Effects of aldose reductase inhibition with tolrestat on diabetic retinopathy in a six months double blind trial

Retinal capillary basement membrane thickening: Role in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy

Vascular basement membrane (BM) thickening has been hailed over half a century as the most prominent histological lesion in diabetic microangiopathy, and represents an early ultrastructural change in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Although vascular complications of DR have been clinically well established, specific cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying dysfunction of small vessels are not well understood. In DR, small vessels develop insidiously as BM thickening occurs. Studies examining high resolution imaging data have established BM thickening as one of the foremost structural abnormalities of retinal capillaries. This fundamental structural change develops, at least in part, from excess accumulation of BM components. Although BM thickening is closely associated with the development of DR, its contributory role in the pathogenesis of DR is coming to light recently. DR develops over several years before clinical manifestations appear, and it is during this clinically silent period that hyperglycemia induces excess synthesis of BM components, contributes to vascular BM thickening, and promotes structural and functional lesions including cell death and vascular leakage in the diabetic retina. Studies using animal models show promising results in preventing BM thickening with subsequent beneficial effects. Several gene regulatory approaches are being developed to prevent excess synthesis of vascular BM components in an effort to reduce BM thickening. This review highlights current understanding of capillary BM thickening development, role of BM thickening in retinal vascular lesions, and strategies for preventing vascular BM thickening as a potential therapeutic strategy in alleviating characteristic lesions associated with DR.

Clinical biomarkers and molecular basis for optimized treatment of diabetic retinopathy: current status and future prospects

Diabetic retinopathy is a highly specific microvascular complication of diabetes and a leading cause of blindness worldwide. It is triggered by hyperglycemia which causes increased oxidative stress leading to an adaptive inflammatory assault to the neuroretinal tissue and microvasculature. Prolonged hyperglycemia causes increased polyol pathway flux, increased formation of advanced glycation end-products, abnormal activation of signaling cascades such as activation of protein kinase C (PKC) pathway, increased hexosamine pathway flux, and peripheral nerve damage. All these changes lead to increased oxidative stress and inflammatory assault to the retina resulting in structural and functional changes. In addition, neuroretinal alterations affect diabetes progression. The most effective way to manage diabetic retinopathy is by primary prevention such as hyperglycemia control. While the current mainstay for the management of severe and proliferative diabetic retinopathy is laser photocoagulation, its role is diminishing with the development of newer drugs including corticosteroids, antioxidants, and antiangiogenic and anti-VEGF agents which work as an adjunct to laser therapy or independently. The current pharmacotherapy of diabetic retinopathy is incomplete as a sole treatment option in view of limited efficacy and short-term effect. There is a definite clinical need to develop new pharmacological therapies for diabetic retinopathy, particularly ones which would be effective through the oral route and help recover lost vision. The increasing understanding of the mechanisms of diabetic retinopathy and its biomarkers is likely to help generate better and more effective medications.

Prevention of diabetic eye disease: the commonest cause of blindness in individuals younger than 65 years

There has been a considerable advancement in the treatment of diabetes and understanding of the biochemical mechanisms underlying diabetic complications in the last 20 years. However, this advancement has not translated into a consistent reduction in diabetic retinopathy, one of the most frightening complications of diabetes mellitus. It is probable that greater attention to preventive intervention will help reduce the damage load in the next future, and that several drugs for the treatment of more advanced stages of diabetic retinopathy will become available. Competent strategies targeting prevention based on screening programs should be proposed to reduce the burden and to improve the clinical outcome of this devastating diabetes complication.

New pharmacologic approaches to treating diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

The goal of treatment of diabetic retinopathy, limitations of laser photocoagulation, endpoints used in clinical studies of diabetic retinopathy treatments, and the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of several new and emerging therapies targeting the biochemical pathways that link chronic hyperglycemia with microvascular damage in patients with diabetic retinopathy are discussed.

SUMMARY

Improving or preserving vision is the primary goal of treatment for diabetic retinopathy. Limitations of laser photocoagulation include a lack of efficacy in some cases, discomfort from the procedure, the need for repeated treatment, and a risk of retinal damage and scarring. Visual acuity, quality of life, and macular thickness are used as endpoints in clinical studies of diabetic retinopathy treatments. Microvascular damage in patients with chronic hyperglycemia is mediated by interrelated pathways involving aldose reductase, advanced glycation end products, protein kinase C (PKC), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Oral aldose reductase inhibitors have been studied with some success only in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The oral PKC inhibitor midostaurin and oral selective PKC beta inhibitor ruboxistaurin appear promising for improving or maintaining visual acuity, with gastrointestinal complaints the most commonly reported adverse effects. Intra-vitreal injection of corticosteroids or VEGF inhibitors is associated with short-lived improvement in or maintenance of visual acuity, a need for repeated injection, and a risk of local adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

A variety of promising new therapies for diabetic retinopathy targeting the biochemical pathways that cause microvascular damage are under investigation. Additional clinical research is needed to determine the role of these new therapies in treating diabetic retinopathy.

Current and future pharmacological intervention for diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a potentially visually devastating complication of chronic hyperglycaemia. Prospective, randomised clinical trials have delineated the standard prevention protocols, including intensive glycaemic, blood pressure, and lipid control, and laser photocoagulation treatment for neovascularisation and clinically significant macular oedema. However, despite these interventions, vision loss from DR still occurs at an alarming rate. Researchers have directed their efforts towards better understanding the specific biological and chemical changes occurring in DR to develop more targeted pharmacological prevention and treatment strategies. This review of diabetic retinopathy will primarily detail the therapies in development at present, including aldose reductase inhibitors, advanced glycosylation end product inhibitors, antioxidants, supplemental oxygen, growth factor modulators including vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and protein kinase C inhibitors, extracellular matrix modifiers including corticosteroids, and vitreous modulators. The experimental therapies alter several different pathways that lead to DR. Future research will further delineate these pathways, and therapy is likely to involve arresting several different promoters of DR.

Pharmacotherapy for diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a potentially visually devastating complication of chronic hyperglycemia and other associated systemic abnormalities. Numerous large, prospective, randomized clinical trials have delineated the current standard prevention and treatment protocols including intensive glycemic and blood pressure control and laser photocoagulation for neovascularization and clinically significant macular edema. However, despite standard intervention, vision loss from DR still occurs at an alarming rate. Thus, more recently, researchers have directed their efforts towards better understanding the microscopic changes occurring in DR to develop more effective pharmacologic prevention and treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Phase II and III clinical studies involving antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors for the management of diabetic macular edema are underway. Researchers recently found elevated pigment endothelium-derived factor (PEDF) associated with active neovascularization, a finding that counteracts prior claims of endogenous anti-angiogenic properties. Other clinical trials are underway to evaluate the efficacy of octreotide, celecoxib, and candesartan on DR. Small clinical studies have suggested beneficial treatment effects for triamcinolone acetonide, interferon alpha-2a, and supplemental oxygen; however, other studies involving losartan, vitamins C and E, and atorvastatin failed to show any benefit.

SUMMARY

Over the past decade, numerous animal models have led to a more thorough understanding of the early microvascular alterations and later neovascularization and edema observed in DR. These discoveries and subsequent human clinical studies involving direct and indirect growth factor modulation, extracellular matrix alteration, vitreolysis, and alternative DR pathways including dyslipidemia, hypoxia, and sorbitol are reviewed in this manuscript.

Current approaches and perspectives in the medical treatment of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of visual loss in industrialized countries. Its classification includes preclinical, nonproliferative (mild, moderate, and severe or preproliferative diabetic retinopathy) and proliferative stages (low risk, high risk, and advanced). Diabetic maculopathy (exudative, edematous, or ischemic) may be associated with either nonproliferative or proliferative retinopathy. Prevention requires the tightest possible control of both blood glucose and blood pressure. Laser photocoagulation remains the only procedure recommended for severe nonproliferative or proliferative retinopathy and maculopathy. Since it reduces legal blindness by more than 90% in proliferative retinopathy and prevents severe sight loss in diabetic maculopathy, photocoagulation is probably one of the most effective forms of treatment known today. Less destructive approaches are desirable, however, and those currently under phase 3 trial include blockade of angiotensin receptors, the beta-isoform of protein kinase C, and growth hormone secretion by long-acting analogues of somatostatin. Evidence from past randomized controlled studies does not support a role for inhibitors of platelet aggregation, aldose reductase, and advanced glycosylation end products in the prevention/treatment of retinopathy. Future approaches might include the use of thiamine and its analogues in the primary and secondary prevention of early retinopathy and blockers of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor in more advanced stages.

Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) are leading causes of blindness in the working-age population of most developed countries. The increasing number of individuals with diabetes worldwide suggests that DR and DME will continue to be major contributors to vision loss and associated functional impairment for years to come. Early detection of retinopathy in individuals with diabetes is critical in preventing visual loss, but current methods of screening fail to identify a sizable number of high-risk patients. The control of diabetes-associated metabolic abnormalities (i.e., hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension) is also important in preserving visual function because these conditions have been identified as risk factors for both the development and progression of DR/DME. The currently available interventions for DR/DME, laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy, only target advanced stages of disease. Several biochemical mechanisms, including protein kinase C-beta activation, increased vascular endothelial growth factor production, oxidative stress, and accumulation of intracellular sorbitol and advanced glycosylation end products, may contribute to the vascular disruptions that characterize DR/DME. The inhibition of these pathways holds the promise of intervention for DR at earlier non-sight-threatening stages. To implement new therapies effectively, more individuals will need to be screened for DR/DME at earlier stages-a process requiring both improved technology and interdisciplinary cooperation among physicians caring for patients with diabetes.

Sorbitol dehydrogenase overexpression potentiates glucose toxicity to cultured retinal pericytes

The polyol pathway consists of two enzymes, aldose reductase (AR) and sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH). There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that acceleration of the polyol pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications. However, a functional role remains to be elucidated for SDH in the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy. In this study, cultured bovine retinal capillary pericytes were used to investigate the effects of SDH overexpression on glucose toxicity. High glucose modestly increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, decreased DNA synthesis, and up-regulated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA levels in cultured pericytes. SDH overexpression was found to significantly stimulate ROS generation in high glucose-exposed pericytes and subsequently potentiate the cytopathic effects of glucose. Fidarestat, a newly developed AR inhibitor, and N-acetylcysteine, an antioxidant, completely prevented these deleterious effects of SDH overexpression on pericytes. Furthermore, fidarestat administration was found to significantly prevent vascular hyperpermeability, the characteristic changes of the early phase of diabetic retinopathy, in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Our present results suggest that SDH-mediated conversion of sorbitol to fructose and the resultant ROS generation may play an active role in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Blockage of sorbitol formation by fidarestat could be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of early phase of diabetic retinopathy.

Aldose reductase: a window to the treatment of diabetic complications?

Kinetic studies on the aldose reductase protein (AR2) have shown that it does not behave as a classical enzyme in relation to ring aldose sugars. These results have been confirmed by X-ray crystallography studies, which have pinpointed binding sites for pharmacological "aklose reductase inhibitors" (ARIs). As with non-enzymic glycation reactions, there is probably a free-radical element involved derived from monosaccharide autoxidation. In the case of AR2, there is free radical oxidation of NADPH by autoxidising monosaccharides, enhanced in the presence of the NADPH-binding protein. Whatever the behaviour of AR2, many studies have showed that sorbitol production is not an initiating aetiological factor in the development of diabetic complications in humans. Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol), other antioxidants and high fat diets can delay or prevent cataract in diabetic animals even though sorbitol and fructose levels are not modified; vitamin C acts as an AR1 in humans. Protein post-translational modification by glyc-oxidation or other events is probably the key factor in the aetiology of diabetic complications. There is now no need to invoke AR2 in xylitol biosynthesis. Xylitol can be produced in the lens from glucose, via a pathway involving the enzymes myo-inositol-oxygen oxidoreductase, D-glucuronate reductase. L-gulonate NAD(+)-3-oxidoreductase and L-iditol-NAD(+)-5-oxidoreductase, all of which have recently been found in bovine and rat lens. This chapter investigates the molecular events underlying AR2 and its binding and kinetics. Induction of the protein by osmotic response elements is discussed, with detailed analysis of recent in vitro and in vivo experiments on numerous ARIs. These have a number of actions in the cell which are not specific, and which do not involve them binding to AR2. These include peroxy-radical scavenging and recently discovered effects of metal ion chelation. In controlled experiments, it has been found that incubation of rat lens homogenate with glucose and the copper chelator o-phenanthroline abolishes production of sorbitol. Taken together, these results suggest AR2 is a vestigial NADPH-binding protein, perhaps similar in function to a number of non-mammalian crystallins which have been recruited into the lens. There is mounting evidence for the binding of reactive aldehyde moieties to the protein, and the involvement of AR2 either as a 'housekeeping' protein, or in a free-radial-mediated 'catalytic' role. Interfering with the NADPH binding and flux levels--possibly involving free radicals and metal ions--has a deleterious effect. We have yet to determine whether aldose reductase is the black sheep of the aldehyde reductase family, or whether it is a skeleton in the cupboard, waiting to be clothed in the flesh of new revelations in the interactions between proteins, metal ions and redox metabolites.

