Patterns of dyspepsia in patients with no clinical evidence of organic diseases

Itopride in the treatment of functional dyspepsia in Chinese patients: a prospective, multicentre, post-marketing observational study

BACKGROUND

Prokinetic agents are commonly used in the symptomatic treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD). Safety or efficacy issues associated with the use of available prokinetics, such as metoclopramide, domperidone, cisapride and mosapride, mean there is a need for an effective and well tolerated prokinetic agent. Itopride is a novel prokinetic agent with a dual mode of action, good safety profile and documented efficacy in placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of itopride in the management of FD.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicentre, post-marketing observational study carried out in private outpatient clinics throughout China. The study included patients with symptomatic FD aged ≥18 years. Patients were prescribed itopride 50 mg three times daily before meals for 4 weeks, after which there was a 2-week follow-up period during which they did not take itopride. Effectiveness and tolerability data obtained from patients who completed 4 weeks of therapy were analysed. The treatment response rate after 4 weeks was measured by patient global assessment; scores at the end of treatment were compared with baseline scores. Response rate based on symptom scoring was also measured after 4 weeks, with an effective treatment being defined as a symptom improvement of ≥50%.

RESULTS

In total, 587 patients with FD were enrolled. The mean ± SD difference in the total symptom score before and after the 4-week treatment period was -5.62 ± 3.27, corresponding to a 69.23 ± 26.53% reduction from baseline (p < 0.001). The treatment response rates in patients who fulfilled Rome I, II and III criteria for FD were 33.68%, 34.71% and 35.50%, respectively, after 1 week of treatment; 52.82%, 54.61% and 56.51%, respectively, after 2 weeks; 66.67%, 67.23% and 68.64%, respectively, after 3 weeks; and 72.82%, 73.54% and 75.15%, respectively, after 4 weeks. Response rates were significantly different at 1 week versus 4 weeks of treatment. Nine patients (1.54%) had adverse events: four were probably related to the study drug, three were possibly related and two were not related. Of the nine patients with adverse events, two discontinued the study drug, two suspended (i.e. temporarily discontinued the drug until the adverse event subsided) the study drug, and five continued the study drug. Seven of the nine patients with adverse events had adverse reactions (defined as adverse events considered causally related to the study drug): two improved, three recovered and two showed no change. No adverse reactions were serious enough to warrant discontinuation of therapy.

CONCLUSION

Itopride was an effective and well tolerated drug in the management of FD in this patient population.

Diagnostic accuracy of age and alarm symptoms for upper GI malignancy in patients with dyspepsia in a GI clinic: a 7-year cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether using demographic characteristics and alarm symptoms can accurately predict cancer in patients with dyspepsia in Iran, where upper GI cancers and H. pylori infection are common.

METHODS

All consecutive patients referred to a tertiary gastroenterology clinic in Tehran, Iran, from 2002 to 2009 were invited to participate in this study. Each patient completed a standard questionnaire and underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Alarm symptoms included in the questionnaire were weight loss, dysphagia, GI bleeding, and persistent vomiting. We used logistic regression models to estimate the diagnostic value of each variable in combination with other ones, and to develop a risk-prediction model.

RESULTS

A total of 2,847 patients with dyspepsia participated in this study, of whom 87 (3.1%) had upper GI malignancy. Patients reporting at least one of the alarm symptoms constituted 66.7% of cancer patients compared to 38.9% in patients without cancer (p<0.001). Esophageal or gastric cancers in patients with dyspepsia was associated with older age, being male, and symptoms of weight loss and vomiting. Each single predictor had low sensitivity and specificity. Using a combination of age, alarm symptoms, and smoking, we built a risk-prediction model that distinguished between high-risk and low-risk individuals with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 and acceptable calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the predictors demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy. While our risk-prediction model had reasonable accuracy, some cancer cases would have remained undiagnosed. Therefore, where available, low cost endoscopy may be preferable for dyspeptic older patient or those with history of weight loss.

Is functional dyspepsia of particular concern in women? A review of gender differences in epidemiology, pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical presentation, and management

Dyspepsia is a remarkably common symptom in the general population. Although multiple definitions have been used to describe the symptom, the most common explanation is that of chronic or recurrent pain or discomfort (a subjective negative feeling that may be associated with early satiety, fullness, bloating, or nausea) centered in the upper abdomen. When a thorough evaluation of a dyspeptic patient fails to identify a cause for her symptoms, the label of nonulcer or functional dyspepsia is applied. Functional dyspepsia is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by relapsing and remitting symptoms. Treatment strategies should focus on alleviating the most bothersome symptom and can be based on the proposed underlying pathophysiology. The effect of gender on mechanisms of disease, symptom presentation, and treatment response is an area of increasing interest and study. As with other functional gastrointestinal disorders, there appear to be some gender-specific features of functional dyspepsia. Specifically, gender-related differences have been observed in some studies of both the prevalence of individual dyspepsia symptoms, and in gastric emptying and proximal gastric motor function. There also appear to be gender differences in the psychosocial realm, with dyspeptic women experiencing a lesser sense of well-being than dyspeptic men, as well as an association of an abuse history with functional dyspepsia. This review will highlight specific gender differences related to the symptom presentation, pathophysiology, and approach to treatment of functional dyspepsia, while noting where differences have not been found and where further investigation is warranted.

