Ceforanide (BL-S786) in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia

Ceforanide. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy

Ceforanide is a 'second generation' cephalosporin administered intravenously or intramuscularly. It is similar to cefamandole and cefonicid in its in vitro superiority to 'first generation' cephalosporins against several species of Enterobacteriaceae as well as its activity against Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. Its activity against Staphylococcus aureus is less than that of cefamandole, cefuroxime and first generation cephalosporins. The in vitro activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae is excellent. Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and Serratia species, and Bacteroides fragilis are resistant, as are many strains of Proteus and Providencia species. The elimination half-life is relatively long, although shorter than that of cefonicid, and in most clinical trials ceforanide has been administered twice daily. It appeared to be comparable in therapeutic efficacy to procaine penicillin and cephazolin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, to cephazolin in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections due to S. aureus or beta-haemolytic streptococci and to cefapirin in S. aureus endocarditis in parenteral drug abusers. Also, it was comparable in efficacy to cephalothin in the prophylaxis of infection in patients undergoing open heart surgery or vaginal hysterectomy, and to cephazolin in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Thus, ceforanide is an alternative to first and certain other second generation cephalosporins in several important therapeutic and prophylactic situations. It has no advantage over other cephalosporins with regard to spectrum of antibacterial activity, but has a longer half-life than other second generation cephalosporins, except cefonicid, and can be administered according to a twice daily dosage schedule.

Review of the new second-generation cephalosporins: cefonicid, ceforanide, and cefuroxime

The new second-generation cephalosporins, cefonicid, ceforanide, and cefuroxime, have recently become available. These agents are generally less active against gram-positive cocci than first-generation cephalosporins and, at best, equal to cefoxitin and cefamandole against many gram-negative bacteria. Cefuroxime, however, is the most active cephalosporin for beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae. These newer agents have superior pharmacokinetic characteristics over cefoxitin and cefamandole. Smaller doses, longer dosing intervals and, potentially, a reduction in total drug cost may be the real advantage of these agents. Open trials and a limited number of comparative studies have documented the effectiveness of cefonicid, ceforanide, and cefuroxime in the treatment of most mild-to-serious infectious diseases, although failures with cefonicid in the treatment of staphylococcal infections have been reported. Notably, cefuroxime has received approval for the treatment of common pediatric bacterial meningitis infections. Replacement of cefamandole or cefoxitin with one of these "longer-acting" agents may be cost-beneficial; however, clinicians must be on alert for the development of bacterial resistance or decreased efficacy.

Ceforanide and cefazolin therapy of pneumonia: comparative clinical trial

Ceforanide is a new (parenteral) long-acting cephalosporin with antimicrobial activity comparable to those of other second-generation cephalosporins. In a randomized prospective study, patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia were treated with ceforanide at 0.5 g every 12 h (28 cases) or with cefazolin at 1.0 g every 8 h (26 cases). The study groups were comparable in clinical and laboratory findings, including etiological diagnosis. Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from the sputum of 38 patients, of whom 8 (21%) were bacteremic. Mean peak and trough serum levels of ceforanide drawn 1 and 11.5 h after the 0.5-g intravenous dose were 39.6 and 2.5 microgram/ml, respectively. Of the 50 patients evaluable for efficacy, all responded clinically with no serious adverse reactions. In spite of clinical improvement and in vitro susceptibility, Haemophilus influenzae persisted in the sputum of five of the eight cefazolin-treated patients and four of the five patients treated with ceforanide. Ceforanide appears to be as safe and effective as cefazolin for the therapy of pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae, but neither drug was effective in clearing H. influenzae from the sputum.

Treatment of cellulitis with ceforanide

Thirty-five patients with cellulitis were treated with ceforanide, 1 g every 12 h, intramuscularly. A good clinical response was observed in 33 cases. Drug failure in the remaining two patients was thought to be due to the lack of surgical debridement. Drug concentrations well in excess of inhibitory levels for Streptococcus pyogenes were generally present throughout the treatment period; although this was not true of ceforanide concentrations relative to inhibitory levels for Staphylococcus aureus, the clinical response in patients with staphylococcal infection still appeared to be entirely satisfactory. Killing of S. pyogenes by 5, 50, and 500X the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceforanide proceeded at the same rate in vitro as did killing by 5, 50, and 500X the minimum inhibitory concentration of penicillin.