Rationale for the use of 5-HT1-like agonists in the treatment of migraine

The locus of Action of CGRPergic Monoclonal Antibodies Against Migraine: Peripheral Over Central Mechanisms

Migraine is a complex neurovascular disorder characterized by attacks of moderate to severe unilateral headache, accompanied by photophobia among other neurological signs. Although an arsenal of antimigraine agents is currently available in the market, not all patients respond to them. As Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) have been developed. Unfortunately, further pharmaceutical development (for olcegepant and telcagepant) was interrupted due to pharmacokinetic issues observed during the Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT). On this basis, the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs; immunoglobulins) against CGRP or its receptor has recently emerged as a novel pharmacotherapy to treat migraines. RCT showed that these mAbs are effective against migraines producing fewer adverse events. Presently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved four mAbs, namely: (i) erenumab; (ii) fremanezumab; (iii) galcanezumab; and (iv) eptinezumab. In general, specific antimigraine compounds exert their action in the trigeminovascular system, but the locus of action (peripheral vs. central) of the mAbs remains elusive. Since these mAbs have a molecular weight of ∼150 kDa, some studies rule out the relevance of their central actions as they seem unlikely to cross the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB). Considering the therapeutic relevance of this new class of antimigraine compounds, the present review has attempted to summarize and discuss the current evidence on the probable sites of action of these mAbs.

Current understanding of meningeal and cerebral vascular function underlying migraine headache

BACKGROUND

The exact mechanisms underlying the onset of a migraine attack are not completely understood. It is, however, now well accepted that the onset of the excruciating throbbing headache of migraine is mediated by the activation and increased mechanosensitivity (i.e. sensitization) of trigeminal nociceptive afferents that innervate the cranial meninges and their related large blood vessels.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a critical summary of current understanding of the role that the cranial meninges, their associated vasculature, and immune cells play in meningeal nociception and the ensuing migraine headache.

METHODS

We discuss the anatomy of the cranial meninges, their associated vasculature, innervation and immune cell population. We then debate the meningeal neurogenic inflammation hypothesis of migraine and its putative contribution to migraine pain. Finally, we provide insights into potential sources of meningeal inflammation and nociception beyond neurogenic inflammation, and their potential contribution to migraine headache.

Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing

Plaguing humans for more than two millennia, manifest on every continent studied, and with more than one billion patients having an attack in any year, migraine stands as the sixth most common cause of disability on the planet. The pathophysiology of migraine has emerged from a historical consideration of the "humors" through mid-20th century distraction of the now defunct Vascular Theory to a clear place as a neurological disorder. It could be said there are three questions: why, how, and when? Why: migraine is largely accepted to be an inherited tendency for the brain to lose control of its inputs. How: the now classical trigeminal durovascular afferent pathway has been explored in laboratory and clinic; interrogated with immunohistochemistry to functional brain imaging to offer a roadmap of the attack. When: migraine attacks emerge due to a disorder of brain sensory processing that itself likely cycles, influenced by genetics and the environment. In the first, premonitory, phase that precedes headache, brain stem and diencephalic systems modulating afferent signals, light-photophobia or sound-phonophobia, begin to dysfunction and eventually to evolve to the pain phase and with time the resolution or postdromal phase. Understanding the biology of migraine through careful bench-based research has led to major classes of therapeutics being identified: triptans, serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists; gepants, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists; ditans, 5-HT1F receptor agonists, CGRP mechanisms monoclonal antibodies; and glurants, mGlu5 modulators; with the promise of more to come. Investment in understanding migraine has been very successful and leaves us at a new dawn, able to transform its impact on a global scale, as well as understand fundamental aspects of human biology.

Genetic epidemiology of migraine and depression

Background

Migraine and major depressive disorder (commonly referred to as depression) are both common disorders with a significant impact on society. Studies in both clinical and community-based settings have demonstrated a strong relationship between migraine and depression. In addition to complicating the diagnosis, depression that is comorbid with migraine may lower treatment adherence, increase risk of medication overuse and is associated with migraine chronification, thus leading to higher direct and indirect costs and poorer health-related outcomes with increased disability.

Aim

The aim of this review is to summarise the current knowledge on the genetic epidemiology of migraine and depression and the possible biological mechanisms underlying their comorbidity.

Methods

We present a narrative review reporting on the current literature.

Results and conclusions

Epidemiological findings indicate that there is a bidirectional relationship between migraine and depression, with one disorder increasing the risk for the other and vice versa, suggesting shared biological mechanisms. Twin and family studies indicate that this bidirectional relationship can be explained, at least partly, by shared underlying genetically determined disease mechanisms. Although no genes have been robustly associated with the aetiology of both migraine and depression, genes from serotonergic, dopaminergic and GABAergic systems together with variants in the MTHFR and BDNF genes remain strong candidates.

Serotonin, 5HT1 agonists, and migraine: new data, but old questions still not answered

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The serotonergic system has long been linked to migraine but recent studies highlight how much is still unclear about this link. And recent data add to the uncertainty of where/how triptans act and why they are headache specific.

