Results of surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Ideal Imaging Method to Detect Infection in Pancreatic Collections: A Brief Primer for the Gastroenterologists

Background: The development of infection in pancreatitis significantly increases the mortality rate up to 100% in the absence of any intervention. Therefore, it is extremely important to diagnose these cases at an early stage. The objectives of this study were to assess the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI) in the diagnosis of infection in pancreatic collections.

Materials and methods: Prospective observational study of abdominal collections due to pancreatitis that underwent both CT and DW-MRI from August 2018 to July 2020 were enrolled in the study. The collections were analysed for infections - air foci in CT and diffusion restriction on DW-MRI.

Results: Of the 39 patients recruited in the study, infected collections were present in 17, and 22 cases had sterile collections. On CT, air foci within the collection were present only in seven of the cases in our study (sensitivity 35%, specificity 95.4%, PPV 85.7%, NPV 65.6%). DW-MRI detected infection in all 17 cases (sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.7%, PPV 74%, NPV 100%).

Discussion: Thirteen out of 17 collections suspicious for infection on DW-MR showed microbiological growth on culture examination. We believe that this is likely due to the patient's prior antibiotic use, which might have altered the micro-environment or inflammatory cell and bacterial content of the collection.

Conclusion: DW-MRI is complementary and superior to CT in detecting infection in pancreatic collections. CT may be used to detect disease burden, extent and vascular complication.

Severe Acute Pancreatitis - How Conservative Can We Be?

Background

Acute pancreatitis still is a disease with overall high mortality. Continuously improved understanding of the pathophysiology, however, led to changes in treatment algorithms within the last decades, thus resulting in decreased mortality. This knowledge of acute pancreatitis enabled a new classification system introduced by an international expert panel. This classification system is helpful in initiating treatment strategies which are adapted to the course of acute pancreatitis. Especially the role of surgery experienced a paradigm shift towards a more conservative approach.

Methods

A specific literature search regarding the treatment of acute pancreatitis was performed in the PubMed database, and the results of key studies were compared. Results of these studies are discussed in the context of the most recent international classification system.

Results and Conclusion

Based upon the available data, we can summarize that conservative treatment of acute pancreatitis with pancreatic necrosis is a valid treatment option for selected cases and is associated with reduced mortality compared to more aggressive therapy. However, patients with acute pancreatitis should be treated in experienced centers.

Acute Pancreatitis: Landmark Studies, Management Decisions, and the Future

A great deal of progress has been made in the last 50 years in the diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis. Many landmark studies have been published and have focused on the classification of acute pancreatitis, markers of severity, important roles of imaging and endoscopy, and improvements in our treatment. This report will review several landmark studies, describe ongoing controversies in management decisions including standards of early fluid resuscitation and appropriate use of enteral feeding, and outline what will be required in the future to improve the care of patients with acute pancreatitis.

Endoscopic therapy of necrotizing pancreatitis and pseudocysts

Endoscopic therapy has become an essential component in the management of postpancreatitis complications, such as infected and/or symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis. However, although there have been 2 recent randomized, controlled trials performed, a general lack of comparative effectiveness data regarding the timing, indications, and outcomes of these procedures has been a barrier to the development of practice standards for therapeutic endoscopists managing these issues. This article reviews the available data and expert consensus regarding indications for endoscopic intervention, timing of procedures, endoscopic technique, periprocedural considerations, and complications.

