Repugnatorial glands with associated striated muscle and sensory cells inMelibe leonina (Mollusca, Nudibranchia)

Swimming behavior of the nudibranch Melibe leonina

Swimming in the nudibranch Melibe leonina consists of five types of movements that occur in the following sequence: (1) withdrawal, (2) lateral flattening, (3) a series of lateral flexions, (4) unrolling and swinging, and (5) termination. Melibe swims spontaneously, as well as in response to different types of aversive stimuli. In this study, swimming was elicited by contact with the tube feet of the predatory sea star Pycnopodia helianthoides, pinching with forceps, or application of a 1 M KCl solution. During an episode of swimming, the duration of swim cycles (2.7 +/- 0.2 s [mean +/- SEM], n = 29) and the amplitude of lateral flexions remained relatively constant. However, the latency between the application of a stimulus and initiation of swimming was more variable, as was the duration of an episode of swimming. For example, when touched with a single tube foot from a sea star (n = 32), the latency to swim was 7.0 +/- 2.4 s, and swimming continued for 53.7 +/- 9.4 s, whereas application of KCl resulted in a longer latency to swim (22.3 +/- 4.5 s) and more prolonged swimming episodes (174.9 +/- 32.1 s). Swimming individuals tended to move in a direction perpendicular to the long axis of the foot, which propelled them laterally when they were oriented with the oral hood toward the surface of the water. The results of this study indicate that swimming in Melibe, like that in several other molluscs, is a stereotyped fixed action pattern that can be reliably elicited in the laboratory. These characteristics, along with the large identifiable neurons typical of many molluscs, make swimming in this nudibranch amenable to neuroethological analyses.

Cellular and subcellular structure of anterior sensory pathways in Phestilla sibogae (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia)

Two sensory-cell types, subepithelial sensory cells (SSCs) and intraepithelial sensory cells (ISCs), were identified in the anterior sensory organs (ASO: pairs of rhinophores and oral tentacles, and the anterior field formed by the oral plate and cephalic shield) of the nudibranch Phestilla sibogae after filling through anterior nerves with the neuronal tracers biocytin and Lucifer Yellow. A third type of sensory cells, with subepithelial somata and tufts of stiff-cilia (TSCs, presumably rheoreceptors), was identified after uptake of the mitochondrial dye DASPEI. Each sensory-cell type has a specific spatial distribution in the ASO. The highest density of ISCs is in the oral tentacles (approximately 1,200/mm2), SSCs in the middle parts of the rhinophores (>4,000/mm2), and TSCs in the tips of cephalic tentacles (100/mm2). These morphologic data, together with electrophysiologic evidence for greater chemical sensitivity of the rhinophores than the oral tentacles (Murphy and Hadfield [1997] Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 118A:727-735; Boudko et al. [1997] Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 23:1787), led us to conclude that the two pairs of chemosensory tentacles serve different chemosensory functions in P. sibogae; i.e., ISCs and the oral tentacles serve contact- or short-distance chemoreception, and SSCs and the rhinophores function for long-distance chemoreception or olfaction. If this is true, then the ISC subsystem probably represents an earlier stage in the evolution and adaptations of gastropod chemosensory biology, whereas among the opisthobranchs, the SSC subsystem evolved with the rhinophores from ancestral cephalaspidean opisthobranchs.

Developmental analysis reveals labial and subradular ganglia and the primary framework of the nervous system in nudibranch gastropods

Previous ultrastructural observations on late stage larvae of dorid nudibranchs (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) revealed two pairs of ganglia within the base of the foot that do not have obvious counterparts in existing descriptions of other gastropod larvae [Chia and Koss (1989). Cell Tiss. Res. 256:17-26.] One of these ganglionic pairs has been implicated in the initiation of settlement preceding metamorphosis [Arkett et al. (1989). Biol. Bull. 176:155-160.] By examining neurogenesis in sequential larval stages, I have found that the pattern of connectives and commissures associated with these enigmatic ganglia is comparable to patterns found in less consolidated adult nervous systems of chitons, monoplacophorans, and archaeogastropods. These comparative data suggest that the two pairs of ganglia in dorid nudibranch larvae are homologues of labial and subradular ganglia. The labial ganglia become incorporated into the cerebral ganglia at metamorphosis. In an attempt to integrate anatomical and developmental observations with behavioral and neurophysiological results, I suggest that receptor cells of the larval labial ganglia may become postmetamorphic primary mechanoreceptors of the oral tube, which have central cell bodies within the "cerebral" ganglia and which help coordinate feeding. Results of this study also address a larger evolutionary issue by questioning the traditional model of an ancestral molluscan nervous system that consists of four longitudinal nerve cords that arise from separate sites along a circumesophageal nerve ring. This pattern results from secondary connections in nudibranchs and possibly other molluscs. The primary condition of a single axon bundle emerging from each cerebral ganglion is more similar to the developing nervous system in polychaete annelids than what has been recognized previously.