Superinfections during antimicrobial treatment with betalactam-aminoglycoside combinations in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies

Febrile Neutropenia Syndromes in Children: Risk Factors and Outcomes of Primary, Prolonged, and Recurrent Fever

BACKGROUND

The approach to recurrent febrile neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer has not been sufficiently addressed and was cited as a research gap in the International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia (IPFNP) Guideline 2017.

METHODS

Retrospective medical record review for all pediatric cancer patients with a diagnosis of FN was performed. Variables were collected at 2 different time sets (at day 1 and day 4 of presentation). Three FN syndromes have been defined based on the duration and time course of the fever: (1) primary: fever resolved before 96 hours and did not follow with recurrent fever; (2) prolonged fever: episodes failing to defervesce after at least 96 hours of antibacterial therapy; (3) recurrent fever: a new episode of fever >72 hours after resolution of the initial fever when a patient remained neutropenic and on antibiotics or if a fever developed within 1 week after antibiotic discontinuation. These entities were compared with define risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with recurrent fever.

RESULTS

A total of 633 FN episodes (FNEs) were identified in 268 patients. Each FNE was classified as primary (n=453, 71.5%), prolonged (n=119, 18.7%), or recurrent (n=61, 9.7%). In multivariable analysis, acute myelogenous leukemia (odds ratio [OR]=4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.95-7.24), allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) (OR=4.9, 95% CI: 2.61-7.35), absolute lymphocyte count <300/mm3 (OR=3.8, 95% CI: 1.30-5.02), prior neutropenia of ≥10 days, (OR=3.95, 95% CI: 1.70-5.93) and hypotension (OR=3.65, 95% CI: 1.30-5.86) on day 1 of presentation were all associated with an increased risk of recurrent fever when compared with primary fever. In subset analysis for only the high-risk FN group, hypotension (OR=3.2, 95% CI: 1.80-4.96), prior neutropenia ≥10 days (OR=2.55, 95% CI: 1.40-6.22), and absolute lymphocyte count <300/mm3 at presentation (OR=2.6, P=0.03, 95% CI: 2.65-7.12) were associated with an increased risk of recurrent fever when compared with high-risk FN not developing recurrent fever. Allogeneic SCT (OR=5.9, 95% CI: 2.65-7.12) and prior neutropenia ≥10 days (OR=2.11, 95% CI: 1.25-9.32) were significantly associated with recurrent fever when compared with prolonged fever. Invasive fungal disease was a more common etiology with recurrent fever compared with primary and prolonged fever (P=0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Recurrent fever episodes were more likely to be admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (OR=3, 95% CI: 1.27-6.23) and had a higher 30-day mortality (OR=8, 95% CI: 1.87-71.85) when compared with primary fever.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of risk factors for recurrent fever may enable the early detection infection-related complications of this high-risk group, and possible improved approaches to treatment resulting in decreased morbidity and mortality.

Secondary Infections in Febrile Neutropenia in Hematological Malignancies: More Than Another Febrile Neutropenic Episode

Objective:

Febrile neutropenic episodes (FNEs) are among the major causes of mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. Secondary infections develop either during the empirical antibiotic therapy or 1 week after cessation of therapy for a FNE. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with secondary infections in febrile neutropenic patients.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 750 FNEs in 473 patients between January 2000 and December 2006.

Results:

Secondary infections were diagnosed in 152 (20%) of 750 FNEs. The median time to develop secondary infection was 10 days (range: 2-34 days). The duration of neutropenia over 10 days significantly increased the risk of secondary infections (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with microbiologically documented infections was found to be higher in primary infections (271/750, 36%) compared to secondary infections (43/152, 28%) (p=0.038). Age; sex; underlying disease; antibacterial, antifungal, or antiviral prophylaxis; blood transfusion or bone marrow transplantation; central venous catheter; and severity of neutropenia did not differ significantly between primary and secondary infections (p>0.05). While fever of unknown origin (p=0.005) and catheter-related bacteremia (p<0.001) were less frequently observed in secondary infections, the frequency of microbiologically (p=0.003) and clinically (p<0.001) documented infections, fungal pneumonias (p<0.001), infections related to gram-positive bacteria (p=0.04) and fungi (p<0.001), and 30-day mortality rate (p<0.001) were significantly higher in cases of secondary infections (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

Secondary infections should be regarded as life-threatening complications of febrile neutropenia. Secondary infections represent a more severe and mortal complication and cannot be regarded just as another FNE.