The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines

Imaging of acute pancreatitis requires not only an understanding of the disease subtypes and the myriad of associated complications but also familiarity with the appropriate radiologic nomenclature as defined by the Atlanta symposium in 1992 and, more recently, by the Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group in 2008. The accurate description of the radiological findings plays a critical role in the evaluation and management of patients with acute pancreatitis, particularly those with severe disease. There have been increasing efforts to develop uniformity in the use of terminology used to define the radiologic findings in acute pancreatitis, in particular, the terminology for fluid collections, a common area of inconsistency and confusion. Terms such as "acute peripancreatic fluid collections," "acute post- necrotic fluid collections," "pseudocyst," and "walled-off pancreatic necrosis" are now recommended as they describe the evolution of fluid collections in patients with both interstitial and necrotizing pancreatitis and nonspecific terms such as "pancreatic abscess" and "phlegmon" are being abandoned. In this review we illustrate, with case examples, the standardized terminology used in the radiological and clinical description of acute pancreatitis, its severity, and complications with an emphasis on the role of ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Different management options of the associated complications are also discussed. The use of standardized terminology will hopefully improve the communication between radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons to facilitate treatment planning and will lead to enhanced outcomes for patients with acute pancreatitis as well as create uniformity for enrollment into research studies.

The role of open necrosectomy in the current management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a review article

The optimal management of necrotizing pancreatitis continues to evolve. Currently, conservative intensive care treatment represents the primary therapy of acute severe necrotizing pancreatitis, aiming at prevention of organ failure. Following this mode of treatment most patients with sterile necroses can be managed successfully. Surgery might be considered as an option in the late phase of the disease for patients with proven infected pancreatic necroses and organ failure. For these patients surgical debridement is still considered the treatment of choice. However, even for this subgroup of patients, the concept of operative strategy has been recently challenged. Nowadays, it is generally accepted that necrotizing pancreatitis with proven infected necroses as well as septic complications directly caused by pancreatic infection are strong indications for surgical management. However, the question of the most appropriate surgical technique for the treatment of pancreatic necroses remains unsettled. At the same time, recent advances in radiological imaging, new developments in interventional radiology, and other minimal access interventions have revolutionised the management of necrotizing pancreatitis. In light of these controversies, the present paper will focus on the current role of surgery in terms of open necrosectomy in the management of severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Early detection of low enhanced pancreatic parenchyma by contrast-enhanced computed tomography predicts poor prognosis of patients with acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

The usefulness of early severity assessment of acute pancreatitis (AP) by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) was investigated.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a 2007 nationwide survey in Japan. Clinical data of 983 patients with AP were analyzed. All were examined by CECT on the day of admission.

RESULTS

Early findings of CECT demonstrated that low enhanced pancreatic parenchyma (LEPP) was associated with the incidence of organ failure (OF), multiple OF, and infectious complications as well as mortality (P < 0.0001). Next, patients were further divided into 4 groups according to the CECT findings, which focused on the LEPP and peripancreatic collections (PPCs). The LEPP/PPC (+/+) group was characterized as high morbidity and high mortality. The incidence of OF (28.2%), multiple OF (15.5%), and mortality (11.4%) in patients assigned to the (+/+) group was significantly higher than in those assigned to the other groups. The incidence of infectious complications was significantly higher in patients assigned to the (+/+) group (16.7%), the (+/-) group (9.0%), and the (-/+) group (7.0%) than those assigned to the (-/-) group (1.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of LEPP and PPC was a useful CECT finding for the early assessment of the severity of AP.

Peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis: Correlation between computerized tomography and operative findings

AIM: To evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) to characterize the nature of peripancreatic collections.

METHODS: Twenty five patients with peripancreatic collections on CECT and who underwent operative intervention for severe acute pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. The collections were classified into (1) necrosis without frank pus; (2) necrosis with pus; and (3) fluid without necrosis. A blinded radiologist assessed the preoperative CTs of each patient for necrosis and peripancreatic fluid collections. Peripancreatic collections were described in terms of volume, location, number, heterogeneity, fluid attenuation, wall perceptibility, wall enhancement, presence of extraluminal gas, and vascular compromise.

RESULTS: Fifty-four collections were identified at operation, of which 45 (83%) were identified on CECT. Of these, 25/26 (96%) had necrosis without pus, 16/19 (84%) had necrosis with pus, and 4/9 (44%) had fluid without necrosis. Among the study characteristics, fluid heterogeneity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the group with necrosis and pus, compared to the other two groups (94% vs 48% and 25%, P = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Among the wall characteristics, irregularity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the groups with necrosis with and without pus, when compared to the group with fluid without necrosis (88% and 71% vs 25%, P = 0.06 and P < 0.01, respectively). The combination of heterogeneity and presence of extraluminal gas had a specificity and positive likelihood ratio of 92% and 5.9, respectively, in detecting pus.

CONCLUSION: Most of the peripancreatic collections seen on CECT in patients with severe acute pancreatitis who require operative intervention contain necrotic tissue. CECT has a somewhat limited role in differentiating the different types of collections.

Acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is a common disease most frequently caused by gallstone disease or excess alcohol ingestion. Diagnosis is usually based on characteristic symptoms, often in conjunction with elevated serum pancreatic enzymes. Imaging is not always necessary, but may be performed for many reasons, such as to confirm a diagnosis of pancreatitis, rule out other causes of abdominal pain, elucidate the cause of pancreatitis, or to evaluate for complications such as necrosis or pseudocysts. Though the majority of patients will have mild, self-limiting disease, some will develop severe disease associated with organ failure. These patients are at risk to develop complications from ongoing pancreatic inflammation such as pancreatic necrosis, fluid collections, pseudocysts, and pancreatic duct disruption. Validated scoring systems can help predict the severity of pancreatitis, and thus, guide monitoring and intervention.Treatment of acute pancreatitis involves supportive care with fluid replacement, pain control, and controlled initiation of regular food intake. Prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in acute pancreatitis if there is no evidence of pancreatic infection. In patients who fail to improve, further evaluation is necessary to assess for complications that require intervention such as pseudocysts or pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy, including ERCP and EUS, and/or cholecystectomy may be indicated in the appropriate clinical setting. Ultimately, the management of the patient with severe acute pancreatitis will require a multidisciplinary approach.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of biapenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, in rat experimental model of severe acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

It is known that prophylaxis with imipenem reduces the risk of infection accompanying severe acute pancreatitis. In this study,we modified a rat experimental model of severe acute pancreatitis for antibiotic evaluation, and the effect of biapenem was compared with that of imipenem to determine the usefulness of biapenem.

METHODS

Severe acute pancreatitis was induced by 5% sodium taurocholate. Antibiotics were subcutaneously administered at 3 and 6 hours and evaluated at 12 hours after the pancreatitis induction. For pharmacokinetic evaluation, antibiotics were subcutaneously administered at 3 hours after the pancreatitis induction.

RESULTS

From 3 hours after the induction, bacteria were detected from the pancreas. The total bacterial count increased in a time-dependent manner for 12 hours. Biapenem administration reduced the total bacterial count in the pancreas, as observed in imipenem administration. The plasma concentration of biapenem was almost equivalent to that of imipenem; however, the pancreatic penetration of biapenem was approximately twice that of imipenem in this model.

CONCLUSIONS

Biapenem was suggested to be effective in prophylactic treatment of infectious complications as much as imipenem because of its superior penetration to the pancreas in severe acute pancreatitis.

Severe acute pancreatitis: Clinical course and management

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) develops in about 25% of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). Severity of AP is linked to the presence of systemic organ dysfunctions and/or necrotizing pancreatitis pathomorphologically. Risk factors determining independently the outcome of SAP are early multi-organ failure, infection of necrosis and extended necrosis (>50%). Up to one third of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis develop in the late course infection of necroses. Morbidity of SAP is biphasic, in the first week strongly related to early and persistence of organ or multi-organ dysfunction. Clinical sepsis caused by infected necrosis leading to multi-organ failure syndrome (MOFS) occurs in the later course after the first week. To predict sepsis, MOFS or deaths in the first 48-72 h, the highest predictive accuracy has been objectified for procalcitonin and IL-8; the Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-score predicts the outcome in the first 48 h, and provides a daily assessment of treatment response with a high positive predictive value. Contrast-enhanced CT provides the highest diagnostic accuracy for necrotizing pancreatitis when performed after the first week of disease. Patients who suffer early organ dysfunctions or at risk of developing a severe disease require early intensive care treatment. Early vigorous intravenous fluid replacement is of foremost importance. The goal is to decrease the hematocrit or restore normal cardiocirculatory functions. Antibiotic prophylaxis has not been shown as an effective preventive treatment. Early enteral feeding is based on a high level of evidence, resulting in a reduction of local and systemic infection. Patients suffering infected necrosis causing clinical sepsis, pancreatic abscess or surgical acute abdomen are candidates for early intervention. Hospital mortality of SAP after interventional or surgical debridement has decreased in high volume centers to below 20%.

