Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of quinaprilat after low dose quinapril in patients with terminal renal failure

Quinaprilat: a review of its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicological data and clinical application

BACKGROUND

Quinaprilat is an ACE inhibitor for intravenous use especially in patients with arterial hypertension or chronic heart failure. In contrast to the oral prodrug quinapril, it has not been approved for clinical application.

OBJECTIVE

In this review, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of quinaprilat as well as toxicological data and results of preclinical and clinical studies are summarized.

METHODS

In a PubMed search for the terms "quinaprilat" and "quinapril", literature relevant for this review was selected.

RESULTS

Quinaprilat is a potent nonsulfhydryl selective ACE inhibitor with a short elimination half-life of 2 - 3 h, but due to slow dissociation from tissue ACE, once daily dosing is sufficient for effective ACE inhibition. Quinaprilat is excreted mainly in urine. In long-term animal studies, quinaprilat was not teratogenic, mutagenic or carcinogenic. However, due to the risk of fetal and neonatal morbidity and death, it should not be administrated in pregnancy. Quinaprilat is characterized by an excellent safety profile; adverse events occur infrequently and are rarely serious.

CONCLUSION

Quinaprilat is an attractive ACE inhibitor, which potently inhibits tissue ACE.

Elimination kinetics of quinaprilat and perindoprilat in hypertensive patients with renal failure on haemodialysis

Objective of the present study was to investigate the elimination kinetics of quinaprilat and perindoprilat, the active metabolites of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors quinapril and perindopril, in hypertensive patients with renal failure under haemodialysis to evaluate the appropriate duration of off-dose of these drugs before starting of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. The informed consent was received from 12 hypertensive patients with renal failure, who were under haemodialysis (42 to 62 years). The patients received oral administration of quinapril (10 mg) or perindopril (2 mg) once a day for four weeks. First, to evaluate the dialyzability of each metabolite, blood samples were collected before and after haemodialysis one week after the repeated doses. Second, to evaluate the elimination kinetics of quinaprilat or perindoprilat, blood samples were collected at 24, 72, 120, 192 and 240 h after the final administration. Plasma concentrations of quinaprilat and perindoprilat were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a model-dependent method. Values of haemodialysis clearance (CL(HD)) and extraction ratio (ER) were 51.5+/-30.2 ml/min and 0.35+/-0.21 for quinaprilat and 108.1+/-5.9 ml/min and 0.75+/-0.04 for perindoprilat, respectively. The terminal elimination half-lives of quinaprilat and perindoprilat were 60.7+/-2.1 and 79.9+/-14.0 h, respectively. The dialyzability of perindoprilat was much higher than that of quinaprilat probably due to low protein binding potency. The present study suggests that hypertensive patients receiving chronic therapy with quinapril or perindopril on haemodialysis should be withdrawn for at least 2 to 3 weeks before LDL apheresis.

Effects of a therapy with losartan and quinaprilat on the progression of chronic renal failure in rats after a single dose of uranyl nitrate or 5/6 nephrectomy

The renoprotective effect of losartan and quinaprilat was tested in two different animal models of renal failure [female Wistar rats, single administration of 0.5 mg uranyl nitrate (UN)/100 g body wt. or 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6NX)]. Losartan (1 mg/100 g body weight [wt.]) and quinaprilat (1 mg/100 g body wt.) were administered intraperitoneally, once daily, starting 10 days after UN and one week after 5/6NX till the end of 10 weeks experimental period. Parameters characterizing the therapeutic effect were blood pressure, urinary protein excretion 4 and 10 weeks after the injury, and p-aminohippurate accumulation in renal cortical slices in vitro, hydroxy-proline concentration in renal tissue and morphology at the end of the experiment. Summarizing our results we state: (1) the angiotensin 1 receptor blocker losartan is more effective in UN-treated than in 5/6 NX rats, and (2) the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor quinaprilat is more effective than losartan because of the amelioration of blood pressure and OH-proline concentration in renal tissue of UN-treated rats.

Risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin antagonists versus ACE inhibitors in end-stage renal disease

The effective treatment of hypertension is an extremely important consideration in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Virtually any drug class--with the possible exception of diuretics--can be used to treat hypertension in the patient with ESRD. Despite there being such a wide range of treatment options, drugs which interrupt the renin-angiotensin axis are generally suggested as agents of choice in this population, even though the evidence in support of their preferential use is quite scanty. ACE inhibitors, and more recently angiotensin antagonists, are the 2 drug classes most commonly employed to alter renin-angiotensin axis activity and therefore produce blood pressure control. ACE inhibitor use in patients with ESRD can sometimes prove an exacting proposition. ACE inhibitors are variably dialysed, with compounds such as catopril, enalapril, lisinopril and perindopril undergoing substantial cross-dialyser clearance during a standard dialysis session. This phenomenon makes the selection of a dose and the timing of administration for an ACE inhibitor a complex issue in patients with ESRD. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors are recognised as having a range of nonpressor effects that are pertinent to patients with ESRD. Such effects include their ability to decrease thirst drive and to decrease erythropoiesis. In addition, ACE inhibitors have a unique adverse effect profile. As is the case with their use in patients without renal failure, use of ACE inhibitors in patients with ESRD can be accompanied by cough and less frequently by angioneurotic oedema. In the ESRD population, ACE inhibitor use is also accompanied by so-called anaphylactoid dialyser reactions. Angiotensin antagonists are similar to ACE inhibitors in their mechanism of blood pressure lowering. Angiotensin antagonists are not dialysable and therefore can be distinguished from a number of the ACE inhibitors. In addition, the adverse effect profile for angiotensin antagonists is remarkably bland, with cough and angioneurotic oedema rarely, if ever, occurring. In patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists are also not associated with the anaphylactoid dialyser reactions which occur with ACE inhibitors. The nonpressor effects of angiotensin antagonists--such as an influence on thirst drive and erythropoiesis--have not been explored in nearly the depth, as they have been with ACE inhibitors. Although ACE inhibitors have not been compared directly to angiotensin antagonists in patients with ESRD, angiotensin antagonists possess a number of pharmacokinetic and adverse effect characteristics, which would favour their use in this population.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part I

Understanding the mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic properties of vasodilatory drugs facilitates optimal use in clinical practice. It should be kept in mind that a drug belongs to a class but is a distinct entity, sometimes derived from a prototype to achieve a specific effect. The most common pharmacokinetic drug improvement is the development of a drug with a half-life sufficiently long to allow an adequate once-daily dosage. Developing a controlled release preparation can increase the apparent half-life of a drug. Altering the molecular structure may also increase the half-life of a prototype drug. Another desirable improvement is increasing the specificity of a drug, which may result in fewer adverse effects, or more efficacy at the target site. This is especially important for vasodilatory drugs which may be administered over decades for the treatment of hypertension, which usually does not interfere with subjective well-being. Compliance is greatly increased with once-daily dosing. Vasodilatory agents cause relaxation by either a decrease in cytoplasmic calcium, an increase in nitric oxide (NO) or by inhibiting myosin light chain kinase. They are divided into 9 classes: calcium antagonists, potassium channel openers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor antagonists, alpha-adrenergic and imidazole receptor antagonists, beta 1-adrenergic agonist, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, eicosanoids and NO donors. Despite chemical differences, the pharmacokinetic properties of calcium antagonists are similar. Absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is high, with all substances undergoing considerable first-pass metabolism by the liver, resulting in low bioavailability and pronounced individual variation in pharmacokinetics. Renal impairment has little effect on pharmacokinetics since renal elimination of these agents is minimal. Except for the newer drugs of the dihydropyridine type, amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nilvadipine, nisoldipine and nitrendipine, the half-life of calcium antagonists is short. Maintaining an effective drug concentration for the remainder of these agents requires multiple daily dosing, in some cases even with controlled release formulations. However, a coat-core preparation of nifedipine has been developed to allow once-daily administration. Adverse effects are directly correlated to the potency of the individual calcium antagonists. Treatment with the potassium channel opener minoxidil is reserved for patients with moderately severe to severe hypertension which is refractory to other treatment. Diazoxide and hydralazine are chiefly used to treat severe hypertensive emergencies, primary pulmonary and malignant hypertension and in severe preeclampsia. ACE inhibitors prevent conversion of angiotensin-I to angiotensin-II and are most effective when renin production is increased. Since ACE is identical to kininase-II, which inactivates the potent endogenous vasodilator bradykinin, ACE inhibition causes a reduction in bradykinin degradation. ACE inhibitors exert cardioprotective and cardioreparative effects by preventing and reversing cardiac fibrosis and ventricular hypertrophy in animal models. The predominant elimination pathway of most ACE inhibitors is via renal excretion. Therefore, renal impairment is associated with reduced elimination and a dosage reduction of 25 to 50% is recommended in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. Separating angiotensin-II inhibition from bradykinin potentiation has been the goal in developing angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. The incidence of adverse effects of such an agent, losartan, is comparable to that encountered with placebo treatment, and the troublesome cough associated with ACE inhibitors is absent.