Transfer of embryos into the uterus: how much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates?

Uterine factors modify the association between embryo transfer depth and clinical pregnancy

The embryo transfer depth may affect the chance of pregnancy. However, embryo dislodging caused by uterine contraction may occur after the transfer. The aim of the retrospective study was to investigate whether the factors associated with uterine contractilities, such as endometrial thickness and progesterone elevation, affect the association between transfer depth and implantation. A total of 7849 fresh transfer cycles on conventional stimulation in a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) center during the period 2013–2015 was reviewed. Patients were categorized according to quartiles of embryo transfer depth (≤ 9 mm, n = 1735, 9.1–11 mm, n = 2557, 11.1–14 mm, n = 1933, ≥ 1.4 mm, n = 1624, respectively). Adjusted for confounding factors, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval, CI) for clinical pregnancy was 0.90 (0.79–1.02), 0.86 (0.74–0.99), and 0.70 (0.60–0.82) respectively in quartiles 2 through 4, comparing with quartile 1. However, the aORs were significantly increased when the endometrial thickness was < 8 mm. In comparison with that in the cycles with a normal endometrial thickness (8–11 mm), the aORs comparing quartiles 2 through 4 with quartile 1 in the cycles with an endometrial thickness < 8 mm increased from 0.78 (95% CI 0.65–0.93), 0.79 (95% CI 0.65–0.97), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.51–0.81) to 1.73 (95% CI 1.21–2.47), 1.04 (95% CI 0.69–1.56), and 1.45 (95% CI 0.91–2.31), respectively. In the cycles with elevated progesterone and blastocyst stage transfer, the aORs comparing quartiles 4 with quartile 1 decreased from 0.73 (95% CI 0.62–0.87) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.63–0.87) to 0.58 (95% CI 0.40–0.84) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.25–0.73) than those in the cycles without. However, only blastocyst transfer showed a significant interaction with transfer depth (p = 0.043). Our data suggested that endometrial thickness and blastocyst transfer significantly affect the association between embryo transfer depth and clinical pregnancy.

Interventions to optimize embryo transfer in women undergoing assisted conception: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Several interventions and techniques are suggested to improve the outcome of embryo transfer (ET) in assisted conception. However, there remains no consensus on the optimal practice, with high variations among fertility specialists.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aiming to identify effective interventions that could be introduced around the time of ET to improve reproductive outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception until March 2021 using a multi-stage search strategy of MeSH terms and keywords, and included all RCTs that evaluated an intervention in the 24-h period before/after ET in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Our primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate post-ET confirmed as viable pregnancy on ultrasound scan. We assessed the risk of bias in included trials and extracted data in duplicate. We pooled data using a random-effect meta-analysis and reported using risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. We explored publication bias and effect modifiers using subgroup analyses.

OUTCOMES

Our search yielded 3685 citations of which we included 188 RCTs (38 interventions, 59 530 participants) with a median sample size of 200 (range 26-1761). The quality of included RCTs was moderate with most showing a low risk of bias for randomization (118/188, 62.8%) and attrition (105/188, 55.8%) but there was a significant risk of publication bias (Egger's test P = 0.001). Performing ET with ultrasound guidance versus clinical touch (n = 24, RR 1.265, 95% CI 1.151-1.391, I2 = 38.53%), hyaluronic acid versus routine care (n = 9, RR 1.457, 95% CI 1.197-1.261, I2 = 46.48%) and the use of a soft versus hard catheter (n = 27, RR 1.122, 95% CI 1.028-1.224, I2 = 57.66%) led to higher clinical pregnancy rates. Other pharmacological add-ons also showed a beneficial effect including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF: n = 4, RR 1.774, 95% CI 1.252-2.512, I2 = 0), Atosiban (n = 7, RR 1.493, 95% CI 1.184-1.882, I2 = 68.27%) and hCG (n = 17, RR 1.232, 95% CI 1.099-1.382, I2 = 57.76%). Bed rest following ET was associated with a reduction in clinical pregnancy (n = 6, RR 0.857, 95% CI 0.741-0.991, I2 = 0.01%). Other commonly used interventions, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prophylactic antibiotics, acupuncture and cervical mucus removal, did not show a significant benefit on reproductive outcomes. Our effect estimates for other important outcomes, including miscarriage and live birth, were limited by the varied reporting across included RCTs.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Using ultrasound guidance, soft catheters and hyaluronic acid at the time of ET appears to increase clinical pregnancy rates. The use of Atosiban, G-CSF and hCG showed a trend towards increased clinical pregnancy rate, but larger trials are required before adopting these interventions in clinical practice. Bed rest post-ET was associated with a reduction in clinical pregnancy and should not be recommended.

Immersive virtual reality as tool to reduce anxiety during embryo transfer

The use of Virtual Reality (VR) has gained wide acceptance in several scientific fields. It represents an innovative technological tool providing the experience to be immersed in a non-physical world putting on head-mounted displays that surround the users with images and sounds. To date, VR has been mainly employed in the healthcare sector for educational aims, in order to provide the learners with a new method of delivering simulations. However, its application to real clinical practice has recently generated beneficial effects for patients, especially for those who experience symptoms of psychological burden. Infertile couples often struggle with anxiety and depression which have a strong impact on life quality. Furthermore, the perspective to undergo long treatments with uncertain results and an history of failed attempts may contribute to enhance patients' negative feelings during In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles until Embryo Transfer (ET). The role of VR in reducing pain and anxiety during outpatient hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography and oocytes retrieval, has been recently investigated with satisfactory results in terms of reducing pain and anxiety levels. However, to date, inconclusive outcomes have been reported on pregnancy rate. Our study would discuss the existent literature on VR applied to current medical practice and infertility, proposing its beneficial impact on women anxiety during IVF cycle with ET.

Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best protocol to prepare endometrium for frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycles.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PubMed and OvidSP search, a total of 1166 studies published after 1990 were identified following removal of duplicates. Following exclusion of studies not matching our inclusion criteria, a total of 33 studies were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was live birth. The following protocols, including true natural cycle (tNC), modified natural cycle (mNC), artificial cycle (AC) with or without suppression, and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin (Gn) or aromatase inhibitor (AI), were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference for both clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted between tNC and mNC groups. When tNC and AC without suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate in favor of tNC, whereas it failed to reach statistical significance for live birth. When tNC and AC with suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in live birth rate favoring the latter. Similar pregnancy outcome was noted among mNC versus AC with or without suppression groups. Similarly, no difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted when ACs with or without suppression groups are compared.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consistent superiority of any endometrial preparation for FER. However, mNC has several advantages (being patient-friendly; yielding at least equivalent or better pregnancy rates when compared with tNC and AC with or without suppression; may not require LPS). Mild OS with Gn or AI may be promising.

Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women

BACKGROUND

Many women undergoing an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle will not achieve a live birth. Failure at the embryo transfer stage may be due to lack of good-quality embryo/s, lack of uterine receptivity, or the transfer technique itself. Numerous methods, including the use of ultrasound guidance for proper catheter placement in the endometrial cavity, have been suggested as more effective techniques of embryo transfer. This review evaluates the efficacy of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (UGET) compared with 'clinical touch' (CTET), which is the traditional method of embryo transfer and relies on the clinician's tactile senses to judge when the transfer catheter is in the correct position.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether ultrasound guidance compared with clinical touch improves pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing embryo transfer during ART cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

For the 2016 update of this review, we ran updated searches in the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register (May 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library, May 2015), MEDLINE (2009 to May 2015), and EMBASE (2009 to May 2015). We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings: American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data from those selected. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. No outcomes were reported using continuous data. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence for the main findings using the GRADE working group methods.

MAIN RESULTS

This systematic review now has 21 included studies (four of which we added in the 2016 update), two studies awaiting assessment, and 47 excluded studies. In total, data for meta-analyses were available in 21 trials (n = 6218 women), of which only four reported live births.UGET was associated with an increased chance of a live birth/ongoing pregnancy compared with CTET (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.65; 13 trials; n = 5859 women; I(2) = 74%; low-quality evidence). Sensitivity analysis by including only trials with low risk of selection bias or by using a random-effects model did not alter the effect. We estimate that for women with a chance of a live birth/ongoing pregnancy of 23% using CTET, this would increase to between 28% and 33% using UGET. We considered the quality of the evidence using GRADE methodology to be low.UGET was associated with an increase in the chance of a clinical pregnancy (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.45; 20 trials; n = 6711 women; I(2) = 42%; moderate-quality evidence). We identified no differences between groups for the incidence of adverse events including multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or miscarriage. These events were relatively rare, and sample sizes limited the ability to detect such differences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests ultrasound guidance improves the chance of live birth/ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared with clinical touch, without increasing the chance of multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or miscarriage. Methodological limitations included: only four studies reporting details of both computerised randomisation techniques and adequate allocation concealment, only four studies reported on the outcome of live birth, and none of the nine studies that reported on ongoing pregnancy reported on live birth, suggesting possible reporting bias. Adequate reporting of randomisation and allocation concealment will improve the quality of future studies. The primary outcome measure of future studies should be the reporting of live births per woman randomised.

Absolute position versus relative position in embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Meta-analysis revealed that embryo placement 20 mm from the fundal endometrial surface resulted in higher pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate compared with placement 10 mm from the fundal endometrial surface. Pregnancy and implantation rates according to relative position were higher when the catheter tip was positioned close to the middle of the endometrial cavity. The aim of the current study is to evaluate differences in implantation and pregnancy rates if the site of embryo transfer is 2 cm distance from the fundal endometrium (DFE) compared to the midpoint of the endometrial cavity length (ECL).

METHODS

Patients were randomized to one of two groups: in group A (n = 98, 98 IVF-ET cycles), the embryo transfer catheter tip was positioned 2 cm DFE, while that in group B (n = 97, 97 IVF-ET cycles) was positioned at the midpoint of the ECL. We compared pregnancy outcomes of implantation rate, chemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate in the two groups.

RESULTS

Analysis of implantation rate (19.5 ± 27.7 vs. 21.7 ± 32.6; p = 0.6), chemical pregnancy rate (51 % vs. 50.5 %; p = 0.94), clinical pregnancy rate (35.7 % vs. 38.1 %; p = 0.73), ongoing pregnancy rate (31.6 % vs. 30.9 %; p = 0.92), ectopic pregnancy rate (8.6 % vs. 2.7 %; p = 0.35), and miscarriage rate (11.4 % vs. 16.2 %; 0.74) revealed comparable results for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation and pregnancy rates were not influenced by the site of the ET catheter tip being 2 cm DFE compared to at the midpoint of the ECL.

ISRCTN

ISRCTN15972342.

Post-embryo transfer interventions for assisted reproduction technology cycles

BACKGROUND

In women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), embryos transferred into the uterine cavity can be expelled due to many factors including uterine peristalsis and contractions, low site of deposition and negative pressure generated when removing the transfer catheter. Techniques to reduce the risk of embryo loss following embryo transfer (ET) have been described but are not standard in all centres conducting ET.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of interventions used to prevent post-transfer embryo expulsion in women undergoing IVF and ICSI.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials to June 2014 and PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, World Health Organization ICTRP, and trial registers from inception to June 2014, with no language restrictions. Additionally, we handsearched reference lists of relevant articles, and ESHRE and ASRM conference abstracts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions used to prevent post-transfer embryo expulsion in women undergoing IVF and ICSI. Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and reviewed the full-texts of all potentially eligible citations to determine whether they met our inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included trials using standardised, piloted data extraction forms. Data were extracted to allow intention-to-treat analyses. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The overall quality of the evidence was rated using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs (n = 1392 women) which administered the following interventions: bed rest (two trials), fibrin sealant (one trial), and mechanical closure of the cervix (one trial). Our primary outcome, live birth rate, was not reported in any of the included trials; nor were the data available from the corresponding authors. For the ongoing pregnancy rate, two trials comparing more bed rest with less bed rest showed no evidence of a difference between groups (odds ratio (OR) 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.31, 542 women, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence). Secondary outcomes were sporadically reported with the exception of the clinical pregnancy rate, which was reported in all of the included trials. There was no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy rate between more bed rest and less bed rest (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.31, 542 women, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence) or between fibrin sealant and usual care (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.78, 211 women, very low quality evidence). However, mechanical closure of the cervix was associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate than usual care (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.40 to 2.63, very low quality evidence). The quality of the evidence was rated as low or very low for all outcomes. The main limitations were failure to report live births, imprecision and risk of bias. Overall, the risk of bias of the included trials was high. The use of a proper method of randomisation and allocation concealment was fairly well reported, while only one trial clearly reported blinding. There was no evidence that any of the interventions had an effect on adverse event rates but data were too few to reach any conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support any specific length of time for women to remain recumbent, if at all, following embryo transfer, nor is there sufficient evidence to recommend the use of fibrin sealants added to the embryo transfer fluid. There is very limited evidence to support the use of mechanical pressure to close the cervical canal following embryo transfer. Further well-designed and powered studies are required to determine the true effectiveness and safety of these interventions.