Severe acute pancreatitis: Clinical course and management

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) develops in about 25% of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). Severity of AP is linked to the presence of systemic organ dysfunctions and/or necrotizing pancreatitis pathomorphologically. Risk factors determining independently the outcome of SAP are early multi-organ failure, infection of necrosis and extended necrosis (> 50%). Up to one third of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis develop in the late course infection of necroses. Morbidity of SAP is biphasic, in the first week strongly related to early and persistence of organ or multi-organ dysfunction. Clinical sepsis caused by infected necrosis leading to multi-organ failure syndrome (MOFS) occurs in the later course after the first week. To predict sepsis, MOFS or deaths in the first 48-72 h, the highest predictive accuracy has been objectified for procalcitonin and IL-8; the Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-score predicts the outcome in the first 48 h, and provides a daily assessment of treatment response with a high positive predictive value. Contrast-enhanced CT provides the highest diagnostic accuracy for necrotizing pancreatitis when performed after the first week of disease. Patients who suffer early organ dysfunctions or at risk of developing a severe disease require early intensive care treatment. Early vigorous intravenous fluid replacement is of foremost importance. The goal is to decrease the hematocrit or restore normal cardiocirculatory functions. Antibiotic prophylaxis has not been shown as an effective preventive treatment. Early enteral feeding is based on a high level of evidence, resulting in a reduction of local and systemic infection. Patients suffering infected necrosis causing clinical sepsis, pancreatic abscess or surgical acute abdomen are candidates for early intervention. Hospital mortality of SAP after interventional or surgical debridement has decreased in high volume centers to below 20%.

Laparoscopic Debridement of Recurrent Pancreatic Abscesses in the Hostile Abdomen

Recurrent necrotizing pancreatitis in the frozen or hostile abdomen remains a challenge. Percutaneous drainage is useful in these cases but often fails if there is significant pancreatic necrosis. We describe a technique for laparoscopic drainage of necrotic pancreas. The preexisting percutaneous drainage tract was sequentially dilated and a working thoracoscope was placed via a Hasson cannula. A pulsatile irrigation system was used to open the cavity for visualization and to wash away obvious necrotic debris. Working sequentially using the irrigation jet flow for debridement and visualization, we opened the entire tract and debrided a majority of the necrotic tissue. A large drainage tube was placed to allow the egress of any residual infection. Three patients to date have been treated with the above technique with no intraoperative complications. All three patients did well initially postoperatively and had adequate drainage. One patient developed a delayed pancreatic pseudocyst. Laparoscopic debridement via percutaneous drainage tract is a useful technique in the hostile abdomen.

Planned Staged Reoperative Necrosectomy Using an Abdominal Zipper in the Treatment of Necrotizing Pancreatitis

