Azathioprine-associated acute pancreatitis in the course of chronic active hepatitis

Drug induced pancreatitis: A systematic review of case reports to determine potential drug associations

OBJECTIVE

A current assessment of case reports of possible drug-induced pancreatitis is needed. We systematically reviewed the case report literature to identify drugs with potential associations with acute pancreatitis and the burden of evidence supporting these associations.

METHODS

A protocol was developed a priori (PROSPERO CRD42017060473). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and additional sources to identify cases of drug-induced pancreatitis that met accepted diagnostic criteria of acute pancreatitis. Cases caused by multiple drugs or combination therapy were excluded. Established systematic review methods were used for screening and data extraction. A classification system for associated drugs was developed a priori based upon the number of cases, re-challenge, exclusion of non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis, and consistency of latency.

RESULTS

Seven-hundred and thirteen cases of potential drug-induced pancreatitis were identified, implicating 213 unique drugs. The evidence base was poor: exclusion of non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis was incomplete or poorly reported in all cases, 47% had at least one underlying condition predisposing to acute pancreatitis, and causality assessment was not conducted in 81%. Forty-five drugs (21%) were classified as having the highest level of evidence regarding their association with acute pancreatitis; causality was deemed to be probable or definite for 19 of these drugs (42%). Fifty-seven drugs (27%) had the lowest level of evidence regarding an association with acute pancreatitis, being implicated in single case reports, without exclusion of other causes of acute pancreatitis.

DISCUSSION

Much of the case report evidence upon which drug-induced pancreatitis associations are based is tenuous. A greater emphasis on exclusion of all non-drug causes of acute pancreatitis and on quality reporting would improve the evidence base. It should be recognized that reviews of case reports, are valuable scoping tools but have limited strength to establish drug-induced pancreatitis associations.

REGISTRATION

CRD42017060473.

Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis in Adults: An Update

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) is a rare entity that is often challenging for clinicians. The aim of our study was to provide updated DIAP classes considering the updated definition of acute pancreatitis (AP) and in light of new medications and new case reports. A MEDLINE search (1950-2018) of the English language literature was performed looking for all adult (≥17 years old) human case reports with medication/drug induced as the cause of AP. The included case reports were required to provide the name of the drug, and diagnosis of AP must have been strictly established based on the revised Atlanta Classification criteria. A total of 183 medications were found to be implicated in 577 DIAP cases. A total of 78 cases were excluded because of minimal details or lack of definite diagnosis of AP. Drug-induced AP is rare, and most drugs cause mild DIAP. Only 2 drugs are well described in the literature to explain causation rather than association (azathioprine and didanosine). Larger case-control studies and a formal standardized DIAP reporting system are essential to study the true potential of the DIAP-implicated drugs described in this review.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based review

The diagnosis of drug-induced acute pancreatitis often is difficult to establish. Although some medications have been shown to cause acute pancreatitis with a large body of evidence, including rechallenge, some medications have been attributed as a cause of acute pancreatitis merely by a single published case report in which the investigators found no other cause. In addition, some medications reported to have caused acute pancreatitis have obvious patterns of presentation, including the time from initiation to the development of disease (latency). There also appear to be patterns in the severity of disease. After reviewing the literature, we have classified drugs that have been reported to cause acute pancreatitis based on the published weight of evidence for each agent and the pattern of clinical presentation. Based on our analysis of the level of evidence, 4 classes of drugs could be identified. Class I drugs include medications in which at least 1 case report described a recurrence of acute pancreatitis with a rechallenge with the drug. Class II drugs include drugs in which there is a consistent latency in 75% or more of the reported cases. Class III drugs include drugs that had 2 or more case reports published, but neither a rechallenge nor a consistent latency period. Class IV drugs were similar to class III drugs, but only 1 case report had been published. Our analysis allows an evidence-based approach when suspecting a drug as causing acute pancreatitis.

