Venous responses to rhythmic exercise in contralateral forearm and calf

Compliance in the deep and superficial conduit veins of the nonexercising arm is unaffected by short-term exercise

The effects of short-term dynamic and static exercise on compliance (CPL) in a single conduit vein in the nonexercising limb are not fully understood, although prolonged cycling exercise was found to produce a significant reduction of CPL in the veins. In this study, we investigated the cross-sectional area (CSA) and CPL in the brachial (deep) and basilic (superficial) veins of the nonexercising arm in 14 participants who performed a 5-min cycling exercise at 35% and 70% of peak oxygen uptake (study 1) and in 11 participants who performed a 2-min static handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (study 2). The CSA in the deep and superficial veins at rest and during the final minute of exercise was measured by high-resolution ultrasonography during a short-duration cuff deflation protocol. The CPL in each vein was calculated as the numerical derivative of the cuff pressure and CSA curve. During short-term dynamic and static exercise, there was no change in CPL in either vein, but there was a decrease in CSA in both veins. The simultaneous findings of unchanged CPL and decreased CSA suggest that CPL during short-term exercise are independently controlled by the mechanisms responsible for exercise-induced sympathoexcitation in both single veins. Thus, short-term exercise does not alter CPL in both conduit superficial and deep veins in nonexercising upper arm.

Central command increases muscular oxygenation of the non-exercising arm at the early period of voluntary one-armed cranking

This study aimed to examine whether central command increases oxygenation in non‐contracting arm muscles during contralateral one‐armed cranking and whether the oxygenation response caused by central command differs among skeletal muscles of the non‐exercising upper limb. In 13 male subjects, the relative changes in oxygenated‐hemoglobin concentration (Oxy‐Hb) of the non‐contracting arm muscles [the anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, biceps brachii, and extensor carpi radialis (ECR)] were measured during voluntary one‐armed cranking (intensity, 35–40% of maximal voluntary effort) and mental imagery of the one‐armed exercise for 1 min. Voluntary one‐armed cranking increased (P < 0.05) the Oxy‐Hb of the triceps, biceps, and ECR muscles to the same extent (15 ± 4% of the baseline level, 17 ± 5%, and 16 ± 4%, respectively). The greatest increase in the Oxy‐Hb was observed in the deltoid muscle. Intravenous injection of atropine (10–15 μg/kg) and/or propranolol (0.1 mg/kg) revealed that the increased Oxy‐Hb of the arm muscles consisted of the rapid atropine‐sensitive and delayed propranolol‐sensitive components. Mental imagery of the exercise increased the Oxy‐Hb of the arm muscles. Motor‐driven passive one‐armed cranking had little influence on the Oxy‐Hb of the arm muscles. It is likely that central command plays a role in the initial increase in oxygenation in the non‐contracting arm muscles via sympathetic cholinergic vasodilatation at the early period of one‐armed cranking. The centrally induced increase in oxygenation may not be different among the distal arm muscles but may augment in the deltoid muscle.

Decreased compliance in the deep and superficial conduit veins of the upper arm during prolonged cycling exercise

We examined whether there is a difference in compliance between the deep and superficial conduit veins of the upper arm in response to prolonged exercise. Eight young men performed cycling exercise at 60% of peak oxygen uptake until rectal temperature had been increased by 1.1°C for 38–48 min. The cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the brachial (deep) and basilic (superficial) veins was assessed by ultrasound during a cuff deflation protocol. Compliance (CPL) was calculated as the numerical derivative of the cuff pressure and CSA curve. During prolonged exercise, CPL in both conduit veins was similarly decreased when compared with pre‐exercise values; however, the CSA decreased in the deep vein but increased in the superficial vein. In addition, passive heating caused an analogous change in CSA and CPL of superficial vein when compared with prolonged exercise, but did not change CSA and CPL of deep vein. Cold pressor test induced the decreased CSA of deep and superficial veins without the alteration of CPL of both veins. These results suggest that CPL in the deep and superficial conduit veins adjusts to prolonged exercise via different mechanisms.

Superficial venous vascular response of the resting limb during static exercise and postexercise muscle ischemia

Superficial venous vascular response to exercise is mediated sympathetically, although the mechanism is not fully understood. We examined whether sympathetic activation via muscle metaboreflex plays a role in the control of a superficial vein in the contralateral resting limb during exercise. The experimental condition involved selective stimulation of muscle metaboreceptors: 12 subjects performed static handgrip exercises at 45% maximal voluntary contraction for 1.5 min followed by a recovery period with arterial occlusion of the exercise arm (OCCL). For the control condition (CONT), the same exercise protocol was performed except that the recovery period occurred without arterial occlusion. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured. The cross-sectional area of the basilic superficial vein (CSAvein) and blood velocity (Vvein) in the resting upper arm were measured by ultrasound while the cuff on resting upper arm was inflated constantly to a subdiastolic pressure of 50 mm Hg. Basilic vein blood flow (BFvein) was calculated as CSAvein × Vvein. During exercise under both OCCL and CONT, HR and MAP increased (p < 0.05), while CSAvein decreased (p < 0.05). During recovery under OCCL, HR returned to baseline, but the exercise-induced increase in MAP and decrease in CSAvein were maintained (p < 0.05). During recovery under CONT, HR, MAP, and CSAvein returned to baseline. BFvein did not change during exercise or recovery under either condition. These results suggest that sympathoexcitation via muscle metaboreflex may be one of the factors responsible for exercise-induced constriction of the superficial veins per se in the resting limb.

Tendon vibration attenuates superficial venous vessel response of the resting limb during static arm exercise

BACKGROUND

The superficial vein of the resting limb constricts sympathetically during exercise. Central command is the one of the neural mechanisms that controls the cardiovascular response to exercise. However, it is not clear whether central command contributes to venous vessel response during exercise. Tendon vibration during static elbow flexion causes primary muscle spindle afferents, such that a lower central command is required to achieve a given force without altering muscle force. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate whether a reduction in central command during static exercise with tendon vibration influences the superficial venous vessel response in the resting limb.

METHODS

Eleven subjects performed static elbow flexion at 35% of maximal voluntary contraction with (EX + VIB) and without (EX) vibration of the biceps brachii tendon. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in overall and exercising muscle were measured. The cross-sectional area (CSAvein) and blood velocity of the basilic vein in the resting upper arm were assessed by ultrasound, and blood flow (BFvein) was calculated using both variables.

RESULTS

Muscle tension during exercise was similar between EX and EX + VIB. However, RPEs at EX + VIB were lower than those at EX (P <0.05). Increases in heart rate and mean arterial pressure during exercise at EX + VIB were also lower than those at EX (P <0.05). CSAvein in the resting limb at EX decreased during exercise from baseline (P <0.05), but CSAvein at EX + VIB did not change during exercise. CSAvein during exercise at EX was smaller than that at EX + VIB (P <0.05). However, BFvein did not change during the protocol under either condition. The decreases in circulatory response and RPEs during EX + VIB, despite identical muscle tension, showed that activation of central command was less during EX + VIB than during EX. Abolishment of the decrease in CSAvein during exercise at EX + VIB may thus have been caused by a lower level of central command at EX + VIB rather than EX.

CONCLUSION

Diminished central command induced by tendon vibration may attenuate the superficial venous vessel response of the resting limb during sustained static arm exercise.

Regional changes in reactive hyperemic blood flow during exercise training: time-course adaptations

Background

Few studies have examined the time-course of localized exercise training on regional blood flow in humans. The study examined the influence of handgrip exercise training on forearm reactive hyperemic blood flow and vascular resistance in apparently healthy men.

Methods

Forearm blood flow and vascular resistance were evaluated, in 17 individuals [Age: 22.6 ± 3.5], in both arms, at rest and following 5 minutes of arterial occlusion, using strain gauge plethysmography, prior to training (V1) and every week thereafter (V2-5) for 4 weeks. Handgrip exercise was performed in the non-dominant arm 5 d/wk for 20 minutes at 60% of maximum voluntary contraction, while the dominant arm served as control.

Results

Resting HR, BP, and forearm blood flow and vascular resistance were not altered with training. The trained arm handgrip strength and circumference increased by 14.5% (p = 0.014) and 1.56% (p = 0.03), respectively. ANOVA tests revealed an arms by visit interaction for the trained arm for reactive hyperemic blood flow (p = 0.02) and vascular resistance (p = 0.009). Post-hoc comparison demonstrated increased reactive hyperemic blood flow (p = 0.0013), and decreased post-occlusion vascular resistance (p = 0.05), following the 1^st week of training, with no significant changes in subsequent visits.

Conclusion

The results indicate unilateral improvements in forearm reactive hyperemic blood flow and vascular resistance following 1 week of handgrip exercise training and leveled off for the rest of the study.

Autonomic control of the venous system in health and disease: effects of drugs

The venous system contains approximately 70% of the blood volume. The sympathetic nervous system is by far the most important vasopressor system in the control of venous capacitance. The baroreflex system responds to acute hypotension by concurrently increasing sympathetic tone to resistance, as well as capacitance vessels, to increase blood pressure and venous return, respectively. Studies in experimental animals have shown that interference of sympathetic activity by an alpha1- or alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist or a ganglionic blocker reduces mean circulatory filling pressure and venous resistance and increases unstressed volume. An alpha1- or alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, on the other hand, increases mean circulatory filling pressure and venous resistance and reduces unstressed volume. In humans, drugs that interfere with sympathetic tone can cause the pooling of blood in limb as well as splanchnic veins; the reduction of cardiac output; and orthostatic intolerance. Other perturbations that can cause postural hypotension include autonomic failure, as in dysautonomia, diabetes mellitus, and vasovagal syncope; increased venous compliance, as in hemodialysis; and reduced blood volume, as with space flight and prolonged bed rest. Several alpha-adrenoceptor agonists are used to increase venous return in orthostatic intolerance; however, there is insufficient data to show that these drugs are more efficacious than placebo. Clearly, more basic science and clinical studies are needed to increase our knowledge and understanding of the venous system.

Measuring venous capacitance and blood flow in pregnancy

Forearm or calf venous plethysmography has been used in pregnant women to examine the effects of pregnancy on the vascular system and more recently to measure blood flow changes in response to intra-arterial infusion of vasoactive substances. To examine the assumption that venous capacitance and blood flow measurements are the same in the forearm and calf, venous plethysmography was conducted simultaneously on the forearm and calf in normal (NP) and hypertensive pregnant women (HTP) in their third trimester and in normal nonpregnant women (N). All studies were made on the right forearm and calf with subjects in the left lateral recumbent position. There was no significant difference between venous capacitance in the forearm (median: 124 x 10(3)mL/100mL/mmHg for both NP and HTP) and leg (134 [NP] and 106 [HTP] x 10(3)mL/100mL/mmHg) for both pregnant groups but venous capacitance in the nonpregnant group was greater in the leg than arm (174 versus 112 x 10(3)mL/100mL/mmHg, p < 0.001). Blood flow was similar in the leg and forearm (median 4.9 versus 3.9mL/100mL/min respectively) in nonpregnant women. Forearm blood flow was also similar to calf flow in NP women (6.2 versus 4.3mL/100mL/min respectively) but greater than calf blood flow in HTP (9.7 versus 5.3mL/100mL/min, p < 0.01). Using left lateral recumbency, forearm and calf vein capacitances are similar in pregnant women, in contrast to nonpregnant women. Blood flow is higher in the forearm than the calf only in hypertensive pregnant women. These observations should be borne in mind when interpreting studies of regional blood flow in pregnancy.