Esophageal manometric studies in children with achalasia before and after operative treatment

Clinical factors and high-resolution manometry predicting response to surgery for achalasia in children

BACKGROUND

Esophageal achalasia is an uncommon condition in children. Although many interventions exist for the management of this disorder, esophageal (Heller) myotomy offers one of the most durable treatments. Our institution sought to review patients undergoing Heller myotomy concentrating on preoperative clinical factors that might predict postoperative outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, who underwent surgical treatment for achalasia at our tertiary pediatric hospital were identified and included in the study cohort. Electronic medical records for these patients were reviewed for clinical presentation variables, nonsurgical preoperative treatment, surgical approach, clinical response to surgery, need for postoperative treatment for ongoing symptoms, and high-resolution manometry (HRM) data.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included in the study, and all underwent myotomy with partial fundoplication (median age: 14.4 y [interquartile range 11.6-15.5]). At a median follow-up of 9.75 mo (interquartile range 3.5-21 mo), 16 (61.5%) patients reported good resolution of their dysphagia symptoms with surgery alone. Two patients (7.7%) had perforation of the gastrointestinal tract requiring surgical intervention. Eight patients (30.8%) required additional treatment for achalasia, with 5 (19.2%) of these undergoing additional surgery or endoscopic treatment. Patients who had preoperative dilation did not have good resolution of their dysphagia (n = 2; P = 0.037). Two of four patients undergoing postoperative dilation had preoperative dilation. None of these patients underwent preoperative manometry. There was a statistically significant difference in the ages of patients who required postoperative intervention and those who did not (14.1 versus 15.2 y old, respectively; P = 0.043). In patients who reported improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease/reflux type symptoms after Heller myotomy, lower esophageal residual pressure (29.1 versus 18.7 mmHg; P = 0.018) on preoperative HRM was significantly higher than in those who did not report improvement after surgery. Higher upper esophageal mean pressure (66.6 versus 47.8 mmHg; P = 0.05) also predicted good gastroesophageal reflux disease/reflux symptom response in a similar manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Current analysis suggests that preoperative dilation should be used cautiously and older patients may have a better response to surgery without need for postoperative treatment. In addition, preoperative HRM can aid in counseling patients in the risk of ongoing symptoms after surgery and may aid in determining if a fundoplication should be completed at the index procedure. Further research is needed to delineate these factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Evaluating long-term results of modified Heller limited esophagomyotomy in children with esophageal achalasia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Modified Heller esophagomyotomy has become the initial treatment of choice for esophageal achalasia in children. However, only limited and not objective data are currently available on the long-term results of modified Heller limited esophagomyotomy (LEM). This retrospective study was undertaken to objectively assess the long-term results of LEM in childhood esophageal achalasia.

METHODS

Medical records of 15 patients with a median age of 9.5 years (range, 6-13 years) who underwent an LEM without an antireflux procedure from January 1991 to December 2005 were reviewed. Clinical scores, barium esophagogram, flexible upper alimentary endoscopy, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry before and 0.5 to 15 years after surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

An excellent to good outcome was observed in 14 (93.3%) patients. One patient (6.7%) required reoperation 8 months after surgery because of persistent dysphagia. The late barium esophagogram showed a significant decrease (from 4.2 +/- 0.95 to 2.4 +/- 1.1 cm, P < .01) of esophageal diameter, as compared with preoperative values. Only 1 patient had grade II esophagitis on flexible upper alimentary endoscopy. Twenty-four- hour esophageal pH monitoring showed an abnormal acid exposure in 1 patient. The late esophageal manometry showed a significant decrease (from 31.7 +/- 7.9 to 7.8 +/- 3.7 mm Hg; < .05) of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and only insignificant increase (from 18.8 +/- 6.2 to 21.4 +/- 8.4 mm Hg; NS) of amplitude of esophageal contractions over preoperative values.

CONCLUSIONS

Transabdominal LEM without an antireflux procedure is an effective and safe treatment of esophageal achalasia in children because of its long-term high rate of symptoms relief and low incidence of postoperative complications, despite the lack of esophageal motility restoration to normal.

Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux is a physiological phenomenon, occurring with different severity and duration in different individuals. Reflux occurs when this normal event results in the occurrence of symptoms/signs or complications. The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux is complex and diverse, since it is influenced by factors that are genetic, environmental (e.g., diet smoking), anatomic, hormonal, and neurogenic. However, many mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Future research should focus on a better understanding of the physiology of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and of gastric motility. The afferent and efferent neural pathways and neuropharmacologic mediators of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastric dysmotility require further study. The role of anatomic malformations such as hiatal hernia in children has been underestimated. While therapeutic possibilities are greater in number and largely improved, the outcomes of some treatments are far from satisfactory in many cases. In addition to development of new forms of treatment, research should address better use of currently available medical and surgical treatments.

[Primary esophageal motor disorders in childhood, genuine achalasia excluded]

AIM

Esophageal manometry has been increasingly used in children allowing better description of esophageal primary disorders as partial achalasia. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe clinical manifestations of partial achalasia, to look for their specificities and to follow clinical and manometric evolution in response to treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients (mean age four years: range one month-13.5 years) presenting with partial achalasia were examined from 1990 to 1998. The symptomatology leading to esophageal manometry was: dysphagia (n = 9), gastroesophageal reflux (n = 6), swallowing disorder (n = 3). pH-metry (n = 8), esophageal endoscopy (n = 11) and barium transit (n = 12) were also performed.

RESULTS

Twelve children were treated with nifedipine, (dysphagia n = 6, gastroesophageal reflux n = 5, swallowing disorder n = 1). At follow-up, a good clinical response was observed in six children while no effect or transient improvement were observed in two and four children respectively. Two of them presented spontaneous clinical resolution of symptoms after nifedipine was stopped but four children needed Heller procedure. Six of 18 patients (dysphagia n = 3, gastroesophageal reflux n = 2, swallowing disorder n = 1) developed achalasia or recurrent symptoms which required Heller surgery. At the first examination, no clinical or manometric features could differentiate these six patients from the remainders who presented a favorable outcome.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal primary disorders as partial achalasia in children are observed in various clinical conditions. The possible development of achalasia and persistence of symptoms in some children justify both attentive clinical and manometric follow-up.

Attenuated nitrergic inhibitory neurotransmission to interstitial cells of Cajal in the lower esophageal sphincter with esophageal achalasia in children

BACKGROUND

Esophageal achalasia (EA) is a rare disease in children, the etiology and pathogenesis of which remain controversial. Previous studies have suggested that a specific class of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) act as mediators in nitrergic inhibitory neurotransmission in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The aim of this investigation is to clarify the status of ICC and nitrergic inhibitory neurons in the LES of EA using immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Specimens were obtained from two patients with EA (aged 6 and 10 years) and two patients with esophageal carcinoma (aged 56 and 63 years) not involving the lower esophagus as controls. Immunohistochemistry was used to study the distribution of ICC and nitrergic inhibitory neuron.

RESULTS

The LES contains the c-kit positive ICC in the muscle layers, which form close relationships with nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-containing nerve fibers in the controls. The distribution of ICC was almost the same between samples with EA and controls. However, such nerve fibers were absent in EA with a longer duration of the symptoms, but were reduced in a shorter duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased nitrergic inhibitory neurotransmission to ICC in LES is a possible cause of sphincter achalasia in pediatric patients with EA. The decrease in NOS-positive neurons of patients with achalasia may be gradual, which may account for the long duration of symptoms prior to treatments. Further advancement of esophageal motility damage was suspected in pediatric EA.