Azathioprine in dermatology: The past, the present, and the future

For several decades, dermatologists have utilized azathioprine to treat numerous debilitating skin diseases. This synthetic purine analog is derived from 6-mercaptopurine. It is thought to act by disrupting nucleic acid synthesis and has recently been found to interfere with T-cell activation. The most recognized uses of azathioprine in dermatology are for immunobullous diseases, generalized eczematous disorders, and photodermatoses. In this comprehensive review, the authors present recent advancements in the understanding of azathioprine and address aspects not covered in prior reviews. They (1) summarize the history of azathioprine; (2) discuss metabolism, integrating information from recent publications; (3) review the mechanism of action with attention paid to the activities of azathioprine not mediated by its 6-mercaptopurine metabolites and review new data about inhibition by azathioprine of the CD28 signal transduction pathway; (4) thoroughly examine thiopurine s-methyltransferase genetics, its clinical relevance, and interethnic variations; (5) review prior uses of azathioprine in the field of dermatology and grade the level of evidence; (6) discuss the use of azathioprine in pregnancy and pediatrics; review (7) key drug interactions and (8) adverse effects; (9) suggest a dosing and monitoring approach different from prior recommendations; and (10) explore the future of azathioprine, focusing on laboratory considerations and therapeutic application.

Drug-induced pancreatitis: an update

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many frequently prescribed drugs are suspected to cause acute pancreatitis (AP). The goal of this paper is to bring to light the often occult but real problem of drug-induced pancreatitis (DIP).

METHODS

We searched the National Library of Medicine/Pubmed for reported cases of DIP from 1966 to April 30, 2004. Medications implicated in AP are classified based on the strength of evidence into one of three classes of drugs associated with pancreatitis. We reviewed the top 100 prescription medications in the United States for their association with AP.

RESULTS

Class I medications (medications implicated in greater than 20 reported cases of acute pancreatitis with at least one documented case following reexposure): didanosine, asparaginase, azathioprine, valproic acid, pentavalent antimonials, pentamidine, mercaptopurine, mesalamine, estrogen preparations, opiates, tetracycline, cytarabine, steroids, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, sulfasalazine, furosemide, and sulindac. Class II medications (medications implicated in more than 10 cases of acute pancreatitis): rifampin, lamivudine, octreotide, carbamazepine, acetaminophen, phenformin, interferon alfa-2b, enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, cisplatin, erythromycin, and cyclopenthiazide. Class III medications (all medications reported to be associated with pancreatitis). Of the top 100 most frequently prescribed medications in the United States, 44 have been implicated in AP, 14 of them fall into either Class I or II of medications associated with AP.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adverse drug reactions, pancreatitis is often-ignored because of the difficulty in implicating a drug as its cause. The physician should have a high index of suspicion for DIP, especially in specific subpopulations such as geriatric patients who may be on multiple medications, HIV+ patients, cancer patients, and patients receiving immunomodulating agents.

The value of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute necrotising pancreatitis in a renal transplant patient

BACKGROUND

The incidence of acute pancreatitis after renal transplantation ranges around 1%, and the mortality rate is nearly 65%. Dynamic computed tomography (CT) scan and amylase levels are valuable in the diagnosis of this rare complication.

CASE OUTLINE

A 29-year-old man was hospitalised with cytomegalovirus (CMV) pancreatitis after renal transplantation. An initial CT scan showed an enlarged pancreas with hypodense, heterogeneous consistency and with peripancreatic, perihepatic, mesenteric and pelvic fluid collections. After initial conservative management, follow-up CT revealed pancreatic necrosis and abscess formation. The patient underwent necrosectomy and repeated drainage of abscess facilitated by a Bogota bag, but he died 60 days after admission and five surgical procedures.

DISCUSSION

CMV pancreatitis after renal transplantation is rare and frequently fatal. In the presence of an acute abdomen after renal transplantation, the diagnosis of pancreatitis should be considered. Dynamic CT scan and measurement of amylase levels are recommended.

Acute and chronic pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis has multiple causes, an unpredictable course, and myriad complications. The diagnosis relies on a combination of history, physical examination, serologic markers, and radiologic findings. The mainstay of therapy includes aggressive hydration, maintenance of NPO, and adequate analgesia with narcotics. Antibiotic and nutritional support with total parenteral nutrition should be used when appropriate.

