An audit on guidelines used for the initial management of patients with minor head injuries in Denmark

Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: Evolutions and emerging revolutions

The aim of diagnostic imaging for maxillofacial trauma is to provide additional information that can positively influence medical or surgical patient management. Current advances in diagnostic imaging have come from the confluence of 3 driving forces: (1) the demand from clinicians to enhance and expand their diagnostic abilities; (2) the development of new theoretical concepts by basic scientists; and (3) the application of concepts by engineers and manufacturers to provide increasingly sophisticated imaging capabilities. The role of imaging within the health care environment is, however, also buffeted by the complex, sometimes competing, interactions of external social, political, economic, and technological pressures at the national, regional, and local levels. The purposes of this review are to provide a perspective on current imaging modalities used for maxillofacial trauma and to provide an insight into the influences, both technologic and external, on future developments and applications.

Reliability of clinical guidelines in the detection of patients at risk following mild head injury: results of a prospective study

OBJECT

The aims of this study were to analyze the relevance of risk factors in mild head injury (MHI) by studying the possibility of establishing prediction models based on these factors and to evaluate the reliability of the clinical guidelines proposed for the management of MHI.

METHODS

A series of 1101 patients with MHI were prospectively enrolled in this study. In all cases clinical data were collected and a computerized tomography (CT) scan was obtained. The relationship between clinical findings and the presence of intracranial lesions was studied to establish prediction models based on logistic regression and recursive partitioning analysis. Recently proposed guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of MHI were selected, calculating their diagnostic efficiency when applying each of them to our series. The incidence of acute intracranial lesions was 7.5% (83 patients). A Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14, loss of consciousness, vomiting, headache, signs of basilar skull fracture, neurological deficit, coagulopathies, hydrocephalus treated with shunt insertion, associated extracranial lesions, and patient age greater than 65 years were identified as independent risk factors. Prediction models built on clinical variables were able to indicate patients with clinically important lesions, but failed to achieve 100% sensitivity in the detection of all patients with CT scans positive for intracranial lesions within reasonable specificity limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical variables are insufficient to predict all cases of intracranial lesions following MHI, although they can be used to detect patients with relevant injuries. Avoiding systematic CT scan indication implies a rate of misdiagnosis that should be known and assumed when planning treatment in these patients by using guidelines based on clinical parameters.

[Minor head injury management in Spain: a multicenter national survey]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Despite of the high incidence of minor head injury, there is still controversy and disparity of criteria regarding its management. The lack of consensual protocols and clinical guidelines can lead to deficiencies in the attention to these patients and to inadequate use of resources. The objective of this study has been to describe the present situation of the management of this entity in the neurosurgical departments of the Spanish public hospitals, and to compare it with other European countries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 57-item questionnaire regarding different aspects of minor head injury was designed and distributed to the 66 neurosurgical departments of the Spanish National Health System between December 1999 and February 2000.

RESULTS

A 83.3% of responses were obtained. More than 92,000 patients per year are assisted at the Spanish third-level hospitals (general hospitals) after suffering a minor head injury. In-hospital on duty neurosurgeons are not available in 49.1% of the Spanish neurosurgical departments. Only in 7.3% of the centres the neurosurgeon is the first physician that assists these patients. However, in 52.7% of the hospitals neurosurgical evaluation is required if the patient refers transient loss of consciousness. A GCS score of 13 is still included in the group of minor head injuries in 29.1% of the centres. Although 89.1% of the surveyed neurosurgical departments considered as satisfactory the attention they provide to these patients, 85.5% think that it would be convenient to elaborate clinical guidelines. Cranial x-ray is considered a useful diagnostic tool by only 38.2% of the centres, however, 89.1% of them still use it as a routine. CT-scan is systematically indicated in all patients after suffering a mild head trauma only in 5.5% of the centres, although it is completely available in 74.5% of them. The study of economical costs shows that choosing cranial CT as screening tool in these patients would mean a 40.6% reduction in costs compared to a management based on x-ray plus in-hospital observation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the inter-hospital variability of minor head injury management in Spain. Clinical guidelines are considered as positive and necessary. Although the Spanish situation is similar to that in other European countries, following the tendency toward a broader cranial CT utilisation, would improve diagnosis profitability and economical efficiency. The results of this study may contribute to the creation of consensual protocols and clinical guidelines in our country that help in daily practice decision-making optimising assistance quality.

Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee

BACKGROUND

The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee was initiated by the Scandinavian Neurosurgical Society to develop evidence-based guidelines for improved care of neurotrauma patients.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search identified 475 papers dealing with the management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries. Forty-two studies presenting class II evidence on the initial management of such injuries were reviewed and management guidelines were developed.

RESULTS

Implementation of the Head Injury Severity Scale is advocated. Patients with minimal injuries (no loss of consciousness, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15) can be safely discharged. Routine early computed tomographic scan is recommended in cases with mild injuries (history of loss of consciousness, Glasgow Coma Scale score = 14-15) and patients with normal scans may be discharged. Computed tomographic scan and admission is mandatory in moderate injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale score = 13). All patients harboring additional risk factors should be scanned and admitted. A flow-chart for clinical decision making and a Head Injury Instruction card is introduced.

CONCLUSIONS

The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee suggests guidelines that should be safe and cost-effective for the initial management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries.

Survey of the management of patients with minor head injuries in hospitals in Sweden

OBJECTIVES

Development of guidelines for quality assurance in head injury care has to be based on knowledge about how today's management is organized. To address the need for guidelines in minor head injury (MHI), the authors studied management practice in Sweden.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional mail survey including all 76 hospitals treating head-injured patients. The questionnaire outlined present management practice in MHI; including routines for clinical and radiological examinations, in-hospital observation, discharge criteria and follow-up.

RESULTS

The initial evaluation is frequently performed by inexperienced physicians. The level of consciousness is assessed according to the Swedish Reaction Level Scale or the Glasgow Coma Scale in 96% of the hospitals. Routine computerized tomography is used in 4%. Skull radiography is not routinely performed. Eighty percent of the hospitals discharge selected patients without in-hospital observation and most (93%) offer no routine follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey shows a variation in the management of MHI in hospitals in Sweden. Routines for assessment of consciousness level are satisfactory, but CT scan for detection of skull fracture and early diagnoses of intracranial complications is usually not performed. Guidelines should be based on present routines including decision rules for CT scan.