RECENT FINDINGS

Markers of 5HT levels in the brains of migraine patients show no changes between attacks. Several recent meta-analyses show the most convincing data on genetic differences in the serotonergic system for 5HT transporters. Findings of additional triptan actions on peripheral trigeminovascular neurons and in the hypothalamus add more fuel to the debate on where these drugs act. A growing list of studies show efficacy of multiple triptans and other 5HT1b/1d agonists in preclinical models of nonheadache pain arguing for reevaluation of whether these drugs have efficacy in other pain states. Despite these issues, serotonergic drugs continue to be the gold standard for abortive agents with new members on the horizon (5HT1f agonists).

SUMMARY

Given the clear efficacy of serotonergic drugs for migraine, continued study on the role of the endogenous 5HT system may lead to more novel therapies. And with the list of studies demonstrating efficacy triptans in models of nonheadache, clinical studies should address whether these drugs work for other types of pain.

New targets for migraine therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

The shift in our understanding of migraine as a vascular disorder to a brain disorder has opened new avenues for the development of novel therapeutics with neural targets. The advent of 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, the triptans, in the 1990s was a crucial step in the modern evolution of treatment. The use of triptans, like their predecessors, is limited by their vasoconstrictor effects, and new development has been slowed by poor academic research funding to identify new targets. The development of agents without vascular effects, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists and selective serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonists, will bring more effective treatments to a population currently without migraine-specific options. In addition, advances in understanding migraine pathophysiology have identified new potential pharmacologic targets such as acid-sensing ion channels, glutamate and orexin receptors, nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Although previous attempts to block subtypes of glutamate receptors, NOS, and TRP channels have had mixed outcomes, new molecules for the same targets are currently under investigation. Finally, an entirely new approach to migraine treatment with noninvasive neuromodulation via transcutaneous neurostimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation is just beginning. Hopefully in the coming years we will see a new era of migraine therapy, with multiple classes of better-tolerated, more effective agents targeting diverse yet specific migraine mechanisms.

[A causative role of vasodilation in migraine? No]

INTRODUCTION

The hypothesis that migraine pain is caused by vasodilation has been challenged by clinical and experimental evidence.

STATE OF ART

The most convincing arguments against the vascular hypothesis come from neuroimaging data. Magnetic resonance imaging studies show that spontaneous migraine attacks are not accompanied by extracranial vasodilation, and by only slight dilation of the intracranial arteries. Pharmacologically-induced migraine attacks also provide further evidence against the role of vasodilation in migraine. Vasodilators such as sildenafil and nitroglycerine trigger attacks without dilation of the middle cerebral artery diameter, whereas VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide) markedly dilates intra- and extracranial arteries but does not induce migraine attacks. Clinical studies also show a lack of correspondence between the subjective experience of throbbing headache and the arterial pulse. Moreover, many acute anti-migraine agents are not vasoconstrictors.

PERSPECTIVES

Further studies are necessary to clarify the mechanisms of migraine headache generation.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to a longstanding and widespread belief, vasodilatation is neither sufficient nor necessary to cause migraine headache and is probably an epiphenomenon.

Activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine1B/1D/1F receptors as a mechanism of action of antimigraine drugs

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of the triptans (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B/1D receptor agonists) was a great improvement in the acute treatment of migraine. However, shortcomings of the triptans have prompted research on novel serotonergic targets for the treatment of migraine.

AREAS COVERED

In this review the different types of antimigraine drugs acting at 5-HT receptors, their discovery and development are discussed. The first specific antimigraine drugs were the ergot alkaloids, consisting of ergotamine, dihydroergotamine and methysergide, which are agonists at 5-HT receptors, but can also bind α-adrenoceptors and dopamine receptors. In the 1990s, the triptans became available on the market. They are 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, showing fewer side effects due to their receptor specificity. In the last years, compounds that bind specifically to 5-HT1D, 5-HT1F and 5-HT7 receptors have been explored for their antimigraine potential. Furthermore, the serotonergic system seems to act in tight connection with the glutamatergic as well as the CGRP-ergic systems, which may open novel therapeutic avenues.

EXPERT OPINION

Although the triptans are very effective in treating migraine attacks, their shortcomings have stimulated the search for novel drugs. Currently, the focus is on 5-HT1F receptor agonists, which seem devoid of vascular side effects. Moreover, novel compounds that affect multiple transmitter and/or neuropeptide systems that are involved in migraine could be of therapeutic relevance.

The combined effect of acupuncture and Tanacetum parthenium on quality of life in women with headache: randomised study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of acupuncture (AC), Tanacetum (TAN) or combined treatment on quality of life in women with chronic migraine (CM).

METHODS

A total of 69 women volunteers were randomly divided into 3 groups: AC, acupuncture administered in 20 sessions over 10 weeks (n=22); TAN, at 150 mg/day (n=23); and AC+TAN (n=23). The primary outcome was Short-Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life assessment score. Secondary outcomes included the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score experienced after randomisation.

RESULTS

AC+TAN was statistically significantly more effective than AC or TAN alone in overall health-related quality of life (SF-36; p<0.05), on MIDAS score (-35.1 (10.6) AC vs -24.8 (11.7) TAN vs -42.5 (9.8) AC+TAN; p<0.05) and in reducing the mean score of pain on VAS (-5.6 (2.4) AC vs -3.7 (2.1) TAN vs -6.4 (3.1) AC+TAN; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present work shows an improvement of the quality of life and better analgesic effect of acupuncture combined with TAN treatment on migraine pain in women when compared with acupuncture or TAN alone.