Permeability of the blood-retinal barrier in healthy humans. European Concerted Action on Ocular Fluorometry

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the inward permeability of the blood-retinal barrier in healthy subjects from six European cities.

METHODS

Seventy-two healthy subjects (age 20-70 years) were selected. At 30 min and 60 min after fluorescein injection, fluorescein mass in vitreous was calculated from the concentrations measured along the optical axis of the eye. Non-protein-bound fluorescein (NPBF) concentrations were measured in plasma prepared from blood samples taken 7, 15 and 55 min after injection. Blood-retinal barrier permeability (PBRB) was calculated from the vitreous fluorescein mass and the time integral of NPBF and was corrected for the autofluorescence of ocular tissue and for lenticular light transmittance.

RESULTS

Mean PBRB values +/- SD (nm.s-1) were 2.07 +/- 0.54 (Coimbra), 2.01 +/- 0.43 (Frankfurt), 2.24 +/- 0.50 (Ghent), 2.37 +/- 0.56 (Herlev), 1.89 +/- 0.44 (Leiden) and 1.74 +/- 0.38 (Porto). Differences between centers were not significant (P > 0.35). Measurements were reproducible and independent of the time after fluorescein injection (P > 0.50). A PBRB higher than 3.16 nm.s-1 or a value which had increased by 32% was considered abnormal (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PBRB values were similar in all centers. The results demonstrate that this is a highly sensitive and reliable method for measuring the permeability of the blood-retinal barrier.

The efficacy of aldose reductase inhibitors in the management of diabetic complications. Comparison with intensive insulin treatment and pancreatic transplantation

Recently, aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) have been registered in several countries for the improvement of glycaemic control. However, their efficacy is still controversial. ARIs inhibit the enhanced flux of glucose through the polyol pathway. As such, they can never be more effective than normoglycaemia, and so their potential benefits and limitations should be considered relative to the effects of prolonged euglycaemia. The clinical effects of ARIs can be put into perspective by assessing the effects of improved glycaemic control attained in randomised trials of intensive insulin treatment [such as the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)] and after pancreatic transplantation. Although direct comparison of these 3 interventions is hampered by differences in patient populations, duration and methods of follow-up and in the potency of ARIs, the effects of these 3 metabolic interventions and their course in time appear remarkably similar. For neuropathy, all 3 interventions induce an increase in average motor nerve conduction velocity of approximately 1 m/sec during the first months of treatment. At the same time, improvement of painful symptoms may occur. These changes probably largely represent a metabolic amelioration of the condition of the nerves. Around the second year of treatment with all 3 forms of metabolic improvement, an acceleration of nerve conduction of a similar magnitude occurs, with signs of structural nerve regeneration and some sensory recuperation. Experience with ARIs in nephropathy is still limited, but similar improvements in glomerular filtration rate and, less consistently, in urinary albumin excretion were found during short term normoglycaemia produced by all 3 forms of treatment. Comparison of a small number of studies, however, shows differences between intensive insulin regimens, pancreatic transplantation and ARIs in effects on retinopathy. Retinopathy often temporarily deteriorates in the early phases of improved glycaemic control, but this is not noted with ARIs. New microaneurysm formation was slightly reduced in a single long term study with the ARI sorbinil, but the preventive effects on the overall levels of retinopathy seemed less strong than in normoglycaemia trials of similar duration. However, the pharmacodynamic effects on inhibiting the polyol pathway differ among ARIs, and the half-life of the inhibiting effect of sorbinil may have been too short for a complete reduction of polyol pathway activity. The trials of prolonged intensive insulin therapy and pancreatic transplantation have demonstrated that very strict metabolic control must be maintained continuously for many years before a significant reduction of complications can be demonstrated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)