The Impact of the Depth of Embryo Replacement into the Uterine Cavity under Transabdominal Ultrasound Guidance on In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Outcome

Aim: The aim of the present study was to determine the importance of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity (upper or lower half endometrial cavity) on the implantation clinical pregnancy rates.Material and Methods: In this prospective observational were included 160 patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation followed by IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer. On the day of embryo transfer under direct transabdominal ultrasound guidance, the transfer catheter was advanced to a defined distance from the uterine fundus, up to the point estimated for transfer: 10 ± 2.5 mm (Group A) and 15 ± 2.5 mm (Group B).Results: In total, 160 patients, aged 24-42 years were included in the study. Overall clinical pregnancy rate were 41.2%. Analysis of our results demonstrated that pregnancy rate is significantly influenced by transfer distance from the fundus where the  pregnancy rate decreases from 48.7% in group B to 34.5%  in group A (p<0.05). There was not significantly difference in abortion rate between the two groups.Conclusion: In conclusion, our results suggest that depth of embryo replacement inside the uterine cavity may influence the pregnancy rates and should be considered as an important factor to improve the success of IVF cycles.

Quality Management Issues in the Assisted Reproduction Laboratory

In the United States, the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA) of 1988 describes requirements and guidelines for implementing a quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program for moderate and high complexity laboratories. These requirements and guidelines apply to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) laboratories as well. The general topic of QC and QA as it pertains to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) is extensively reviewed. This review summarizes many of the QC and QA events that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in this biotechnological field. These events include control of the culture environment inside and outside of the incubator, as well as factors that affect culture media. This review also discusses, in considerable detail, the QC and the QA that pertain to equipment used within the laboratory and how to control for potential contaminants, which reside within the laboratory. This review provides evidence to indicate the need for laboratory personnel to monitor quality improvement issues on a continuous basis. Personnel must be willing to change as improvements in technology occur in order to meet the ever-evolving demands of a more difficult patient population. Suggestions for meeting these demands are offered.

Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women

BACKGROUND

Many women undergoing an Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) cycle will not achieve a live birth. Failure at the embryo transfer stage may be due to lack of good quality embryo/s, lack of uterine receptivity, or the transfer technique itself. Numerous methods, including the use of ultrasound guidance for proper catheter placement in the endometrial cavity, have been suggested as a more effective technique of embryo transfer. This review evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasound guided embryo transfer (UGET) compared with 'clinical touch' (CTET) the traditional method of embryo transfer.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether ultrasound guidance influences treatment outcomes in women undergoing embryo transfer (ET) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases were searched in November 2009. We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (searched November 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE (1970-2009), EMBASE (1985-2009), BIO Extracts (1980-2009). Relevant conference proceedings were also hand searched (ASRM, ESHRE and FIGO).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data from those selected.

MAIN RESULTS

This update identified 59 potential trials of which 42 were excluded. Data for analysis was available in seventeen studies. One study reported live births and personal communication resulted in data relating to this outcome being obtained in two additional studies. There is no evidence of a significant difference in the outcome of live birth (OR 1.14 (95%CI0.93 to 1.39; P=0.02) although heterogeneity was high (64%) and the results should be interpreted with caution. Seven studies reported on ongoing pregnancies. The ongoing pregnancies per woman randomised associated with UGET (441/1254) was significantly higher than for clinical touch (350/1218) OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.64, P<0.0003). No statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were identified between the comparison groups. These events are relatively rare and sample sizes limit the ability to detect such differences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The studies are limited by their quality with only two studies reporting details of both computerised randomisation techniques and adequate allocation concealment. Ultrasound guidance does appear to improve the chances of live/ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared with clinical touch methods. The quality of future studies should be improved with adequate reporting of randomisation, allocation concealment, and power calculations. The primary outcome measure of future studies should be the reporting of live births per woman randomised.

Post-embryo transfer interventions for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients

BACKGROUND

Techniques for embryo transfer (ET) are being developed, optimized, and standardized to provide the best outcomes.This includes methods to reduce the risk of embryo loss following ET.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically locate, analyse, and review the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of post-ET techniques for women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched electronic databases; reference lists of primary studies, review articles, and relevant publications; and conference abstracts. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Screening and selection of 2436 possible trial citations were performed independently by two review authors. Four prospective, truly randomised trials met the inclusion criteria. The trials compared two competing post ET interventions or an intervention versus no treatment in women undergoing IVF and ICSI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently collected data and assessed risk of bias using a standardized data extraction form. Individual outcome data were extracted to support an intention-to-treat analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome, live birth rate, was not reported in any of the included trials. The ongoing pregnancy rate was only available for one trial that compared immediate ambulation with 30 minute bed rest, with no evidence of an effect with bed rest (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.85).Secondary outcomes were sporadically reported with the exception of clinical pregnancy rate, which was reported in all of the included trials. There was no significant difference between less bed rest and more rest (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.67). Nor was there any significant difference between the use of a fibrin sealant and control (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.78). Even so, there was a significantly higher probability of pregnancy following mechanical closure of the cervix compared with no intervention (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.40 to 2.63).The risk of bias of the included studies was variable. The reporting of a proper method of randomisation and allocation concealment was demonstrated in the majority of trials, while only one trial was reported to be blinded.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support a certain amount of time for women to remain recumbent following ET, or to support the use of fibrin sealants. Finally, there is limited evidence to support the use of mechanical closure of the cervical canal following ET. Further well-designed and powered studies are required to determine the true effect, if any, of these and other post ET techniques for women undergoing IVF and ICSI.

