Reversible achalasia-like motor pattern of esophageal body secondary to postoperative stricture of gastroesophageal junction

Proteomic identification of proteins suggestive of immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration in serum of achalasia patients

Background/Aims

The primary pathophysiologic abnormality in achalasia is known to be a loss of inhibitory myenteric ganglion cells, which may result from an immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration. The aim of this study was to identify proteins suggestive of an immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration in the serum of achalasia patients using a proteomic analysis.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from five symptomatic achalasia patients and five sex- and age-matched healthy controls. Serum proteomic analysis was conducted, and the protein spots were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight and a proteomics analyzer. The serum level of C3 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in nine patients with achalasia and 18 sex- and age-matched healthy controls.

Results

Of the 658 matched protein spots, 28 spots were up-regulated over 2-fold in the serum from achalasia patients compared with that from controls. The up-regulated proteins included complement C4B5, complement C3, cyclin-dependent kinase 5, transthyretin, and alpha 2 macroglobulin. The serum levels of C3 in achalasia patients were significantly higher than those of controls.

Conclusions

The serum proteomic analysis of achalasia patients suggests an immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration. Further validation studies in larger samples and the esophageal tissue of achalasia patients are required.

Pharyngeal dilation in cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction and Zenker diverticulum

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Prolonged obstruction at the level of the lower esophageal sphincter is associated with a dilated, poorly contractile esophagus. The association between prolonged obstruction at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and dilation and diminished contractility of the pharynx is uncertain. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the association between prolonged obstruction at the level of the UES and dilation and diminished contractility of the pharynx.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

The fluoroscopic swallow studies of all persons with cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction (CPD) diagnosed between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008 were retrospectively reviewed from a clinical database. Three categories of CPD were defined: nonobstructing cricopharyngeal bars (CPBs), obstructing CPBs, and Zenker diverticulum (ZD). The primary outcome measure was the pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR), a surrogate measure of pharyngeal strength on fluoroscopy. Secondary outcome measures included pharyngeal area in the lateral fluoroscopic view and UES opening. The outcome measures were compared between groups and to a cohort of nondysphagic age- and gender-matched controls with the analysis of variance.

RESULTS

A total of 100 fluoroscopic swallow studies were evaluated. The mean age (+ or -standard deviation) of the cohort was 70 years (+ or -10 years). Thirty-six percent were female. The mean PCR progressively increased, indicating diminishing pharyngeal strength, from the normal (0.08), to the nonobstructing CPB (0.13), to the obstructing CPB (0.22), to the ZD group (0.28) (P < .001 with trend for linearity). There was a linear increase in pharyngeal area from the normal (8.75 cm(2)) to the nonobstructing CPB (10.00 cm(2)), to the obstructing CPB (10.46 cm(2)), to the ZD group (11.82 cm(2)) (P < .01 with trend for linearity).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that there is an association between cricopharyngeus muscle dysfunction and progressive dilation and weakness of the pharynx. Laryngoscope, 2010.

Esophageal ileus following laparoscopic fundoplication

Early postoperative dysphagia occurs in most patients following laparoscopic fundoplication. Whether dysphagia is associated with a change in esophageal motor function and/or a change in gastroesophageal junction characteristics is unknown. Esophageal motility in the early postoperative period has not been evaluated previously. Esophageal motility was studied on the first postoperative day in 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (control group), using standard perfusion manometry. Primary peristalsis on water swallows following fundoplication elicted a median response of 5% successful peristalsis compared with median response of 100% successful peristalsis following cholecystectomy (P = 0.05). The fundoplication was associated with failure of primary esophageal peristalsis in 7/10 patients, compared to 2/10 patients who underwent cholecystectomy (P = 0.068 Fisher's exact test). Three months after fundoplication, in nine patients studied, primary peristalsis was similar to peristalsis observed preoperatively in seven patients and two patients still had an aperistaltic esophagus. In this study, esophageal manometry 1 day after surgery demonstrated grossly disturbed esophageal motility in most patents following laparoscopic fundoplication, compared to normal motility following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Peristalsis improved at 3 months or more following surgery. This suggests that an 'esophageal ileus' occurs during the early period after laparoscopic fundoplication.

Etiology and pathogenesis of achalasia: the current understanding

Idiopathic achalasia is an inflammatory disease of unknown etiology characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and failure of LES relaxation due to loss of inhibitory nitrinergic neurons in the esophageal myenteric plexus. Proposed causes of achalasia include gastroesophageal junction obstruction, neuronal degeneration, viral infection, genetic inheritance, and autoimmune disease. Current evidence suggests that the initial insult to the esophagus, perhaps a viral infection or some other environmental factor, results in myenteric plexus inflammation. The inflammation then leads to an autoimmune response in a susceptible population who may be genetically predisposed. Subsequently, chronic inflammation leads to destruction of the inhibitory myenteric ganglion cells resulting in the clinical syndrome of idiopathic achalasia. Further studies are needed to better understand the etiology and pathogenesis of achalasia-such an understanding will be important in developing safe, effective, and possibly curative therapy for achalasia.

