Interval sampling of breath hydrogen (H2) as an index of lactose malabsorption in lactase-deficient subjects

Dietary sorbitol and mannitol: food content and distinct absorption patterns between healthy individuals and patients with irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Sorbitol and mannitol are naturally-occurring polyol isomers. Although poor absorption and induction of gastrointestinal symptoms by sorbitol are known, the properties of mannitol are poorly described. We aimed to expand data on food composition of these polyols, and to compare their absorptive capacities and symptom induction in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and healthy individuals.

METHODS

Food samples were analysed for sorbitol and mannitol content. The degree of absorption measured by breath hydrogen production and gastrointestinal symptoms (visual analogue scales) was evaluated in a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study in 21 healthy and 20 IBS subjects after challenges with 10 g of sorbitol, mannitol or glucose.

RESULTS

Certain fruits and sugar-free gum contained sorbitol, whereas mannitol content was higher in certain vegetables. Similar proportions of patients with IBS (40%) and healthy subjects (33%) completely absorbed sorbitol, although more so with IBS absorbed mannitol (80% versus 43%; P = 0.02). Breath hydrogen production was similar in both groups after lactulose but was reduced in patients with IBS after both polyols. No difference in mean (SEM) hydrogen production was found in healthy controls after sorbitol [area-under-the-curve: 2766 (591) ppm 4 h(-1) ] or mannitol [2062 (468) ppm 4 h(-1) ] but, in patients with IBS, this was greater after sorbitol [1136 (204) ppm 4 h(-1) ] than mannitol [404 (154) ppm 4 h(-1) ; P = 0.002]. Overall gastrointestinal symptoms increased significantly after both polyols in patients with IBS only, although they were independent of malabsorption of either of the polyols.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased and discordant absorption of mannitol and sorbitol occurs in patients with IBS compared to that in healthy controls. Polyols induced gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS independently of their absorptive patterns, suggesting that the dietary restriction of polyols may be efficacious.

Ineffectiveness of breath methane excretion as a diagnostic test for lactose malabsorption

BACKGROUND

In clinical and field conditions, breath gas analysis has been widely used in evaluating carbohydrate digestion. A field study was performed to determine the prevalence of lactose malabsorption in Myanmar children and to evaluate the possibility of using breath methane excretion to indicate lactose malabsorption in a field situation.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 118 children aged 1 to 12 years. A hydrogen breath test after a lactose meal (2 g/kg, maximum 50 g) was used as a standard test.

RESULTS

Lactose malabsorption was detected in 16.7% of children aged 1 to 2.9 years, with the prevalence increasing with age from 40.5% of those aged 3 to 5.9 years to 88.5% of those aged 6 to 8.9 years and reaching 91.7% in those aged 9 to 11.9 years. Lactose malabsorption was more prevalent when children were weaned before 4 months of age (87.2 vs. 41.1%; p < 0.01). Compared with lactose-tolerant children, those with lactose malabsorption had significantly higher concentrations of breath hydrogen excretion 60 minutes after the lactose test meal. Breath methane excretion was also significantly higher in samples at 120 minutes in children with lactose malabsorption. Breath methane excretion of greater than or equal to 2 parts per million at 180 minutes as a diagnostic test for lactose malabsorption had a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 84.6%.

CONCLUSION

The breath methane test for lactose malabsorption has a lower sensitivity and specificity than the breath hydrogen test and therefore does not replace the lactose breath hydrogen test.

Raising milk energy content retards gastric emptying of lactose in lactose-intolerant humans with little effect on lactose digestion

Lactose digestion improves when the energy content of a meal is raised, perhaps due to delayed gastric emptying; however, this has not been demonstrated directly. It is not known whether lactose-intolerant subjects should consume full-fat or high energy milk instead of half-skimmed milk. In this study, breath 13CO2 and hydrogen (H2) measurements were combined to assess simultaneously the effect of increasing milk energy content on gastric emptying, digestion, and tolerance of lactose. On two separate days, 11 adult lactose maldigesters ingested, in the fasting state, a single dose of 710 kJ half-skimmed milk or 1970 kJ high energy milk. Both contained 18 g lactose and were supplemented with 100 mg 13C-glycine for breath 13CO2 measurement. For 6 h after milk ingestion, samples of expired breath were collected, and subjects scored their symptoms on a four-grade questionnaire. Gastric emptying was measured from excretion of breath 13CO2. The mean gastric emptying half-time was significantly longer after ingestion of high energy milk than after half-skimmed milk (84 +/- 4 vs. 64 +/- 4 min, P = 0.004). The mean area under the breath H2 excretion curve measured for 6 h was 330 +/- 61 microL/L after subjects consumed high energy milk vs. 470 +/- 82 microL/L after they consumed half-skimmed milk (P = 0.07). Mean symptom scores did not differ after ingestion of the two milks, but only two subjects experienced disturbing symptoms after high energy milk ingestion compared with five subjects after ingestion of half-skimmed milk (P = 0.56). Although ingestion of high energy milk delayed the gastric emptying of lactose for significantly longer than the ingestion of half-skimmed milk (P < 0.01), it did not lead to significant improvement in symptoms and reflected only a trend toward improved lactose digestion (P = 0.07), as measured by the area under the breath H2 excretion curve. These results indicate that it is not beneficial for most lactose-intolerant subjects to replace consumption of half-skimmed milk by milk with a higher energy content.