Management of functional dyspepsia: Unsolved problems and new perspectives

The common characteristic criteria of all functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are the persistence and recurrence of variable gastrointestinal symptoms that cannot be explained by any structural or biochemical abnormalities. Functional dyspepsia (FD) represents one of the important GI disorders in Western countries because of its remarkably high prevalence in general population and its impact on quality of life. Due to its dependence on both subjective determinants and diverse country-specific circumstances, the definition and management strategies of FD are still variably stated. Clinical trials with several drug classes (e.g., proton pump inhibitors, H2-blockers, prokinetic drugs) have been performed frequently without validated disease-specific test instruments for the outcome measurements. Therefore, the interpretation of such trials remains difficult and controversial with respect to comparability and evaluation of drug efficacy, and definite conclusions can be drawn neither for diagnostic management nor for efficacious drug therapy so far. In view of these unsolved problems, guidelines both on the clinical management of FD and on the performance of clinical trials are needed. In recent years, increasing research work has been done in this area. Clinical trials conducted in adequately diagnosed patients that provided validated outcome measurements may result in better insights leading to more effective treatment strategies. Encouraging perspectives have been recently performed by methodologically well-designed treatment studies with herbal drug preparations. Herbal drugs, given their proven efficacy in clinical trials, offer a safe therapeutic alternative in the treatment of FD which is often favored by both patients and physicians. A fixed combination of peppermint oil and caraway oil in patients suffering from FD could be proven effective by well-designed clinical trials.

A rational approach to uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: review of the literature

In this paper the rationale and limitations of the four most important approach strategies to dyspepsia in primary care (empiric treatment, prompt endoscopy, "test-and-scope", and "test-and-treat") are analysed. It is concluded that in the absence of alarm symptoms, a "test-and-treat" approach is currently the most rational approach provided that three conditions are met: (1) a highly accurate test should be used, (2) the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in the population should not be too low, and (3) an effective anti-H pylori regimen should be prescribed taking sufficient time to instruct and motivate the patient.

Nonulcer dyspepsia. Current concepts and management

NUD is a common heterogeneous condition with a multifactorial cause. NUD is a cause of considerable morbidity with an annual incidence of 8% and similar incidence of spontaneous resolution. Its economic effects are considerable. The estimated annual cost to the community of NUD is $431 per patient for the initial 6 months after diagnosis. The annual Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) expenditure on acid-related disorders in one Northern California HMO was estimated to be $59.4 million, of which NUD represented a significant proportion. The association of H. pylori infection with NUD is controversial. There are strong epidemiologic evidence and supportive pathophysiological mechanisms to implicate H. pylori causally in a subset of cases. Treatment studies are likewise conflicting. Evidence suggests that treatment cannot guarantee improvement in all cases of H. pylori-related NUD but that a subset would benefit with complete symptom resolution in the long term. It is not possible currently to predict which patients would or would not respond to eradication therapy. The strength of evidence is such that empiric eradication therapy, based on noninvasive H. pylori testing, can be advocated in young patients with dyspepsia safely and effectively with resultant financial savings.

Nomenclature of dyspepsia, dyspepsia subgroups and functional dyspepsia: clarifying the concepts

There is international agreement that dyspepsia refers to pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen. However, the term 'discomfort' has been variably defined. While other symptoms may often be simultaneously present, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can usually be clearly distinguished by the presence of predominant heartburn. Dyspepsia is a frequent reason for consultation in primary care and in gastrointestinal practice. With the widespread availability and utilization of endoscopy, it has become evident that a structural (or organic) explanation is found in only a minority of patients presenting with dyspepsia. Operationally, functional dyspepsia is defined as persistent or recurrent dyspepsia for 3 or more months in the absence of a clinically identifiable structural disease causing the symptoms. It has been proposed, based on symptoms, that functional dyspepsia be subdivided into symptom subgroups to promote patient homogeneity. The initially proposed 'clustering' of symptoms into ulcer-like and dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia has proved a dismal failure because of the considerable overlap observed, the lack of stability over time and the failure to identify robust pathophysiological abnormalities or responses to therapy. A subcategorization based upon the most bothersome symptom is theoretically more attractive but needs to be prospectively and rigorously tested.

Predicting endoscopic diagnosis in the dyspeptic patient. The value of predictive score models

BACKGROUND

Score models to predict endoscopic diagnosis in dyspepsia may compensate for the unreliable clinical diagnosis. This study aimed to construct and test score models designed to predict diagnosis in dyspepstic patients managed in primary care.

METHODS

Three models to predict organic dyspepsia, major dyspepsia, or peptic ulcer were constructed by regression analysis of clinical data from 1026 consecutive dyspeptic patients referred for endoscopy. The models were tested in 207 patients in primary care, who were potential candidates for endoscopy. Validation experiments were analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Significant losses of predictive power were found for all models when applied to primary care patients, and no model could be used as a reliable decision support instrument in primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictive score models developed in patients referred for endoscopy are not reliable when applied to patients in primary care who are potential candidates for endoscopy. Future models should be constructed and validated in unselected primary care populations.

The outcome of unexplained dyspepsia. A questionnaire follow-up study of patients after endoscopy

Ninety-three consecutive patients referred to a gastroenterology unit with unexplained dyspeptic symptoms were sent a postal questionnaire 6-12 months after endoscopy. It inquired into their current physical symptoms and subjective improvement since investigation, satisfaction with treatment, past history and current psychological well-being. A comparison group of 47 patients with peptic disease were similarly surveyed. Those with unexplained dyspepsia reported more current physical symptoms, more dissatisfaction with their treatment and less subjective improvement than those with peptic disease. The two groups were similar in terms of psychological distress but previous consultation for abdominal and other somatic complaints were more common in those with unexplained dyspepsia. The implications for management of dyspeptic patients are discussed.