Reversal of inflammatory and noninflammatory visceral pain by central or peripheral actions of sumatriptan

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sumatriptan is used specifically to relieve headache pain. The possible efficacy of sumatriptan was investigated in 2 models of visceral pain.

METHODS

Pancreatic inflammation was induced by intravenous injection of dibutyltin dichloride. Noninflammatory irritable bowel syndrome was induced by intracolonic instillation of sodium butyrate. The effects of systemic sumatriptan on referred hypersensitivity were tested in both models. Effects of sumatriptan within the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), a site of descending modulation of visceral pain, was determined by (1) testing the effects of RVM administration of 5HT1(B/D) antagonists on systemic sumatriptan action and (2) determining whether RVM application of sumatriptan reproduced the actions of systemic drug administration.

RESULTS

Systemic sumatriptan elicited a dose- and time-related blockade of referred hypersensitivity in both models that was blocked by systemic administration of either 5HT1(B) or 5HT1(D) antagonists. Sumatriptan administered into the RVM similarly produced dose- and time-related blockade of referred hypersensitivity in both visceral pain models. This was blocked by local microinjection of the 5HT1(B) antagonist but not the 5HT1(D) antagonist. Microinjection of 5HT1(B) or 5HT1(D) antagonists into the RVM did not block the effects of systemic sumatriptan.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that sumatriptan suppresses either inflammatory or noninflammatory visceral pain, most likely through peripheral 5HT1(B)/(D) receptors. Actions at 5HT1(B) receptors within the RVM offer an additional potential site of action for the modulation of visceral pain by triptans. These studies offer new insights into the development of strategies that may improve therapy of visceral pain conditions using already available medications.

Nitrergic and glutamatergic neuronal mechanisms at the trigeminovascular first-order synapse

Nitric oxide (NO) donors such as glyceryl trinitrate cause headache, which suggests involvement of NO in trigeminovascular sensory processing. Sensory transmission at first-order synapses is believed to involve glutamate and the question arises as to whether it is also involved in trigeminovascular sensation and whether it might interact with nitrergic mechanisms. We investigated these questions at the first central synapse in the trigeminovascular sensory system of the cat. Neuronal action potentials in the trigeminal nucleus were recorded while the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) or facial receptive field (RF) were stimulated electrically. Drugs, including the neuronal excitant glutamate, were applied to neurons via microiontophoresis. Results were obtained from 152 neurons activated with A-delta latencies by SSS stimulation and by glutamate. The NO donor S-nitrosoglutathione (SNOG, 50 nA) was applied iontophoretically to 41 neurons during SSS stimulation and 13 neurons during pulsatile glutamate ejection. Responses to both modes of stimulation were enhanced by SNOG; the proportion of neurons enhanced was 56% to SSS stimulation and 59% to glutamate. The inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), N(omega)-propyl-L-arginine (p-ARG, 50 nA) was applied iontophoretically to 17 neurons during stimulation of SSS and to 10 neurons during pulsatile glutamate ejection. Responses to both stimuli were suppressed by p-ARG: The proportion of neurons suppressed were: to SSS stimulation 59% and to glutamate 80%. Microiontophoretic ejection of eletriptan (50 nA) reversibly suppressed responses of neurons to SSS stimulation, to RF electrical stimulation and to pulsatile iontophoretic application of glutamate. This suppression of responses was antagonised by the concurrent local iontophoretic application of the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR127935 or by concurrent iontophoretic application of the selective 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL155732. These results suggest that glutamatergic mechanisms are important in sensory transmission in the trigeminovascular system and that they can be modulated by nitrergic and serotonergic mechanisms.

Activation of 5-HT1B/1D receptor in the periaqueductal gray inhibits nociception

It is considered that the site of action of the abortive antimigraine compounds acting at serotonin, 5-HT(1B/1D,) receptors (triptans) is the trigeminovascular system. We tested whether there is a non-trigeminal site of action. The 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist, naratriptan, was microinjected into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG), and activity in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) was monitored. Recordings were made from 20 nociceptive neurons in the dorsal horn of the TNC that received convergent input from the dura mater and face. Responses of neurons to dural, facial cutaneous and corneal stimulation were studied before and after injection of naratriptan. Naratriptan decreased the excitability to electrical stimulation of the dura mater as the A-fiber response decreased by 24 +/- 4.1% (p < 0.001) and the C-fiber response decreased by 42 +/- 8.2% (p < 0.001). Spontaneous activity was decreased by 38 +/- 7.5% (p < 0.001). After injection, the mechanical thresholds of the dura mater increased from (n = 14, p < 0.01). Responses to stimulation of the face and cornea were not altered by injection of naratriptan. These results suggest that 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor activation in the vlPAG activates descending pain-modulating pathways that inhibit dural, but not facial and corneal nociceptive input. These findings have implications for the understanding of the action of triptans in migraine and cluster headache, suggesting that brain loci other than the trigeminal nucleus may play a role in the clinical action of triptans.

Treatment of childhood headaches

Migraine and tension-type headaches are two of the most common types of primary headache disorders in children. Migraine is a primary central nervous system disorder characterized by triggered or spontaneous episodes of activation of trigemino-vascular complex, neurogenic inflammation around vessels and meninges, and stimulation of the peripheral and central pain pathways of the trigemino-cervical complex. The triptans, by their selective agonistic action on 5-HT1B/1D receptors, are very effective in the treatment of migraine pain and associated symptoms. Early studies on the safety and efficacy of triptans in the management of childhood migraine show encouraging results. We propose a stratified-care model for the management of migraine in children, and discuss pharmacotherapy based on the pathophysiologic mechanisms of migraine pain. Management of tension-type headaches requires comprehensive medical and psychologic evaluation and an individualized approach for a successful outcome.