Hysteroscopic evaluation of endocervical and endometrial lesions observed after different procedures of embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Endocervical and endometrial damage observed after different procedures of embryo transfer (ET) were investigated using diagnostic hysteroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, descriptive and comparative study, in an Infertility centre, University Hospital. Hundred consecutive infertile patients with a normal uterine cavity, included in an IVF program, were enrolled between May 1st, 2006 and April 30th, 2007. All the patients had a diagnostic hysteroscopy immediately after trial ET using soft ET catheters: (i) IVF Sydney Set (Cook, Limerick, Ireland) (n=27), (ii) Elliocath (Ellios, Paris, France) (n=34), (iii) Frydman classic 4.5 (CCD, Paris, France) (n=19), and rigid ET catheters: Memory Frydman 4.5 (CCD, Paris, France) (n=20). All the procedures were recorded and blindly reviewed. Data were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis test for age and severity of endometrial lesions, or Fisher's exact test for binary criteria.

RESULTS

Endocervical lesions were more frequently encountered in the soft (63%) and rigid (85%) Frydman's catheter groups compared to other groups (Elliocath: 29%, IVF Sydney Set: 26%; p<0.0001). Presence of blood on the catheter, and endometrial lesions were significantly less frequent in soft catheter groups compared to the rigid catheter group (p<0.0001). Severe endometrial lesions were less frequently observed when soft catheters were used (85%, 53%, 32%, 11% for Memory Frydman, Frydman classic, Elliocath and IVF Sydney Set, respectively; p<0.0001). The presence of blood on the catheter signed severe endometrial lesions.

CONCLUSION

All ET catheters can lead to endocervical and endometrial damage. Severe endometrial lesions were less frequent when soft catheters were used.

Effects of cancer treatment on ovarian function

Causes of primary ovarian failure are reviewed, focusing specifically on cancer treatment-related modalities. Strategies and future directions for protection of the ovaries during cancer therapy, including ovarian transposition, and conformal radiation techniques are presented.

What is the best site for embryo deposition? A systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons

The site of embryo replacement has been postulated as being important to the success of IVF/ICSI. In order to determine the best site for embryo deposition during embryo transfer, a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing different uterine deposition sites was undertaken. Electronic (e.g. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS) and hand searches were performed to locate trials. Outcomes measures were the live-birth (LBR), ongoing pregnancy (OPR), and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR). Assessments of the endometrial cavity length (ECL) and the distance from the fundus to the tip of the catheter (DTC) were utilized. Six studies were identified, of which three were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Mantel-Haenszel method, utilizing the fixed-effects model. The LBR and OPR showed an increasing trend when transfers were performed to the lower half of the uterine cavity. For the DTC, all rates were significantly higher for the approximately 20 mm versus approximately 10 mm distance from the uterine fundus, supporting the results of the ECL analysis. The results of this systematic review show that there is limited evidence of the superiority of lower cavity transfers (e.g. approximately 20 mm) compared with the traditional high cavity (e.g. approximately 10 mm) transfers. More well-designed and powered randomized trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Prospective randomized comparison of Wallace and Labotect embryo transfer catheters

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of Wallace and Labotect embryo transfer catheters in a single assisted reproduction centre. A total of 260 women undergoing embryo transfer were randomized between Wallace and Labotect catheters. When both catheters failed to negotiate the cervical canal, the transfer was accomplished with a stiff catheter. Intention to treat analysis revealed that Wallace and Labotect embryo transfer catheters yielded statistically similar clinical pregnancy (44.6 versus 34.6%), implantation (23.2 versus 18.9%) and ongoing pregnancy (38.5 versus 27.7%) rates. As treated analysis revealed clinical pregnancy rates of 42.5 versus 35.4%, implantation rates of 22.3 versus 20.6% and ongoing pregnancy rates of 36.8 versus 28.3% with Wallace and Labotect catheters respectively. Catheter change due to unsuccessful negotiation of the internal cervical os was significantly more frequently necessary when embryo transfer was first intended with the Wallace than the Labotect catheter (P < 0.001; 33 and 2% respectively). Although not being statistically significant, the observed differences may be regarded as clinically important and may reach statistical significance in larger trials. More trials are necessary before reaching a definitive conclusion regarding the performance of the Labotect embryo transfer catheter.

The influence of abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer on pregnancy rate: a preliminary report

To determine whether the use of abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves the clinical pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, 50 fresh cycles with day 3 embryo transfer were studied; 27 patients were randomized to ultrasound-guided transfers, and 23 patients were randomized to clinical touch transfers. Although the clinical pregnancy rate was not statistically different (18.5% in the ultrasound-guided group vs. 17.4% in the clinical touch group), the use of abdominal ultrasound during the embryo transfer procedure provided a greater degree of confidence and satisfaction to both patients and physicians.

Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women

BACKGROUND

Many women undergoing an Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) cycle will not achieve a live birth. Failure at the embryo transfer stage may be due to poor embryo quality, lack of uterine receptivity, or the transfer technique itself. Numerous methods, including the use of ultrasound guidance for proper catheter placement in the endometrial cavity, have been suggested as a means of improving the technique of embryo transfer. This review evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasound (UGET) in comparison with 'clinical touch' embryo transfer (CTET) the traditional method of embryo transfer.

OBJECTIVES

:To determine whether ultrasound guidance influences treatment outcomes in women undergoing embryo transfer (ET) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

All electronic databases were searched on 20 th August 2006. We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (searched August 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1970-2006), EMBASE (1985-2006), BIO Extracts (1980-2006). Relevant conference proceedings were also hand searched (ASRM, ESHRE and FIGO).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised controlled trials were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data from those selected.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen out of fifteen identified studies were eligible for analysis. No study reported live births, however, personal communication resulted in data relating to this outcome being obtained in two of the studies. Six studies reported on ongoing pregnancies. The live birth/ ongoing pregnancies per woman randomised associated with UGET (452/1376) was significantly higher than for clinical touch (353/1338) OR 1.40, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.66, P<0.0001). This means, for example, that for a population of women with a 25% chance of pregnancy using clinical touch this would be increased to 32% (28% to 46%) by using UGET. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two comparison groups with the exception of blood on the catheter.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The studies are limited by their quality with only one of the thirteen studies reporting details of both computerised randomisation techniques and adequate allocation concealment. Ultrasound guidance does appear to improve the chances of live/ongoing and clinical pregnancies compared with clinical touch methods. The quality of future studies should be improved with adequate reporting of randomisation, allocation concealment, and power calculations. The primary outcome measure of future studies should be the reporting of live births per woman randomised.

Use of phenazopyridine for reducing discomfort during embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

The embryo transfer is a critical part of in vitro fertilization. When performed under abdominal ultrasound guidance, the embryo transfer procedure requires a full bladder. Patients often state that the discomfort of the distended bladder causes more pain than the actual transfer procedure. Phenazopyridine HCl is a bladder analgesic. The objective of this study was to determine if a single dose of phenazopyridine prior to embryo transfer reduces patient discomfort during that procedure.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial.

SETTING

University-based Reproductive Medicine practice.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty-five reproductive age infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

INTERVENTION(S)

Phenazopyridine (200 mg) or placebo taken 1 hour prior to embryo transfer utilizing transabdominal sonography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pain as assessed by visual analogue pain scale and physician and nurse assessment of patient discomfort.

RESULT(S)

Study groups were similar in their demographic background. Mean pain score as assessed by a visual analogue pain scale during the procedure was 2.95 +/- 2.4 in the placebo group, and 3.03 +/- 2.6 in the active medication group (NS). There were also no significant differences in the observations of pain assessments.

CONCLUSION(S)

Phenazopyridine used in a single dose prior to embryo transfer does not alleviate patient discomfort.

Is what we clearly see really so obvious? Ultrasonography and transcervical embryo transfer—a review

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the role of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (ET) and its influence on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF).

DESIGN

Medline review of published manuscripts.

RESULT(S)

Studies evaluating the role of ultrasound-assisted ET have had mixed results, and although meta-analysis of prospective trials suggests an improvement in outcome, limitations in study design may overstate the effect of ultrasonography. Other ET techniques may eliminate the advantages provided by ultrasonography, limiting its benefit to specific clinical scenarios. However, because no trial has demonstrated an adverse effect and because cases that may benefit from its use often cannot be predicted reliably, the routine application of ultrasonography can be justified.

Ultrasonographic-guided embryo transfer does not enhance pregnancy rates compared with embryo transfer based on previous uterine length measurement

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy rates (PRs) after ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and embryo transfer based on ultrasonographic length measurement.

DESIGN

Prospective intervention group combined with retrospective control group.

SETTING

University fertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

INTERVENTION(S)

Transabdominal ultrasonographic guidance at embryo transfer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy and implantation rates.

RESULT(S)

In 367 ultrasound-guided embryo transfers clinical PR, ongoing PR, and implantation rate were 35.1%, 31.1%, and 24.3%, respectively. In 363 embryo transfers based on previous ultrasonographic length measurement, the rates were 33.9%, 29.5%, and 24.2%, respectively. There were no statistical significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Ultrasonographic guidance does not show any benefit in terms of PR and implantation rate compared to previous ultrasonographic length measurement, an other precise and atraumatic transfer technique.

Firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons

A systematic review of published evidence on firm embryo transfer catheters is presented. Extensive searches were conducted for full-text manuscripts, abstracts, ongoing and unpublished trials. Direct and adjusted indirect comparisons were undertaken, where appropriate. Twenty-six randomized controlled trials comparing embryo transfer catheters were identified. Only two trials (314 transfers) compared different firm embryo catheters. Using direct comparison, both the Tom Cat and Tefcat catheters demonstrated statistically significant increased chances of clinical pregnancy compared with the Tight Difficult Transfer (TDT) catheter (P=0.007; OR=3.67, 95% CI=1.48-9.10 and P<0.0001; OR=4.71, 95% CI=2.34-9.48 respectively). The implantation rates were also higher with the Tom Cat and Tefcat catheters than the TDT catheter (P=0.005; OR=3.67, 95% CI=1.48-9.10 and P<0.00001; OR=4.29, 95% CI=2.45-7.50 respectively). Using adjusted indirect comparison, Tom Cat and Tefcat catheters were compared, and shown to have similar pregnancy and implantation rates (OR=0.99; 95% CI=-0.87-1.79 and OR=0.86; 95% CI=-0.77-1.35). In conclusion, both Tom Cat and Tefcat catheters give better outcomes than the TDT catheter, but are similar to each other.

A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative efficacy of different types of embryo transfer (ET) catheters.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized, controlled trials comparing at least two different ET catheters.

SETTING

Infertility centers providing treatment with in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

PATIENT(S)

Women undergoing ET.

INTERVENTION(S)

Embryo transfer with soft or hard catheters.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

A total of seven prospective trials were identified that compared soft (Cook or Wallace) catheters with hard (TDT, Frydman, Tomcat, Rocket) catheters. The meta-analysis demonstrated an increased chance of clinical pregnancy when soft ET catheters were used. The TDT catheter was compared against both soft catheters and other hard catheters, showing decreased chance of clinical pregnancy when the TDT catheter was used. Six more prospective trials were identified comparing the Cook and Wallace soft catheters, and the meta-analysis of these data showed no demonstrable difference in clinical pregnancy rates.

