Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity

Is the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease progressive? A 21-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE. We re-evaluated a cohort of patients referred for reflux symptoms and objectively diagnosed with pathological reflux, with the purpose of clarifying the course of conservatively treated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). MATERIAL AND METHODS. All consecutive patients with GERD diagnosed between 1984 and 1988 showing pathologic 24-h pH-metry in the interval 3.8-10% and without any previous surgery in the gastroesophageal tract were assessed for further follow-up. A total of 40 evaluable patients were followed in the years 2007-08 with endoscopy, manometry, 24-h pH-metry, Helicobacter pylori assessment and the self-administered questionnaires the GERD Impact Scale, the Reflux Disease Questionnaire, the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Health Survey. Baseline data from the 1980s were retrieved and compared with the evaluations conducted at follow-up. RESULTS. At follow-up 20.7 years (range 18.8-23.5 years) after referral, the study population showed more use of acid suppressants (p = 0.007) and increasing prevalences of esophagitis (p = 0.001) and Barrett's esophagus (p = 0.002). Esophagitis was seen in 16/40 patients (40%) at baseline and in 29/40 (72.5%) at follow-up. No significant deterioration was seen at follow-up in manometry data and in most pH data. Patients with esophagitis (ERD) were less likely to have a positive H. pylori test (hazard ratio 0.054; p = 0.002) than non-erosive (NERD) patients. Symptom evaluations showed significantly lower quality of life in the ERD group. CONCLUSIONS. After 20 years a considerable part of the cohort still experienced symptoms of reflux and showed endoscopic progression, although no significant deteriorations were seen in manometry data and in most pH-metry data. H. pylori infection was inversely associated with erosive esophagitis and this supports the hypothesis that H. pylori colonization is a protective factor against GERD.

Glass and antimony electrodes for oesophageal pH monitoring in distressed infants: how different are they?

OBJECTIVE

Although antimony electrodes are by far the most popular for performing oesophageal pH monitoring, there are few data comparing the accuracy of glass and antimony electrodes. Therefore, we tested the accuracy of both electrodes in the prediction of oesophagitis.

METHOD

pH monitoring using a glass electrode and an antimony electrode was performed in 60 distressed infants, aged between 1 and 6 months. An upper endoscopy with oesophageal biopsies was also performed in all infants.

RESULTS

A reflux index (percentage of the total time with pH < 4.0) greater than 5% was considered to be abnormal and was found in 40/60 patients. Histological oesophagitis was present in 26/60 infants. The reflux index was > 5% with the glass electrode in 18/26 children with histological oesophagitis and with the antimony electrode in 10/26 children with histological oesophagitis. Histology of the oesophagus was normal in 22/40 children with abnormal pH monitoring. With the glass electrode, the mean reflux index in the group with oesophagitis was significantly higher than in the group with normal histology, although there was an important overlap. With the antimony electrode, the mean reflux indices in the groups with and without oesophagitis were not different. Regarding normal/abnormal, there was discordance in 35% of the pH studies. No reflux index could be related to a clinically useful sensitivity and specificity to predict oesophagitis.

CONCLUSION

The reflux index does not accurately predict oesophagitis. Oesophageal pH monitoring and endoscopy provide complementary information.

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry: a novel technique to improve detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux literature review

Ambulatory pH monitoring is currently the best method for detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux. However, pH electrodes are able to measure only acid reflux, and therefore, non-acid reflux episodes, a potentially important cause of symptoms, are ignored by this technique. Multichannel intraluminal electrical impedance has recently been proposed as a novel method to overcome the above limitation of pH testing. Impedance (expressed in ohms) is a measure of the total opposition to current flow between adjacent electrodes. As refluxed contents are characterised by different conductivity, which is the inverse of impedance, for the first time a pH-independent accurate and practical qualitative analysis of refluxate is possible. For instance, the conductivity of air is almost zero and then impedance increases compared with baseline, whereas the conductivity of liquid is much higher and the impedance curve decreases remarkably. The combination of electrical impedance with traditional pH monitoring has the only aim of differentiating acid from non-acid liquid reflux. Moreover, the impedance catheter contains multiple pairs of ring electrodes along the oesophagus, so that an exact assessment of the proximal extent of refluxed material can be achieved. From a clinical point of view, electrical impedance + pH-metry could be useful for identifying the number and percent times of gas, acid and non-acid reflux episodes, to improve the yield of symptom index, to evaluate the reasons for poor response of reflux symptoms to proton pump inhibitors and to know the proximal extent of reflux events in patients with atypical symptoms. Thus, this technique has the potential to become a useful tool for improving our knowledge of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and optimising the management of these patients.

