Rubella embryopathy after previous maternal rubella vaccination

Does Rubella Cause Autism: A 2015 Reappraisal?

In the 1970s, Stella Chess found a high prevalence of autism in children with congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), 200 times that of the general population at the time. Many researchers quote this fact to add proof to the current theory that maternal infection with immune system activation in pregnancy leads to autism in the offspring. This rubella and autism association is presented with the notion that rubella has been eliminated in today’s world. CRS cases are no longer typically seen; yet, autistic children often share findings of CRS including deafness, congenital heart defects, and to a lesser extent visual changes. Autistic children commonly have hyperactivity and spasticity, as do CRS children. Both autistic and CRS individuals may develop type 1 diabetes as young adults. Neuropathology of CRS infants may reveal cerebral vasculitis with narrowed lumens and cerebral necrosis. Neuroradiological findings of children with CRS show calcifications, periventricular leukomalacia, and dilated perivascular spaces. Neuroradiology of autism has also demonstrated hyperintensities, leukomalacia, and prominent perivascular spaces. PET studies of autistic individuals exhibit decreased perfusion to areas of the brain similarly affected by rubella. In both autism and CRS, certain changes in the brain have implicated the immune system. Several children with autism lack antibodies to rubella, as do children with CRS. These numerous similarities increase the probability of an association between rubella virus and autism. Rubella and autism cross many ethnicities in many countries. Contrary to current belief, rubella has not been eradicated and globally affects up to 5% of pregnant women. Susceptibility continues as vaccines are not given worldwide and are not fully protective. Rubella might still cause autism, even in vaccinated populations.

Rubella monitoring in pregnancy as a means for evaluating a possible reemergence of rubella

OBJECTIVE

Although it is commonly accepted that rubella is well-controlled, a recent reemergence of both pertussis and measles might also predict a reemergence of rubella. This study was designed to estimate the current incidence of rubella exposure in pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, descriptive study, conducted in Houston, TX, at The Woman's Hospital of Texas. Women are typically screened for rubella immunity at the beginning of pregnancy. Rubella nonimmunity is defined as a titer less than 10 IU/mL in the US. Women who were non-immune early in pregnancy (<20 weeks) were recruited for this study and asked to be tested again for rubella immunity at the time of delivery.

RESULTS

Of 298 women who were rubella nonimmune (IgG <10 IU/mL) early in pregnancy, 19 converted to immune status (IgG >40 IU/mL, defined as at least a 4-fold increase) at time of delivery, a rate of 6.38% (4.12% to 9.75%; 95% Wilson-Score confidence interval). For the 19 patients who converted to immune status at time of delivery, 8 patients had levels of 40-150 IU/mL, 6 patients had levels of 151-300 IU/mL, 2 patients had levels of 301-500 IU/mL, and 3 patients had levels >500 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy is a critical time to evaluate rubella exposure. This study estimated the current incidence of rubella exposure in pregnancy to be 6.38%.

Bone lesions in an infant with congenital parvovirus b19 infection

Bone lesions on radiographs of newborns often suggest congenital infections. Skeletal roentgenograms are recommended in the evaluation of suspected congenital syphilis, but bone lesions have been recognized in other congenital infections. We report the case of an infant with hydrops fetalis secondary to congenital parvovirus B19 infection who was found to have bone lesions in multiple long and axial bones on admission to the neonatal ICU. Both the infant and her mother were evaluated for other causes of congenital infection, but no other agents were identified. The bone lesions had nearly completely resolved by 10 weeks of age. Screening of neonates with congenital parvovirus B19 infection for bone lesions may provide additional insight into the incidence and pathophysiology of these lesions.

Subclinical rubella reinfection during pregnancy followed by transmission of virus to the fetus

We report a documented case of rubella reinfection during pregnancy in a previously vaccinated woman with residual antibody titre to rubella of 15 IU/ml. The reinfection occurred following an exposure to rubella virus (contact with 6-year-old daughter with clinical rubella) between the 7th and 10th week of pregnancy which resulted in transmission of the virus to the fetus. Umbilical cord blood drawn by cordocentesis was found to be strongly positive for rubella IgM antibody. After termination of the pregnancy rubella virus was isolated in cell culture from fetal tissues.

Congenital rubella syndrome despite repeated vaccination of the mother: a coincidence of vaccine failure with failure to vaccinate

Congenital rubella syndrome occurred in a boy born to a mother who had been properly vaccinated three times before conception, but developed only low titers of rubella antibody. The non-vaccinated father most likely infected the mother on a home visit during the third to fifth weeks of gestation. He served in the army and fell ill during an outbreak of a rubella-like disease in his military unit. The mother subsequently developed a slight rash, but rubella IgM antibodies were lacking and rubella infection was not suspected. This incidence demonstrates the necessity of vaccinating all children, including boys and young men, in order to reduce the number of infections and prevent further cases of congenital rubella syndrome.

