The authors measured simple reaction time (RT) to visual stimuli, presented either singly to 1 or the other visual field or in bilaterally presented pairs, to 2 women with callosal agenesis. The stimuli were either white against a black background or gray against an equiluminant yellow background. RTs to bilateral pairs were decreased beyond predictions based on a simple race between independent unilateral processes, implying interhemispheric neural summation. This effect was enhanced under equiluminance in the participant M.M. whose anterior commissure was within normal limits, but not in the participant J.P. whose anterior commissure was enlarged. The anterior commissure may act, relative to its size, to inhibit cortical activation to bilateral pairs, which then acts to decrease subcortical neural summation.

Crossed-uncrossed difference in simple reaction times to lateralized flashes: between- and within-subjects variability

In unimanual reaction times (RT) to lateralized flashes, contralateral responses tend to be slower than ipsilateral responses. This has been called Crossed-Uncrossed Difference (CUD). The CUD tends to show variability across subjects and across studies, but until now the stability of the CUD in an individual subject has not been investigated. To address the role of inter- and intra-subject variability in the CUD, three normal right handers were tested over 50 experimental sessions of 800 trials each, for a total of 40,000 trials of simple reaction times to lateralized flashes. In each subject, CUDs were computed for each session, over two, three, or more sessions, and over the entire dataset. These CUDs were then compared to the CUDs obtained in a group of 15 normal right handers, each tested once in a single session. Results show that: (i) CUD variability across several sessions in a single subject mimics the variability observed in a sample of subjects tested in a single session; (ii) this variability is considerably reduced when the CUD is computed over at least 2400 trials per subject; (iii) CUDs computed over 2400 and up to 12,000 of trials tend to be extremely similar ( approximately 2 ms) across the three subjects tested here; (iv) when reaction times are ordered from the fastest to the slowest and divided into bins, the CUD is remarkably stable over the entire reaction time distribution; and (v) in contrast to the variability of the CUD, the variability for crossed and uncrossed responses across several sessions in a single subject is small and does not mimic the variability observed in a sample of subjects tested in a single session. Taken together, these data suggest that the intersubject variability in the CUD observed in single experimental sessions does not represent a reliable intersubject difference and that the CUD computed over thousands of trials reflects hard-wired mechanisms of callosal transmission.

Interhemispheric transfer of colour and shape information in the presence and absence of the corpus callosum

Two split-brained subjects, one (L.B.) with full forebrain commissurotomy and one (R.B.) with callosal agenesis, and a group of twenty neurologically intact subjects were tested in three discrimination tasks: a go-no go task, a two-choice task, and a three-choice task. The discriminations were based on colour in Experiment 1, and on shape in Experiment 2. The stimuli were presented in one or other visual field, and the subjects responded with the fingers of one or other hand, allowing the differences in reaction time between crossed and uncrossed responses (CUD) to be calculated. For the normal subjects the CUD tended to diminish with the complexity of the tasks, suggesting that both hemispheres were increasingly involved. Unlike R.B. and the normal controls, who made virtually no errors, L.B. had increasing difficulty as task complexity increased. He was better able to transfer information from the right to the left hemisphere than vice versa, but an analysis of his accuracy under the crossed conditions showed that the amount transferred was always well under one bit. This confirms previous evidence that L.B. has very limited subcortical transfer of either colour or shape.

Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task: I. Occipital and peri-Rolandic recordings

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the relative participation of each cerebral hemisphere during a lateralized task that can be performed by a single hemisphere. This first of two articles focuses on recordings from visual and motor cortices.

METHODS

Intracranial event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from occipital and/or peri-Rolandic sites in 8 patients with intractable epilepsy while they performed a lateralized visual oddball task.

RESULTS

As expected, lateralized visual (N150, P200, N250) and motor (N/P400, N/P550) ERP effects were found for occipital and peri-Rolandic recordings, respectively. These reflect an advantage for direct over indirect sensory/motor pathways. More surprisingly, some occipital recordings were paradoxically larger in amplitude for indirect than for direct visual stimulus lateralization, and other occipital sites were sensitive to motor response factors. Likewise, one peri-Rolandic site exhibited a slow wave component that was sensitive to visual sensory factors. There was also pervasive bilaterally-symmetric ERP activity as reflected by P3-like and slow wave-like components.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings argue against a hemispheric independence model of information processing. With the exception of initial stimulus input and final response output pathway effects, the processing in this simple task engages both hemispheres in a roughly symmetrical fashion, even though a single hemisphere may be adequate for task performance.

Interhemispheric transmission times in the presence and absence of the forebrain commissures: effects of luminance and equiluminance

One subject (L.B.) with full forebrain commissurotomy, one (R.B.) with callosal agenesis and 20 normal controls were tested for simple reaction time (RT) with each hand, to visual stimuli in one or the other visual field. RTs for uncrossed conditions (hand ipsilateral to the visual field) were subtracted from RT to crossed conditions (hand contralateral to the visual field) to yield the crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD), taken to be a measure of interhemispheric transfer time. CUDs increased from an average of 4.9 ms among the control subjects, to 23.3 ms for R.B., to 53.1 ms for L.B. Although overall RTs in all subjects increased with decreasing luminance of the stimuli, the CUD was not systematically affected and remained largely unaffected even under equiluminance. The results support previous evidence that interhemispheric transfer, even in the split brain, depends on visually insensitive pathways.

