Experimental study of the efficacy of the endoluminal prosthesis in colonic anastomoses

Review of Colonic Anastomotic Leakage and Prevention Methods

Although surgeries involving anastomosis are relatively common, anastomotic leakages are potentially deadly complications of colorectal surgeries due to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. As a result of the potentially fatal effects of anastomotic leakages, a myriad of techniques and treatments have been developed to treat these unfortunate cases. In order to better understand the steps taken to treat this complication, we have created a composite review involving some of the current and best treatments for colonic anastomotic leakage that are available. The aim of this article is to present a background review of colonic anastomotic leakage, as well as current strategies to prevent and treat this condition, for a broader audience, including scientist, engineers, and especially biomedical engineers.

Intraluminal bypass devices as an alternative to protective ostomy for prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of the literature

AIM

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most important complication of colorectal surgery, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Protective ostomy, the current standard of care for protecting a colorectal anastomosis, has important drawbacks that require the creation of an alternative strategy. Over the past 30 years, several intraluminal bypass devices, designed to shield the anastomosis from the faecal stream, have been developed. The aim of this literature review was to create an updated overview of the devices available and their effectiveness in preventing AL, and to investigate whether they could serve as an alternative to protective ostomy in the future.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature on intraluminal bypass devices used for preventing colorectal AL was performed. The MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and articles were marked as relevant if an intraluminal bypass device was studied in an animal or human population.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 24 relevant articles related to 10 intraluminal bypass devices protecting a colorectal anastomosis. These articles included experimental animal studies, preclinical (pilot) studies, as well as retrospective and prospective clinical studies. Each device was assessed with regard to surgical technique, effectiveness and device-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Intraluminal bypass devices show promise in preventing AL and its clinical consequences. However, there is insufficient high-level evidence to draw firm conclusions. There is a need for randomized controlled trials that directly compare these devices with the protective ostomy.

Feasibility of an Intraluminal Bypass Device in Low Colorectal Anastomosis

Background: The Cologuard CG-100 is a novel intraluminal bypass device designed to reduce the clinical outcomes associated with low colorectal anastomotic leak. The device is inserted transanally, anchored to the colon above the anastomosis, and deployed intraluminally to cover the anastomosis from within. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the device in a porcine model. Method: Twelve pigs underwent low colorectal anastomosis with insertion of the Cologuard CG-100 device. Contrast material injection, abdominal X-ray, and histologic studies were used to evaluate sealing quality, device positioning, and tissue damage, respectively. The surgeons completed a usability and satisfaction questionnaire after completion of the procedure. Results: Absolute sealing was observed in all 4 animals euthanized immediately after surgery. In the other 8 animals, the device was kept in situ for 10 days and then extracted. X-ray films with injection of contrast material through a designated injection tube before device removal showed that the sheath and ring were correctly placed. No leak was demonstrated. There were no device-related adverse events, and no critical histological abnormalities were noted in the bowel area that was compressed by the device. The device was found to be easy to insert, position, and extract. Conclusion: The Cologuard CG-100 device efficiently reduced contact between fecal content and low colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model and is easily deployed and extracted. It holds promise for possible clinical use pending further studies.

Can intraluminal devices prevent or reduce colorectal anastomotic leakage: A review

Colorectal anastomotic leakage is a serious complication of colorectal surgery, leading to high morbidity and mortality rates. In recent decades, many strategies aimed at lowering the incidence of anastomotic leakage have been examined. The focus of this review will be on mechanical aids protecting the colonic anastomosis against leakage. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Collaborative library for all papers related to prevention of anastomotic leakage by placement of a device in the colon. Devices were categorised as decompression devices, intracolonic devices, and biodegradable devices. A decompression device functions by keeping the anal sphincter open, thereby lowering the intraluminal pressure and lowering the pressure on the anastomosis. Intracolonic devices do not prevent the formation of dehiscence. However, they prevent the faecal load from contacting the anastomotic site, thereby preventing leakage of faeces into the peritoneal cavity. Many attempts have been made to find a device that decreases the incidence of AL; however, to date, none of the devices have been widely accepted.

Protection of stapled colorectal anastomoses with a biodegradable device: the C-Seal feasibility study

BACKGROUND

A colorectal anastomotic leak can be life-threatening. We have assessed the feasibility of a new intraluminal biodegradable bypass device that we designed to avoid anastomotic leakage and the necessity of a temporary stoma.

METHODS

Fifteen patients underwent colorectal surgery. Before performing the anastomosis in a standard way, the C-Seal (Polyganics BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) was glued to the anvil of the circular stapler. Consequently, the bypass was fixated in the staple row just proximal of the simultaneously made anastomosis. A water-soluble contrast enema was performed after 1 week.

RESULTS

The sheath was well compatible with the standard stapler device and easy to use. All donuts remained intact. No radiologic or clinical leaks were observed after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study shows that the C-Seal can be applied successfully in colorectal surgery. Further investigation with large numbers of patients is now necessary to assess the efficacy of the C-Seal as a protective device.

Estudo comparativo entre as técnicas de sutura total e serosubmucosa em anastomoses colônicas na presença de um protetor intraluminar em cães

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a cicatrização comparando as técnicas de sutura total e parcial em anastomoses colônicas término-terminais na presença de um protetor intraluminar confeccionado a partir de um dreno de Penrose. MÉTODOS: Foram realizadas anastomoses colônicas em 10 cães nos quais foi suturado a mucosa / submucosa um protetor intraluminar por meio da eversão do segmento intestinal proximal em 10 cm. Os animais foram distribuidos em dois grupos experimentais: Grupo 1 - sutura total e Grupo 2 - sutura serosubmucosa. Os animais foram reoperados com sete dias de pós-operatório para coleta de material e subseqüente análise histopatológica. RESULTADOS: Observamos no exame histopatológico das anastomoses realizadas com sutura serosubmucosa (Grupo 2) uma melhor cicatrização caracterizada por um menor infiltrado inflamatório e por uma maior integridade das camadas intestinais quando comparadas com o Grupo 1. CONCLUSÃO: O uso da técnica de sutura parcial mostrou-se superior a de sutura total nas anastomoses colônicas na presença de protetor intraluminar.

Use of intraluminal protection in colonic anastomosis in dogs

PURPOSE: To test the use of intraluminal protection in colonic anastomosis without intestinal cleansing. The intraluminal liner was fashioned from porcine submucosa preserved in glycerin and then fixed 10 cm anteriorly to the anastomotic site. This technique was compared with the one used in termino-terminal colonic anastomosis without intraluminal protection. METHODS: Twenty-eight dogs were divided into two groups of fourteen animals each. Clinical and histopathological tests were performed on the fourth and twenty-first postoperative days. RESULTS: The morbidity and mortality rates were higher in animals that did not receive the intraluminal liner. Histopathological examinations in animals in which the intraluminal liner was used showed better healing, characterized by milder inflammation and increased amount of collagen. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the use of intraluminal protection decreases complication rates in colonic anastomosis and promotes better healing.