PURPOSE

The optimal operative treatment for severe necrotizing pancreatitis (SNP) still remains controversial. This article describes the operative approach with a planned staged necrosectomy using the "zipper" technique.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2000, 35 patients with SNP were treated with this approach. The patient demographics, etiology and severity of SNP, hospital course, and outcome were recorded and comparisons of several parameters were made between the patients who survived and those who died.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 34%. A total of 16 fistulae developed in 11 patients (31%), recurrent intra-abdominal abscesses in 4 (11%), and hemorrhaging in 5 (14%). The patients who died compared with those who survived had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II score on admission (14.5 vs 9, P < 0.001), extrapancreatic extension of necrosis more often (100% vs 65%, P = 0.02), and developed postoperative hemorrhaging more often (33% vs 4%, P = 0.038). A multivariate logistic analysis revealed an APACHE-II score of > 13 on admission (P = 0.018) and an extension of necrosis behind both paracolic gutters (P < 0.001) to both be prognostic factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe necrotizing pancreatitis still carries significant morbidity and mortality. This surgical approach facilitates the removal of all devitalized tissue and seems to decrease the incidence of recurrent intra-abdominal infection requiring reoperation. An APACHE-II score of > or = 13 and an extension of necrosis behind both paracolic gutters was thus found to signify a worse outcome.

Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos)

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess are severe complications of acute pancreatitis. Surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in these critically ill patients. Endoscopic therapy has the potential to offer a safer and more effective alternative treatment modality. However, its role needs to be further investigated.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the outcome of consecutive patients with pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess, all unfit to undergo surgery, who underwent a new aggressive endoscopic approach. The treatment includes (1) synchronous EUS-guided multiple transmural and/or transpapillary drainage procedures followed by balloon dilation of the cystogastrostoma or cystoduodenostoma, (2) daily endoscopic necrosectomy and saline solution lavage, and (3) sealing of pancreatic fistula by N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate.

RESULTS

Pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscesses were successfully drained in 13 patients, thus avoiding emergency surgery as an initial treatment. Surgery was completely avoided in 9 patients over a median follow-up of 8.3 months (range 3-81 months). Surgery was combined with endoscopic therapy in one patient because of abscess extension into the right paracolic gutter, which was not manageable by endoscopic drainage. Because of the "disconnected-duct syndrome," two patients later developed recurrent pseudocysts and underwent elective surgery. Complications included minor bleeding after balloon dilation and necrosectomy in 4 cases, which were self limiting or controlled endoscopically.

CONCLUSIONS

This aggressive endoscopic approach shows promising results. It expands the potential for endoscopic treatment in patients with pancreatic necrosis and/or pancreatic abscess.

Initial management of acute pancreatitis: critical issues during the first 72 hours

Although most patients with acute pancreatitis have a mild course, almost a quarter of patients will develop complications. It has become clear that the early management of patients with acute pancreatitis will likely affect outcome. Too often patients are admitted to the hospital with what appears to be mild disease only later to deteriorate with severe disease. This review will focus on the early management of patients with acute pancreatitis in an attempt to prevent severe disease, complications, and death.

Complications of acute pancreatitis: clinical and CT evaluation

Mortality of acute pancreatitis is dependent on the development of potentially lethal complications that can coexist and occur at any time following an acute attack. The nature and clinical relevance of these complications differ, contingent on the time of occurrence following a severe episode of pancreatitis. They can be divided into (1), early complications that manifest at the onset or within the first 2 to 3 days, (2) intermediate complications that occur predominantly during the second to fifth week, and (3) late complications that usually manifest months or years following the resolution of an acute attack. Early complications are systemic in nature with diverse clinical manifestations of the cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and/or metabolic systems. Intermediate complications are abdominal, pancreatic, and retroperitoneal, and are mostly septic in nature, associated with pancreatic or peripancreatic fat necrosis and pseudocysts. Late, life-threatening complications are mainly vascular or hemorrhagic in nature or involve the development of chronic pancreatic ascites. The early detection and objective evaluation of these complications by clinical and imaging methods leads to specific treatment options in the continuous attempt to decrease mortality rates in acute pancreatitis.

Pancreatic sepsis: prevention and therapy

Except for a minority of early fatalities, most deaths in acute pancreatitis occur after the first 7 to 10 days due to infective complications, particularly infected necrosis. Hence, preventing this risk factor seems to represent a major step forward in the clinical management of severe pancreatitis. Consequently, antibiotics emerged as a cornerstone of the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. The duration of such treatment, the route of administration and the substance(s) of choice need to be carefully selected. Surgical debridement is the treatment of choice of infected necrosis, while percutaneous drainage is successful in some patients.

