Reaction of swine to oil-adjuvanted inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine inoculated by intramuscular and subcutaneous routes

Emergency vaccination of pigs against foot-and-mouth disease: protection against disease and reduction in contact transmission

The protective ability of two novel oil-based FMD vaccines in pigs was examined. Both vaccine formulations were shown to protect pigs against airborne challenge with homologous FMDV within four days of vaccination, but not at two and three days post-vaccination. Protection was associated with the induction of variable and low titre serum antibody responses. A transmission study showed that protective immunisation resulted in reduced virus excretion. Vaccination at seven days, but not at four days, prior to challenge prevented contact transmission of FMD. The two formulations tested in this study have the favourable characteristics of low viscosity, low reactivity and high potency emergency FMD vaccines for use in strategic vaccination campaigns to assist the control of outbreaks of FMD.

International bank for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine: assessment of Montanide ISA 25 and ISA 206, two commercially available oil adjuvants

The International Vaccine Bank at Pirbright has recently installed large-scale vaccine formulation equipment for the preparation of oil-adjuvanted vaccines. Such vaccines are claimed to offer a number of advantages over Al(OH)3, particularly their ability to raise better immunity in pigs. This paper reports on the potency in pigs, cattle and guinea-pigs of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines prepared with two novel oil adjuvants, Montanide ISA 25 and 206 (Seppic, Paris). The results indicate that vaccines adjuvanted with these oils retain potency for a longer period than our conventional aqueous formulation, following storage at +4 degrees C, and elicit good antibody responses in both pigs and cattle regardless of injection route. In addition they gave no evidence of toxicity or prolonged pyrexia following their administration. Local reactions at the site of inoculation were not observed in cattle vaccinated intramuscularly, even following a booster dose. Pigs vaccinated intramuscularly only showed local reactions if the volume administered exceeded the 2.0 ml dose or the animals received a second vaccination. These observations on the efficacy of such oil formulated vaccines suggest that they have potential as an alternative to the current aqueous formulation.