Management of Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis can be mild or severe. Identifying causes helps in preventing recurrent episodes, management of complications, treatment of the underlying disorder, and/ or removal of an etiologic agent. Supportive care, pain control, nutrition, and antibiotic use are discussed. Overall, the goal is to prevent and minimize complications and reduce mortality. Chronic pancreatitis is complex, and the etiology of the abdominal pain is multifactorial. The goal is to eliminate causes and treat underlying disorders that may contribute to the inflammatory process. Management of pain, pancreatic insufficiency, and complications is essential. If medical management is not successful, surgical options should be considered.

Drug-associated acute pancreatitis: twenty-one years of spontaneous reporting in The Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

Drugs are considered a rare cause of acute pancreatitis. We conducted a descriptive study to assess which drugs have been associated with acute pancreatitis in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports in The Netherlands.

METHODS

Our study is based on reports of drug-associated acute pancreatitis reported to the Netherlands Center for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs and The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Foundation LAREB between 1 January 1977 and 1 January 1998. We used an algorithm to validate the diagnosis and to assess the causal relationship between acute pancreatitis and use of the suspected drug.

RESULTS

A total of 55 cases were available for review. We excluded 11 (20.0%) reports, as we could not confirm the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Another 10 (18%) cases were excluded, as the causal relationship with the suspected drug was unlikely. In the remaining 34 reports, acute pancreatitis was labeled as definite in 11 (32%) and as probable in 23 (68%). The age of the patients ranged from 17 to 84 yr with a median of 41; 24 (71%) patients were female. Of the 34 cases, 27 (79%) recovered, five (15%) died, and in two (6%) the outcome is unknown. Azathioprine, cimetidine, interferon-alpha, methyldopa, metronidazole, olsalazine, and oxyphenbutazon all had a definite causal relationship with acute pancreatitis. Doxycycline, enalapril, famotidine, ibuprofen, maprotiline, mesalazine, and sulindac had a probable causal relationship with acute pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of drugs was associated with acute pancreatitis in Dutch adverse drug reaction reports. Quantitative information about drug-induced pancreatitis is scanty. Epidemiological studies to assess the risk of drug-induced acute pancreas, therefore, are needed.

Drug-induced pancreatitis

Few data exist about the incidence of drug-induced pancreatitis in the general population. 20 cases of drug-related pancreatitis were reported in Switzerland over a period of 12 years. The proportion of cases of pancreatitis caused by drugs is estimated to be around 2% in the general population, with much higher proportions in specific subpopulations, such as children and patients who are HIV positive. The literature about drug-induced pancreatitis consists mainly of anecdotal case reports. Clear evidence of a definite association with pancreatitis, by means of rechallenge tests, or consistent case reports, supported by animal experiments or data on the incidence of acute pancreatitis in drug trials exists for didanosine, valproic acid (sodium valproate), aminosalicylates, estrogen, calcium, anticholinesterases and sodium stibogluconate. An association with drug-induced pancreatitis is likely but not definitely proven for thiazide diuretics, pentamidine, ACE inhibitors, asparaginase, vinca alkaloids, some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and clozapine. Pancreatitis is possibly caused by azathioprine, furosemide (frusemide), tetracycline, metronidazole, isoniazid, rifampicin (rifampin), sulphonamides, cyclosporin and some antineoplastic drugs. Many drugs have been reported to be associated with acute pancreatitis. However, lack of rechallenge evidence, consistent statistical data, or evidence from experimental studies on a possible mechanism prohibit definitive conclusions about most of them. The high incidence of concurrent illnesses known to induce acute pancreatitis, makes a trigger role or co-factor role for the drug seem most likely.