Congenital rubella syndrome after maternal reinfection

This report concerns a case of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) with atypical immune response affecting an infant whose mother had repeated evidence of immunity before pregnancy. Laboratory diagnosis of CRS could only clearly be achieved by virus isolation after the second month of life despite typical clinical features of CRS and multiple organ involvement. After the first month of age, low concentrations of specific IgM antibodies were revealed by ELISA and confirmed by a reference test system (IgM-specific haemagglutination inhibition assay). Persistent and increasing high levels of IgM antibodies were detected only after the 6th month of life. Later on IgG antibody levels decreased. Immunological investigations showed an IgG1-hypoglobulinaemia. The unusual feature of the present case report is not only the failure of the maternal rubella immunity to prevent CRS, but the defect of the child's immune system, probably attributable to congenital infection. As a consequence, laboratory diagnosis of CRS could not be achieved initially by the proved serological methods.

Rubella and mumps vaccines

As a fetal infection occurring during early pregnancy, rubella's potential for teratogenicity is unparalleled. In the postnatal period it is a relatively benign disease. Mumps, on the other hand, causes moderate morbidity and occasional mortality. Both infections cause considerable morbidity and disruption in the lives of young people gathered for group activities. Widespread use of safe and effective live attenuated vaccines has dramatically reduced the incidence of rubella, congenital rubella, and mumps in the United States. Nevertheless, significant numbers of young children, especially in areas of urban and rural immigration and poverty, fail to be immunized in a timely fashion; and some adolescents and young adults remain susceptible either because they escaped immunization in childhood or are primary vaccine failures. These individuals remain the source of individual cases and small outbreaks of rubella and mumps. For total eradication of these infections, we need to intensify vaccine efforts and to maintain surveillance efforts for mumps, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome.

Fetal infection after maternal reinfection with rubella: criteria for defining reinfection

Five cases of asymptomatic maternal reinfection with rubella are described that occurred in England and Wales during 1985-8 and resulted in intrauterine infection. The criteria for diagnosing reinfection are described. In four cases the rubella contact was with the woman's own children. Two women had therapeutic abortions, rubella virus being recovered from the products of conception, and three were delivered of infants with congenitally acquired disease. Though the risks associated with maternal reinfection with rubella are very small and being measured in a prospective study, it is hoped that the recently introduced augmented programme of rubella vaccination will reduce rubella in the community and therefore this small risk still further.

Congenital rubella infection after previous immunity of the mother

A newborn boy was admitted with a congenital rubella infection. Seven years previously his mother had been vaccinated against rubella; 3 years previously rubella immunity had been confirmed. Therefore, intrauterine transmission must have occurred after maternal reinfection during pregnancy. Prenatal diagnosis of rubella embryopathy with serological methods after subclinical maternal reinfection is nearly impossible.

Comparison of the performance and reproducibility of various serological methods and diagnostic kits for the detection of rubella antibodies

For rubella antibody detection performance and reproducibility of standard laboratory methods and newer assay systems have been evaluated. IgM antibody detection in sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation (SDG) was compared with two commercial ELISAs and the non-commercial anti-my-hemadsorption immunosorbent technique. The two ELISAs proved to be more sensitive than the SDG even if done with a long incubation hemagglutination inhibition test (HAI) to increase sensitivity. Additional tests showed that the sensitivity of the SDG could be increased by using ELISA instead of HAI. The reproducibility of all tests was good. In 205 assays the ELISA enzygnost IgM showed a coefficient of variation (CV) with its reference serum of 6.3% for titers, while the CV for absorbance was 37.8%. With ELISA rubazyme M the same reference serum gave a CV of 13.7% in 149 subsequent assays. In 12 and 13 assays in the anti-my-hemadsorption immunosorbent technique the CV varied with the height of the reference serum used between 4.7 and 18.7%. Antibody detection using HAI was compared with IgG antibody detection using two commercial ELISAs and a commercial single radial hemolysis test (SRH). In 592 assays with a low positive control serum the HAI gave a CV of 6.0%. With the ELISA enzygnost a CV of 7.7% for the titers was obtained in 72 assays, but for absorbances the CV was 39.4%. The CV for the kit internal low positive control in 148 assays with the ELISA rubazyme was 26.8%. As with HAI the reproducibility of the SRH was good. The same control serum used in the HAI gave a CV of 6.2% in 418 subsequent assays. Because of the good reproducibility and sensitivity the SDG can now be replaced by newer techniques which are less expensive and time consuming. Interference with rheumatoid factor was only observed in the ELISA enzygnost if sera were not pretreated with latex adsorbents. The reproducibility of our HAI was comparable to that of the SRH while the results obtained with the two commercial ELISAs were less reproducible. Until it is known, that antibodies detected with the newer techniques are able to prevent re-infection, it would be unwise to reject the HAI completely for the determination of immunity status.

Detection of rubella-specific IgM in subclinical rubella reinfection in pregnancy

Seven cases of asymptomatic rubella reinfection in early pregnancy are described. In each, there was a history of exposure to a rubelliform illness and low levels of rubella-specific IgM subsequently appeared in the serum. Four of the women had been immunised, after having been shown to be susceptible to rubella, one had been immunised at school without previous antibody screening, and two were uncertain about immunisation. One pregnancy was terminated and rubella virus was not isolated from the products of conception. Six pregnancies went to term and the infants showed no evidence of intrauterine infection. In a further case it was impossible to discriminate between reinfection and primary infection, and termination of pregnancy was offered.