PEG ileus. A new cause of small bowel obstruction

A wandering tube

The predominant causes of acute mechanical small bowel obstruction in geriatric patients are adhesions and hernias, which is not much different than in other adult age groups. Unusual etiologies may be encountered, such as volvulus or gallstone ileus, but a displaced feeding gastrostomy tube is a distinctly rare cause of intestinal obstruction which needs to be considered by emergency physicians as it may be increasingly encountered.

Laparoscopically monitored percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children: a safer procedure

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has now become the preferred technique for facilitating enteral nutrition in children with inadequate caloric intake. Because many problems related to PEG insertion have recently been reported, we were motivated to reassess this established technique. We have therefore added a new step--laparoscopic monitoring--to the classic PEG procedure.

METHODS

Fifteen children who required PEG during the previous year were studied. Their ages ranged from 2 months to 18 years. Six children were < 1 year old at the time of operation. In 11 patients, the PEG was performed at the end of a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. In the others, it was done as a single procedure.

RESULTS

In all 15 children, the PEG was performed safely and quickly, without complications.

CONCLUSION

The addition of 'laparoscopic monitoring' to the classic PEG procedure introduced by Gauderer et al. changes the first and last parts of the procedure from an almost 'blind' undertaking to a well-controlled and safer procedure.

The 'cut and push' method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The standard method of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes is by gastroscopy. This has implications for endoscopy time and resources, and we believe is not always necessary. Depending on the type of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube used we often used the 'cut and push' method. This involves cutting the catheter at skin level and allowing the tube and internal bumper to spontaneously pass. The cut and push method also represents a considerable resource saving compared to the endoscopic method that we think warrants further discussion.

METHOD

We reviewed all the files of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes removed in our unit over the last 4 years.

RESULTS

During the period of July 1995 to July 1999, we have inserted 384 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Seven tubes have been removed endoscopically and 73 tubes have been removed with the cut and push method. Only two possible complications have been recorded (2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that we have provided further evidence that percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes can be removed safely using the cut and push method. Patients who are often frail and who have multiple medical problems are saved an often-long journey to the endoscopy unit as well as the hazards of an endoscopy. The saving in resources in what is already an overworked system by not performing endoscopies is also considerable.

The principles and practical application of enteral nutrition

The enteral route is the preferred method of nutritional support in patients with functional gastrointestinal tracts. Many techniques for obtaining enteral access are available, and the decision regarding which one to use depends on several issues, including the functional integrity of each part of the gastrointestinal tract, the duration of anticipated nutritional support, and the risk of aspiration and gastroesophageal reflux. Nasoesophageal tubes are useful for short-term supplementation; however, patients needing nutritional support for longer than 2 weeks may be better served with a more permanent tube. Blenderized pet food diets are recommended for nutritional support because these diets do not need to be supplemented with protein or micronutrients. Commercial human enteral formulas provide a useful alternative for patients with specific nutrient requirements or for feeding via nasoesophageal or jejunostomy tubes.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in paediatric practice: complications and outcome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to establish the morbidity and mortality of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in a tertiary referral paediatric practice and to identify risk factors for developing complications after a PEG.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients who had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy attempted over a 5-year period (1990 to 1995) were reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty percutaneous gastrostomies were placed in 120 paediatric patients. Indications for insertion were inability to swallow (n = 74, of which, 52 were neurologically impaired), inadequate calorie intake (n = 30), special feeding requirements (n = 12), continuous enteral feeding in short gut (n = 2), and malabsorption (n = 2). All the children had complex medical problems, and 80% of the patients were rated as "high risk" for general anaesthesia (> or = ASA grade 3). Major complications developed in 21 children (17.5%) and minor complications in 27 (22.5%). Of the 17 children in whom gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) became symptomatic, 10 required a Nissen fundoplication. Nine of these 10 children were neurologically impaired (19% of the neurologically impaired children). One postrenal transplant patient on immunosuppression died 54 days after the procedure of intraabdominal sepsis. Thirty-one patients required secondary surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG is associated with significant morbidity. Neurologically impaired children are at risk of acquiring symptomatic GOR, but the risk does not warrant routine fundoplication. Major complications are common and need urgent surgical consultation with many requiring secondary surgical procedures. PEG in paediatric patients should be considered a major surgical undertaking.

Nonendoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: morbidity and mortality in children

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often removed by cutting the tubing at skin level and allowing the internal components to pass through the gastrointestinal tract. This technique is commonly used in adults, but little information is available concerning its safety in younger patients.

METHODS

To assess the safety of this approach in children, the clinical courses of all patients who had undergone PEG tube removal in our pediatric gastroenterology unit over a 3-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

Five of 11 patients in whom the internal components were allowed to pass developed significant complications. Three required subsequent endoscopic removal of the internal component due to persistent vomiting, one died from complications of esophageal perforation caused by the retained internal component, and one developed a gastrocutaneous fistula containing the retained bumper 2 years after PEG tube removal. Significant complications occurred more often in the younger and smaller patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Small children are at greater risk than adults for developing serious complications associated with unremoved PEG tube internal components. If passage of the internal components cannot be confirmed after 2 weeks, chest and abdominal radiographs should be obtained.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the elderly: complications (review)

Due to varying disease processes, the elderly may have limited oral access to their otherwise intact gastrointestinal tract. In such individuals, the intact gastrointestinal tract must be accessed in other ways. Until the early 1980s, choices were limited to temporary solutions such as the nasogastric tube or to long operative procedures such as the operative gastrostomy tube. The introduction of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) allowed a quick, safe, and cheap procedure as an option. While PEG tubes have been used to help many of the elderly with their nutritional needs, they are not without risks. Below is a review of the literature concerning PEG complications in the elderly.

PEG -- is the E necessary? A comparison of percutaneous and endoscopic gastrostomy

We describe our experience of 45 percutaneous gastrostomies using 12 F Wills-0glesby (Cook, Inc, Bloomington, IN, USA) catheters and 33 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies using 12 F Bower PEG's (Corpak, Inc, Wheeling, IL, USA). Tube displacement was a continued problem with the Wills-Oglesby catheter resulting in three patients developing peritonitis with one death. In view of this we would recommend as the preferred technique the endoscopic placement of Bower PEG catheters unless there are contraindications to the endoscopic technique.

Obturation of the small bowel

Obturation of the small bowel is an uncommon but important cause of small bowel obstruction. There are a great number of substances that may impact at the narrow portions of the small bowel. More than one object may be present in the alimentary tract and should be actively sought. Certain groups of patients are more likely to suffer from the condition. We present two cases of small bowel obstruction due to obturation and review the relevant literature.

PEG ileus. A preventable complication

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is an established procedure in the nutritional management of patients. There are numerous reports in the literature describing the techniques for placing PEG tubes. However, there are few reports that discuss the proper methods for removing these devices and the complications that may result from incorrectly removing a PEG tube. An increasing number of patients with PEG tubes are being cared for by individuals who are not familiar with these devices and their proper method of removal. The use of an incorrect method to remove a PEG tube may result in significant morbidity to the patient. We report a case of bowel obstruction resulting from the incorrect removal of a PEG tube that required laparotomy. To prevent similar complications, PEG tubes should be removed using the appropriate method by individuals familiar with the device.

Intestinal passage of the PEG end-piece: is it safe?

Two rare but life-threatening complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are reported: small bowel perforation and obstruction. Both resulted from impaction of the PEG end-piece after separation at skin level. Review of the literature revealed very few complications from intestinal passage of PEG end-pieces. The free intragastric PEG end-piece routinely passes through the gastrointestinal tract in most cases. One of these two cases was drawn from a series of 100 patients with intentional intestinal passage of PEG end-pieces to give a severe complication rate of 1%. A case can be made for routine endoscopic per-oral removal of PEG end-pieces in the elective setting, but this is more costly and not without hazard. Previous laparotomy and/or known adhesions is a relative indication for endoscopic retrieval of the PEG end-piece. Oesophageal disease or intolerance of endoscopy is a relative indication for intestinal passage. Close clinical follow up is recommended to ensure that the PEG end-piece has passed per-rectum. If the PEG end-piece has not passed and is shown in the small bowel on plain X-ray at approximately 3 weeks after separation then lodgement has probably occurred and early operative intervention is warranted.

Comparison of Foley catheter as a replacement gastrostomy tube with commercial replacement gastrostomy tube: a prospective randomized trial

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides a non-surgical alternative to long-term enteral feeding. The gastrostomy tube, however, may deteriorate, malfunction, or be accidentally expelled, requiring replacement. A commercial gastrostomy tube is commonly used for replacement. However, a commercial replacement gastrostomy tube is many times more expensive than a Foley catheter, and the two have never been compared. We compared the efficacy and safety of an all-silicone Foley catheter used as a replacement feeding gastrostomy tube with the effectiveness of a commercial replacement gastrostomy tube in 46 patients undergoing long-term enteral feedings per gastrostomy. Twenty-four patients were randomized to the Foley group and 22 patients to the commercial replacement gastrostomy tube group. The Foley catheter functioned well without need for replacement in 16 (66%) patients for 27.4 +/- 14.8 (mean +/- SD) weeks; the commercial replacement gastrostomy tube functioned in 13 (59%) patients for 24.5 +/- 13.6 weeks (p > 0.05, NS). The Foley catheter needed to be replaced because of malfunction in 8 (34%) patients and the commercial replacement gastrostomy tube in 9 (41%) patients after 21.6 +/- 11.5 weeks and 19.3 +/- 9.3 weeks, respectively (p > 0.05, NS). Neither the Foley catheter nor the commercial replacement gastrostomy tube migrated; this was the most striking finding, in contrast to case reports in the literature. Our data suggest that the Foley catheter can be safely used as a replacement gastrostomy tube; it is considerably cheaper than the commercial replacement gastrostomy tube, and its efficacy and complication rates are similar to those of the commercial replacement gastrostomy tube.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Over the past 5 to 7 years, the veterinary profession has benefitted from our increased ability to provide nutrition to the small animal patient who cannot or will not eat. The adaptation of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for use in the dog and cat deserves a great deal of credit in advancing the level of care we can now give to the chronically ill or critical care patient. The PEG is a relatively simple technique that has proved to be a very cost-efficient way to maintain the nutritional status of the small animal patient. In the author's experience, owner acceptance of using the PEG in the home environment on a chronic basis has been excellent.