Influence of aminophylline and 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline on the anticonvulsive action of diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital, and valproate against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice

A potential anti-asthmatic drug, CR 2039, enhances the anticonvulsive activity of some antiepileptic drugs against pentetrazol in mice

CR 2039 (4-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-N-[4-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl]phenylbenzam ide), in doses of 10, 20, and 100 mg/kg i.p., did not modify the seizure pattern observed after subcutaneous pentetrazol, administered at its CD97 of 90 mg/kg for the clonic phase. However, when combined with antiepileptic drugs, this phenylbenzamide derivative (20 mg/kg) converted the subprotective doses of ethosuximide (100 mg/kg) or valproate (100 mg/kg) against the clonic phase into anticonvulsive ones. The protection observed was comparable to that noted after doubling the doses of these antiepileptics. Also, a combination of valproate (100 mg/kg) with CR 2039 (10 mg/kg) resulted in a clear-cut protection against clonic seizures induced by pentetrazol. The protective efficacy of clonazepam was not affected by the phenylbenzamide derivative up to 40 mg/kg. The potentiation of the anticonvulsive activity of ethosuximide or valproate was not accompanied by increased adverse effects, evaluated in the chimney test (motor coordination) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Finally, CR 2039 (20 mg/kg) did not alter the plasma levels of the antiepileptic drugs studied, which speaks against a pharmacokinetic mechanism in the observed results. In conclusion, CR 2039 seems devoid of a hazardous influence of the anti-asthmatic drug, aminophylline, on the anticonvulsive effects of conventional antiepileptics.

N6-2-(4-aminophenyl)ethyl-adenosine enhances the anticonvulsive activity of antiepileptic drugs

N6-2-(4-Aminophenyl)ethyl-adenosine (APNEA, a non-selective agonist of the adenosine A3 receptors), at the subprotective dose of 1 mg/kg against electroconvulsions, significantly potentiated the anticonvulsive action of phenobarbital, diphenylhydantoin and valproate against maximal electroshock, being ineffective at lower doses. APNEA (0.0039-1 mg/kg) also enhanced the protective activity of carbamazepine. Aminophylline (5 mg/kg) and 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (8-CPX, 5 mg/kg), reversed the APNEA (1 mg/kg)-induced enhancement of the anticonvulsive action of phenobarbital, diphenylhydantoin and valproate, but not that of carbamazepine produced by APNEA at 0.0039 mg/kg. The adenosine agonist did not alter the plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs studied, so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable. Finally, APNEA (0.0156 and 1 mg/kg) administered alone or in combination with carbamazepine significantly decreased the body temperature and impaired long-term memory. Our results suggest that APNEA at low doses potentiates the protective activity of carbamazepine most likely through the A subtype of adenosine receptors. At higher doses, APNEA seems to enhance the anticonvulsive effect of other antiepileptics via adenosine A1 receptors.

Chronic caffeine and the anticonvulsant potency of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock

The anticonvulsant activities of intraperitoneally (IP) given carbamazepine (CBZ) or diphenylhydantoin (DPH), expressed as their respective ED50 values in mg/kg, were assessed after caffeine (CAFF) treatment against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. CAFF was administered IP either in a single dose or every 12 h for 3 (subchronic CAFF) and 14 days (chronic CAFF). Moreover, the protective activity of the antiepileptics was determined in mice which, following chronic CAFF, received a challenge dose of CAFF after either 24 or 72 h since CAFF withdrawal. A significant reduction of the protective efficacy of CBZ was observed after chronic CAFF treatment (in a dose of 11.55 mg/kg), while a single dose and a 3-day treatment did not alter the action of CBZ. In case of CAFF (23.1 mg/kg), a significant elevation of CBZ's ED50 value was noted after 3- and 14-day treatments with CAFF. In contrast, chronic CAFF (23.1-46.2 mg/kg) decreased the anticonvulsive activity of DPH to the same extent as did acute CAFF. Moreover the ED50 values for both, CBZ and DPH, evaluated 24 h after a 14-day treatment with CAFF (in doses of 23.1 and 46.2 mg/kg, respectively), were significantly elevated compared to respective control groups. A strong impairment of the anticon-vulsant action of CBZ and DPH was observed when a challenge dose of CAFF was injected following either 24 or 72 h injection-free time. Pharmacokinetic interactions do not seem to explain the obtained results in terms of total plasma levels of the antiepileptics after chronic treatment with CAFF. Our results may suggest that epileptic patients should avoid CAFF-containing beverages and medicines.