[Physiopathology of migraine]

The pathophysiology of migraine is not yet fully understood. The most important structures involved seem to be the central nervous system (cortex and brain stem), the trigeminovascular system and related cranial arteries, other autonomic fibres innervating such vessels, and various local vasoactive agents, including SP, CGRP, NO, VIP, NPY, ACh, NA, NKA, among others. The spreading depression phenomenon may explain clinical as well experimental findings in migraine. Its propagation velocity mirrors what is found in clinical aura, it may activate the spinal trigeminal nucleus and may induce CGRP and NO release. Circulatory changes detected with various imaging procedures during migraine also support the pathophysiological role of spreading depression. Three abnormal loci (chromosomes 1 and 19) have been recently found in familial hemiplegic migraine. This produces abnormalities in the voltage-dependent P/Q Ca channel, specific for the central nervous system, which regulates the release of various neurotransmitters, probably including serotonin. It is possible that a channelopathy underlies the pathophysiology of migraine, as in other paroxysmal neurological disorders secondary to membrane hyperexcitability.

Serotonin inhibits trigeminal nucleus activity evoked by craniovascular stimulation through a 5HT1B/1D receptor: a central action in migraine?

The development of serotonin (5HT1B/1D) agonists as treatments for the acute attack of migraine has resulted in considerable interest in their mechanism of action and, to some extent, renewed interest in the role of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT) in the disorder. The initial synthesis of this class of compounds was predicated on the clinical observation that intravenous 5HT terminated acute attacks of migraine. In this study the superior sagittal sinus was isolated in the alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg i.p. and 20 mg/kg i.v. injection supplementary 2 hourly) anesthetized cat. The sinus was stimulated electrically (120V, 250 microsec duration, 0.3 Hz), and neurons of the trigeminocervical complex in the dorsal C2 spinal cord were monitored using electrophysiological methods. After baseline recordings in each animal, 5HT (15 microg/kg/min) was infused for 5 minutes in the presence of either vehicle (group A) or the 5HT1B/1D antagonist GR127935 (100 microg/kg i.v. injection; group B). The baseline probability of cell firing after sagittal sinus stimulation was 0.61 +/- 0.1 at a latency to the fastest peak of 11.1 +/- 0.4 msec. In group A, 5HT infusion alone had a small effect of increasing mean blood pressure (12 +/- 3 mm Hg), which in itself did not alter cell firing. In group A, 5HT alone had an inhibitory effect on evoked trigeminal activity, which developed 15 to 20 minutes after commencement of the infusion. The inhibition of cell firing lasted for 20 minutes, after which the activity returned to baseline. In group B, the combination of 5HT and GR127935 had no effect on trigeminal cell firing, although the small hypertensive effect was still present. These data indicate that 5HT inhibits evoked trigeminal nucleus firing via the 5HT1B/1D receptor at which GR127935 is an antagonist. It is likely that some part of the effect of 5HT in migraine relates to inhibition of trigeminal nucleus activity, just as it is likely that some part of the effect of the triptans is also mediated at this central site and may be complementary to their nonneuronal actions. Moreover, the data highlight the case for describing this class of headache as neurovascular headaches rather than vascular headaches, to recognize the implicit contribution of the trigeminovascular system to their pathophysiology.

Comparison of more and less lipophilic serotonin (5HT1B/1D) agonists in a model of trigeminovascular nociception in cat

The trigeminovascular system consists of bipolar neurons innervating pain-producing intracranial structures, such as the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), and projecting to the medullary and upper cervical dorsal horn second order neurons. Zolmitriptan is a newly developed 5HT1B/1D receptor agonist with both peripheral and central sites of action in the trigeminovascular system due to greater lipophilicity relative to the more hydrophilic antimigraine compound sumatriptan. Given that we have seen electrophysiological and autoradiographic binding data to suggest that the compound may inhibit activity at second-order neurons this study was designed to examine whether such an effect could be demonstrated in a population of trigeminal neurons using Fos immunohistochemistry. Cats were anesthetised with alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg intraperitoneal then 20 mg/kg intravenous maintenance) with all surgery being conducted using halothane (1-3%). The animals were prepared for physiological monitoring, including blood pressure, heart rate, rectal temperature, and end-expiratory CO2. They were intubated, ventilated, and paralyzed with gallamine triethiodide (6 mg/kg i.v.). A midline craniotomy was performed to expose the sinus for electrical stimulation using hook electrodes. Twenty-four hours after completion of the surgical procedures the animal was ready for treatment. Vehicle, sumatriptan (85 micrograms/kg), or zolmitriptan (30 micrograms/kg) was administered and the SSS was stimulated (250 microseconds, 100 V at 0.3 Hz) for 1 h. Following an additional 1 h the animal was perfused and immunohistochemistry was used to detect the protein product of the immediate early gene c-Fos. We compared the dorsal horns of the medulla (trigeminal nucleus caudalis) and the C1 and C2 cervical spinal cords in control animals with those receiving zolmitriptan or sumatriptan. We noted a significant reduction in Fos expression after treatment with zolmitriptan but no effect with sumatriptan. Given that zolmitriptan accesses central neurons and that the method of stimulation we have employed would bypass peripheral trigeminal mechanisms it is likely that the reduction in second-order trigeminal neuronal activity was due to a direct inhibitory effect of the compound on those cells. These neurons form a possible site for the treatment of acute attacks of migraine.