Comparison of 24-h control of gastric acidity by three different dosages of pantoprazole in patients with duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND

It is now clear that the extent to which gastric acid secretion must be suppressed varies with the clinical condition being treated.

AIM

To assess the 24-h control of gastric acidity and the individual response variability of three different doses of pantoprazole.

METHODS

Sixty-four duodenal ulcer patients were recruited for this prospective, randomized, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study. They were subdivided into three well-matched groups treated with 20 mg o.m., 40 mg o.m. and 40 mg b.d. of pantoprazole, respectively. Endoscopy and intragastric pH monitoring were performed in each patient before and after 14 days of treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were eligible for final analysis (17 treated with 20 mg o.m., 18 with 40 mg o.m. and 20 with 40 mg b.d. pantoprazole). The ulcer crater healed in 94, 88 and 95% of cases, respectively. The three dosages of pantoprazole produced significant increases in gastric pH compared to basal levels (P < 0.0001). There was also a clear dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect, which augmented on moving from the lowest dosage of 20 mg o.m. pantoprazole to the highest dosage of 40 mg b.d. (P < 0.01-0.001). The inter-individual response variability within the three treatment groups was more marked with the dose of 20 mg than with the two higher doses of pantoprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

All three doses of pantoprazole we tested are highly effective in decreasing gastric acidity and there is a clear dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect on moving from the lowest to the highest dosage. The greatest inter individual variation in the degree of acid inhibition was seen with pantoprazole 20 mg o.m., while the majority of patients responded adequately to the two higher doses of the drug.

Interests of the 'artificial stomach' techniques to study antacid formulations: comparison with in vivo evaluation

In this overview, the methods for assessing antacid activity in vitro are surveyed, and the problems of their comparison with in vivo methods of evaluation are discussed. In vitro assessment is based on two types of method: static and dynamic. The static method of titration, with end-of-titration pH values ranging between 3.0 and 1.0, has been used to quantify the number of sites capable of binding H+ ions at each end-of-titration pH, and to identify certain chemical mechanisms involved in this binding; in other words, this approach provides the pharmacological characteristics of the drugs tested. In contrast, it does not take into account physiological factors modulating antacid activity, such as gastroduodenal fluxes (including gastric emptying), drug adherence to the mucosa, and acid secretion. The dynamic method was initially based on an artificial stomach model, which has gradually been upgraded to a computer-controlled artificial stomach-duodenum model. This model overcomes certain weaknesses of the static method by simulating flux and pH conditions in the gastroduodenal tract, by taking into account interactions with the gastric mucosa and thereby reproducing the in vivo medium encountered by antacids. It is therefore capable of reflecting the characteristics of antacids, namely their effect on gastric pH and resistance to acidification, at the same time helping to identify the underlying chemicophysical mechanisms. In vivo, the antacid effect can be assessed qualitatively by means of pH-meter studies in healthy volunteers, both in baseline conditions and during secretory stimulation, and also quantitatively by methods based on intragastric titration in response to a liquid meal (IGT). pH-meter studies in baseline conditions come up against the variability of the basal pH and antacid homogenization with gastric contents, which results in a wide range of individual values. This variability is found in pH-meter studies during pentagastrin infusion and, to a lesser degree, in response to a meal. Close correlations have, however, been established between results obtained with the artificial stomach model and in healthy volunteers submitted to pH-metric or IGT studies, with several antacids. It seems that the artificial stomach method is sufficiently reproducible to make it the method of choice for investigating the antacid activity of all drugs aimed at treating acid hypersecretion disorders. In contrast, in vivo studies may be warranted for precise therapeutic indications, such as treatment of duodenal ulcer or gastro-esophageal reflux, in which the therapeutic effect is judged on the basis of an improvement in symptoms and endoscopic criteria, without the need to demonstrate the antacid effect itself.

Rhythmic patterns in incidence of peptic ulcer perforation over 5.5 decades in Norway

The incidence of ulcer perforation in 1480 patients treated in the Bergen area of Norway between 1935 and 1990 was analyzed for daily (circadian), weekly (circaseptan), and yearly (circannual) time effects. A circadian rhythm was found overall that was reproducible and fairly stable across seasons, decades, and days of the week. After subgrouping, a circadian rhythm was found in younger patients, males, and duodenal perforations, while a 12 h (circasemidian) rhythm characterized ulcer perforation for women and for gastric ulcers. Duodenal perforations showed highest incidence in the afternoon, while gastric perforations showed a major peak around noon and a secondary peak near midnight. For duodenal ulcer perforation, the circannual pattern was characterized by a 6-month rhythm, with significantly higher incidence in May-June-July and in November-December in most subgroups. A circaseptan rhythm was not found, but there was a significantly higher incidence on Thursday-Friday as compared to Sunday-Monday. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the perforation of an ulcer thus seemed to show pronounced circadian and 6-month rhythmic variations, much less so circaseptan or circannual rhythms. While it is likely that exogenous environmental and/or societal factors play a significant role, variations in ulcer perforation may be related to endogenous biological rhythms in pathophysiological factors since the circadian pattern of duodenal perforation follows that for gastric acidity. Knowledge of the temporal patterns in peptic ulcer perforation and associated pathophysiologic factors should prove useful in optimizing the chronotherapeutic management of ulcer disease.

Circadian gastric acidity in Helicobacter pylori positive ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia in the duodenum

BACKGROUND

The presence of gastric metaplasia allows helicobacter pylori to colonise the duodenum and this condition is thought to be acquired as a response to acid hypersecretion. This functional disorder, however, is present only in a subgroup of duodenal ulcer patients and, in addition, surface gastric metaplasia has been frequently found in the proximal duodenum of normal subjects and patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia, who cannot be certainly considered as acid hypersecretors.

AIMS

To clarify the role of acid in inducing gastric type epithelium in the duodenum. This study aimed at assessing whether the pattern of circadian gastric acidity differs between H pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients with and without duodenal gastric metaplasia.

PATIENTS

Seventy one patients with duodenal ulcer confirmed by endoscopy and who were found to be positive for H pylori infection by histology on antrum biopsy specimens were enrolled into this study.

METHODS

Gastric type epithelium in the duodenum was found in 49 of 71 ulcer patients (69%). Continuous 24 hour gastric pH metry was performed in 50 healthy subjects and in the two subgroups of duodenal ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia in the duodenum. Gastric acidity was calculated for 24 hours (1700-1659), night (2000-0759) and day-time (0800-1959).

RESULTS

Ulcer patients without gastric metaplasia showed a significantly higher gastric acidity (p < 0.001) than controls for every time interval considered, while the ulcer subgroup with gastric metaplasia was more acid than healthy subjects (p < 0.001) during the whole 24 hour period and the daytime. There was no difference between the two subgroups of duodenal ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia during the various time segments analysed.

CONCLUSION

The findings confirm that the circadian gastric acidity of duodenal ulcer patients is higher than that of controls. As there is no difference in gastric pH between duodenal ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia, gastric hyperacidity is not specific to patients with duodenal gastric metaplasia. It is probable that this histological change is a non-specific response to mucosal injury resulting from various factors and not exclusively to acid.

Absence of tolerance in duodenal ulcer patients treated for 28 days with a bedtime dose of roxatidine or ranitidine

There is much experimental work on the occurrence of tolerance to the antisecretory effect of H2-receptor antagonists in healthy subjects, while data on its development in patients with duodenal ulcer are poor and conflicting. Moreover, this phenomenon has not been studied previously with 24 h gastric pH-metry in patients with active duodenal ulcer. For these reasons, we carried out a prospective pharmacodynamic investigation in 48 patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer using the well-established once daily dosing schedule of H2 blockers. They were studied by means of 24 h continuous endoluminal pH-metry which was performed before, on d1 and d28 after receiving an oral bedtime dose (2200 hours) of either roxatidine 150 mg or ranitidine 300 mg, given in randomized and single-blind fashion. Eight patients did not complete the study for various reasons and 82% of ulcers healed after 4 weeks of therapy. Gastric pH was higher (P < 0.001) on d1 and d28 than basal values during all time periods, but the evening, with both H2 blockers. There was no significant difference between pH values of d1 and d28 in any time interval with both roxatidine and ranitidine. There was also no difference in pharmacodynamic data between the two active treatments. We conclude that tolerance does not develop after 1 month's treatment with a bedtime dose of H2 antagonist in patients with active duodenal ulcer and therefore data gathered on this phenomenon in healthy subjects are not applicable to ulcer patients.

Are duodenal ulcer seasonal fluctuations paralleled by seasonal changes in 24-hour gastric acidity and Helicobacter pylori infection?

The occurrence of duodenal ulcer is characterized by seasonal variation, for poorly understood reasons. No previous study has assessed whether 24-h intragastric acidity and Helicobacter pylori infection have similar seasonal fluctuations in patients with this disorder. For this reason, we evaluated retrospectively the circadian gastric pH in 319 new patients (226 men and 93 women, mean age 45.2 years) with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer, who agreed to undergo this examination during the years 1987-1992 in our center. The month-by-month occurrence of the disease over the global 6-year period was assessed, and the mean pH values were calculated for each patient during three time intervals of interest: 24 h, daytime (08:00-19:59 h), and nighttime (20:00-07:59 h). The mean pH values of these three time periods were then calculated month by month throughout the annual cycle. H. pylori infection was sought by histology in 171 patients examined in the period from 1990 to 1992. The percentage of H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer patients was then calculated for each season. The calendar fluctuation of duodenal ulcer occurrence showed an evident increase (p < 0.001) in fall (October-December) and in winter (January-March) compared with spring (April-June) and summer (July-September). Both 24-h and nighttime gastric acidity showed no significant variation by month, whereas daytime gastric pH varied significantly (p < 0.05) with two evident decreases, meaning higher acidity, in April and August. H. pylori infection was detected in 152 of 171 patients (89%), and the percentage of H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcers did not differ from season to season. We conclude that there was no parallel circannual fluctuation of duodenal ulcer, gastric acidity, and H. pylori infection in the restricted sample of patients we studied. This reduces the apparent relevance of acid in inducing ulcer seasonal fluctuation. Also, the responsibility of H. pylori in this phenomenon can be excluded until a reliable diagnostic method capable of distinguishing recent from old infection is found.

Antisecretory effects of three omeprazole regimens for maintenance treatment in duodenal ulcer

This study was carried out to assess the antisecretory effects and their possible changes over time of three different dose regimens of omeprazole that could be proposed for maintenance treatment in duodenal ulcer. Forty-five patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were studied by means of 24-hr gastric pH-metry both in basal conditions and on the fifth day of acute treatment with omeprazole 20 mg in the morning. Ulcers healed after four weeks (in three cases after eight weeks) and afterwards, 15 patients were randomized to receive orally at 0800 hr in single-blind fashion omeprazole 10 mg daily (group A), 15 to receive omeprazole 40 mg on Saturday and Sunday followed by a five-day period without medication (group B), and 15 to receive omeprazole 20 mg every other day (group C) for up to three months. On the 20th and 80th days of these maintenance treatments 24-hr gastric pH-metry was repeated to assess the antisecretory effectiveness of each regimen over a two-month period. In patients of group B these tests began at 1700 hr on Friday, the last of five days off treatment, and in those of group C at 1700 hr of the day off medication. All three dose regimens of omeprazole were able to raise pH values significantly (P < 0.01-0.001) compared to basal levels. Omeprazole 20 mg every other day was more effective (P < 0.01) than omeprazole 40 mg weekend, but did not differ significantly from omeprazole 10 mg daily. The durations of acid inhibition (pH > 3.0 units/24 hr) were 12.44, 10.00, and 17.38 hr with groups A, B, and C, respectively. There was no significant difference between the pH profiles of the 20th and 80th days with every dose regimen. It is concluded that all three dose regimens of omeprazole are effective in reducing gastric acidity and their pharmacodynamic action does not change with time. Therefore they are suitable to be assessed in large clinical trials aimed at verifying the prevention of duodenal ulcer recurrence for longer periods.

New method for improving accuracy of 24-hour continuous intragastric pH-metry. Reflections on physiological and pharmacological studies

Continuous 24-hr intragastric pH-metry was prospectively performed in 801 subjects with different clinical conditions using two pH electrodes placed closely adjacent. The aim was to assess the in situ repeatability of the test and to verify whether the removal of artifacts, interference, and noise usually superimposed onto the fundamental signal recorded by the measuring apparatus improves the clinical usefulness of experimental data. The following debugging/filtering procedure was used: first, pH recordings of each channel were amended separately from artifacts, then they underwent 7 min windowed median interference debugging, and finally Wiener noise filtering was applied. Afterwards, the 24-hr mean pH profile was obtained in each subject by averaging the pH tracings of the two channels every minute (1440 data points/24 hr). The efficiency of this procedure was assessed at each step by evaluating the difference among groups using the O'Brien test, a distribution-free nonparametric method well-suited for evaluating differences among groups allocated onto a two-way layout. The differences among groups calculated from raw pH data of the single channels can be very misleading, in that it is possible to find that they are significant on one channel and not significant on the other channel. Conversely, the significance of the differences among groups increases progressively at each step of the above debugging/filtering procedure applied to raw pH profiles of each channel. Seven minutes was shown to be the most suitable time lag for windowed median removal of interference.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A pharmacodynamic study of two omeprazole regimens suitable for long-term treatment of duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND

The experience with long-term treatment of peptic ulcer with omeprazole is still scant, but the possibility cannot be excluded that its better pharmacodynamic effect on gastric acidity also has a positive result in the relapse rate. Moreover, this drug acts via a mechanism other than receptorial binding, and therefore its efficacy should not dissipate with time. This study was carried out to assess the pharmacodynamic properties and the possible changes with time of two dose regimens of omeprazole that could be suitable for long-term treatment in duodenal ulcer.

METHODS

Twenty patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were studied by means of 24-h gastric pH-metry both in basal conditions and on the 5th day of acute treatment with 40 mg omeprazole in the morning. All the ulcers healed after 4 weeks, and thereafter 10 patients were randomized to receive orally 20 mg omeprazole daily at 0800 h in single-blind fashion (group A) and 10 to receive 20 mg omeprazole every other day (group B) for up to 6 months. At the end of the 1st, 3rd, and 6th month of these maintenance treatments 24-h gastric pH-metry was repeated to assess the antisecretory effect of each regimen over time. In group-B patients the test was performed on 2 consecutive days (without and with medication) at each time interval. The fasting gastrin values were also determined. The patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy every 2 months.

RESULTS

Three patients in group B were lost to follow-up for various reasons, and only seven remained eligible for final analysis. The two long-term regimens of omeprazole were able to increase significantly pH values (p < 0.02-0.001) and the times spent at and above pH 3.0 (p < 0.001) over 24 h compared with basal conditions. In group A the 24-h pH value obtained in the 6th month was higher (p < 0.02) than that in the 3rd month of maintenance treatment. In group B the pharmacologic effect tended to decrease on the day without medication compared with the day with medication, but the difference between them was significantly (p < 0.05) only at the 6-month interval. There was no significant difference between the gastrin levels of the two groups in the long-term treatment. No ulcer relapse was detected at any long-term endoscopic control in the two groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The two omeprazole regimens we tested are effective in reducing gastric acidity, and their pharmacodynamic action does not decrease with time. They are therefore suitable for maintenance treatment in acid-related disorders.

Bolus infusion of famotidine: effects on gastric pH by repeated 12-hour doses of 20 mg in postoperative patients

This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of intravenous (IV) famotidine in suppressing gastric secretion over a 48-hour period. Twenty postoperative patients requiring a nasogastric tube received famotidine 20 mg IV every 12 hours and gastric pH was measured continuously by means of an indwelling probe. A baseline recording was performed over the first 4 hours and then the drug was infused every 12 hours (q12h) over a 15-minute period for the subsequent 48 hours. The mean pH value achieved during each time segment under active treatment was significantly higher (P < .001) than the mean basal value. Also the density distributions of minutes spent at the various pH units confirm that famotidine is highly effective (P < .001) in raising and maintaining gastric pH above 4.0 units during most of the drug-related period (44 hours). It can be concluded that repeated intravenous boli of famotidine 20 mg every 12 hours allow us to obtain an effective control of intragastric acidity. The antisecretory action is consistent over the total 48-hour period examined and therefore the use of intermittent infusion of famotidine seems to be advisable, as opposed to the recommended continuous IV administration of cimetidine and ranitidine. There is, however, a considerable intersubject variability in the antisecretory response to the drug.

Variability in individual response to various doses of omeprazole. Implications for antiulcer therapy

This study was carried out in order to perform a combined prospective assessment of the individual pharmacodynamic response and of duodenal ulcer healing in patients treated with three different doses of omeprazole. Ninety-nine patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers were subdivided into three parallel groups of 33 cases, who were randomly assigned to receive orally at 0800 hr, in single blind fashion, either 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg of omeprazole. All of them underwent continuous intragastric pH monitoring both in basal conditions and on the fifth day of each dose regimen; ulcer healing was then assessed endoscopically after four weeks of treatment. All three doses of omeprazole caused pH values to increase significantly (P < 0.001) over the whole 24-hr period. In patients treated with omeprazole 10 mg, the individual responses showed the highest variability: the acid inhibition, expressed in terms of time spent above pH 3.0, lasted for more than 16 hr in 42% of cases, for more than 8 hr in 28%, and for less than 6 hr in 30%. In patients treated with omeprazole 20 mg, the pharmacological response was more marked and uniform and lasted for more than 16 hr in 79% of cases; however, it is worth noting it lasted for less than 6 hr in three patients (10%). In patients treated with omeprazole 40 mg, the individual response was excellent (more than 16 hr) in 94% of cases, and it lasted for less than 6 hr in only one patient (3%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Circadian acidity pattern in prepyloric ulcers: a comparison with normal subjects and duodenal ulcer patients

We used continuous 24-h pH monitoring to compare the circadian intragastric acidity of 36 patients with prepyloric ulcers (PPU) with that of 101 normal subjects (NS) and that of 206 patients with duodenal ulcer (DU). The ulcer crater was endoscopically ascertained in all cases, and PPU were located within an area up to 2 cm proximal to the pylorus. The pH curve pertaining to DU patients ran below that of NS during most of the circadian period, whereas the pH profile of PPU patients was higher than that of NS, and this was particularly true during the evening and the night. The acidity of PPU patients was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that of NS during the night only, whereas it was lower (p < 0.05-0.001) than that of DU patients during each time interval analysed (24 h, nighttime, and daytime). Our findings show that the gastric acidity of PPU patients differs greatly from that of DU patients, since it is lower throughout the whole 24-h period, and particularly during the night. Thus these two entities are pathophysiologically different with regard to the acidity pattern and should be considered two distinct subgroups of peptic ulcer disease instead of being incorporated, as usually happens, in the clinical group 'duodenal ulcer disease'.

Twenty-four-hour control of gastric acidity by twice-daily doses of placebo, nizatidine 150 mg, nizatidine 300 mg, and ranitidine 300 mg

This study was carried out to assess the effects on gastric acidity of placebo twice daily (bid), nizatidine 150 mg bid, nizatidine 300 mg bid, and ranitidine 300 mg bid by means of continuous 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring. Twelve patients with duodenal ulcer in remission were randomized to receive in single-blind fashion the above medications on four separate occasions, at least 1 week apart. The three active regimens produced higher pH values (P < .001) and maintained gastric pH above 3.0 units for a longer period (P < .001) than placebo in all time intervals but evening. Nizatidine 150 mg bid caused a lower rise in pH than nizatidine 300 mg bid (P < .01) and ranitidine 300 mg bid (P < .05) during both the daytime and the whole 24 hours. In these time windows also the time spent above 3.0 pH units was significantly shorter for the former regimen than for 300 mg bid of both nizatidine (P < .01) and ranitidine (P < .05). There was no difference between the latter two dosing schedules in terms of both potency and duration of action in all the time intervals considered. It is concluded that twice daily doses of H2 blockers are more effective than placebo in reducing gastric acidity. Three hundred milligrams twice daily of both nizatidine and ranitidine produce a significantly greater and longer-lasting acid suppression than 150 mg bid of nizatidine. Our study also confirms the greater effectiveness of H2 antagonists during nighttime than during day-time.

Mealtime versus nighttime acid inhibition. A clinical pharmacological study with ranitidine

This study was carried out in order to compare the effects of mealtime and bedtime regimens of ranitidine on gastric acidity. Fifteen duodenal ulcer patients in clinical remission were randomized to receive in single-blind fashion either placebo, ranitidine 300 mg at night (2200 hr) or ranitidine 150 mg three times a day given before each of the three daily meals (1800, 0800 and 1200 hr). Over 24 hr, the two active treatments produced a significantly greater acid inhibition than placebo, while the single daily regimen was superior to the three times a day regimen of ranitidine in terms of both rise in pH values (P less than 0.001) and duration of action expressed as time spent above 3.0 pH units (P less than 0.05). The analysis of these two parameters during fractioned periods of the circadian cycle showed that the three divided doses of ranitidine were more effective during the daytime (P less than 0.01) and the evening (P less than 0.001), whereas the bedtime dose of ranitidine was superior during the night (P less than 0.0001). Thus a short-lasting antisecretory action, which is, however, capable of fully controlling the high acidity of postprandial periods, might be the key to understanding the results of several recent clinical trials in which the suppression of daytime gastric acidity has been shown to promote similar or even faster duodenal ulcer healing rates than the suppression of nocturnal acidity.