Anticonvulsant activity of phenobarbital and valproate against maximal electroshock in mice during chronic treatment with caffeine and caffeine discontinuation

We evaluated the protective activity (expressed as ED50 values in mg/kg of phenobarbital (PB, 120 min before testing) and valproate (30 min) alone or combined with caffeine in male mice with seizures induced by maximal electroshock (MES). Both antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were administered by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection in a single dose to mice receiving intraperitoneal caffeine either in a single dose 30 min before the test or as pretreatment every 12 h for 3 and 14 days. In addition, we determined the ED50 values of the AEDs 24 and 72 h after 14-day treatment with caffeine. Finally, we studied the influence of a challenge dose of caffeine, injected in mice 24 and 72 h after 14 days of treatment with caffeine, on the protective activity of PB or VPA. Caffeine in a single dose of 23.1 mg/kg reduced the anticonvulsant effect of PB. Its protective activity was further impaired after 3 and 14 days of caffeine treatment. The ED50 for VPA was significantly increased both by the single dose of caffeine and by chronic treatment. The anticonvulsant activity of PB and VPA measured 24 and 72 h after 14-day treatment with caffeine did not differ from control values, but a challenge dose of caffeine injected 24 or 72 h after daily injections for 14 days resulted in a significant reduction in the protective activity of both AEDs. Measurement of the total plasma levels of caffeine, VPA, and PB did not suggest pharmacokinetic interactions as an explanation for our results. Our results indicate that chronic caffeine exposure may progressively reduce the antiepileptic potency of VPA and PB.

Influence of aminophylline and strychnine on the protective activity of excitatory amino acid antagonists against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice

Aminophylline reversed the protective action of both, D-3-(2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid (D-CPP-ene-a competitive NMDA antagonist) and valproate (used as a conventional antiepileptic drug for comparative purposes) against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. The respective ED50 values of aminophylline were 55.7 and 98.4 mg/kg i.p. However, aminophylline (up to 100 mg/kg i.p.) did not influence the protective efficacy of 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methyl- enedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine (GYKI 52466-a non-NMDA antagonist). Strychnine affected the protection provided by D-CPP-ene, GYKI 52466, and valproate against maximal electroshock-the ED50 values of strychnine for the reversal of the anticonvulsive effects of D-CPP-ene, GYKI 52466 or valproate were 0.082, 0.35 and 0.28 mg/kg s.c., respectively. An involvement of strychnine sensitive glycinergic receptor-mediated events in the mechanism of the anticonvulsive activity of excitatory amino acid antagonists and valproate may be postulated. The ineffectiveness of aminophylline to reduce the anticonvulsive effects of GYKI 52466 may distinguish a new class of antiepileptic drugs offering an advantage over conventional antiepileptics in patients with epilepsy, requiring aminophylline for pulmonary reasons.

Influence of a potential anti-asthmatic drug, CR 2039, upon the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

CR 2039 [[4-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-N-(4-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl]phenylbenza m ide], in doses of 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg i.p., significantly elevated the threshold for electroconvulsions, increasing the CS50 (current strength 50% in mA) values from 6.3 to 7.2, 7.5, and 7.6 mA, respectively. When combined with carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, or valproate, CR 2039 (5 and 10 mg/kg) potentiated the anticonvulsive action of these antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions which was reflected by significant decreases in the respective ED50s (in mg/kg). The protective efficacy of phenobarbital was not affected by the phenylbenzamide derivative. The potentiation of the anticonvulsive activity of three antiepileptics was not accompanied by increased adverse effects, evaluated in the chimney test (motor coordination) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Finally, CR 2039 (10 mg/kg) did not alter the plasma levels of the antiepileptic drugs studied which speaks against a pharmacokinetic mechanism in the observed results. It is concluded that CR 2039 may prove a safer anti-asthmatic drug for the use in epileptic patients than aminophylline which, either acutely or chronically, considerably impaired the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptics.