Controlled trial of high-dose octreotide in treatment of acute pancreatitis. Evidence of improvement in disease severity

The effect of thymosin α1 for prevention of infection in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is an acute inflammatory disease with prolonged clinical course, which is complicated by the presence of persistent organ failure and severe infection. Infection mainly occurs in the late phase of SAP and it is found to be the main cause of death. Therefore, developing strategies for the prevention of SAP-related infection has been a crucial approach to improve patients' outcomes. Due to remarkable immune-cells-regulating properties, thymosin α1 has been recognized as a promising immune therapy, especially in several infectious diseases. Recently, thymosin α1 has been given high expectations to exert clinical benefits in the prevention of SAP-related infection.

AREAS COVERED

The review of currently available strategies for SAP-related infection prevention and the use of thymosin α1 in SAP patients.

EXPERT OPINION

The current available strategies achieve limited success for preventing SAP-related infection. A possible explanation is that the trigger of infection, immunosuppression has not been concurrently resolved. The application of thymosin α1 in a clinical study showed a prophylactic effect against SAP-related infection. However, the use of thymosin α1 in SAP patients is still at an early stage of clinical investigation and requires high-quality and large sample size evidences.

Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

In people with acute pancreatitis, it is unclear what the role should be for medical treatment as an addition to supportive care such as fluid and electrolyte balance and organ support in people with organ failure.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different pharmacological interventions in people with acute pancreatitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2016, Issue 9), MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and trial registers to October 2016 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also searched the references of included trials to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only RCTs performed in people with acute pancreatitis, irrespective of aetiology, severity, presence of infection, language, blinding, or publication status for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified trials and extracted data. We did not perform a network meta-analysis as planned because of the lack of information on potential effect modifiers and differences of type of participants included in the different comparisons, when information was available. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the binary outcomes and rate ratios with 95% CIs for count outcomes using a fixed-effect model and random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 84 RCTs with 8234 participants in this review. Six trials (N = 658) did not report any of the outcomes of interest for this review. The remaining 78 trials excluded 210 participants after randomisation. Thus, a total of 7366 participants in 78 trials contributed to one or more outcomes for this review. The treatments assessed in these 78 trials included antibiotics, antioxidants, aprotinin, atropine, calcitonin, cimetidine, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), gabexate, glucagon, iniprol, lexipafant, NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), octreotide, oxyphenonium, probiotics, activated protein C, somatostatin, somatostatin plus omeprazole, somatostatin plus ulinastatin, thymosin, ulinastatin, and inactive control. Apart from the comparison of antibiotics versus control, which included a large proportion of participants with necrotising pancreatitis, the remaining comparisons had only a small proportion of patients with this condition. Most trials included either only participants with severe acute pancreatitis or included a mixture of participants with mild acute pancreatitis and severe acute pancreatitis (75 trials). Overall, the risk of bias in trials was unclear or high for all but one of the trials.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

seven trials were not funded or funded by agencies without vested interest in results. Pharmaceutical companies partially or fully funded 21 trials. The source of funding was not available from the remaining trials.Since we considered short-term mortality as the most important outcome, we presented only these results in detail in the abstract. Sixty-seven studies including 6638 participants reported short-term mortality. There was no evidence of any differences in short-term mortality in any of the comparisons (very low-quality evidence). With regards to other primary outcomes, serious adverse events (number) were lower than control in participants taking lexipafant (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.96; N = 290; 1 study; very low-quality evidence), octreotide (rate ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; N = 770; 5 studies; very low-quality evidence), somatostatin plus omeprazole (rate ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.70; N = 140; 1 study; low-quality evidence), and somatostatin plus ulinastatin (rate ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.60; N = 122; 1 study; low-quality evidence). The proportion of people with organ failure was lower in octreotide than control (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97; N = 430; 3 studies; very low-quality evidence). The proportion of people with sepsis was lower in lexipafant than control (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.83; N = 290; 1 study; very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of differences in any of the remaining comparisons in these outcomes or for any of the remaining primary outcomes (the proportion of participants experiencing at least one serious adverse event and the occurrence of infected pancreatic necrosis). None of the trials reported heath-related quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very low-quality evidence suggests that none of the pharmacological treatments studied decrease short-term mortality in people with acute pancreatitis. However, the confidence intervals were wide and consistent with an increase or decrease in short-term mortality due to the interventions. We did not find consistent clinical benefits with any intervention. Because of the limitations in the prognostic scoring systems and because damage to organs may occur in acute pancreatitis before they are clinically manifest, future trials should consider including pancreatitis of all severity but power the study to measure the differences in the subgroup of people with severe acute pancreatitis. It may be difficult to power the studies based on mortality. Future trials in participants with acute pancreatitis should consider other outcomes such as complications or health-related quality of life as primary outcomes. Such trials should include health-related quality of life, costs, and return to work as outcomes and should follow patients for at least three months (preferably for at least one year).

Immunomodulatory therapies for acute pancreatitis

It is currently difficult for conventional treatments of acute pancreatitis (AP), which primarily consist of anti-inflammatory therapies, to prevent the progression of AP or to improve its outcome. This may be because the occurrence and progression of AP, which involves various inflammatory cells and cytokines, includes a series of complex immune events. Considering the complex immune system alterations during the course of AP, it is necessary to monitor the indicators related to immune cells and inflammatory mediators and to develop more individualized interventions for AP patients using immunomodulatory therapy. This review discusses the recent advances in immunomodulatory therapies. It has been suggested that overactive inflammatory responses should be inhibited and excessive immunosuppression should be avoided in the early stages of AP. The optimal duration of anti-inflammatory therapy may be shorter than previously expected (< 24 h), and appropriate immunostimulatory therapies should be administered during the period from the 3^rd d to the 14^th d in the course of AP. A combination therapy of anti-inflammatory and immune-stimulating drugs would hopefully constitute an alternative to anti-inflammatory drug monotherapy. Additionally, the detection of the genotypes of critical inflammatory mediators may be useful for screening populations of AP patients at high risk of severe infections to enable the administration of early interventions to improve their prognosis.

High-dose versus low-dose octreotide in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of high-dose octreotide in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) or SAP, two hundred and thirty-six patients with predicted SAP and 136 patients with SAP were randomized into control, high-dose octreotide (High-O) and low-dose octreotide (Low-O) groups. In addition to the conventional managements administrated in control group, High-O group received an intravenous infusion of octreotide at 50 μg/h × 3d + 25 μg/h × 4d, and Low-O group received octreotide at 25 μg/h × 7d. The major primary outcomes included the numbers of predicted SAP patients which developed SAP after intervention and the number of patients with SAP amelioration. Secondary outcomes included APACHE II, SIRS scores, plasma levels of somatostatin (SST), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). There were no significant differences between the control and Low-O groups in terms of prevention and treatment for SAP. The incidence of SAP in patients with predicted SAP who received High-O was significantly lower than the Low-O group: 37.5% vs. 59.8%, p=0.005. Compared with Low-O group, the number of SAP patients in the SAP arm in the High-O group was reduced by 29.8%. Plasma levels of SST in both predicted SAP and the SAP patients were efficiently recovered (from 132.71±31.40 pg/ml to 180.00±23.50 pg/ml, p<0.05) after high-dose octreotide supplementation, which concomitantly reduced TNF-α and IL-6 levels. High-dose octreotide administration within 48h after AP onset may efficiently reduce the risk of SAP developing and partly attenuate SAP through raising plasma SST to a normal level and decreasing IL-6 and TNF-α.

Current pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for acute pancreatitis

Disease severity in patients with acute pancreatitis varies from mild disease with minimal morbidity to severe disease in which a whole spectrum of local and systemic complications may occur. Infectious complications frequently arise, and pancreatic necrosis in particular is an important risk factor for mortality. Several strategies have been investigated to stop the progression of organ dysfunction, targeting different steps in the pathogenesis, but none of these have proved beneficial. In recent years, the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics has also been in question, as one blinded study could not demonstrate an advantage. Better risk stratification methods should improve the design of future trials, so that only patients with a high probability of complications can be studied.

From acute pancreatitis to end-organ injury: mechanisms of acute lung injury

BACKGROUND

Multi-organ dysfunction, and in particular lung injury, is often responsible for the unfavorable outcome of patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Understanding of the mechanisms by which local inflammation in the pancreas leads to end-organ injury is crucial for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed with the terms "acute pancreatitis," "lung injury," "inflammatory response," "SIRS," and "multi-organ dysfunction." Pertinent articles were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Modulation of the inflammatory response using a combination of immunomodulatory agents may decrease the incidence of severe pancreatitis-related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials are of utmost importance to establish the validity of such strategies.

Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms

BACKGROUND

The management of acute pancreatitis (AP) is still based on speculative and unproven paradigms in many centers. Therefore, we performed an evidence-based analysis to assess the best available treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive Medline and Cochrane Library search was performed evaluating the indication and timing of interventional and surgical approaches, and the value of aprotinin, lexipafant, gabexate mesylate, and octreotide treatment. Each study was ranked according to the evidence-based methodology of Sackett; whenever feasible, we performed new meta-analyses using the random-effects model. Recommendations were based on the available level of evidence (A=large randomized; B=small randomized; C=prospective trial).

RESULTS

None of the evaluated medical treatments is recommended (level A). Patients with AP should receive early enteral nutrition (level B). While mild biliary AP is best treated by primary cholecystectomy (level B), patients with severe biliary AP require emergency endoscopic papillotomy followed by interval cholecystectomy (level A). Patients with necrotizing AP should receive imipenem or meropenem prophylaxis to decrease the risk of infected necrosis and mortality (level A). Sterile necrosis per se is not an indication for surgery (level C), and not all patients with infected necrosis require immediate surgery (level B). In general, early necrosectomy should be avoided (level B), and single necrosectomy with postoperative lavage should be preferred over "open-packing" because of fewer complications with comparable mortality rates (level C).

CONCLUSIONS

While providing new insights into key aspects of AP management, this evidence-based analysis highlights the need for further clinical trials, particularly regarding the indications for antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery.

Effects of octreotide on lipid peroxidation in pancreas and plasma in acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis in rats

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic effects of octreotide in acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) have always been considered to be due to the inhibition of the exocrine pancreatic secretion in order to reduce pancreatic autodigestion. In this experimental study we analyzed whether octreotide has also antioxidative effects on acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

40 male Wistar rats were randomized into four groups (n = 10). Group 1 underwent a laparotomy. Groups 2-4 received an injection of natrium taurocholate into the pancreatic duct to induce acute pancreatitis. One hour later group 2 was injected 1 ml NaCl solution intraperitoneally, while groups 3 and 4 received 0.1 or 0.2 mg octreotide, respectively. The severity of ANP was examined histologically. The lipid peroxide level as well as the activity of glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase were measured in plasma and pancreatic tissue samples.

RESULTS

High-dose octreotide decreased the lipid peroxide level in plasma (2.1 +/- 0.53 vs. 4.69 +/- 1.35 nmol/l; p < 0.05) and pancreatic tissue samples 4.67 +/- 1.37 vs. 13.20 +/- 2.93 nmol/ml; p < 0.05) compared to the pancreatitis control group. Low-dose octreotide, however, did not reduce lipid peroxidation.

CONCLUSION

Octreotide seems to have a dose-dependent antioxidative effect in natrium taurocholate-induced pancreatitis in rats.

Prevention and treatment of progressive multiple organ disfunction in acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is illness with unpredictable outcome. In some patients course of illness is progressive and leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome often resulting with lethal outcome. During last decade the treatment protocols have changed. Basic patophysiologic mechanisms leading to progression of the illness, as well as, contemporary diagnostic and treatment possibilities that can prevent occurrence of severe consequences and improve outcome are presented.

Stimulated gastrointestinal hormone release and gallbladder contraction during continuous jejunal feeding in patients with pancreatic pseudocyst is inhibited by octreotide

BACKGROUND

Continuous enteral feeding, the old-new therapeutic modality in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis and those with complications is considered to bypass the cephalic, the gastric, and (at least in part) the intestinal phase of pancreatic secretion. The aim of this study was to test the GI hormonal changes and gallbladder motility during CJF in patients with pancreatic pseudocysts following acute pancreatitis, with or without octreotide pretreatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 15 patients with pancreatic pseudocysts, an 8-French (8F) nasojejunal catheter was positioned into the jejunum distal to the ligament of Treitz during duodenoscopy. On test d 1, blood samples were taken for CCK, gastrin, insulin-like immunoreactivity (IRI), glucagon, and glucose measurements prior to and at 20, 40, 60, and 120 min following jejunal saline infusion at a rate of 2 mL/min. The gallbladder volumes were determined simultaneously by ultrasonography. On test d 2, CJF (175 kcal/h) was started by the same route and at the same infusion rate. Analogous measurements were performed as indicated above. On test d 3, 100 microg of octreotide was administered subcutaneously and the previous procedure was repeated. The plasma level of CCK and glucagon and the serum levels of IRI and gastrin were determined by bioassay and radioimmunoassay (RIA), respectively.

RESULTS

Significant changes in hormone levels were not observed during jejunal saline perfusion. However, the levels of CCK (5.7+/-0.9 pmol), gastrin (10.6+/-1.3 pmol/L), IRI (27.2+/-5.8 microIU/mL), glucagon (322.8+/-32.4 pg/mL), and glucose (5.8+/-1.0 mmol/L) were significantly increased at 20 min during CJF vs the saline controls (2.0+/-0.3 pmol, 6.8+/-1.1 pmol/L, 7.8+/-0.4 microIU/mL, 172.8+/-33.4 pg/mL, and 4.5+/-0.5 mmol/L, respectively) and remained elevated at 40, 60, and 120 min. Octreotide pretreatment eliminated the increases in CCK, gastrin, IRI, and glucagon levels observed during CJF alone. The significant decrease in gallbladder volume during CJF was also prevented by octreotide pretreatment.

CONCLUSION

Continuous jejunal feeding (CJF) elicited significant increases in gastrointestinal (GI) regulatory hormone (cholecystokinin [CCK], gastrin, IRI, and glucagon) levels and evoked a consecutive gallbladder contraction. These biological responses are eliminated by octreotide pretreatment. Further clinical studies are needed to assess the eventual therapeutic effect of octreotide during CJF in patients with pancreatic pseudocyst.

The effects of somatostatin and octreotide on experimental and human acute pancreatitis

The role of somatostatin and octreotide for AP has been studied for two decades, yet the data still remain inconclusive. The inconsistencies of the results of experimental studies and clinical trials may stem from the fact that the optimal therapeutic modality has not been determined. Furthermore, although they are similar in structure and physiologic activities, the mechanisms of action and effects of somatostatin and octreotide in AP may be different. Because the data are sparse, most reports, primarily those in the English literature, on the efficacy of somatostatin and octreotide in the management of AP were reviewed. Included are both nonrandomized and prospective, double-blind, clinical trials and studies on the effects of these agents on various experimental models of the disease. The results of the studies on somatostatin and octreotide are presented and discussed separately, with specific reference to the experimental and treatment details. The main focus of the review is the effect of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of octreotide. Analysis of the data suggests that somatostatin could not be recommended for AP and that the efficacy of subcutaneous administration of octreotide is also questionable. Theoretically, intravenous octreotide may be more appropriate for this condition, but recent results with this therapeutic method are limited and contradictory. Studies that would delineate the optimal therapeutical modality and the patient population most likely to respond to the treatment are prerequisite for large-scale clinical trials on the effects of octreotide on human pancreatitis.

Meta-analysis of somatostatin, octreotide and gabexate mesilate in the therapy of acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Autodigestion of the pancreas, secondary to the activation of digestive enzymes, is the pathogenetic mechanism of acute pancreatitis (AP).

AIM

Clinical trials in which somatostatin (SS), octreotide (OCT) and gabexate mesilate (FOY) were used to treat patients with AP, were submitted to a meta-analytical evaluation. Five end-points were evaluated: early and overall mortality, patients with complications, complication rate, and patients who needed surgery.

RESULTS

In mild AP, no agent proved of value. In severe AP, both SS and OCT were beneficial in improving the overall mortality: the odds ratios (OR) were, respectively, 0.36 (95% CI: 0.20-0.64, P = 0.001) and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.35-0.88, P = 0.006). FOY had no effect on either early or overall mortality, but was effective in improving complication rate (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56-0.88, P = 0.02), number of patients with complications (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41-0.91, P = 0.01), and number of cases submitted to surgery (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.92, P = 0.01). SS and OCT had no effect on these latter outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Antisecretory agents, such as SS and OCT, are able to reduce mortality without affecting complications, whereas antiproteases, such as FOY, have no effect on mortality but do reduce complications. A trial exploring the efficacy of combining antisecretory agents with antiproteases would be of great benefit in patients with severe AP.

A randomized, controlled trial of octreotide in the management of patients with acute pancreatitis

CONCLUSION

In this study, octreotide was not found to be of benefit in the treatment of acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin and its long-acting analog octreotide have both been proposed for the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis, but neither agent has been adequately assessed in patients with severe attacks.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with moderate or severe acute pancreatitis who were admitted to hospitals within the west of Scotland over an 18-mo period were randomized to receive octreotide, 40 micrograms/h, by continuous i.v. infusion for 5 d, or placebo in addition to standard supportive therapy.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications (54% octreotide group and 40% placebo group) or mortality (octreotide group 18%; placebo group 20%).

Acute pancreatitis: nonsurgical management

The care of patients with severe acute pancreatitis is complex. Although numerous medical therapies have been proposed, few interventions have been shown to be of benefit in patients with severe disease. This review summarizes the nonoperative management of patients with acute pancreatitis, including therapies shown to be of little value, the role of antibiotics in patients with acute pancreatitis, the importance of monitoring and supportive care, and the rationale of endoscopic and surgical intervention.

Octreotide treatment in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and pulmonary failure

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficiency of intravenous infusion of octreotide in the treatment of patients with severe pancreatitis and pulmonary failure.

DESIGN

Prospective, case-control study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Treatment group: 39 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis were selected for the study. In all, pulmonary failure developed under conservative treatment and surgical intervention had been necessary because of local (abscess, necrosis) or systemic (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) complications. The outcome was prospectively followed up until death or discharge from the hospital.

CONTROL GROUP

54 case-control matched patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis and pulmonary failure, who had not been treated with octreotide.

INTERVENTION

Each patient in the treatment group received 100 micrograms intravenous octreotide three times daily for 10 days, in addition to the standard intensive care therapy.

RESULTS

The groups (octreotide group, control group) were highly comparable with regard to age (mean age: 54, 51 years), sex, severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score: 27, 27), etiology of pancreatitis, and pretreatment at the time of admission to the intensive care unit. There was no difference in the development of renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hemostatic, neurologic, or local complications. But the frequency of the adult respiratory distress syndrome (18 vs 40%; p < 0.05) and circulatory shock (51 vs 87%; p < 0.05) was significantly lower in the treatment group. Furthermore, mortality was 26% (10 of 39 patients) in the octreotide group and 61% (33 of 54 patients) in the control group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of our case-control study showed a beneficial effect of octreotide in patients with severe necrotizing pancreatitis and pulmonary failure. Based on these data, a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study should be performed to evaluate these results.

Review article: the relative effectiveness of somatostatin and octreotide therapy in pancreatic disease

Somatostatin and octreotide inhibit basal and stimulated pancreatic secretion, stimulate reticuloendothelial system activity, modulate the cytokine cascade and are cytoprotective with respect to the pancreas. These effects of somatostatin and octreotide suggest that both drugs may be useful either in the treatment of pancreatic disorders, or in preventing acute pancreatitis following procedures on the pancreas. In recent years it has become clear that somatostatin is a useful and effective therapy for severe acute pancreatitis and in preventing complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), whereas octreotide has no beneficial effect and may be deleterious in both these indications. The differences in the therapeutic efficacy of somatostatin and octreotide in acute pancreatitis and ERCP appears to be related to their differential effects on sphincter of Oddi motility--the native hormone relaxing, and the analogue increasing, its contractility. Consequently, any beneficial effects of octreotide in both acute pancreatitis and ERCP are offset by the increased contractility of the sphincter of Oddi, which results in retention of activated enzymes within the pancreas and further autodigestion of the gland. Somatostatin and octreotide are equally effective in promoting the closure of pancreatic fistulae. However, the time to closure after commencement of therapy is much more variable and longer in patients treated with subcutaneous octreotide than those receiving intravenous somatostatin, possibly as a result of fluctuations in pancreatic enzyme secretion between consecutive administrations of the hormone. Furthermore, the initial potent inhibitory effect of octreotide on pancreatic secretion is lost after 7 days of continuous subcutaneous administration. Therefore, in terms of cost-effectiveness, somatostatin would appear to be the treatment of choice for pancreatic fistulae. Octreotide markedly reduces the complication rates after elective pancreatic surgery. It remains to be established whether somatostatin is as effective as octreotide in this indication.

Expanding uses of octreotide

This chapter reviews the therapeutic use of octreotide in a variety of pancreatic disorders, including acute pancreatitis, in the prevention of postoperative and post-ERCP pancreatitis, in the control of postoperative pancreatic fistulae, and in chronic pancreatitis for the control of pain and of pseudocysts and ascites. The review also discusses the use of octreotide in intestinal disorders of motility, gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal fistulae and refractory diarrhoea, including the diarrhoeas of AIDS, diabetes, short gut, chemotherapy, ileostomy and gastric surgery. The use of octreotide in neuroendocrine tumours, both for therapy and diagnostic imaging, is reviewed briefly. The paucity of adequately controlled studies in many of these situations is indicated and the potential usefulness of octreotide estimated.