Trigeminal ganglion elicited increases in nucleus trigeminal caudalis blood flow: a novel migraine model

We developed an assay which predicts the antimigraine efficacy of sumatriptan. Our assay is based on two assumptions: (1) electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion mimics the neurogenic inflammatory process and (2) stimulation-induced increases in n. trigeminal caudalis blood flow reflect activation of a large population of neurons. Briefly, the trigeminal ganglion was electrically stimulated for 30 s periods at 1 and 10 Hz before and after administration of saline or the antimigraine compound sumatriptan in chloralose-anesthetized cats. Sumatriptan blunted the increase in blood flow following stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion. These data suggest that the n. trigeminal caudalis blood flow model may be useful in identifying antimigraine compounds.

The selectivity of MDL 74,721 in models of neurogenic versus vascular components of migraine

MDL 74,721 (R)-2-(N1,N1-dipropylamino)-8-methylaminosulfonylmethyl-1,2,3,4-te trahydronaphthalene, a sulfonamidotetralin, has been found to exhibit a 10,000-fold greater potency in neurogenic versus vascular models of migraine. Sumatriptan, a relatively pure 5-HT1D/5-HT1B receptor agonist, also showed higher potency versus neurogenic inflammation. However, for sumatriptan the potency difference (100-fold) in the two pathophysiological models was less pronounced than seen for MDL 74,721. The affinity profile of MDL 74,721 at 5-HT1 receptor subtypes may in part explain its ability to differentiate these two physiological responses. MDL 74,721 demonstrated nanomolar affinity for 5-HT1A (12.7 +/- 0.3 nM) and 5-HT1D (41.3 +/- 10.9 nM) but considerably lower affinity for 5-HT1B receptors (> 1000 nM). Serotonin-like activity was seen in in vitro functional assays including inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in human 5-HT1D receptor-transfected fibroblasts or eliciting vasoconstriction in isolated human pial arteries. The intrinsic activity (relative to 5 - HT[E(Amax)]) and affinity (pD2) for the human cerebrovascular 5-HT receptors were: 5-HT (100%, 7.51 +/- 0.09), sumatriptan (94%, 6.85 +/- 0.1) and MDL 74,721 (66%, 5.70 +/- 0.23). In anaesthetised cats, treatment with MDL 74,721 resulted in a dose-related reduction in the percentage of carotid flow going through the arteriovenous anastomoses to the lungs, with an ED50 of 0.3 mg/kg i.v., the same as sumatriptan. However, in the guinea-pig neurogenic model, MDL 74,721 inhibited plasma protein extravasation with an ED50 of 0.023 microg/kg compared to 2.5 microg/kg for sumatriptan. MDL 74,721 was also effective in this model (in rats) after oral administration. In conclusion, MDL 74,721 demonstrates a preclinical profile consistent with anti-migraine efficacy. Its marked preference for inhibiting neurogenic inflammation makes this compound a useful tool for assessing the relative contribution of this pathophysiological mechanism to the human disease state.

Atypical facial pain: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover pilot study of subcutaneous sumatriptan

A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover pilot study involving 19 patients was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous sumatriptan, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-like receptor agonist, in the treatment of atypical facial pain (AFP). A reduction in total pain was found 120 min post injection in the sumatriptan group. Most patients, however, described the medication as ineffective overall, despite significant pain score reduction. The temporary improvement of pain scores with the active drug was thought to be too small to be of any clinical benefit, but suggests that vascular or neurogenic mechanisms may be involved in the aetiology of AFP. Sumatriptan is not an appropriate therapeutic option for patients with AFP, but could prove a valuable drug in experimental clinical pharmacology.

Current concepts of the pathophysiology of migraine

An understanding of the basic anatomy and physiology of the cranial circulation facilitates the assessment and management of patients with headache, particularly vascular-type headaches, such as migraine. At the very least, all pain is perceived and processed in the brain. With migraine it is likely that the fundamental problem and its clinical expression are driven by the CNS; thus study of the brain regarding headache is warranted. As therapy evolves during the 1900s, such an understanding will be necessary, as new and highly specific receptor-targeted compounds allow treatment and improvement of headache in many patients. Since writing this article, the nomenclature for serotonin (5HT) receptors has changed so that any reference herein to 5HTID alpha is now 5HTID and 5HTID beta is now 5HTI beta. This change in nomenclature is discussed in Martig PR, Hoyer D, Humphrey PPA, et al: Alignment of receptor nomenclature with the human genome: Classification of 5HT-1 beta and 5HT-1D receptor subtypes. Trends in the Pharmacological Sciences 17:103, 1996.

Serotonin 1D (5-HT1D) agonists and other agents in acute migraine

This article discusses the use of serotonin1D agonists in the treatment of acute migraine. Specifically, the author reviews the efficacy and safety of this class of drugs with sumatriptan as the main focus. Agents under clinical trial are also discussed. Recurrence of migraine, long-term usage, and side effects of serotonin1D agonists are included in the review. The article also discusses alternative medications, such as intranasal lidocraine, intravenous chlorpromazine, and intravenous prochlorperazine, for acute treatment of migraine. The limited role of narcotics and sedatives is also mentioned.

