Influence of carvedilol and propranolol on coronary blood flow

Effect of atenolol and celiprolol on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion in coronary artery disease

Earlier studies have reported on the potentiated muscarinic vasoconstriction of intracoronary acetylcholine after metoprolol application in patients with coronary artery disease. The present study investigated the effect of celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo on acetylcholine-induced vasomotion in patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, direct effects on coronary vasomotion and on hemodynamics were evaluated. Acetylcholine (intracoronary concentrations of 6.3x10(-7), 2.0x10(-6), and 6.3x10(-6) M) was given before and after double-blind celiprolol (0.30 mg/kg IV), atenolol (0.15 mg/kg IV), or placebo in 3x12 patients. Vasomotion was investigated by quantitative coronary angiography in proximal and distal segments of epicardial coronary arteries, and by the determination of the coronary resistance index based on Doppler-flow measurements. The investigated drugs had no direct affect on the diameter of the epicardial coronary arteries. However, celiprolol, in contrast to atenolol, significantly reduced systemic vascular resistance (change after atenolol: from 1,855+/-308 to 2,161+/-550 dyne s cm(-5); celiprolol: 1,691+/-435 to 1,411+/-343 dyne s cm(-5); and placebo: 1,722+/-215 to 1,710+/-213 dyne s cm(-5), p<0.001) and the coronary resistance index (change after atenolol: 2.52+/-3.58 to 2.86+/-4.24; celiprolol: 2.70+/-1.55 to 2.49+/-2.26; and placebo: 1.97+/-1.35 to 1.92+/-1.25, p<0.01). Celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo did not have different effects on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion of epicardial conductance vessels (diminution of proximal lumen diameter before/after atenolol: 0.42+/-0.39/0.44+/-0.39 mm; celiprolol: 0.32+/-0.26/0.30+/-0.24 mm; and placebo: 0.36+/-0.29/0.43+/-0.40 mm) and of coronary resistance vessels (reduction of coronary resistance index before/after atenolol: 1.95 +/-4.74/ 1.92+/-3.74; celiprolol: 0.98+/-0.73/1.41+/-1.50; and placebo: 1.16+/-1.29/1.16+/-1.04). In contrast to atenolol, celiprolol possesses vasodilative properties in systemic and coronary resistance vessels. There was no direct effect on the diameter of conductance vessels. Acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion both in conductance and resistance vessels was not influenced by the beta blockers that were studied. This suggests that atenolol and celiprolol do not influence endothelium-dependent, nitric oxide related vasomotion.

Carvedilol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy

Carvedilol is a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which also causes peripheral vasodilation primarily via alpha 1-adrenergic blockade. Carvedilol produces its antihypertensive effect partly by reducing total peripheral resistance by blocking alpha 1-adrenoceptors and by preventing beta-adrenoceptor-mediated compensatory mechanisms. This combined action avoids many of the unwanted effects associated with traditional beta-blocker or vasodilator therapy. In clinical trials published to date, most of which enrolled small numbers of patients, the antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol administered once daily was similar to that of atenolol, labetalol, pindolol, propranolol, metoprolol, nitrendipine (in elderly patients), slow release nifedipine or captopril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Combined therapy with carvedilol 25 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, nicardipine 60 mg or slow release nifedipine 20 mg has an additive antihypertensive effect. Carvedilol and atenolol at similar doses were equally effective at reducing blood pressure in patients who had previously not responded adequately to hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy. As a result of its multiple mechanisms of action, carvedilol is suited for the management of specific groups of hypertensive patients, such as those with renal impairment. In patients with non-insulin-dependent or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus carvedilol does not appear to affect glucose tolerance or carbohydrate metabolism. Initial studies have demonstrated that carvedilol and slow release nifedipine have similar efficacy in patients with stable angina pectoris and there is evidence that carvedilol has a beneficial haemodynamic effect in patients with congestive heart failure (NYHA class II or III) secondary to ischaemic heart disease. A postmarketing surveillance study has shown that carvedilol is generally well tolerated with only 7% (164/2226) of patients (83% of the total number received 25mg daily for 12 weeks) withdrawing from treatment because of adverse events. Vertigo, headache, bronchospasm, fatigue and skin reactions were the most common events causing withdrawal. Thus, clinical experience to date suggests that carvedilol is likely to be a valuable addition to the options currently available for treating patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, and may offer particular benefit in specific populations of hypertensive patients.

Clinical pharmacology of carvedilol

Animal work has shown that carvedilol is a nonselective beta-blocking drug. It has a vasodilator action from alpha-receptor blockade, but there is evidence that it has further action to relax smooth muscle, possibly from calcium channel antagonism. Carvedilol is lipid soluble and 25% bioavailable, and it has a half-life of about 7 h. It lowers blood pressure at rest and reduces the tachycardia and the rise of blood pressure on exercise. It reduces the level of blood pressure reached during isometric exercise or the cold pressor test. Cardiac output at rest is maintained, and the haemodynamics in the compromised heart is improved. It has an important peripheral vasodilator action, peripheral flow being maintained to important organs, e.g. kidneys, despite the fall in blood pressure. Exercising renin and noradrenaline levels are increased, as are the latter at rest. Carvedilol is lipid neutral. Carvedilol shifts the dose-response curve to isoprenaline to the right, as well as to alpha-stimulants such as phenylephrine. Responses to angiotensin are little affected. The ratio of beta- to alpha-blockade has been found to be 7.6 for 50 mg and 12.5 for 100 mg of carvedilol. There is no evidence of a decline in alpha-blockade after 1 week of continuous administration.

Acute hemodynamic effects of carvedilol in comparison with propranolol in patients with coronary heart disease

In a randomized, double-blind study oral doses of 50 mg carvedilol (Dilatrend) were compared with 40 mg propranolol in 16 male patients with coronary heart disease, CHD [12 without significant stenoses following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 4 with multivessel disease]. Bicycle ergometry in the supine position was performed before and 80 min after drug application; measurements were done at rest, during and after exercise. Clinically, the total exercise time and the onset of angina and exhaustion were noted, while the investigated hemodynamic parameters were heart rate, systemic and pulmonary pressures and resistances, cardiac index, and lower limb blood flow. Clinically, carvedilol improved the exercise tolerance more than propranolol as regards angina and exhaustion. Hemodynamically, carvedilol did not lead, as the classic betablocker propranolol does, to an increase in systemic or pulmonary resistance, to a decrease in cardiac output, or to an increase of the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise, but instead caused opposite changes. In contrast to propranolol, the post exercise lower limb blood flow had increased significantly. The differences in action between the two betablockers can be explained by the vasodilating properties of carvedilol. Due to these acute effects, carvedilol may be preferred to propranolol in the treatment of CHD patients with hypertension, peripheral occlusive artery disease, and/or coronary vasospasm.