Optimal sites for forehead oscillometric blood pressure monitoring

Comparison of blood pressure measured by oscillometry from the supraorbital artery and invasively from the radial artery

In previous studies, oscillometric blood pressure measured from the supraorbital artery has been shown to agree quite well with pressure measured from the brachial artery in normal subjects. In this study, surgical patients whose conditions warranted the use of invasive blood pressure monitoring during the surgery were chosen. We compared systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured oscillometrically from the supraorbital artery with intraarterial blood pressures, measured invasively from the radial artery. A pressure bladder was attached to the forehead of each patient. The bladder was connected to a forehead blood pressure monitor. A catheter was inserted in a radial artery, and connected to a pressure monitor. Forehead blood pressure was measured every 5 min. Radial arterial pressure was averaged over the same period during which the forehead measurement was made. Blood pressures measured with the two methods were compared. For the systolic pressure, the difference between the two methods was -9.9 +/- 17.9 mm Hg (mean +/- SD). For diastolic pressure, the difference was -8.0 +/- 10.9 mm Hg. There was a significant difference between the two methods in the patient population chosen in this study.

Supraorbital artery as an alternative site for oscillometric blood pressure measurement

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive blood pressure measured from the superficial temporal artery has been shown to correlate well with pressure in the brachial artery. The supraorbital artery may be an even better site for monitoring blood pressure on the forehead because it originates from the internal carotid artery, and it is easier to locate anatomically. This study compares mean pressure measured oscillometrically over the supraorbital artery and at the upper arm.

METHODS

Oscillometric signals from the supraorbital artery were recorded in 20 surgical patients under general anesthesia using a 2.5- x 1-cm bladder attached to the forehead with a self-adhesive pad. Blood pressure was measured simultaneously from the arm using a Dinamap 1846 blood pressure monitor, and the resulting data compared with the supraorbital artery measurements.

RESULTS

The mean difference between 219 pairs of blood pressure measurements, from the forehead and the arm, was 3.8 mm Hg. The standard deviation of the differences was 7.4 mm Hg. The linear regression equation for the data was y = 0.98x + 3.25, with a standard error of estimate of 7.31 mm Hg. The correlation coefficient between the two measurements was 0.82.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that mean blood pressures measured oscillometrically from the supraorbital and brachial arteries agree and correlate well with each other. The supraorbital artery should be a good alternative site for blood pressure measurement.