CONCLUSION(S)

An increased chance of clinical pregnancy is achieved when soft ET catheters are used. There appears to be little difference between the Cook and Wallace soft catheters.

Embryo transfer: factors involved in optimizing the success

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Embryo transfer is arguably the most critical step in assisted reproduction. The purpose of this article is to review the different aspects of the procedure in the light of recent evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomized trials have shown that significantly higher pregnancy rates are obtained when embryo transfer is performed under ultrasound guidance, the embryos are deposited in the middle part of the uterine cavity, an atraumatic technique is used and when low-dose aspirin is routinely administered following the procedure. Blood in the catheter and leaving the embryos inside it for more than 120 s diminish the pregnancy rate significantly. Air in the catheter, immediate removal of the catheter, performing two transfers in the same cycle, prolonged bed rest, sexual intercourse after embryo transfer or the use of sildenafil do not affect the results. Based on currently available evidence, Cochrane reviews have concluded that the live birth rate is not increased by delaying embryo transfer from day two to three or to the blastocyst stage, and that single embryo transfer leads to lower live birth rates than the transfer of two embryos. The value of a mock transfer a few days before the actual procedure has been challenged as the position of the uterus may change. The effect of holding the cervix with a volsellum, routinely administering antibiotics and the superiority of one catheter over the others is still to be determined.

SUMMARY

Recent studies confirm the importance of the various aspects of embryo transfer. More randomized studies are needed to further evaluate them.

Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential

In spite of recent improvements in IVF, pregnancy rates have not increased significantly and one of the major problems remains the high multiple pregnancy rate. Better criteria are therefore necessary to establish the viability of a transferable embryo. Early prognosis of the developmental fate of the oocyte would help in selecting the best embryos to transfer, but non-invasive selection at the oocyte stage (extracytoplasmic and intracytoplasmic morphology) has proved to be of little prognostic value. Recently, it has been shown that follicular vascularization appears to be predictive of oocyte developmental fate, making it a good first-step approach for selection. Observation of pronuclei patterns at the zygote stage appears to offer an additional prognostic tool, correlating well with IVF outcome. Morphological evaluation of the embryo at days 2-3 remains the most used and valid method of selection, even though it is not sufficient to select embryos with the higher implantation potential. Blastocyst culture is another possible strategy for selecting the best embryos with reduced risk of aneuploidies, though not all major chromosomal aberrations are excluded by prolonged in-vitro culture. In summary, selecting the best embryo for transfer is a decision that should be based on choices made during the different stages of assisted reproductive technologies.

Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis*

BACKGROUND

The true impact of the embryo transfer catheter choice on an IVF programme has not been fully examined. We therefore decided to systematically review the evidence provided in the literature so that we may evaluate a single variable in relation to a successful transfer, the firmness of the embryo transfer catheter.

METHODS

An extensive computerized search was conducted for all relevant articles published as full text, or abstracts, and critically appraised. In addition, a hand search was undertaken to locate any further trials.

RESULTS

A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the types of embryo transfer catheters were identified. Only ten of these trials, including 4141 embryo transfers, compared soft versus firm embryo catheters. Pooling of the results demonstrated a statistically significantly increased chance of clinical pregnancy following embryo transfer using the soft (643/2109) versus firm (488/2032) catheters [P = 0.01; odds ratio (OR) = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.79]. When only the truly RCT were analysed, the results were again still in favour of using the soft embryo transfer catheters [soft (432/1403) versus firm (330/1402)], but with a greater significance (P < 0.00001; OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.26-1.77).

CONCLUSION

Using soft embryo transfer catheters for embryo transfer results in a significantly higher pregnancy rate as compared to firm catheters.

Ultrasound-guided trial transfer may be beneficial in preparation for an IVF cycle

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to determine if ultrasound-guided trial transfer (UTT) in the office in preparation for an IVF cycle can be utilized as an alternative and/or adjunct to ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (UGET).

METHODS

Patients planning to undergo an IVF cycle at an academic centre were included. Each patient underwent an UTT in the office by the same practitioner. The difference in length (DL), if any, was measured from the perceived top of the uterine cavity (catheter tip) to the actual cavity apex as visualized by ultrasound.

RESULTS

Of the 64 patients enrolled, 19 patients (29.7%) had a measurable DL, of which 14 (21.9%) had a DL exists 0.5 cm, and nine (14.1%) had a DL exists 1.0 cm. Significant differences were noted between patients when comparing DL to previous pregnancy status and the total cavity depth (sounding depth + DL) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

UTT in the office setting appears to be beneficial in preparation for an IVF cycle with embryo transfer.

Abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: experiences from 330 clinical investigations

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer on the rate of implantation and clinical pregnancy.

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with the traditional method. A total of 330 patients were randomly divided into two groups on the day of embryo transfer. For the cases (n = 178), ultrasound-guided was used; controls (n = 152) was performed using routine methods.

RESULTS

The rate of implantation and clinical pregnancy for the cases (19.6 and 37.1%, respectively) was significantly higher than for the controls (12.6 and 25%, respectively; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer can significantly increase the rate of implantation and clinical pregnancy, and should be recommended as a routine procedure in the process of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

Ultrasound guidance is not necessary during easy embryo transfers

PURPOSE

To determine whether the use of ultrasound (US) to guide embryo transfer (ET) in a population previously defined as likely to have easy transfer would change the implantation and pregnancy rates in an ICSI program.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients identified as likely to have easy transfer after mock transfer were divided into two groups: Group I, US-guided ET (N = 50) and Group II, ET without the aid of US (N = 50).

RESULTS

Implantation and pregnancy rates were similar (p = 0.51, p = 0.29) for Group I (19.6%, 42%) and Group II (16.3%, 30%), as also was the abortion rate (p = 0.55) (Group I: 1/21; Group II: 2/15).

CONCLUSION

As long as previous mock transfers are routinely performed during a cycle preceding assisted reproduction and the clinician considers transfer to be easy, ultrasound does not benefit the process of embryo transfer.

