Role of lysine in the replication of reovirus. II. Characterization of empties and effect on macromolecular synthesis

Reovirus variants with mutations in genome segments S1 and L2 exhibit enhanced virion infectivity and superior oncolysis

Reovirus preferentially replicates in transformed cells and is being explored as a cancer therapy. Immunological and physical barriers to virotherapy inspired a quest for reovirus variants with enhanced oncolytic potency. Using a classical genetics approach, we isolated two reovirus variants (T3v1 and T3v2) with superior replication relative to wild-type reovirus serotype 3 Dearing (T3wt) on various human and mouse tumorigenic cell lines. Unique mutations in reovirus λ2 vertex protein and σ1 cell attachment protein were associated with the large plaque-forming phenotype of T3v1 and T3v2, respectively. Both T3v1 and T3v2 exhibited higher infectivity (i.e., a higher PFU-to-particle ratio) than T3wt. A detailed analysis of virus replication revealed that virus cell binding and uncoating were equivalent for variant and wild-type reoviruses. However, T3v1 and T3v2 were significantly more efficient than T3wt in initiating productive infection. Thus, when cells were infected with equivalent input virus particles, T3v1 and T3v2 produced significantly higher levels of early viral RNAs relative to T3wt. Subsequent steps of virus replication (viral RNA and protein synthesis, virus assembly, and cell death) were equivalent for all three viruses. In a syngeneic mouse model of melanoma, both T3v1 and T3v2 prolonged mouse survival compared to wild-type reovirus. Our studies reveal that oncolytic potency of reovirus can be improved through distinct mutations that increase the infectivity of reovirus particles.

The preferential cytotoxicity of reovirus for certain transformed cell lines

The susceptibility of a variety of cell lines of different mammalian origin to cytotoxic (CT) induction by either ultraviolet light-irradiated reovirus type 2 (UVR2) or viable reovirus type 2 plus the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, was examined. The following groups of cells were found to be susceptible to CT-induction: certain tumor cells and spontaneously transformed cell lines of human origin and certain virally and spontaneously transformed cell lines of murine origin. The following groups of cells were found to be resistant: normal human diploid cell lines, primary and continuous cell cultures of subhuman primates, primary mouse cells, normal rat kidney cells and baby hamster kidney cells. Susceptibility to CT-induction could not be related to the adsorption of virus to cells, nor to the capacity of the cell to support virus replication.

Induction of interferon in L cells by reoviruses

L cell cultures challenged with reoviruses types 1 and 3 produced little to no detectable interferon under conditions which permitted virus replication and under conditions which prevented replication of a temperature-sensitive mutant strain of reovirus type 3 (ts-1). Ultraviolet-irradiated reoviruses and double-stranded ribonucleic acids extracted from purified reovirus type 3 also induced little to no interferon in L cell cultures. Under similar conditions, MM virus proved to be an effective inducer of interferon. Exposure of L cells to interferon prior to challenge with virus (priming) failed to enhance interferon production upon subsequent challenge with reovirus although priming increased the amount of interferon produced following MM virus challenge. L cell cultures that were challenged with reovirus type 3 and subsequently with either MM or Colorado tick fever viruses produced similar titers of interferon as cell cultures that were challenged with either MM or Colorado tick fever virus alone, respectively. These data show that the presence of production of reovirus type 3 double-stranded ribonucleic acid is not sufficient for induction of interferon in L cell cultures and that additional processes which are required for induction of interferon in L cell cultures are not expressed by reovirus type 3.

Reovirus: effect of noninfective viral components on cellular deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis

We determined the effects of noninfective reovirus components on cellular deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis. Reovirus inactivated by ultraviolet light inhibited cellular DNA synthesis, whereas reovirus cores and empty capsids did not. Both cores and empty capsids were adsorbed to cells. Adenine-rich ribonucleic acid (RNA) from reovirus, adsorbed to cells in the presence of diethyl-aminoethyl-dextran, produced a partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. RNA was synthesized in the presence of actinomycin D after infection with ultraviolet light-irradiated reovirus, and this RNA synthesis was not due to multiplicity reactivation of virus infectivity. These data suggest that viral structural proteins do not inhibit DNA synthesis and that the inhibition produced by ultraviolet-irradiated virus may be mediated in part or in toto by a newly synthesized viral product.