Effects of radiation on the survival of excision-defective cells from Drosophila melanogaster

The Drosophila ortholog of the human XPG gene

Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XPG) protein is a junction-specific endonuclease which is indispensable for nucleotide excision repair (NER) of DNA in eukaryotes. Recent studies have hinted at a second, essential function for the XPG protein in higher eukaryotes. We undertook a comparison of the amino acid sequences of multiple XPG orthologs to determine if a motif or domain could be identified that is conserved uniquely in higher eukaryotes. A search of current databases allowed us to retrieve complete amino acid sequences for the human, mouse and Xenopus XPG proteins, and for two yeast orthologs. We also identified an incomplete Drosophila open reading frame (ORF) that was a good candidate for the XPG protein. We cloned a complete Drosophila cDNA for this ORF and examination of the primary amino acid sequence suggests that this cDNA encodes the Drosophila ortholog of XPG. A comparison of all six orthologous polypeptides reveals the presence of two previously unidentified conserved domains. One of these is unique to all four higher eukaryotic sequences. Conceivably this domain evolved to support the essential function of XPG protein.

Repair of UV-induced (6-4)photoproducts measured in individual genes in the Drosophila embryonic Kc cell line

The nucleotide excision repair (NER; dark-repair) of (6-4)photoproducts ((6-4)PPs) was assayed in cells from a permanent Drosophila melanogaster embryonic cell line, Kc, after exposure to 20 or 40 J/m2 ultraviolet (UV) light. Induction rates in the transcriptionally active genes Gart and Notch as well as in the inactive white locus is similar. They are formed with a frequency of about one-third of that of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). In all three genes, (6-4)PPs are repaired with the same rate and to the same extent: 31% of the (6-4)PPs are removed in 4 hours post-irradiation and after 16 hours repair is nearly complete. In none of the three genes strand-specific repair was found. Exposure of cells that were irradiated with 40 J/m2 UV to photoreactivating light for 1 hour prior to dark-repair incubation, resulted in enhanced repair of (6-4)PPs.

Repair of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in the individual genes Gart, Notch and white from Drosophila melanogaster cell lines

The excision repair of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers was investigated in three genes: Gart, Notch and white in a permanent Drosophila cell line Kc, derived from wild type Drosophila melanogaster embryonic cells. In this cell line Gart and Notch are actively transcribed, whereas white is not expressed. In all three genes UV-induced pyrimidine dimers were removed with the same rate and to the same extent: 60% removal within 16 hours, up to 80-100% in 24 hours after irradiation with 10 or 15 J/m2 UV. These kinetics are similar to the time course of dimer removal measured in the genome overall. No difference in repair of the inactive white locus compared to the active Gart and Notch genes was found. Similar results were obtained using a different wild type cell line, SL2, although repair appeared to be somewhat slower in this cell line. The results are discussed with respect to the data found for gene specific repair in other eukaryotic systems.

denV gene of bacteriophage T4 restores DNA excision repair to mei-9 and mus201 mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

The denV gene of bacteriophage T4 was fused to a Drosophila hsp70 (70-kDa heat shock protein) promoter and introduced into the germ line of Drosophila by P-element-mediated transformation. The protein product of that gene (endonuclease V) was detected in extracts of heat-shocked transformants with both enzymological and immunoblotting procedures. That protein restores both excision repair and UV resistance to mei-9 and mus201 mutants of this organism. These results reveal that the denV gene can compensate for excision-repair defects in two very different eukaryotic mutants, in that the mus201 mutants are typical of excision-deficient mutants in other organisms, whereas the mei-9 mutants exhibit a broad pleiotropism that includes a strong meiotic deficiency. This study permits an extension of the molecular analysis of DNA repair to the germ line of higher eukaryotes. It also provides a model system for future investigations of other well-characterized microbial repair genes on DNA damage in the germ line of this metazoan organism.

Equivalence of UDS responses for established cell lines and primary cells derived from the mei-9a and mus201D1 excision repair-deficient strains of Drosophila melanogaster

Autoradiographic analysis of unscheduled DNA synthesis in response to DNA damage produced by relatively high doses of the direct-acting, monofunctional alkylating agent, MMS, (4.5 mM) and UV (40 J/m2) demonstrates that established cell lines, derived from the mei-9a and mus201D1 excision repair-deficient strains of Drosophila melanogaster, perform no measurable incorporation of [3H]thymidine into repair patches, in accordance with the observations made for the corresponding primary embryonic cells derived from the two mutagen-sensitive strains of flies. These established cell lines can therefore be used as appropriate models for both the examination of the biochemical basis of the genetic defects in the mei-9 and mus201 mutations and the role of excision-repair processes in spontaneous and induced mutation induction in eukaryotic cells.