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and the accuracy of trial embryo transfer

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested that ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (UG-ET) may improve the outcome in IVF; however, several factors may account for the improvement in pregnancy rate. This study examines the use of ultrasound to determine the accuracy of trial transfer (TT) in preparation for ET.

METHODS

Sixty-seven consecutive patients prospectively underwent UG-ET over a 2 month period. Total cavity length by US was compared with the length noted by TT. A difference of > or = 1 cm was considered significant. All embryos were placed within 1-2 cm of the fundus by US.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (29.9%) had a difference of > or = 1 cm and 13 patients (19.4%) had a difference of < or = 1.5 cm. Patients with a difference of > or = 1 or > or = 1.5 cm had a significantly greater depth at transfer (P < 0.001) and uterine cavity length (P < 0.001) when compared with patients without a difference. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, delivery and overall miscarriage rates did not differ between patients with a difference of > or = 1 or > or = 1.5 cm versus no difference. There were no ectopic pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Nineteen percent of patients had a discrepancy of > or = 1.5 cm and approximately 30% had a difference of > or = 1 cm from TT at UG-ET, suggesting a benefit to UG-ET. A large prospective randomized trial comparing UG-ET with blind transfer is required to assess further if UG-ET should be used in all cases of ET.

Implantation Failure in Assisted Reproduction Technology and a Critical Approach to Treatment

In this article, we review the literature and our personal experience regarding the many factors that appear to influence implantation rate. Oocyte quality, as determined by patient age and aneuploidies, probably plays a major role in RIF. However, a panoply of other factors have been brought under investigation, quite often with contradictory results and additional intriguing questions to be studied. Infections of the vagina, cervix, and endometrium, the role of mucus aspiration and washing of the cervix on transfer, the role of catheter guidance for a correct transfer and potion of embryos, the effect of mock transfer, and the role of hysteroscopy and its timing before transfer procedures are analyzed both as a review of the literature and as opinions and data from our experience. Many of these factors are interlaced and from the apparently simple issue of trauma, to infections and immune modulation of hatching and implantation, a biological continuum can easily be identified. The impact of abnormalities of the immune system and of homeostasis abnormalities is also covered in a brief overview of reported works and our experience. These latter areas probably constitute the common biological background of all other external factors that, however, the skilled must equip themselves for improving implantation success.

Middle to lower uterine segment embryo transfer improves implantation and pregnancy rates compared with fundal embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in pregnancy and implantation rates as a function of the embryo placement.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary care center.

SUBJECT(S)

All fresh, nondonor IVF cycles performed in 2001.

INTERVENTION(S)

Alteration in embryo transfer (ET) target location from the fundal region to the middle to lower uterine segment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rate (sonographic sac evidence/number of transfer cycles), implantation rate (number of sacs/number of embryos transferred), patient age, peak E(2), and fertilization rate.

RESULT(S)

A total of 393 fundal and 273 lower to middle uterine segment ETs were performed. The pregnancy (PR), implantation, and birth rates were significantly higher after a middle to lower uterine segment ET compared with fundal ET (39.6% vs. 31.2%; 21% vs. 14%; and 34.1% vs. 26.2%, respectively). Groups did not differ regarding patient age, basal FSH, peak E(2), number of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, fertilization rate, embryo quality, or number of embryos transferred.

CONCLUSION(S)

Both PR and implantation rates are favorably affected by directing embryo placement to the lower to middle uterine segment. By some unknown mechanism, it appears that this endometrial location provides a more favorable region for embryo deposition.

Validity of trans-rectal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer against retroflexed uterus

Background:  Embryo transfer is one of the most critical steps affecting the success of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer. It has been reported that uterine contraction caused by touching the uterine fundus at the time of embryo transfer decreased the pregnancy rate. It was demonstrated that there is a significant rise in the pregnancy rate by adequate positioning of embryos. Transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer has been reported to improve the pregnancy rate compared with the clinical touch method. The improvement of the pregnancy rate under ultrasound guidance can be attributed to the accurate positioning of the embryos aided by good visualization without touching the uterine fundus. However, sometimes difficulties are encountered when visualizing the tip of the catheter in cases where the patient has a retroflexed uterus. Methods:  In the present study, we investigated the difference in the pregnancy rates and in the implantation rates between transabdominal ultrasound-guided group and trans-rectal ultrasound-guided group in retroflexed cases. Results and Conclusion:  We found that the pregnancy rate and the implantation rate were higher among the trans-rectal group compared with the transabdominal group in retroflexed cases. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. (Reprod Med Biol 2003; 2: 159-163).

Impact des techniques de transfert sur l’implantation

Embryo transfer is an important step in the success of IVF treatment. All efforts should be made to avoid difficult embryo transfers provoking bleeding or uterine contractions. Evaluation before IVF treatment, including a trial transfer and a uterine ultrasonography, should allow one to evaluate the transfer step, anticipate problems, and thus improve treatment. An hysteroscopy can be useful for uterine cavity exploration. It is also important to remove cervical mucus before introduce the transfer catheter. It is essential to deposit embryos as gently as possible during IVF, avoiding manoeuvres that might trigger uterine contractions which could adversely affect the results of this treatment. Soft catheters perform better, and ultrasound-guidance facilitates embryo transfer. Progesterone administration starting on the day of oocyte retrieval induces a decrease in uterine contraction frequency on the day of ET (embryo transfer). Both Wallace and CDD catheters perform similarly. Trial catheterization on the day of ET could prevent most of the unanticipated procedural difficulties during the transfer.

Influence of embryo transfer depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of transfer distance from the fundus (TDF) on clinical pregnancy rate (PR) and ectopic pregnancy rate.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort. Between January 2000 and December 2001, 699 ultrasound (US)-guided embryo transfers were conducted. Mock transfer was performed to measure uterine cavity depth 1 month before treatment. Cavity depth was measured by abdominal US before the transfer, from the vaginal stripe to the fundus. Transfers were performed with a Wallace embryo transfer catheter (Cooper Surgical, Shelton, CT) using US and physician's judgment of cavity depth. Transfer distance from the fundus was calculated by subtracting the depth of catheter insertion from the cavity depth, as determined by US or by mock transfer. Statistical analyses were performed by building a multivariable logistic regression model to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

SETTING

Women aged 23 to 43 years who are in a university-affiliated, community-based IVF program in Springfield, Massachusetts.