Initial human experience with MK-462 (rizatriptan): a novel 5-HT1D agonist

AIMS

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral MK-462 in comparison with oral sumatriptan in healthy male volunteers.

METHODS

Sixteen healthy male volunteers were studied in a rising, single dose, alternating panel design with eight subjects per panel. Matching placebo was administered to two of eight study subjects at each dose level of MK-462 in a randomized, double-blind fashion.

RESULTS

MK-462 was rapidly absorbed with a median tmax of 1.3 h (range 1-3 h) vs a tmax for sumatriptan of 2.5 h (range 1-4 h, P < 0.001). Administration of either MK-462 or sumatriptan produced maximal mean elevations of 5-10 mmHg in systolic and diastolic blood pressures without effect on heart rate; the changes occurred sooner following MK-462, consistent with more rapid absorption. Both MK-462 and sumatriptan provoked mild increases in serum growth hormone without any effect on serum prolactin concentrations. The most commonly reported symptom following MK-462 was drowsiness.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the novel 5-HT1D agonist, MK-462, is rapidly absorbed following oral administration and warrants further investigation of its utility in the treatment of acute migraine.

Fully automated assay for the determination of sumatriptan in human serum using solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

A method is described for a fully automated, sensitive, accurate and precise assay for the determination of sumatriptan in human serum. The assay consists of solid-phase extraction followed by reversed-phase HPLC with electrochemical detection. The extraction procedure has been fully automated on a Zymate XP robot linked on-line to the HPLC system. The assay is linear over the analytical range 1-30 ng ml-1 and selective for sumatriptan with respect to endogenous plasma components and GR49336, the major circulating metabolite. The intra-assay data demonstrate a maximum bias and precision across the calibration range of 10% and 6.6% respectively. The inter-assay data demonstrate a maximum bias and precision across the calibration range of 6.7% and 8.8%, respectively. The extraction efficiency of the assay is approximately 90% and is constant across the calibration range. The assay was used for the determination of sumatriptan in serum clinical samples and was shown to be robust in sustained use over several months. The use of a Zymate XP robot allowed complete automation of the assay, which resulted in high-quality, high-throughput analyses.

Selective vasoconstriction by alniditan in the carotid vascular bed of anaesthetized dogs

In anaesthetized dogs, alniditan or (-)-(R)-N-[3,4-dihydro-2H-1- benzopyran-2-yl)methyl]-N'-(1,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2-pyrimidinyl)-1,3- propanediamine dihydrochloride, a new compound with 5-HT1-like receptor ligand effects, dose dependently (0.63-80 micrograms/kg i.v.) reduced common carotid arterial blood flow with comparatively little effect on other cardiovascular variables including coronary, mesenteric and renal arterial blood flow, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and airway resistance. The potency of alniditan was higher than that of sumatriptan and comparable to that of ergotamine (dose producing a 50% reduction: alniditan = 5.1 micrograms/kg i.v.; sumatriptan = 13.1 micrograms/kg i.v.; ergotamine = 4.6 micrograms/kg i.v.; median values). The reduction of carotid arterial blood flow by alniditan was accompanied by an increase of carotid arterial vascular resistance and correlated with the increase of the difference in oxygen saturation between arterial and jugular venous blood, suggesting a preferential reduction of extracerebral shunt flow by the compound via constriction of arteriovenous anastomoses in the carotid vascular region. The extent and duration of carotid arterial blood flow reductions after alniditan at 5 micrograms/kg i.v. were similar to those after sumatriptan 15 micrograms/kg i.v. but larger/longer after alniditan at 15 micrograms/kg i.v. than after sumatriptan at 15 micrograms/kg i.v. The dose-dependent increase of carotid arterial vascular resistance by alniditan was similar in dogs premedicated daily for 4 days with solvent or active compound (20 micrograms/kg i.v.), indicating absence of tolerance or resetting of sensitivity to the compound.

Differentiation between partial and silent 5-HT1D beta receptor antagonists using rat C6-glial and Chinese hamster ovary cell lines permanently transfected with a cloned human 5-HT1D beta receptor gene

Intrinsic activities of serotonin (5-HT) receptor ligands at cloned human 5-HT1D beta receptor sites were determined by measuring cAMP responses in two permanently transfected cell types: rat C6-glial and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells. Both transfected cell lines expressed a similar 5-HT1D beta receptor density (361 to 448 fmol/mg protein) and displayed a number of similar cAMP responses: marked inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation by 5-HT; a similar agonist potency and efficacy with 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT), 5-methoxytryptamine, bufotenine, sumatriptan, 7-trifluoromethyl-4(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-pyrolo-(1,2-a)quinoxal ine (CGS 12066B), 5-methoxy-3(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl)1H-indole (RU 24,969), and tryptamine, their maximal effect being comparable to that of 5-HT; less agonist efficacy with m-trifluoro-phenyl-piperazine (TFMPP) (it inhibited at most 63% of stimulated cAMP formation); and antagonist activity against the 5-CT-mediated agonist response with methiothepin, 2'-methyl-4-(5-methyl-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid [4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenyl]-amide (GR 127,935), and ritanserin. Metergoline and 1-naphtylpiperazine showed different intrinsic activities. In contrast to their pronounced antagonist activity in the transfected CHO-K1 cell line, the antagonist effect was only partial and absent for metergoline and 1-naphtylpiperazine in the transfected C6-glial cell line, respectively. In conclusion, these cell lines are useful as a tool to measure with high sensitivity differences in intrinsic activities of 5-HT receptor ligands and, therefore, discriminate between silent antagonists (no intrinsic activity) and antagonists with intrinsic activity (i.e. partial agonists), even though this intrinsic activity may be relatively weak.

