Cross-sectional areas of lumbar muscles after surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A study with magnetic resonance imaging after microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy

The association between changes in multifidus muscle morphology and back pain scores following discectomy surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of discectomy on back muscles (e.g. multifidus muscle (MM)) morphology in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) following discectomy surgery, address the association of back muscles morphology with pain score preoperatively and post-operatively, and investigate the relationships between the changes from pre- to post-operative back muscles measurements and pain score (primary outcome) and disability score (secondary outcome) change following discectomy if any.

METHODS

We searched three online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. In LDH patients, eligible for discectomy surgery, pre- and post-operative and the changes from pre- to post-operative of back and/or leg pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and multifidus muscle morphology, were considered as primary outcomes. Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the methodological quality of RCTs and observational studies, respectively. Standardize mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was evaluated. A meta-regression analysis was conducted. GRADE approach was used to summarize the strength of evidence.

RESULTS

One RCT and five observational studies were included in the analysis of 489 patients with LDH undergoing discectomy surgery. The mean overall follow-up was 64.9 weeks (6 to 148.7 weeks). There was a significant negative relationship between the change from pre- to post-operative cross-sectional area (CSA) in MM and change in VAS back pain [regression coefficient = -0.01, (95% CI = -0.02, -0.01), p = 0.044] after discectomy surgery. No significant relationship between preoperative CSA in MM and preoperative/post-operative clinical (any of the follow-up periods) scores could be established.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study found very low-quality grade evidence for an association between higher reduction of CSA in MM and less reductions of back pain scores following discectomy surgery for patients with LDH. Due to the heterogeneity and methodological limitations, further studies will improve understanding and aid preoperative counselling.

Modified Taylor Retractor in Unilateral Subperiosteal Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Frugal Alternative to the Tubular Retractor

OBJECTIVE

To do a comparative surgical outcome and cost-benefit analysis of our simple modified Taylor retractor with both open and tubular techniques in lumbar discectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively divided 52 lumbar disc patients operated by 2 different techniques between January 2019 and June 2020 into 2 groups- group 1 (n = 20): standard open macrodiscectomy (4-5 cm incision); group 2 (n = 32): unilateral translaminar microdiscectomy using our modified Taylor retractor with a small incision (18-20 mm, comparable to the tubular retractor). We compared both groups in terms of surgical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis. In addition, a cost-benefit comparison between our modified Taylor technique and that of the already published tubular microdiscectomy cohort was done.

RESULTS

Complete symptom resolution occurred in 85% group 1 and 84.4% group 2 patients, with no difference in complication rates. Mean hospital stay was significantly less in group 2 (1.2 ± 0.37 days) as compared with group 1 (2.4 ± 1.15, P < 0.001). The mean total cost per patient was $2253.17 ± 69.16 in the modified Taylor microdiscectomy group compared with $2495.76 ± 214.85 (P < 0.001) in standard macrodiscectomy. Compared with the previously published tubular microdiscectomy cohort ($3069.91 ± 69.16), the modified Taylor retractor was $816.74 cheaper per patient with similar length of incision, surgical outcome, and hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar clinical outcomes at decreased costs are obtained using the modified Taylor retractor compared with the tubular retractor. The modified Taylor retractor has a simple design, is user-friendly, and frugal alternative to the tubular retractor system for microscopic discectomy, especially in the resource-constrained countries.

Multifidus atrophy is localized and bilateral in active persons with chronic unilateral low back pain

OBJECTIVE

To compare the lumbar multifidi muscle volume devoid of fat local to the site of pain in persons with and without chronic unilateral lower lumbar pain.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional design.

SETTING

University biokinesiology laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Active individuals (n=14) with chronic unilateral lower lumbar pain (>1 y) were matched for age, height, weight, and activity level with healthy individuals (n=14). Individuals with back pain had minimal disability (Oswestry Disability Index [mean ± SD], 14.9%±6.3%) at the time of testing.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multifidus and erector spinae muscle volumes at the L5-S1 levels, multifidus muscle volumes at the L4 and S2-3 levels.

RESULTS

Average multifidus volume was diminished by 18.1% between groups (P=.026) only at the L5-S1 levels. There was no difference between painful and pain-free sides. There were no volume differences between groups above L5, below S1, or in erector spinae at the L5-S1 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that despite a low level of disability and an activity level similar to that of matched control subjects, considerable localized, bilateral multifidus atrophy is present. Such impaired size of the multifidus will likely reduce its capacity to control intersegmental motion, thus increasing the susceptibility to further injury. Unlike acute unilateral low back pain (LBP), muscle size is reduced bilaterally in persons with chronic unilateral LBP.

Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients

Background

No consensus exists on how rehabilitation programs for lumbar discectomy patients with persistent complaints after surgery should be composed. A better understanding of normal and abnormal postoperative trunk muscle condition might help direct the treatment goals.

Methods

A three-dimensional CT scan of the lumbar spine was obtained in 18 symptomatic and 18 asymptomatic patients who had undergone a lumbar discectomy 42 months to 83 months (median 63 months) previously. The psoas muscle (PS), the paraspinal muscle mass (PA) and the multifidus muscle (MF) were outlined at the L3, L4 and L5 level. Of these muscles, fat free Cross Sectional Area (CSA) and fat CSA were determined. CSA of the lumbar erector spinae (LES = longissimus thoracis + iliocostalis lumborum) was calculated by subtracting MF CSA from PA CSA. Mean muscle CSA of the left and right sides was calculated at each level. To normalize the data for interpersonal comparison, the mean CSA was divided by the CSA of the L3 vertebral body (mCSA = normalized fat-free muscle CSA; fCSA = normalized fat CSA). Differences in CSA between the pain group and the pain free group were examined using a General Linear Model (GLM). Three levels were examined to investigate the possible role of the level of operation.