Esophageal pneumatic dilation for postfundoplication dysphagia: safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcome

OBJECTIVE

Persistent dysphagia occurs in 5-10% of patients after fundoplication. The cause is obscure in most cases, and the management has not been well established. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the predictors of success for esophageal pneumatic dilations in patients with dysphagia after fundoplication.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 14 patients who underwent pneumatic dilation for persistent postfundoplication dysphagia. All patients had esophageal manometry before dilations.

RESULTS

There were nine responders to pneumatic dilations (30-40-mm balloons). The nadir lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation pressure was the only significant predictor for successful dilation and was higher among the responders than nonresponders (median 10 mm Hg vs 5 mm Hg). All six of 14 patients with nadir LES pressure > or = 10 mm Hg had a good response. There was no significant difference in the LES basal pressure between the responders and nonresponders (median 20 mm Hg vs 12 mm Hg). The median distal peristaltic amplitude (74 mm Hg vs 69 mm Hg), percent of failed peristalsis (8% vs 45%), and ramp pressure (19 mm Hg vs 17 mm Hg) did not differ significantly between the responders and nonresponders. No perforations occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumatic dilation is a reasonably safe and effective treatment for patients with postfundoplication dysphagia. Raised nadir LES relaxation pressure seems to be a useful predictor of successful outcome.

Development of achalasia secondary to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

Dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is commonly attributed to edema and/or improperly constructed wraps, and in some instances the cause can be difficult to identify. We report, for the first time, the development of secondary achalasia after LNF as a cause of late-onset postoperative dysphagia. A total of 250 consecutive patients undergoing LNF were analyzed for the development of postoperative dysphagia at a university hospital. Patients were considered to have secondary achalasia if they met the following four criteria: (1) preoperative manometry demonstrating normal peristalsis and normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation; (2) lack of esophageal peristalsis on postoperative manometry or fluoroscopy with or without incomplete LES relaxation; (3) no mucosal lesions seen on endoscopy; and (4) dysphagia refractory to dilatation. The following three groups of patients were identified: patients who developed secondary achalasia (group A, n = 7); patients with persistent dysphagia requiring and responding to postoperative dilatation (group B, n = 12 patients); and patients whose postoperative recovery was not complicated by dysphagia (group C, n = 231). The groups were comparable in terms of all preoperative variables except for age. Patients in group A were older than those in group B (57 years [range 27 to 66 years] vs. 36.5 years [range 27 to 63 years], P = 0.028) but were not significantly older than patients in group C (45 years [range 20 to 84 years], P = 0.42). The onset of severe dysphagia was later in group A than in group B (135 days [range 15 to 300 days] vs. 20 days [range 9 to 70 days], P = 0.002). The median weight loss in group A was also significantly greater than in Group B (15 pounds [range 11 to 44 pounds] vs. 4 pounds [range 0 to 15 pounds], P = 0.0007). Two patients in group A who underwent reoperation failed to improve. Botulinum toxin injections were tried in two patients and Heller myotomy in one with good results. Nine patients in group B improved promptly after one dilatation, and three improved after two dilatations. Secondary achalasia should be considered as one of the causes of persistent dysphagia after an apparently successful antireflux operation. Secondary achalasia tends to occur in older patients and is characterized by a delayed onset of symptoms. Imaging studies are a reliable means of excluding mechanical obstruction as a cause of secondary achalasia, and a negative result should raise the suspicion of secondary achalasia. Esophageal motility studies are necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Failure to consider the diagnosis of secondary achalasia can lead to multiple fruitless attempts at dilatation or even inappropriate reoperations.

Dysphagia after antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is experienced by many patients after antireflux surgery. This literature review examines factors associated with the development, prediction and management of postoperative dysphagia.

METHODS

Published studies examining issues related to dysphagia, gastro-oesophageal reflux and fundoplication were reviewed.

RESULTS

Postoperative dysphagia is usually temporary but proves troublesome for 5--10 per cent of patients. Technical modifications, such as a partial wrap, division of short gastric vessels and method of hiatal closure, have not conclusively reduced its incidence. There is no reliable preoperative test to predict dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

It is uncertain whether postoperative dysphagia arises from patient predilection or is largely a consequence of mechanical changes created by fundoplication. Anatomical errors account for a significant proportion of patients referred for correction of dysphagia but these are uncommon in large single-institution studies. Abnormal manometry cannot predict dysphagia and, on current evidence, 'tailoring' the operation does not prevent its occurrence.