Interhemispheric communication is via direct connections

Two priming experiments, using normal university students as subjects, independently projected low imagery primes and concrete target words to the left or right visual fields (LVF or RVF) to examine the merits of three spreading activation models of interhemispheric communication: (i) callosal relay of a semantically encoded prime; (ii) transfer of products activated as a result of the spread of activation; and (iii) direct connections between the hemispheres. The first experiment temporally separated pairs by a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 250 ms and obtained strong support for the direct connections model. Priming effects were obtained only when the prime was projected to the RVF and the target to the LVF. The pattern of priming effects suggested that low imagery words projected to the left hemisphere can activate concrete associates in the right hemisphere via direct callosal connections between the two. In the second experiment, the SOA was increased to 450 ms. This time, RVF-RVF priming was obtained along with RVF-LVF priming. The findings are interpreted within a modification of Bleasdale's (1987) framework, where abstract/low imagery words and concrete/high imagery words are represented in separate subsystems in the left hemisphere lexicon. Support was also found for the view that the left hemisphere is comprised of a complex network of abstract and concrete words, while the right hemisphere operates as a subsidiary word processor, subserving linguistic processing with a limited, special purpose lexicon comprised of associative connections between concrete, imageable words (e.g., Zaidel, 1983a; Bradshaw, 1980). Interhemispheric communication in the priming procedure appears to occur at the semantic level, via direct connections between the hemispheres.

Age and interhemispheric transfer time: a failure to replicate

In a recent study with the Poffenberger paradigm, Brizzolara et al. reported longer estimates of interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT) for children aged 7 years than for adults. They interpreted this finding as evidence for incomplete functional maturity of the corpus callosum in young children. The present study was we were unable to replicate the age effect reported by Brizzolara et al. A closer look at the original study revealed that only 80 observations per child had been collected, which makes it probable that the larger IHTTs in 7-year-olds were caused by stimulus-response compatibility rather than by the lower efficiency of the corpus callosum during childhood years.

Bilateral field interactions, hemispheric specialization and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time

The interrelationship between bilateral visual field processing, hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric transmission time (IHTT) was examined in two experiments in order to test two theories regarding callosal function and lateralized visual processing. Contrary to both theoretical speculations [Braun, Neuropsychology Review, Vol. 3, pp. 321-365, 1992] and a recent report [Nowicka et al., Neuropsychologia, Vol. 34, pp. 147-151, 1996], the directional asymmetry in evoked potential measures of IHTT did not vary with task differences in indices of hemispheric specialization. IHTT was faster from right to left hemispheres regardless of visual field advantage for the task. Similarly, patterns of correlation between IHTT and bilateral field advantage did not change between verbal and spatial matching tasks, despite differences in visual field advantage. Since the latter data did not consistently support the Brown and Jeeves [Neuropsychologia, Vol. 31. pp. 1267-1281, 1993] hypothesis, an alternative hypothesis involving hemispheric asymmetries in attention rather than processing specialization was proposed.

Maximizing the bilateral field advantage on verbal and nonverbal matching tasks

Research has established that response latencies are generally shorter on visual matching tasks when one target is projected to each hemifield (bilateral presentation) than when both targets are projected to the same hemifield (unilateral presentation). This effect, called the bilateral field advantage (BFA), has recently shown promise as a predictor of callosal dysfunction. As a step toward developing a reliable BFA index, the present study examined two factors that appear to influence the extent of BFA in normal subjects. Twenty-seven right-handed college students performed a verbal matching task (using letter pairs drawn from the set AaBb) and a nonverbal matching task (using dot pattern pairs constructed with 4 dots in a 3 x 3 matrix). Order of task varied across subjects (dots followed by letters, or letters followed by dots, or letter trials and dot trials interleaved at random). The targets were presented either unilaterally or bilaterally. Results revealed a robust BFA for the letter-matching task in all three task order conditions, suggesting that the letter task may be suitable for inclusion in a battery of tasks for clinical assessment. The dot-matching task did not yield a significant BFA when administered as the first task. The dot task BFA increased when the letter task preceded it, and became comparable to the letter task BFA in the interleaved condition.

Interhemispheric transmission of information and functional asymmetry of the human brain

The study investigated directional differences in interhemispheric transmission time using the VEPs method. Specifically we were interested in whether there exists an asymmetry in the transmission of information to and from the hemisphere specialized in its processing. Two type of stimuli, specific for the left and right hemisphere, were presented in the left and right visual fields. The latency differences between visual evoked potential components registered in the hemispheres ipsilateral and contralateral to the stimulated hemifield were compared. Interhemispheric transmission time was shorter when the information was transferred from the hemisphere non-specialized for its processing to the specialized one than in the opposite direction. The results suggest the existence of a physiological mechanism that ensures fast transmission of information to that hemisphere which is more efficient in its processing.

Directional asymmetries in interhemispheric transmission time: evidence from visual evoked potentials

The hypothesis was tested that interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT), as measured in the latency of bilaterally recorded visual evoked potentials, is directionally asymmetric, i.e. that an IHTT is faster for transmission from right-to-left hemisphere, than from left-to-right. A meta-analysis of 18 experiments within the published literature reporting visual evoked potential IHTTs indicates a significant experiment-wise predominance of faster right-to-left IHTTs. A new experiment is also reported in which significantly faster right-to-left IHTT was found in visual evoked potentials recorded from parietal electrodes to lateral visual field presentations while subjects performed a task requiring complex stimulus recognition and analysis, and a choice response.

Callosal efficiency is related to sustained attention

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between the efficiency of interhemispheric communication (IHC) and the ability to sustain attention. Children were tested on a vigilance task in which the amount of time between target presentations (interstimulus intervals; ISI) was varied. IHC was assessed by comparing within-field and between-field matches on a tachistoscopic task. Subjects who showed better IHC had faster RTs on the long ISI trials of the vigilance task, suggesting callosal involvement in the ability to sustain attention over a long period of time in the absence of sensory input.