Drug induced acute pancreatitis: incidence and severity

To determine the incidence and severity of drug induced acute pancreatitis, data from 45 German centres of gastroenterology were evaluated. Among 1613 patients treated for acute pancreatitis in 1993, drug induced acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 22 patients (incidence 1.4%). Drugs held responsible were azathioprine, mesalazine/sulfasalazine, 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI), oestrogens, frusemide, hydrochlorothiazide, and rifampicin. Pancreatic necrosis not exceeding 33% of the organ was found on ultrasonography or computed tomography, or both, in three patients (14%). Pancreatic pseudocysts did not occur. A decrease of arterial PO2 reflecting respiratory insufficiency, and an increase of serum creatinine, reflecting renal insufficiency as complications of acute pancreatitis were seen in two (9%) and four (18%) patients, respectively. Artificial ventilation was not needed, and dialysis was necessary in only one (5%) case. Two patients (9%) died of AIDS and tuberculosis, respectively; pancreatitis did not seem to have contributed materially to their death. In conclusion, drugs rarely cause acute pancreatitis, and drug induced acute pancreatitis usually runs a benign course.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis. A critical review

Acute pancreatitis has a high morbidity and significant mortality. Among its many causes ethanol is pre-eminent, but many other drugs have also been incriminated. This article begins with a definition of the mechanisms, pathogenesis and clinical features of acute pancreatitis; it then critically reviews the evidence for drugs, excluding ethanol, as being causative. The drugs which have been implicated are considered under 3 headings: definite associations, probable associations and unlikely associations. A brief outline of possible treatment, strategies and prognosis associated with acute pancreatitis concludes the article.

The therapeutic use of azathioprine in renal transplantation

This review discusses the pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, clinical use, toxicities, drug interactions, and possible approaches for therapeutic monitoring of azathioprine (AZA). The drug has been used extensively in posttransplant immunosuppressive protocols. Its therapeutic use is hampered by the development of toxicities, however, especially leukopenia, which is a common criterion for dosage adjustment. Azathioprine is rapidly converted in the liver and erythrocytes to 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), which is eventually metabolized to inactive 6-thiouric acid (6TU). The terminal half-lives of AZA and 6MP are 50 and 74 minutes, respectively. While renal dysfunction does not alter the disposition of AZA, hepatic insufficiency attenuates the pharmacologic activity. Immunosuppression depends on the formation of active intracellular thiopurine ribonucleotides, although AZA itself may block antigen recognition. Individualization of AZA regimens by determining tissue concentrations of thioguanine nucleotides, and plasma concentrations of AZA, 6MP, or 6TU may improve the risk:benefit ratio.

Nature and course of pancreatitis caused by 6-mercaptopurine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP) has an important role in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Its most frequent short-term complication has proven to be pancreatitis, which we have now seen in 13 of 400 (3.25%) patients (12 Crohn's disease, 1 ulcerative colitis) and which we here describe. The timing of the pancreatitis was such that it could not be attributed to sulfasalazine, which was also being taken by 9 patients, or corticosteroids, which were being taken by 7 patients. The dosage of 6-MP ranged from 50 to 100 mg daily, and the pancreatitis, which was uncomplicated in all cases, occurred within 8-32 days with one exception (6.5 mo). Symptoms included epigastric pain, back pain, fever, and nausea. The serum amylase was elevated in 12 patients. The average elevation was 5.9 times normal. In all cases, the 6-MP was discontinued and symptoms and signs returned to normal over a period of 1-11 days. No other complications of 6-MP occurred; there was no leukopenia. Of 7 patients rechallenged with 6-MP, all developed recurrent pancreatitis, including 4 in less than 24 h. In 3 patients, desensitization attempted by a gradual increase in dose from 1/8 tablet (approximately 6 mg) daily also led to recurrence. The timing of the initial pancreatitis and the recurrence at rechallenge are best explained by an allergic reaction. 6-Mercaptopurine should not be reinstituted once it has caused pancreatitis.

Mechanisms of action and clinical applications of cytotoxic drugs in rheumatic disorders

Failure to suppress disease activity in certain rheumatic disorders such as systemic lupus, polyarteritis nodosa, or Wegener's granulomatosis may significantly heighten the probability of a fatal outcome. In other rheumatic disorders (for example, rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis) the disease left unchecked may indeed be severely crippling but rarely is it fatal. Thus the decision on whether to add a cytotoxic drug often evolves into a benefit-to-risk analysis, a decision in which the patient must also be intimately involved. There are two few well-controlled studies of the use of cytotoxic agents to make dogmatic statements regarding their use in the treatment of rheumatic disorders. Nevertheless, a review of the literature, some of which has been cited above, does permit one to make some reasoned judgments in choosing a drug for a particular disease (Table 2).