The molecular genetics of the incision step in the DNA excision repair process

This review describes the evolution of research into the genetic basis of how different organisms use the process of excision repair to recognize and remove lesions from their cellular DNA. One particular aspect of excision repair, DNA incision, and how it is controlled at the genetic level in bacteriophage, bacteria, S. cerevisae, D. melanogaster, rodent cells and humans is examined. In phage T4, DNA is incised by a DNA glycosylase-AP endonuclease that is coded for by the denV gene. In E. coli, the products of three genes, uvrA, uvrB and uvrC, are required to form the UVRABC excinuclease that cleaves DNA and releases a fragment 12-13 nucleotides long containing the site of damage. In S. cerevisiae, genes complementing five mutants of the RAD3 epistasis group, rad1, rad2, rad3, rad4 and rad10 have been cloned and analyzed. Rodent cells sensitive to a variety of mutagenic agents and deficient in excision repair are being used in molecular studies to identify and clone human repair genes (e.g. ERCC1) capable of complementing mammalian repair defects. Most studies of the human system, however, have been done with cells isolated from patients suffering from the repair defective, cancer-prone disorder, xeroderma pigmentosum, and these cells are now beginning to be characterized at the molecular level. Studies such as these that provide a greater understanding of the genetic basis of DNA repair should also offer new insights into other cellular processes, including genetic recombination, differentiation, mutagenesis, carcinogenesis and aging.

Photoreactivation of UV damage in cultured Drosophila cells

Cell survival and photoreactivation of 254 nm ultraviolet (UV) light damage in a wild type Drosophila cell line was assayed by colony formation in liquid medium. Fo, Fq, and extrapolation number for the exponential portion of survival curves are 21 J/m2, 3.6 J/m2, and 1.5 for non-photoreactivated cells and 110 J/m2, 11.2 J/m2, and 1.3 for those exposed to photoreactivating light. Maximal photoreactivation occurs at the 100 J/m2 region of the curve. At 10 and 50% survival, 75-80% of the UV damage was photoreactivable.

Photoreactivation rescue and hypermutability of ultraviolet-irradiated excisionless Drosophila melanogaster larvae

There is accumulating evidence suggesting that expression of genes for repair of UV damage to DNA in mammals and fish is regulated developmentally. Therefore, the activity of excision repair and photoreactivation in vivo in young larvae of Drosophila melanogaster was examined in a strain carrying the mutation mus201 that was unable to carry out excision repair. The photoreactivation activity in first-instar larvae was so high that UV-induced lethality in excision-less larvae was almost completely rescued by posttreatment with fluorescent light. Excision repair activity in first-instar repair-proficient larvae was so high that UV irradiation was scarcely able to produce somatic eye-color mutations. In contrast, excisionless larvae showed a high incidence of somatic eye-color mutation after UV-irradiation, and this incidence was reduced to the spontaneous level by posttreatment with fluorescent light. Incorporation of a postreplication repair-defective mutation into the excisionless strain decreased the incidence of UV-induced somatic mutations by a factor of 3. The analogous repair dependence of UV mutagenesis in Drosophila and Escherichia coli is discussed. It is proposed that UV-induced somatic mutations in excisionless Drosophila larvae are caused primarily by pyrimidine dimers and that a constitutive, error-prone pathway for filling daughter-strand gaps opposite dimers is, at least partly, responsible for the fixation of mutations.

Enhanced survival and decreased mutation frequency after photoreactivation of UV damage in rat kangaroo cells

The effect of pyrimidine dimers on cytotoxicity, DNA repair and mutagenesis was studied in cells, derived from the rat kangaroo, which possess photoreactivating capabilities. A significant enhancement in colony-forming ability was achieved after UV irradiation in exponentially growing cells if photoreactivating light treatment followed the UV irradiation. If photoreactivation treatment was delayed 24 h after UV irradiation, no significant increase in survival was observed. Assays of pyrimidine dimers, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and survival in contact-inhibited cells all confirmed a minor role of dark excision repair and a major role of photoreactivation. Photoreactivation decreased the frequency of mutations to 6-thioguanine resistance to a greater extent than the alteration seen in survival. Approximately 1.6 times the dose must be given to get equal killing in photoreactivated cells, whereas 4 times the dose must be given to obtain equal mutation frequencies in light-treated cells. This suggests that the removal of dimers is more effective in mutant reduction than enhancement of survival.