Infection in neutropenic patients with cancer

Neutropenic fever sepsis syndromes are common among patients with cancer who are receiving intensive cytotoxic systemic therapy. Recognition of the syndromes and timely initial antibacterial therapy is critical for survival and treatment success. Outcomes are linked to myeloid reconstitution and recovery from neutropenia, control of active comorbidities, and appropriate treatment of the infections that underlie the sepsis syndrome. Hematologists and oncologists must be clear about the prognosis and treatment goals to work effectively with critical care physicians toward the best outcomes for patients with cancer who develop neutropenic sepsis syndromes.

Secondary infections in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia

OBJECTIVE

Patients with neutropenia due to cancer chemotherapy are prone to severe infections. Cancer patients canexperience >1 infectious episode during the same period of neutropenia. This study aimed to determine the etiologicaland clinical characteristics of secondary infectious episodes in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia and to identifythe factors associated with the risk of secondary infectious episodes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All cancer patients that received antineoplastic chemotherapy at Ankara University, School ofMedicine, Department of Hematology between May 2004 and May 2005 and developed neutropenia were included in thestudy. Data were collected using survey forms that were completed during routine infectious diseases consultation visits.Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-square test, whereas Student's t-test was used for continuous variables.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of secondary infections (SIs).

RESULTS

SIs were observed during 138 (53%) of 259 febrile neutropenic episodes. Of the 138 episodes, 89 (64.5%)occurred in male patients with a mean age of 40.9 years (range: 17-76 years). In total, 80% of the SIs were clinically ormicrobiologically documented. Factors on d 4 of the initial febrile episode were analyzed via a logistic regression model. The presence of a central intravenous catheter (OR: 3.01; P<0.001), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as the underlyingdisease (OR: 2.12; P=0.008), diarrhea (OR: 4.59; P=0.005), and invasive aspergillosis (IA) during the initial febrileepisode (OR: 3.96; P=0.009) were statistically significant risk factors for SIs.

CONCLUSION

Among the cancer patients with neutropenia in the present study, AML as the underlying disease, thepresence of a central venous catheter, diarrhea, and IA during the initial febrile episode were risk factors for thedevelopment of SIs.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea, a frequent complication in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia

Diarrhoea occurs frequently in neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia receiving chemotherapy and may be caused by either infection- or drug-induced cytotoxicity. Since Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhoea in non-haematologic patients, we were interested in its incidence in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In this retrospective study, we analysed 134 patients with AML receiving a total of 301 chemotherapy courses. Diarrhoea occurred during 33% of all courses in 58 patients. C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) occurred in 18% of all patients and 9% of all treatment courses. Almost one third of diarrhoea episodes were caused by C. difficile. CDAD was associated with older age (58 vs. 50 years), number of antibiotics administered (2 vs. 1), duration of antibiotic therapy (7 vs. 4 days), ceftazidime as the antibiotic of choice (75% vs. 54%) and duration of neutropenia (12 vs. 7 days) prior to onset of diarrhoea. An increased risk for CDAD was seen for prolonged neutropenia. CDAD responded well to oral metronidazole and/or vancomycin and no patient died of this complication. In conclusion, CDAD is common in patients with AML receiving chemotherapy. C. difficile enterotoxin testing of stool specimens should be included in all symptomatic patients.

