Surgery of the traumatized spleen

[Intraoperative and postoperative complications of splenectomy]

Spleen is being surgically removed because of trauma, in diagnostic and-or therapeutical purposes because of the benignant and malignant diseases. The percentage of morbidity during and after splenectomy is relatively low. During surgery might occur bleeding, trauma of the pancreatic tail, stomach, lineal flexure of the colon, left hemidiafragm, left suprarenal gland and upper pole of the left kidney, which must be correspondingly reclaimed during the same intervention. In the early postoperative period, postoperative bleeding, subfrenic abscess, pulmonal atelectasis, bronchopneumonia and left pleural extravasations might occur. Especially is important notification of these events in due time and adequate conservative and surgical treatment. After splenectomy, there is an increase of the number of trombocytes, which might lead to the tromboembolic complications. In the prevention of these complications in the postoperative period prolonged antiagregation therapy is suggested. Postsplenectomy sepsis is very late, general complication of splenectomy, which occurs because of the lower immunity in the child age. To prevent these complications, partial splenectomies, reimplantations of the spleen, prolonged application of the penicillin medicines after splenectomy and antipneumococcal vaccine are performed.

[Initial diagnosis of intra-abdominal hemorrhage caused by isolated splenic injury in blunt abdominal trauma]

Diagnosis of intraabdominal bleeding caused by spleen injury must be performed in the shortest possible period of time, with little risk for the patient, and with high preciseness. By its simple performance, high preciseness and little risk for the patient, DPL imposes as the predominant method in initial diagnostic of intraabdominal bleeding. Control and monitoring of lavage may duly signalize degree of bleeding. Preciseness of this diagnostic in our series ranges up to 93.3%. DPL method is especially important in a combined neurotrauma. Ultrasonography is a sovereign method in diagnostic of bleeding source as well as in monitoring of bleeding that from the very beginning does not require urgent surgical intervention. Its importance is in monitoring both intrasplenic and subcapsulary hematomas. It is not appliable in disturbed and haemodynamically unstable patients. It is in particular important in children where a maximum conservative attitude with respect to operative treatment has been assumed. CT takes the leading place with respect to preciseness of bleeding area, and the combined thoracoabdominal trauma. Preciseness of CT in our series comes up to 96.6%, but can be applied only in haemodynamically stable patients. Same as US of abdomen so the CT of abdomen represents a prominent method in monitoring of both intrasplenic and subcapsular hematomas, which do not require urgent surgical intervention.

Anatomical and surgical aspects of splenic segmentectomies

Based upon the anatomicosurgical segments of the spleen, suggested by DiDio and demonstrated in cadavers, classified and named by Neder (1958) and Zappalá (1958, 1959, 1963), the normal segmental organization was anatomically and radiologically confirmed in 51 human spleens, after studying corrosion casts and radiograms of intraparenchymal vessels (Christo, 1959 a, b, 1960, 1962, 1963, 1993). From 1958 to 1965, pioneer segmental resections were performed successfully in 34 dogs and in 9 patients to safely remove traumatic injured splenic segments. At the same time, the overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI) became well identified. Consequently, to save normally functioning splenic parenchyma became the most important issue in the management of splenic injuries. The anatomical basis for partial splenectomy and splenic segmentectomy is discussed. The term "splenorrhaphy" was employed to designate all conservative or parenchyma saving operations of spleen based upon its vascular supply: from topical packings to splenic sutures including "cappings" and partial splenectomies. From analysis of 38 consecutive reports in 20 years, covering 4,076 patients, it was concluded that "splenorrhaphies" had been electively employed in 46% of the injuries and partial splenectomies were identified in 8.6% of these surgical interventions. However, the critical minimal mass of splenic tissue to be preserved after partial splenectomies is still to be defined. Postoperative complications directly related to "splenorrhaphies" are rare. Uncommonly performed after splenectomies, the heterotopical splenic autotransplantation has presented dubious results. Trials with nonoperative management of splenic blunt trauma injuries have been safer among children, whose spleens are predominantly transversally disrupted and have a higher relationship "capsular resistance/parenchymal bulk". Splenectomies have been most frequently the ultimate result of delayed laparotomy and underlying risks of growing blood requirements may surpass the advantages of preventing OPSI.

Splenic salvage using an absorbable mesh: feasibility, reliability and safety

Forty-nine adults underwent surgery for splenic injury: 17 (group 1) had salvage with a splenic mesh, seven (group 2) underwent other preservation techniques, and 25 (group 3) underwent splenectomy. There were six, zero and 11 hilar lesions in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Seven of 15 associated lesions involved the digestive tract. There was no significant difference in transfusion requirements, length of operation or postoperative complications. One patient died in each of groups 1 and 2, and eight in group 3. Secondary splenectomy was performed once in groups 1 and 2. The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the preservation groups (1 and 2) than in group 3. Splenic preservation was feasible in 24 of 49 adults with splenic injury requiring surgery. The splenic mesh wrap is safe and reliable, and allows splenic salvage even with hilar injury.

Management of splenic trauma

This article examines the current management of trauma to the spleen. The incidence, mechanism, classification, diagnosis, treatment and complications of splenic trauma are reviewed. Modern radiological investigations are assessed in view of the recent vogue for non-operative management. The effects of splenectomy and particularly of overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis are discussed. The role of non-operative management of splenic injuries in children and in adults without associated injuries is emphasized. Means of repairing and preserving the spleen are detailed. Prompt splenectomy is necessary in seriously traumatized patients, especially those with head or multiple injuries.

Delayed presentation of blunt splenic injury

Eleven patients with delayed presentation of splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma treated during a 10 year period have been described. They represented 24 percent of all patients treated for blunt splenic injury in our department in that time period. Ten patients required operative treatment and one was treated nonoperatively. There were no deaths. The value of computerized tomography and ultrasonography in the accurate preoperative assessment of splenic injury has been documented. In addition, the various diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities in blunt splenic trauma have been discussed.