The effects of sumatriptan on pituitary secretion in man

Sumatriptan, a new antimigraine drug with high affinity and selectivity for certain 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1D) receptor subtypes, was administered to 12 normal subjects, in order to investigate the effects of 5-HT receptor activation on anterior pituitary secretion. Sumatriptan increased plasma growth hormone (GH) levels from 2.5 +/- 0.5 mIU/l in basal conditions to 17.3 +/- 2.6 mIU/l 30 min after administration of the drug. After pre-treatment with cyproheptadine, an anti-serotoninergic drug known to inhibit GH secretion, the mean integrated sumatriptan-induced GH response decreased from 14.8 +/- 3.9 muI/l*hr to 3.7 +/- 1.7 mIU/l*hr. Sumatriptan administration did not have any effect on the secretion of the other anterior pituitary hormones. It is concluded that sumatriptan selectively increases GH secretion in man, but the exact nature of the receptors involved is not yet known.

Function of the peripheral serotoninergic pathways in migraine: a proposal for an experimental model

We propose a model for assessing the function of 5HT receptors in migraine by evaluating their expression on monocytes by means of double-labeling fluorocytometry (CD14-positive cells FITC-labeled). This model demonstrates that during headache induced in migraine without aura sufferers given isosorbide dinitrate followed by sumatriptan treatment 5HT expression on monocytes progressively increases. This increase may be due to the activation of 5HT turnover and to the increased availability of 5HT displaced by sumatriptan from cerebrovascular receptors during head pain.

Inhibition by sumatriptan of central trigeminal neurones only after blood-brain barrier disruption

1. The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1)-like agonist, sumatriptan, is highly efficient in the relief of migraine headache and its accompanying symptoms. 2. Experimental evidence has indicated that its site of action may be on the cranial vessels or on the trigeminal innervation of the cranium, or both, since sumatriptan does not pass the blood-brain barrier easily under normal circumstances. It is, however, not clear whether the blood-brain barrier is normal or abnormal during a migraine attack. 3. In this study, single unit activity and trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials in central trigeminal neurones were monitored during electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus. 4. Intravenous administration of sumatriptan (100 micrograms kg-1) did not alter trigeminal evoked activity unless the permeability of the blood-brain barrier had been increased by infusion of an hyperosmolar mannitol solution. After blood-brain barrier disruption, sumatriptan decreased the peak-to-peak amplitude of evoked potentials by 40 +/- 6% and the probability of firing of single units by 30 +/- 9%. Mannitol infusions alone in control animals caused no changes in evoked potentials or single unit activity. 5. The data suggest that in normal circumstances sumatriptan does not have sufficient access to trigeminal neurons to alter their function.

On serotonin and migraine: a clinical and pharmacological review

Migraine patients have chronically low systemic 5-HT, predisposing them to develop migrainous headache once an attack has been initiated. Changes in platelet 5-HT content are not causally related, but reflect similar changes at a neuronal level. Stimulation of vascular 5-HT1 receptors, probably located in the vessel wall within the dural vascular bed, may alleviate the headache and associated symptoms, but does not interact with earlier mechanisms within the pathophysiological cascade. These receptors are of an as yet unidentified 5-HT1 subtype, closely resembling, but not identical to 5-HT1D receptors. Activation of these receptors results in vasoconstriction, inhibiting depolarization of sensory perivascular afferents within the trigemino-vascular system and thus stopping the headache. Additional inhibition of the release of vasoactive neuropeptides may be involved, but seems to be of only secondary clinical importance.

Sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine

Sumatriptan is a selective 5-HT1-like agonist, which is effective in the treatment of migraine and cluster headache. It has been rigorously assessed in clinical trials involving over 7000 patients who have treated over 35,000 migraine attacks. Both subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan provide a high level of efficacy with 86% of patients obtaining relief after a single 6 mg injection (at 2 h) and 75% after 100 mg oral sumatriptan (4 h), compared with up to 37% in the placebo-treated group (P < 0.001). The onset of effect is rapid, occurring 10 min after injection and 30 min after the tablet. Oral sumatriptan (100 mg) has been evaluated against ergotamine, 2 mg, plus caffeine, 200 mg (as Cafergot); and against aspirin, 900 mg, plus metoclopramide, 10 mg. Headache relief was superior in sumatriptan-treated patients; 66% obtaining relief at 2 h, compared with 48% on Cafergot (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients obtaining complete relief of headache (Grade 0, no pain) was significantly higher with sumatriptan (40%) than with Cafergot (14%) at 2 h. Associated symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and photophobia are effectively relieved by sumatriptan, whereas Cafergot provoked nausea and vomiting in a proportion of patients. Headache relief with sumatriptan was also superior to that seen with aspirin plus metoclopramide. Sumatriptan was as effective in the relief of accompanying nausea and vomiting as aspirin plus metoclopramide. The efficacy of sumatriptan is maintained after repeated long-term use; over a six-month period efficacy was comparable in the first and last attacks, regardless of how many attacks were treated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sumatriptan: a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonist for the acute treatment of migraine

OBJECTIVE

The clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and associated drug interactions of the novel antimigraine drug sumatriptan are reviewed.

