Symposium: Screening for colorectal cancer

Basolateral activation with TLR agonists induces polarized cytokine release and reduces barrier function in RPE in vitro

PURPOSE

Systemic inflammation may be of importance in the development of AMD. RPE cells can recognize danger signals with toll-like receptors (TLR) and may react in a pro-inflammatory manner. In this study, we evaluated the basal and apical secretions of TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1β in primary RPE cells and RPE/choroid explant cells under basolateral stimulation of TLR2, 3, and 4; the effects on barrier function; and their influence on neuronal cell viability.

METHODS

RPE/choroid tissue explants were prepared from porcine eyes and cultivated in modified Ussing chambers; primary porcine RPE cells on transwell plates. Cells were basally stimulated with agonists Pam2CSK4 (Pam; TLR2), polyinosinic/polycytidylic acid (Poly I:C; TLR3), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS; TLR4) for 24 h. Supernatants were evaluated with ELISA for cytokines TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1β. Apical supernatants were applied to SHSY-5Y cells, and cell viability was evaluated in MTT assay. Barrier function was tested by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and occludin immunostaining.

RESULTS

None of the tested TLR agonists was toxic on RPE cells after 24 h of exposure. Unstimulated RPE cells secreted hardly any cytokines. Pam induced IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNFα on the basal and apical sides at all concentrations tested. Poly I:C induced IL-6 and TNFα primarily at the basal side at lower but on both sides at higher concentrations. LPS induced IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNFα apically and basally at all concentrations tested. In the RPE/choroid, a strong difference between apical and basal secretions could be found. IL-6 was constitutively secreted basally, but not apically, but was induced by all agonists on both sides. IL-1ß and TNFα alpha were strongly induced on the basal side by all agonists. TER was reduced by all agonists, with Pam and LPS being effective in all concentrations tested. Occludin expression was unaltered, but the distribution was influenced by the agonists, with a less distinct localization at the cell borders after treatment. None of the agonists or supernatants of treated RPE and RPE/choroid organ cultures exerted any effect on viability of SHSY-5Y cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Danger signals activating TLRs can induce polarized cytokine expression and contribute to the loss of barrier function in the RPE.

Screening for large bowel neoplasms in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer

Logistical problems associated with population screening for colorectal cancer are identified and the possibility of targeting screening to those with a familial predisposition to the disease is discussed. Evidence for a substantial genetic effect on the overall incidence of colorectal cancer is reviewed. The screening detection rate of colorectal neoplasms in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer has been shown to be higher than that expected in a non-selected population; the evidence that polypectomy will reduce future colorectal cancer risk in such individuals is explored. Recent advances in the molecular genetics of colorectal cancer susceptibility are reviewed; it is possible that a genetic test might be developed in the future which could identify at least a proportion of those at risk. Excluding financial considerations, the risk-benefit ratio of colonoscopy in a screened population is intimately related to the remaining risk of colorectal cancer in those who undergo the examination. At present, patients undergoing colonoscopy to investigate a positive faecal occult blood (FOB) test as part of a population-based screening programme include individuals with a familial predisposition as well as those without. About 20 per cent of all cases of colorectal cancer are associated with an obvious genetic predisposition, and the risk of cancer in their relatives is high. Because false positives occur with Haemoccult, the residual risk to the population who are FOB positive but do not have a familial trait may be sufficiently low that the dangers of colonoscopy could outweigh the potential benefits. Scotland has a high incidence of colorectal cancer, and analysis of recent Scottish incidence data shows an actuarial lifetime risk of developing this disease of one in 23 for men and one in 33 for women. As a family history of the disease increases that risk by two to four times and the neoplasms arise throughout the colon in such a group, there may be a case for offering colonoscopy to all first-degree relatives of those under 50 years of age at diagnosis, if not of all index cases of colorectal cancer.

Screening for colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal carcinoma will occur in some 147,000 Americans this year. This disease accounts for 15% of all cancers and 12% of all cancer deaths. Screening for colorectal carcinoma may allow the disease process to be found earlier and, in some situations such as when polyps are found and removed, may even prevent the disease. The two main modalities of screening are fecal occult blood tests and sigmoidoscopy. By general screening of asymptomatic patients as well as by selective screening of those at high risk, there is hope that the incidence and mortality of this cancer will diminish. Absolute confirmation of this benefit is still lacking, making the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of this screening somewhat questionable. Current educational efforts are designed to increase compliance and to help solve some of these unanswered questions.

Colorectal carcinoma and Haemoccult. A study of its value in mass screening using meta-analysis

Meta-analysis has been performed on the world literature relating to Haemoccult screening for colorectal cancer. The analysis indicated a sensitivity of about 50%, specificity of about 97%, positive predictive value of 4.3% and negative predictive value of 99.85%. These figures assume a prevalence of colorectal cancer in the population of 0.3%. A model calculation using these figures together with some additional realistic assumptions suggests no reduction in mortality compared to an unscreened population. It is concluded that many questions about faecal occult blood screening remain and that uncontrolled mass population screening is not justified at this stage.