Pneumonia

Most patients suffering from community acquired pneumonia do not appear at a radiology department since diagnosis is made on a clinical basis. In severe or unclear situations, a chest X-ray is done and analysis is frequently done by interns. Radiologists frequently see those patients that suffer from recurrent, nosocomial pneumonia, or an additional predisposing disease. The appropriate investigational technique, frequently targeted differential diagnosis, and the special needs of these patients need to be understood by radiologists. Early detection of a focus of infection is the major goal in immunocompromised patients. As pneumonia is the most common focus, chest imaging is to be done at the beginning. The sensitivity of chest X-rays, especially in the supine position, is known to be low. Therefore the very sensitive high-resolution CT (HRCT) became the gold standard in neutropenic hosts and is widely replaced by thin-section multi-detector-row-CT (MDCT). Underlying diseases such as pulmonary embolism or bronchial carcinoma might also be depicted. Furthermore, the costs of CT are low in comparison to antibiotics. The infiltrate needs to be localised, so that a physician can utilise this information as a guidance for invasive procedures for further microbiological work-up. The radiological characterisation of infiltrates gives a first and rapid hint to differentiate between different sorts of infectious (typical bacterial, atypical bacterial, fungal) and non-infectious aetiologies. Follow-up investigations need careful interpretation according to disease and concomitant treatment. Temporary exclusion of infectious involvement of the lung with high accuracy is, besides of pneumonia management, a hot topic for clinicians.

Pneumonia in neutropenic patients

Radiologists have a special role in the management of neutropenic patients. The appropriate investigational technique, frequently targeted differential diagnosis, and the special needs of these patients, need to be understood. Early detection of a focus is the major goal in febrile neutropenic patients. As pneumonia is the most common focus, chest imaging is a special radiological task. The sensitivity of chest X-ray, especially in supine position, is known to be low; therefore, the very sensitive high-resolution CT (HRCT) became gold standard in neutropenic hosts and will probably be replaced by thin-section multislice CT (MSCT) in the near future. Costs of high-resolution CT are low in comparison to antibiotics. An infiltrate needs to be localised, so that a physician can utilise this information as a guidance for invasive procedures for further microbiological work-up. The radiological characterisation of infiltrates gives a first and rapid hint to differentiate between different sorts of infectious (typical bacterial, atypical bacterial, fungal) and non-infectious aetiologies. Follow-up investigations need careful interpretation according to disease and concomitant treatment. Due to an increased incidence of fungal infiltrates even with appropriate therapy, follow-up of an infiltrate must use further parameters in addition to lesion size. Temporary exclusion of infectious involvement of the lung with high accuracy remains of special interest for clinicians.

Piperacillin/tazobactam/amikacin versus piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin in the empirical treatment of neutropenic patients

A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare the efficacy of a regimen containing a glycopeptide versus one containing a beta-lactamase inhibitor in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. Fifty-eight patients received piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin (group 1) and 56 received piperacillin/amikacin/tazobactam (group 2). In the case of persistence of fever without microbiological documentation of the cause, teicoplanin was also given empirically in group 2 on day 4, and amphotericin B in both groups on day 6. In 114 evaluable febrile episodes, the rate of success without modification of therapy was 60% in patients on piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin and 41% in patients on piperacillin/amikacin/tazobactam (p < 0.03). Eleven of 34 patients in the latter group who failed to improve eventually responded upon addition of teicoplanin. Ten and nine patients in group 1 and group 2 respectively required the addition of amphotericin B for definite improvement. There were 14 episodes of gram-positive septicemia in each group: the response rate was 100% in group 1 and 43% in group 2. Three episodes of gram-negative breakthrough septicemia occurred in group 1 versus no cases in group 2 (p = 0.1). Three deaths occurred in each group. Piperacillin/amikacin/tazobactam may be as efficacious as piperacillin/amikacin/teicoplanin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients provided the regimen is modified (usually by addition of teicoplanin) in unresponsive cases.

Candida colonization and systemic infection in neutropenic patients. A retrospective study

The results of surveillance cultures in 424 neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies were analyzed to evaluate the relationship between colonization and infection by Candida species. Eighteen (32%) of 56 patients with multiple noncontiguous colonized sites developed proven (13 cases) or probable (five cases) systemic candidiasis, versus two patients with proven candidiasis (1.2%) of 170 with one colonized site (P less than 0.00000001), and one patient with proven candidiasis (0.5%) of 198 without any evidence of Candida colonization (P less than 0.00000001). Twenty-two patients with multiple colonized sites who developed a febrile episode resistant to antibiotics were treated with empiric amphotericin B. Nine of 11 given empiric amphotericin B within day 6 survived versus three of 11 receiving antifungal therapy after day 6 (P = 0.014). The above data seem to justify further prospective studies on Candida colonization as indication to early antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients.