Malignant sinonasal epithelioid schwannoma

Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses

The nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses occupy the top of the upper respiratory tract and form pneumatic spaces connected with the atmosphere. They are located immediately beneath the base of the cranium, where crucial vital structures are harbored. From this region, very much exposed to airborne agents, arise some of the more complex and rare benign and malignant lesions seen in humans, whose difficulties in interpretation make this remarkable territory one of the most challenging in the practice of surgical pathology.

Contents of this chapter cover inflammations and infections, polyps and pseudotumors, fungal and midfacial destructive granulomatous lesions, as well as benign, borderline, and malignant neoplasms. Among the neoplasms, emphasis is made on those entities characteristic or even unique for the sinonasal region, such as Schneiderian papillomas, glomangiopericytoma, intestinal- and non-intestinal-type adenocarcinomas, olfactory neuroblastoma, nasal-type NK-/T-cell lymphoma, and teratocarcinosarcoma. Moreover, recently recognized entities involving this territory, i.e., HPV-related non-keratinizing carcinoma, NUT carcinoma, and SMARCB1-deficient basaloid carcinoma, are also discussed in the light of their specific molecular findings. Furthermore, the text is accompanied by numerous classical and recent references, several tables, and 100 illustrations.

Current diagnostic strategies for undifferentiated tumours of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses

Several malignant tumours occurring in the sinonasal tract may present with an undifferentiated morphology. Overall, these lesions pose significant diagnostic difficulties for the surgical pathologist, especially in limited biopsy material, but their correct classification is becoming increasingly important for an appropriate treatment strategy. This review deals with the criteria for differential diagnosis of these neoplasms, with emphasis on recent advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular biology, as well as with previous progress in electron microscopy. Through careful microscopic examination of haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, in the light of clinical information and imaging data, a list of differential diagnoses can be made and an appropriate panel of antibodies can be chosen to further categorize the tumour. An initial panel including cytokeratins, synaptophysin, S100 protein, desmin and CD45 may allow the classification of most lesions or may help to narrow the list of differential diagnoses. Further refinement can be obtained through second-line markers, including in-situ hybridization for Epstein-Barr virus, other neuroendocrine markers, melanocytic markers, myogenin, CD99, other lymphocyte markers, and CD138 and light chains. Finally, molecular analysis can further assist in the recognition of specific entities such as nuclear protein in testis midline carcinoma, Ewing's sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumour, alveolar rhadbomyosarcoma, and poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma.

Nasenhöhle und Nasennebenhöhlen

Die Gesichtsmitte (der Bezirk zwischen Oberlippe und Stirn) entwickelt sich zwischen der 4. und 8. Schwangerschaftswoche. [ 220] Der Stirnfortsatz bildet sich währen der 4. postovulatorischen Woche, aus ihm gehen die oberen und mittleren Anteile des Gesichts hervor. Die Oberkiefer- und Nasenwülste entwickeln sich unterhalb des Stirnfortsatzes. Am Ende der 4. Woche bilden zwei oberflächliche Verdickungen der Nasenwülste die Riechplakoden, die ektodermaler Herkunft sind und aus denen der Epithelbelag der Nasenhöhle und Nasennebenhöhlen hervorgeht. Die Plakoden stülpen sich ein und bilden die Riechgruben, aus denen die vorderen Choanen (Nasenlöcher) und weniger oberflächlich die primitiven hinteren Choanen entstehen. Die medialen Nasen- und Stirnfortsätze bilden das Nasenseptum, die Stirnknochen, Nasenknochen, die Siebbeinzellen- Komplexe und die oberen Schneidezähne. Die lateralen Nasen- und Oberkieferfortsätze vereinigen sich zur Bildung des Philtrum und der Columella. Das knorpelige Nasenskelet bildet sich während der 7. und 8. postovulatorischen Woche tief unterhalb der Nasen- und Stirnbeinknochen aus dem Chondrocranium. Die Nasennebenhöhlen entwickeln sich in der 6. Fetalwoche aus den lateralen Nasenwänden, und ihr Wachstum setzt sich nach der Geburt während des gesamten Kindes- und Jugendalters fort.

[Schwannoma of the nasal cavity: a case report]

Schwannomas of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are quite rare, with 4% occurring in this location. Most of them are benign and do not recur when totally removed by surgery. It is very important to distinguish between schwannoma and primary benign neurofibroma. Neurofibromas are lesions having the possibility for malignant transformation and recurrence. A case of schwannoma in the nasal cavity is reported, and the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, as well as recommendations from the literature, are described. The histological and immunohistochemical features are discussed in detail to draw a distinction between schwannoma and neurofibroma. In cases of intranasal and paranasal lesions, the existence of a schwannoma must be considered. Differentiating between schwannoma and neurofibroma is important for estimating the risk of malignant transformation and recurrence.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of the paranasal sinuses and the anterior skull base

BACKGROUND

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs) are highly aggressive neoplasms with a marked propensity for local recurrence and metastatic spread. The management of MPNSTs continues to challenge pathologists and surgeons. As MPNSTs of the paranasal sinuses and the skull base are rare, prognostic factors and treatment modalities have not been consistently identified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present a case of MPNST of the anterior skull base and provide an overview of all MPNSTs reported since 1970, in which the tumour location was the anterior skull base or the paranasal sinuses.

RESULTS

Literature review revealed 33 well-documented cases of MPNSTs in this anatomic location. These cases were analysed with emphasis on age, gender, affected site, therapy, outcome, presence of neurofibromatosis, local recurrence and metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite multimodal therapy and advances in surgical techniques, the prognosis of MPNST located in the paranasal sinuses and the anterior skull base remains dismal. Outcome is mainly a function of local control by surgical resection. Adjuvant radiochemotherapy has shown no benefit. It may therefore be advisable to abstain from radiochemotherapy in order to improve chances for surgical intervention in case of recurrent disease. Close follow-up investigations are indispensable.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the head and neck: management of 10 cases and literature review

BACKGROUND

This study analyzes the management and outcomes of a series of 10 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) of the head and neck.

METHODS

From 1984 to 2004, 10 patients underwent surgical treatment of a MPNST. We retrospectively reviewed presenting symptoms, radiological findings, surgical management, and follow-up status and performed a literature review.

RESULTS

Eight tumors were located at the lateral skull base; 2 involved the vagus nerve in isolation. Two lesions were growing within the sinonasal tract. The most common presenting symptom was a rapidly enlarging cervical mass. Seventy percent of the tumors could be resected completely. Long-term follow-up showed a 2-year disease-specific survival rate of 50% and 5-year survival rate of 20%. Negative prognostic indicators were advanced tumor stage, early recurrence, and presumably also the presence of von Recklinghausen's disease. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was found to make no difference in outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, MPNST is one of the most aggressive tumors in the head and neck area. Complete tumor removal is the mainstay of treatment and most important prognostic factor of MPNST. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be used to assist surgical excision in local control. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial.

Facial malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare neoplasms, only sporadically reported involving the maxillo-mandibular region (ten cases with CT or MR data). We present here five additional cases with CT and MR findings along with an extensive review of the literature.

RESULTS

Accurate diagnosis of MPNSTs is difficult because pathological like radiological criteria are often non specific. Radiological features display a large spectrum of abnormalities from a well-delineated heterogeneous appearance simulating benign schwannoma to extensive erosive patterns. Their development along the mandibular nerve, the absence of any target or central dot sign, their strong predominant peripheral enhancement must suggest the diagnosis of MPNSTs while irregular bone destruction or the detection of poorly defined margins with muscular infiltration are the most reliable criteria of malignancy. Unfortunately, MPNSTs also display a considerably varied histology. Careful clinical and radiological correlation should bring pathologists to examining large samples of the lesion to better evaluate the overall organisation of the lesion and detect some evocative criteria often only present in some areas of the sample as the peculiar curlicue or whorled arrangement of the spindle cells or the alternation of densely cellular fascicles with hypocellular, myxoid zones. Focal, limited immunostaining for S-100 protein is one of the most important additional criterion.

CONCLUSION

If accurate early diagnosis often remains difficult, careful correlation of clinical, pathological and radiological data should in most cases suggest a diagnosis of MPNSTs which display a poor prognosis and requires early and adapted treatment.

Free Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap With Anterior Rectus Sheath to Provide the Orbital Support in Globe-Sparing Total Maxillectomy

Reconstruction after total maxillectomy with preservation of the orbital contents is technically more challenging than when the maxillectomy is combined with orbital exenteration. It results in severe complications if the orbital content is not supported. We would like to introduce a new technique using free rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flap with anterior rectus sheath to support the orbital content in a patient who underwent globe-sparing total maxillectomy. The large resection of the recurrent maxillary peripheral nerve sheath tumor was performed in a 34-year-old male patient. Right free RAM flap was harvested simultaneously with the tumor resection. The anterior sheath of upper portion of the rectus muscle was also incorporated into the flap. The free edge of the upper anterior rectus sheath was anchored to three different points: Lateral rim, medial rim and the posterior remnant of the bony orbital floor with non-absorbable suture. Consequently, orbital support was achieved with well-vascularized, thin, strong fascia with smooth surface. Right facial artery and vein were chosen as recipient vessel. Duration of the operation was 5.5 hours. Postoperative period was uneventful. Six months after the surgery, the right eye was in good position without inferior dystopia. Eyeball movement could be done without restriction. The patient also denied diplopia. Reconstruction of globe-sparing total maxillectomy defects with free RAM flap with anterior rectus sheath has several advantages that enable the reconstructive surgeon to solve the multiple complex reconstructive task with one flap: 1) elimination of the secondary donor site morbidity; 2) more simply addressing the challenging task of the eye support than the other techniques; 3) obliterating the maxillectomy defect and closing the palate; 4) restoring the large skin defect; and 5) reducing the operation time. It is difficult to conclude that this technique is the best choice in such cases based on a report of the single case. However, presented technique should be kept in mind as a practical and effective reconstructive option in cases that have underwent the total maxillectomy with the preservation of the orbit.

Epithelioid Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor in the Infraorbital Nerve

Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are rarely found in cranial nerves. This report describes one such tumor originating from the infraorbital nerve in a 55-year-old man who presented with diplopia and right cheek numbness. Imaging showed a mass along the floor of the right orbit, which was excised. Histology suggested melanoma or carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for S-100 and negative for HMB-45 and cytokeratin. Four other cases from the literature involving cranial nerves are discussed.

Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor involving maxillary sinus

We present a case of epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) located in the maxillary sinus region in a young man. The clinical history was short, but at admission the neoplastic infiltration was so extensive that only diagnostic biopsy was performed. The patient received palliative treatment and died 6 months later. Histologically, the neoplasm had a predominant epithelioid component. Neoplastic tissue was vimentin, S-100, Cam 5.2 and neuron-specific enolase positive. P53 protein reaction was found in 6% of the cells and the proliferation index assessed with Ki-67 was 52%. An appropriate immunohistochemical panel was essential for the final diagnosis of this epithelioid malignant tumor, with the location rather unusual for MPNST.

Management of a sporadic malignant subfrontal peripheral nerve sheath tumor

Malignant subfrontal (olfactory) peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are exceedingly rare. Although meningiomas are the most common subfrontal extra-axial lesions, it is important to recognize that MPNSTs, which are radiographically similar to meningiomas, can also be present in this location. MPNSTs require more aggressive surgical and postoperative management than meningiomas. In this paper, we describe a patient with a subfrontal MPNST with unusual histological characteristics and present a review of the literature. A 49-year-old woman presented with chronic sinusitis and progressive headaches. A neurological examination revealed left-sided anosmia. Brain-imaging studies revealed a large left subfrontal mass with extension into the frontal and ethmoid sinuses and the nasal cavity. The patient underwent both a bifrontal transbasal craniotomy and a transnasal approach for an attempt at total resection of both the intradural and extradural components of the MPNST. The patient was treated postoperatively with radiation therapy, and had no evidence of recurrence at her follow-up examination 1-year after treatment. Subfrontal PNSTs are extremely rare and usually benign. The specific cell and nerve of origin for these tumors remains unknown. Our case shows that these rare lesions can present as a malignant variant and thus require aggressive surgical and postoperative management to provide long-term tumor control.

Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Report of a case with inflammatory infiltration

The epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (EMPNST) is a rare sarcoma originating from the supportive non-neuronal components of peripheral nerves. Our patient was a 75-year-old Japanese man who presented with complaints about pain and a mass in the left thigh. Characteristic histopathological features were large epithelioid-like cells closely resembling a malignant melanoma or another type of soft tissue tumor. Notable infiltration of neutrophils in the tumor was seen. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells proved positive for S-100, NSE, GFAP, MBP, chromogranin A and synaptophysin, and negative for CEA, keratin, HMB-45, G-CSF, and GM-CSF. Tumor-related inflammatory infiltration may be caused by an autonomous production of some cytokines. However, these tumor cells were negative for G-CSF and GM-CSF so that the mechanism triggering inflammatory infiltration is unclear. Electron microscopy revealed the presence of an extracellular basal lamina, intermediate cell junctions, and numerous dense-cored granules in the cytoplasm. These findings suggested a schwannian derivation, consistent with the diagnosis of EMPNST. There have been reports on S-100 positivity and HMB-45 negativity of this tumor type, but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of an EMPNST positive for MBP, chromogranin A, and synaptophisin. Where unequivocal features are lacking, these markers might be useful for differential diagnosis.

Niedrig-maligne periphere Nervenscheidentumoren der Nasen- und Nasennebenh�hlenschleimhaut

Sinonasal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are infrequent neoplasms. 16 cases of low-malignant MPNST in this localization were retrieved from the files of soft tissue tumors established in Jena. They were examined with regard to their morphology and immunohistochemistry. The importance of an only partial immunostaining by S100 protein antibodies for diagnosis and differential diagnostic discrimination to benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (schwannomas and neurofibromas) is explained. Finally, the differential diagnosis of spindle cell tumors in the sinonasal region in general is briefly discussed.

Subcutaneous malignant epithelioid schwannoma with cartilaginous differentiation

BACKGROUND

Malignant epithelioid schwannoma is a rare tumor. The aim of this study is to describe a case of subcutaneous malignant epithelioid schwannoma with cartilaginous differentiation.

METHODS

Histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural examinations were performed on a tumor that arose on the back of a 37-year-old woman.

RESULTS

Histologically, the tumor predominantly consisted of small, round or polygonal cells arranged in cords or nests. Immunohistochemical study revealed that the tumors cells were positive for vimentin, S-100 protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein and neuron specific enolase. The cells were negative for HMB-45, keratin, epithelial membrane antigen, and CAM5.2. Electron microscopic study showed closely associated cells with undifferentiated features. The cells were devoid of external laminae and cellular junctions.

CONCLUSION

Malignant epithelioid schwannoma should be pathologically differentiated from other epithelioid tumors with cartilaginous elements.

Factors in the pathogenesis of tumors of the sphenoid and maxillary sinuses: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To explain the processes that lead to the development of tumors in the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses.

STUDY DESIGN

A 32-year review of the world's literature on neoplasms of these two sinuses and a randomized case-controlled study comparing the normal mucosal architecture of the maxillary to the sphenoid sinus.

METHODS

Analysis of a 32-year world literature review reporting series of cases of maxillary and sphenoid sinus tumors. Tumors were classified by histological type and separated into subgroups if an individual incidence rate was reported. Histomorphometry of normal maxillary and sphenoid sinus mucosa was performed in 14 randomly selected patients (10 sphenoid and 4 maxillary specimens). Specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and hematoxylin. Histomorphometric analysis was performed with a Zeiss Axioscope light microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY) mounted with a Hamamatsu (Hamamatsu Photonics, Tokyo, Japan) color-chilled 3 charge coupled device digital camera. The images were captured on a 17-inch Sony (Sony Corp., Tokyo, Japan) multiscan monitor and analyzed with a Samba 4000 Image Analysis Program (Samba Corp., Los Angeles, CA). Five random areas were selected from strips of epithelium removed from each sinus, and goblet and basal cell measurements were made at magnifications x 100 and x 400.

RESULTS

The literature review revealed that the number and variety of tumors in the maxillary sinus are much greater than those in the sphenoid. The incidence of metastatic lesions to each sinus is approximately equal. No recognized pattern of spread from any particular organ system could be determined. On histomorphometric study there were no statistically significant differences between the sinuses in the concentration of goblet cells, basal cells, or seromucinous glands.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors involved in the pathogenesis of tumors of the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses include differences in nasal physiology, embryology, morphology, and topography. There are no significant histological differences in the epithelium and submucous glands between the two sinuses to explain the dissimilar formation of neoplasms.