The analgesic tramadol has minimal effect on gastrointestinal motor function

AIMS

The analgesic tramadol, an opioid agonist and monoaminergic reuptake blocker, has been assumed to interfere less with gastrointestinal motor function than other opioid analgesics, but this has not been specifically investigated. In this study we examined the effect of tramadol on variables of gastrointestinal motor function.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers participated in a two-arm, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, cross-over study comparing tramadol 50 mg and placebo solutions given four times a day for 10 days. Oro-caecal (lactulose H2-breath test) and colonic (solid markers) transit times and anal sphincter pressures were measured after 10 days dosing.

RESULTS

Median oro-caecal transit time was 90 min (interquartile range: 75-105) with placebo and 90 min (60-105) with tramadol (not significant). The median total colonic transit time increased from 45.6 h (25.2-64.8) with placebo to 58.8 h (50.4-78.0) with tramadol (not significant), which is still within the normal range (< 60 h). Anal sphincter resting pressures were not significantly changed by tramadol compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadol has a minor delaying effect on colonic transit, but no effect on upper gastrointestinal transit or gut smooth muscle tone. Tramadol may be a useful analgesic where interference with gut motor function is undesirable.

Complex carbohydrate malabsorption in exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

The magnitude of complex carbohydrate malabsorption in exocrine pancreatic insufficiency has not been well quantified in the past. The quantity of carbohydrate malabsorbed after a rice starch (100 g) meal in 20 patients with chronic pancreatitis (n = 10) or pancreatic cancer (n = 10) was therefore estimated. Patients had a three day stool fat collection (80 g/24 hour fat intake), a lactulose (20 g), and a rice flour (100 g) breath hydrogen test. Normal controls (n = 29) had a postprandial H2 increase < or = 14 ppm and malabsorbed (mean (SEM)) 1.12 (0.44) (range 0-11.10) g of the 100 g of carbohydrate ingested. Patients malabsorbed significantly more carbohydrate (11.36 (2.23) (range 8.90-32.60) g, F1.47 = 29.92, p < 0.001). The number of patients with fat (> 7 g, n = 8) or carbohydrate (increase in H2 > or = 20 ppm, n = 10) malabsorption was not different (chi 2 = 0.10, p = 0.75). There was a significant correlation between faecal fat and amount of malabsorbed carbohydrate (r = 0.60, F1.17 = 9.70, p = 0.006) and faecal fat and stool wet weight (r = 0.57, F1.18 = 8.67, p < 0.009), but not between stool wet weight and amount of malabsorbed carbohydrate (r = 0.28, F1.17 = 1.45, p = 0.25). Although patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency malabsorb 10%-30% of the ingested complex carbohydrate, the main determinant of stool wet weight could be faecal fat.

Effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors on mouth to caecum transit time in humans

The alpha-glucosidase inhibitors acarbose and miglitol have been successfully used to control postprandial hyperglycaemia in diabetics. They probably work by slowing carbohydrate digestion and absorption, but their effect on mouth to caecum transit time has not been studied. The effect acarbose (100 mg), miglitol (100 mg), and placebo on mouth to caecum transit time (380 kcal breakfast with 20 g of lactulose) was investigated in 18 normal volunteers using breath hydrogen analysis. Both miglitol and acarbose significantly increased breath hydrogen excretion (F2,34 = 6.31, p = 0.005) and shortened the mouth to caecum transit time (F2,34 = 3.49, p = 0.04) after breakfast compared with placebo. There was a significant negative correlation between breath hydrogen excretion and mouth to caecum transit time suggesting that with shorter transit times significantly more carbohydrates were spilled into the colon. These results indicate that alpha-glucosidase inhibitors accelerate mouth to caecum transit time by inducing carbohydrate malabsorption.

Influence of nonfermented dairy products containing bacterial starter cultures on lactose maldigestion in humans

The effect of nonfermented dairy products containing yogurt or acidophilus cultures on lactose utilization by lactose-maldigesting humans was investigated. Yogurt and acidophilus milk containing 10(7) or 10(8) of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus, or Lactobacillus acidophilus, respectively, were prepared using commercially processed 2% low fat milk. Immediately following inoculation, products were refrigerated. Lactose maldigestion was monitored by measuring breath hydrogen excretion at hourly intervals for 8 h following consumption of 400 ml of each test meal containing approximately 20 g of lactose. The yogurt milk containing 10(8) cfu/ml was shown to contain significant concentrations of microbial beta-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23; approximately 3 U/ml), which remained stable for at least 14 d at refrigerator temperatures. Breath hydrogen peaks were delayed and significantly lower (approximately 20 ppm at 5 to 7 h) than control values (approximately 70 ppm at 4 h), and intolerance symptoms were eliminated in all subjects. Yogurt milk containing 10(7) cfu/ml demonstrated intermediate breath hydrogen values and was marginally significantly different from control values. Lactobacillus acidophilus strains with varying resistance to bile and total beta-galactosidase-producing potential were also tested. Only one strain, LA-1, which demonstrated low bile resistance and intermediate beta-galactosidase activity, was capable of significantly decreasing breath hydrogen values when 10(8) cfu/ml of milk was consumed.

Prediction of lactose malabsorption in referral patients

Two hundred forty-two patients referred for various gastrointestinal complaints were evaluated for clinical parameters that would predict findings of lactose malabsorption. Breath hydrogen and blood glucose lactose tests were performed after ingestion of 50 g lactose. Presenting complaints, duration of symptoms, and patient demographics such as age, sex, and ethnic heritage were not different between lactose malabsorbers and absorbers as defined by the breath hydrogen lactose test. Food-related symptoms in general and after specific foods such as milk, ice cream, cheese, and yogurt were also similar between groups. Prior to testing, 30% of malabsorbers (N = 161) and 36% of absorbers (N = 81) reported lactose-related symptoms (P = NS). The blood glucose response to lactose was abnormal in 60% of malabsorbers and 15% of absorbers. This study confirmed our impression that it is difficult to predict lactose absorption status by clinical parameters. The majority of our lactose malabsorber patients were unaware of lactose-associated symptoms. Furthermore, symptom assessment, demographics, food history, and blood glucose testing did not predict abnormal hydrogen responses to lactose.

The enzymology of intestinal disease

The role of enzyme estimations is reviewed. Serum levels of most enzymes do not alter significantly in intestinal diseases because dying mucosal cells slough off into the lumen. Similarly, biopsy material may provide misleading results because of lack of homogeneity between diseased and normal segments of bowel, whether in inflammatory or neoplastic conditions. Lactase deficiency is the most common intestinal enzyme deficiency. The once popular lactose tolerance test is lately giving way to the breath hydrogen test, which generally reflects unabsorbed carbohydrate reaching the colon. This test and its clinical usefulness are reviewed in some detail, and the use of lactulose as an indicator of intestinal transit is also discussed.

Hydrogen concentration in expired air analyzed with a new hydrogen sensor, plasma glucose rise, and symptoms of lactose intolerance after oral administration of 100 gram lactose

A rapid breath hydrogen analyzer to detect lactose malabsorption is described. After ingestion of a lactose solution the patient expires into a mouthpiece attached to a hydrogen sensor at 30-min intervals for 3 1/2 h. The hydrogen of the expired air causes a voltage change that can be transformed into ppm from a calibration curve. A tolerance test with a load of 100 g lactose was performed in 43 consecutive patients with various gastrointestinal disturbances, referred to the laboratory for the commonly used lactose tolerance test based on plasma glucose measurements. Eleven patients developed symptoms of lactose intolerance during the test. Biopsy specimens from the distal duodenum or proximal jejunum showed partial villous atrophy in one, in whom celiac disease with lactose intolerance was diagnosed; the other 10 had normal specimens. In nine of them lactose intolerance was diagnosed and confirmed by observation for months on a lactose-poor diet. The 10th patient (H.P.L.) did not improve on such a diet. He also showed pronounced symptoms of intolerance during a test with monosaccharides (glucose + galactose). His intestinal disease remained undiagnosed. The 11 patients with symptoms of intolerance and 3 patients without symptoms during the lactose load showed a flat plasma glucose curve after drinking the lactose solution--that is, a maximum rise of the glucose concentration of 1.5 mmol/l. One of the symptom-free patients dropped out and could not be observed, another did not improve on a lactose-poor diet, and the third noticed a favorable effect of the diet on stool consistency but not on other abdominal symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lactose malabsorption in Greek adults: correlation of small bowel transit time with the severity of lactose intolerance

Using breath hydrogen analysis after 139 mmol (50 g) oral lactose load, we investigated the prevalence of lactose malabsorption in 200 Greek adults and examined the relationship between symptoms and small bowel transit time. One hundred and fifty subjects had increased breath hydrogen concentrations (greater than 20 ppm) after the lactose load. In these individuals peak breath hydrogen concentration was inversely related to small bowel transit time (r = 0.63, 6 = 6.854, p less than 0.001) and the severity of symptoms decreased with increasing small bowel transit time. Lactose malabsorbers with diarrhoea during the lactose tolerance test had a small bowel transit time of 51 +/- 22 minutes (x +/- SD; n = 90) which was significantly shorter than the small bowel transit time of patients with colicky pain, flatulence, and abdominal distension (74 +/- 30, n = 53; p less than 0.001) and both groups had significantly shorter small bowel transit time than that of asymptomatic malabsorbers (115 +/- 21 n:7; p less than 0.001). When the oral lactose load was reduced to 33 mmol (12 g), the small bowel transit time increased five-fold and the overall incidence of diarrhoea and/or symptoms decreased dramatically. These results indicate that the prevalence of lactase deficiency in Greece may be as high as 75% and suggest that symptom production in lactose malabsorbers is brought about by the rapid passage down the small intestine of the malabsorbed lactose.