PATIENT(S)

All patients enrolled in IVF program undergoing embryo transfer.

INTERVENTION(S)

No patient received any additional procedure or intervention. All of the measurements obtained with the embryo catheter and the transvaginal ultrasound were part of the program's protocol for the embryo transfer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Odds ratio examining relationship between embryo transfer depth and PR.Clinical, implantation, and ectopic PR were 37%, 20%, and 2.1%. Cavity depth by US differed from cavity depth by mock by at least 10 mm in >30% of cases. The TDF by US was highly predictive of PR; TDF by mock was not predictive of PR. Increasing the TDF by US resulted in significantly increased PR as well as lower ectopic rates. Using regression analysis, the odds ratio for TDF by US was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.07-1.14). This suggests that for every additional millimeter embryos are deposited away from the fundus, the odds of clinical pregnancy increased by 11%.

CONCLUSION(S)

After controlling for potential confounders, the clinical PR is significantly influenced by the transfer distance from the fundus. Cavity depth by US is clinically useful to determine the depth beyond which catheter insertion should not occur.

The Impact of Embryo Transfer on Implantation—A Review

Embryo transfer has received little clinical attention and has been, until recently, the most inefficient step in in-vitro fertilization (IVF). In this article, the authors review the literature and their personal experience regarding the process of intrauterine transfer of embryos, which remains the object of much discussion. Factors which appear to influence implantation rates are: contamination of the catheter tip with cervical bacteria, stimulation of uterine contractions during the procedure, the type of catheter, ultrasound guidance during the transfer, and the position of the embryos in the uterine cavity. Easy and atraumatic transfer is essential for successful implantation and the embryos need to be placed in the middle of the cavity, away from the fundus. Knowing, beforehand, the position and length of the uterus can provide better results and may reduce the rate of ectopic pregnancies. Evidence from randomized studies has supported this claim. Despite the number of available studies controlling certain variables, most authors, even using the same catheter, ultrasound guidance and/or a trial transfer use different protocols or similar instruments in different ways. Standardization of the transcervical intrauterine transfer of embryos in a large randomized study is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. The goal of improved implantation and pregnancy rates deserve these efforts.

A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative efficacy of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and embryo transfer by clinical touch alone.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with embryo transfer by clinical touch alone.

SETTING

Infertility centers providing treatment with in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer.

PATIENT(S)

Women undergoing embryo transfer.

INTERVENTION(S)

Embryo transfer with or without transabdominal ultrasound guidance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate.

RESULT(S)

A total of eight prospective controlled trials were identified. Of these studies, four were nonrandomized or quasi-randomized and four were genuinely randomized. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased chance of clinical pregnancy following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in all studies and in the genuinely randomized subgroup. The embryo implantation rate was also significantly increased following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION(S)

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer significantly increases the chance of clinical pregnancy and significantly increases the embryo implantation rate.

Endometrial lesions caused by catheters used for embryo transfers: a preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

To visualize by microhysteroscopy any possible lesions on the endocervix and endometrium made by the catheters commonly used for embryo transfer (ET).

DESIGN

Prospective descriptive study. Tertiary fertility center (IFER).

PATIENT(S)

Twenty-three infertile patients underwent a mock transfer before a microhysteroscopy during the postovulatory phase (days 2-5 after ovulation) of the cycle with a Tomcat catheter (n = 5), Frydman's catheter (n = 5), Frydman's set (n = 3), or Wallace's catheter (n = 10).

INTERVENTION(S)

Mock ETs and subsequent mycrohysteroscopies.Visualization, description, and documentation of endocervical and endometrial lesions.

RESULT(S)

The lesions in all 23 patients were described and documented (tunnel-like, groove-like, punch-out, crater-like). The Wallace catheter appears to be less traumatic to the endometrium (but it seems that it is important to take care to not pass the internal os with the outer sheath). The Tomcat catheter and the Frydman's set caused the more significant lesions that were observed.

CONCLUSION(S)

In this preliminary study, for the first time endometrial lesions caused by the ET catheters were directly visualized and documented. Some of these observed lesions appear to be capable of compromising the success of ET.

The transfer point is a novel measure of embryo placement

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between IVF-ET pregnancy outcomes and measures of embryo placement.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENT(S)

Twenty-three patients who underwent two ultrasonography-guided ETs, of which one resulted in a clinical pregnancy and the other did not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Point of embryo placement normalized to the endometrial cavity length (the transfer point), distance from the point of embryo placement to the uterine fundus, time required for ET, contact with the uterine fundus, and evidence of trauma. Videotaped ETs were quantitatively analyzed.

RESULT(S)

From February 1, 2000, to March 31, 2001, videotaped ETs from 23 pairs of pregnant and nonpregnant cycles were identified. Embryo placement was more shallow in pregnancy cycles than in nonpregnancy cycles. The groups did not differ in the absolute distance of embryo placement to the fundus, ovarian stimulation, or other features of the ET.

CONCLUSION(S)

The transfer point may serve as a better marker of embryo position than does the absolute distance to the uterine fundus.

Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer--experience from a single provider

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood during embryo transfer on the results of in vitro fertilization and ICSI.

METHODS

A cohort of 784 consecutive cycles in 655 in vitro fertilization and ICSI patients were studied.

RESULTS

Negotiating the cervix, using the volsellum, presence of blood on the catheter wall or on the cervix did not affect the results. Changing the catheter and blood on the catheter tip reduced the pregnancy (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05) and implantation rates (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01). The Ultrasoft catheter produced higher pregnancy (P < 0.0005) and implantation rates (P < 0.01) compared to the more rigid Frydman catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

Negotiation of the cervix, the use of a volsellum, and the presence of blood on the catheter wall or on the cervix do not affect the results. Changing the catheter and blood on the catheter tip significantly diminish the pregnancy and implantation rates. Soft catheters perform better.