Results

In lumbar discectomy patients with pain, the mCSA of the MF was significantly smaller than in pain-free subjects (p = 0.009) independently of the level. The mCSA of the LES was significantly smaller in pain patients, but only on the L3 slice (p = 0.018). No significant difference in mCSA of the PS was found between pain patients and pain-free patients (p = 0.462). The fCSA of the MF (p = 0.186) and of the LES (p = 0.256) were not significantly different between both populations. However, the fCSA of the PS was significantly larger in pain patients than in pain-free patients. (p = 0.012).

The level of operation was never a significant factor.

Conclusions

CT comparison of MF, LES and PS muscle condition between lumbar discectomy patients without pain and patients with protracted postoperative pain showed a smaller fat-free muscle CSA of the MF at all levels examined, a smaller fat- free muscle CSA of the LES at the L3 level, and more fat in the PS in patients with pain. The level of operation was not found to be of importance. The present results suggest a general lumbar muscle dysfunction in the pain group, in particular of the deep stabilizing muscle system.

Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial

The concept of minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery comprises reduced muscle injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate creatine phosphokinase (CPK) in serum and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus muscle on magnetic resonance imaging as indicators of muscle injury. We present the results of a double-blind randomized trial on patients with lumbar disc herniation, in which tubular discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy were compared. In 216 patients, CPK was measured before surgery and at day 1 after surgery. In 140 patients, the CSA of the multifidus muscle was measured at the affected disc level before surgery and at 1 year after surgery. The ratios (i.e. post surgery/pre surgery) of CPK and CSA were used as outcome measures. The multifidus atrophy was classified into three grades ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe atrophy), and the difference between post and pre surgery was used as an outcome. Patients’ low-back pain scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS) were documented before surgery and at various moments during follow-up. Tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy resulted in a nonsignificant difference in CPK ratio, although the CSA ratio was significantly lower in tubular discectomy. At 1 year, there was no difference in atrophy grade between both groups nor in the percentage of patients showing an increased atrophy grade (14% tubular vs. 18% conventional). The postoperative low-back pain scores on the VAS improved in both groups, although the 1-year between-group mean difference of improvement was 3.5 mm (95% CI; 1.4–5.7 mm) in favour of conventional microdiscectomy. In conclusion, tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy did not result in reduced muscle injury. Postoperative evaluation of CPK and the multifidus muscle showed similar results in both groups, although patients who underwent tubular discectomy reported more low-back pain during the first year after surgery.

The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. a two-year follow-up of spine surgery patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

So far there is no golden standard for the measurement of functional disability in spinal problems. The Oswestry index can be used to monitor the response to treatment and rehabilitation. It is based on a patient's subjective impression of his or her own state of disability. The purpose of this prospective study is to give a graphic presentation of the behaviour of the Oswestry index in different spine surgery groups.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The material includes 193 discectomy and decompressive operations. 37 of these patients had been operated earlier. The patients were observed for two years after the index operation through the mail with the Oswestry questionnaire.

RESULTS

Before an operation the average Oswestry index corresponded to severe disability on average. After successful treatment the Oswestry index dropped by 20-40 points on average. The more complex the problem the higher the postoperative lines remained.

CONCLUSIONS

The results compared well with those of earlier studies. The graphs presented in this study may help the treating clinician to make conclusions on how his or her patients are doing on average after surgery.

Magnetic resonance imaging of denervation-induced muscle atrophy: effects of clenbuterol in the rat

We show that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to quantify the amount of muscle in the lower legs of adult rats and to noninvasively monitor the onset and progression of denervation-induced atrophy. Muscle cross-sectional areas determined from 2D gradient-echo MR images allow longitudinal quantification of the protective effects of a beta(2)-adrenergic agonist clenbuterol. We also show that the estimation of clenbuterol's efficacy is improved by computation of the muscle volume. Rapid animal throughput and the ability to accurately estimate efficacy make MRI an attractive technology for studying skeletal muscle atrophy and hypertrophy, allowing the evaluation of potential therapies in longitudinal studies.

The Oswestry Disability Index

STUDY DESIGN

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. This review is based on publications using the ODI identified from the authors' personal databases, the Science Citation Index, and hand searches of Spine and current textbooks of spinal disorders.

OBJECTIVES

To review the versions of this instrument, document methods by which it has been validated, collate data from scores found in normal and back pain populations, provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI, and maintain the ODI as a gold standard outcome measure.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It has now been 20 years since its original publication. More than 200 citations exist in the Science Citation Index. The authors have a large correspondence file relating to the ODI, that is cited in most of the large textbooks related to spinal disorders.

METHODS

All the published versions of the questionnaire were identified. A systematic review of this literature was made. The various reports of validation were collated and related to a version.

RESULTS

Four versions of the ODI are available in English and nine in other languages. Some published versions contain misprints, and many omit the scoring system. At least 114 studies contain usable data. These data provide both validation and standards for other users and indicate the power of the instrument for detecting change in sample populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure. The process of using the ODI is reviewed and should be the subject of further research. The receiver operating characteristics should be explored in a population with higher self-report disabilities. The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood, particularly in sensitivity to real change.