DATA SOURCES

English-language publications pertaining to sumatriptan were identified via a search of the MEDLINE computerized database.

STUDY SELECTION

Open and controlled clinical studies were reviewed in assessing clinical efficacy, although only the results of controlled, randomized trials from the basis for the conclusions pertaining to the effectiveness of sumatriptan.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary measure of drug effectiveness in all clinical studies was significant improvement in headache severity scores. Secondary measures included functional ability, time to relief, rescue medication use, associated symptoms of nausea/vomiting and photo/phonophobia, and, in some studies, headache recurrence rate. These data were obtained from each published clinical trial and used in the overall analysis of sumatriptan efficacy.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sumatriptan is a serotonin agonist that has been studied for the acute treatment of migraine and cluster headache. The drug appears to work via specific serotonin receptors to mediate selective vasoconstriction within the cranial vasculature and to prevent the release of inflammatory mediators from trigeminal nerve terminals. The recommended dose of sumatriptan is 6 mg given subcutaneously at the onset of headache; an oral formulation is under investigation. In the published clinical trials of the oral and subcutaneous dosage forms to date, sumatriptan was effective in reducing headache severity from moderate/severe to mild/absent in approximately 70-80 percent of patients treated with active drug, compared with only 20-30 percent in the placebo groups, and 48 percent in the oral ergotamine tartrate/caffeine (Cafergot)-treated group. Secondary measures of effectiveness also favored sumatriptan. There may be a higher rate of headache recurrence with sumatriptan compared with placebo or Cafergot, although further study is necessary to confirm this observation. Adverse effects associated with sumatriptan administration generally were mild and transient and included tingling, warm/hot sensations, and pressure and tightness in the chest and neck. No significant drug interactions have yet been identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Sumatriptan appears to represent a safe and effective alternative to the ergot alkaloids for the abortive treatment of acute migraine. However, further clinical trials, especially those yielding comparative data with current antimigraine agents, are needed to determine the full therapeutic contribution of sumatriptan.

Carotid vascular effects of ergotamine and dihydroergotamine in the pig: no exclusive mediation via 5-HT1-like receptors

1. Though it is well known that the antimigraine drugs ergotamine and dihydroergotamine reduce carotid arteriovenous anastomotic shunting, it is uncertain whether a 5-HT1-like receptor is responsible for this effect. Using a high dose of methiothepin (3 mg kg-1), which completely blocks the carotid vascular effects of sumatriptan, we have attempted to study the role of 5-HT1-like receptors in the carotid vascular effects of ergotamine as well as dihydroergotamine in anaesthetized pigs. 2. Both ergotamine and dihydroergotamine increased arterial blood pressure and decreased heart rate. 3. The ergot alkaloids reduced dose-dependently total carotid blood flow and conductance as a result of a selective decrease in the arteriovenous anastomotic fraction. The nutrient fraction increased, particularly to bones, tongue and salivary glands with ergotamine and to ears, head skin, bones and salivary glands with dihydroergotamine. In contrast, dural vascular conductance tended to decrease. 4. Methiothepin (3 mg kg-1) partially antagonized the decrease in total carotid and arteriovenous anastomotic blood flow and conductance by the ergot alkaloids; the ED30 for ergotamine and dihydroergotamine (agonist dose eliciting a 30% decrease in arteriovenous anastomotic conductance) was raised by 3.1 and 5.2 fold respectively. 5. These results indicate that the effects of ergotamine and dihydroergotamine are partly mediated by methiothepin-sensitive receptors, which may probably belong to either 5-HT1-like or alpha 2-adrenoceptor category. However, an important part of the effect of ergot alkaloids is left after methiothepin and this could be mediated by other, perhaps novel, receptors.

5-Hydroxytryptamine and the pathophysiology of migraine

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) has long been implicated in the aetiology of migraine but the evidence remains circumstantial and certainly not definitive. Numerous papers have reviewed the background which is briefly outlined here. Although the continued belief in the primary involvement of 5-HT in the genesis of a migraine attack has recently been questioned, many antimigraine drugs undeniably interact potently with 5-HT receptors. It can be argued, however, that their modest clinical benefit results from their pharmacological effects, be they mediated through 5-HT receptors or otherwise, independently of any pathophysiological involvement of endogenous 5-HT. Nevertheless, there seems convincing evidence that central release of 5-HT by various drug mechanisms causes migraine-like headache in migraineurs. It remains to be seen whether these drugs mimic the pathological event initiating the spontaneous migraine attack. Regardless of these considerations, the focus of research on 5-HT and migraine has proved to be enormously profitable over several decades, culminating recently in the identification of a novel, potentially important, antimigraine drug for the treatment of the acute attack. This drug, sumatriptan, is a selective cranial vasoconstrictor which mediates this effect by specifically activating a particular 5-HT1 receptor subtype. Undoubtedly a precise understanding of its clinical mechanism of action, which is currently being studied by a number of groups, will lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of migraine. Perhaps this in turn will help in finally determining whether migraine is a vascular disease and whether or not a disturbance of 5-HT is just epiphenomenal or is truly the primary initiating pathological event.