Outcome analysis of patients with acute pancreatitis by using an artificial neural network

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors performed this study to evaluate the ability of an artificial neural network (ANN) that uses radiologic and laboratory data to predict the outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An ANN was constructed with data from 92 patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent computed tomography (CT). Input nodes included clinical, laboratory, and CT data. The ANN was trained and tested by using a round-robin technique, and the performance of the ANN was compared with that of linear discriminant analysis and Ranson and Balthazar grading systems by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The length of hospital stay was used as an outcome measure.

RESULTS

Hospital stay ranged from 0 to 45 days, with a mean of 8.4 days. The hospital stay was shorter than the mean for 62 patients and longer than the mean for 30. The 23 input features were reduced by using stepwise linear discriminant analysis, and an ANN was developed with the six most statistically significant parameters (blood pressure, extent of inflammation, fluid aspiration, serum creatinine level, serum calcium level, and the presence of concurrent severe illness). With these features, the ANN successfully predicted whether the patient would exceed the mean length of stay (Az = 0.83 +/- 0.05). Although the Az performance of the ANN was statistically significantly better than that of the Ranson (Az = 0.68 +/- 0.06, P < .02) and Balthazar (Az = 0.62 +/- 0.06, P < .003) grades, it was not significantly better than that of linear discriminant analysis (Az = 0.82 +/- 0.05, P = .53).

CONCLUSION

An ANN may be useful for predicting outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Prophylactic antibiotics and pancreatic necrosis

Recent controlled clinical studies suggest a positive effect of early antibiotic treatment on late morbidity and mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. In contrast, widespread use of antibiotics may lead to an increased number of fungal infections and multiresistant bacteria. Optimal choice, duration, and route of administration of the antibiotic agent(s) are far from being established. The additional administration of an antifungal agent with prophylactic intention cannot be supported by the currently available data.

Pancreatic pseudocysts and fluid collections: percutaneous approaches

Radiological imaging and intervention play important roles in the management of pancreatic fluid collections and pseudocysts. Computed tomography evaluation of the severity of pancreatitis and assessment of its course are now routine. Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and abscesses is commonly performed as an adjunct to surgical treatment and is frequently definitive therapy. Percutaneous débridement of pancreatic necrosis has recently emerged as a viable alternative to open surgical treatment.

Percutaneous necrosectomy and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis: an initial experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development of a minimally invasive technique aimed at surgical debridement in addition to simple drainage of the abscess cavity.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical intervention for secondary infection of pancreatic necrosis is associated with a death rate of 25% to 40%. Although percutaneous approaches may drain the abscess, they have often failed in the long term as a result of inability to remove the necrotic material adequately.

METHODS

Fourteen consecutive patients with infected necrosis secondary to acute pancreatitis were studied. The initial four patients underwent sinus tract endoscopy along a drainage tract for secondary sepsis after prior open necrosectomy. This technique was then modified to allow primary debridement for proven sepsis to be carried out percutaneously in a further 10 patients. The techniques and initial results are described.

RESULTS

Additional surgery for sepsis was successfully avoided in the initial four patients managed by sinus tract endoscopy, and none died. Of the following 10 patients managed by percutaneous necrosectomy, 2 died. The median inpatient stay was 42 days. There was one conversion for intraoperative bleeding. Eight patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital after a median of three percutaneous explorations. Only 40% of patients required intensive care management after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These initial results in an unselected group of patients are encouraging and show that unlike with percutaneous or endoscopic techniques, both resolution of sepsis and adequate necrosectomy can be achieved. The authors' initial impression of a reduction in postoperative organ dysfunction is particularly interesting; however, the technique requires further evaluation in a larger prospective series.

Does an infected peripancreatic fluid collection or abscess mandate operation?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections or abscess with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical intervention has been the mainstay of treatment for infected peripancreatic fluid collections and abscesses. Increasingly, PCD has been used, with mixed results reported in the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 1993 to 1997 was performed on 82 patients at a tertiary care public teaching hospital who had computed tomography-guided aspiration for suspected infected pancreatic fluid collection or abscess. Culture results, need for subsequent surgical intervention, length of stay, and death rate were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five aspirations were performed in 82 patients (57 male patients, 25 female patients) with a mean age of 40 years (range 17-68). The etiologies were alcohol (41), gallstones (32), and other (9). The mean number of Ranson's criteria was four (range 0-9). All patients received antibiotics. Forty-eight patients had evidence of pancreatic necrosis on computed tomography scan. Cultures were negative in 40 patients and positive in 42. Twenty-five of the 42 culture-positive patients had PCD as primary therapy, and 6 required subsequent surgery. Eleven patients had primary surgical therapy, and five required subsequent surgery. Six patients were treated with only antibiotics. The death rates were 12% for culture-positive patients and 8% for the entire 82 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Historically, patients with positive peripancreatic aspirate culture have required operation. This series reports an evolving strategy of reliance on catheter drainage. PCD should be considered as the initial therapy for culture-positive patients, with surgical intervention reserved for patients in whom treatment fails.

Pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: evolution of findings on contrast-enhanced CT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to investigate the natural history of pancreatic necrosis on contrast-enhanced CT in patients managed nonoperatively.

METHOD

A computer-based radiology information search revealed 32 patients with pancreatic necrosis who had had serial contrast-enhanced CT scans and were managed nonoperatively. There were 23 men and 9 women with a mean age of 51 years. One hundred forty-five contrast-enhanced CT scans were retrospectively reviewed for the location and extent of necrosis. The medical records of all patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

The 32 patients had a mean Ranson clinical grade of 5.8 (range 3-8). Eighteen of these 32 patients were managed nonoperatively, and 14 patients required a necrosectomy after initial nonoperative management. In the 32 patients, the location of necrosis was in the head (3), body (6), tail (2), head/body (2), head/body/tail (9), body/tail (9), and head/tail (1). Extent of necrosis was 0-25% (9), 26-50% (6), 51-75% (6), and 76-100% (11). The extent of necrosis remained stable during follow-up in 22 (69%) patients and increased during follow-up in 10 (31%). Necrosectomy was performed in six (60%) patients in whom there was an increase in necrosis and eight (36%) patients in whom necrosis was stable. No patient had restoration of normal enhancement in an area that was previously necrotic. There were five patients who were managed nonoperatively (mean follow-up 318 days) in whom the necrosis eventually resorbed, forming a focal parenchymal cleft reminiscent of a scar. Five of the 32 patients died.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic necrosis as demonstrated by CT tends to remain stable in most patients treated nonoperatively. If the extent of necrosis increases, patients are more likely to require a necrosectomy. In some patients managed nonoperatively, the pancreatic necrosis will resorb, resulting in a fat-replaced cleft reminiscent of a scar.

Surgical approach in patients with acute pancreatitis. Is infected or sterile necrosis an indication--in whom should this be done, when, and why?

The morbidity and mortality rates of severe acute pancreatitis are related to the degree of pancreatic necrosis that accompanies the attack and to the presence of infection. The decision about whether and when to operate on these patients is often difficult, and it requires mature clinical judgment. Proven infection of pancreatic necrosis is an absolute indication for surgical intervention, at which time surgical doffebridement and drainage should be performed. Most patients with sterile necrosis eventually respond to conservative nonsurgical medical management. In patients who remain critically ill for weeks or whose clinical course deteriorates despite maximal intensive care, surgery may be appropriate. Even when these guidelines are followed, the mortality (15% to 40%) and morbidity (approximately 80%) rates remain high.

Surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis

In necrotizing pancreatitis, surgical treatment is indicated in patients with infected necrosis. Conservative management should be favored if necrosis remains sterile and the patient responds to intensive care therapy. Different surgical techniques have been established during the past years, including conventional drainage, open and semiopen drainage, and closed management with postoperative continuous lavage of the lesser sac. For experienced physicians, these techniques provide comparable results, and none has been proved to be superior to the others.

Decreased mortality from necrotizing pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing pancreatitis has been associated with mortality rates of 25% to 80%. We reviewed our experience to determine whether aggressive debridement and comprehensive critical care improves survival.

METHODS

The records of 989 patients with the diagnosis of pancreatitis admitted between January 1990 and September 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-six patients required surgery for necrotizing pancreatitis and are the subjects of this review.

RESULTS

Five of twenty-six patients (19%) died. For all patients, mean Ranson's score was 4.3 of 11, mean admission APACHE II score was 17.2, and mean Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) score was 9.1. Poor outcome was associated with infected pancreatic necrosis (P = 0.03), elevated APACHE II score on admission (P = 0.04), and progression of MOD during the week after admission (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates improved survival in seriously ill patients with necrotizing pancreatitis as a result of comprehensive surgical and critical care.

Fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis: results of open management of the abdomen and "planned" reoperations

BACKGROUND

Controversy still surrounds the management of fulminant acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Because mortality rates continue to be high, especially in patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis, aggressive surgical techniques, such as open management of the abdomen and "planned" reoperations, seem to be justified.

STUDY DESIGN

From 1988 through 1995, 28 patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis were treated with open management of the abdomen followed by planned reoperations at our surgical intensive care unit.

RESULTS

All patients had infected necrosis with severe clinical deterioration: 12 patients had an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score > or = 20 and 16 patients had a Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) > or = 15. Nineteen patients suffered from severe multiorgan failure; the remaining 9 patients needed only ventilatory and inotropic support. The mean number of reoperations was 17. In 14 patients, major bleeding occurred; fistula developed in 7. Later, 9 abscesses were drained percutaneously. The hospital mortality rate was 39%. Longterm morbidity in survivors was substantial, especially concerning abdominal-wall defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Open management of the abdomen followed by planned reoperations is an aggressive but reasonably successful surgical treatment strategy for patients with fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis. Morbidity and mortality rates were high, but in these critically ill patients, such high rates could be expected. Because management and clinical surveillance require specific expertise, management of these patients is best undertaken in specialized centers.

The diagnosis and management of fluid collections associated with pancreatitis

Pancreatitis may be acute or chronic, mild or severe. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis remains the most serious form of acute pancreatitis and accounts for the majority of complications. Although there is an established nomenclature for pancreatitis and pancreatic fluid collections, such as pancreatic pseudocysts, it is not widely understood or recognized by physicians, including gastroenterologists. Because nonspecialists will be increasingly called upon to treat and appropriately refer patients with pancreatitis and its complications for more specialized care, it is important to understand the evolving treatment options for managing these patients. This article addresses and summarizes pancreatitis and its complications, particularly pancreatic collections.

Natural course of acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis comprises, in terms of clinical, pathologic, biochemical, and bacteriologic data, four entities. Interstitial edematous pancreatitis and necrotizing pancreatitis are the most frequent clinical manifestations; pancreatic pseudocyst and pancreatic abscess are late complications after necrotizing pancreatitis, developing after 3 to 5 weeks. Determinants of the natural course of acute pancreatitis are pancreatic parenchymal necrosis, extrapancreatic retroperitoneal fatty tissue necrosis, biologically active compounds in pancreatic ascites, and infection of necrosis. Early in the course of acute pancreatitis multiple organ failure is the consequence of various inflammatory mediators that are released from the inflammatory process and from activated leukocytes attracted by pancreatic injury. During the late course, starting the second week, local and systemic septic complications are dominant. Around 80% of deaths in acute pancreatitis are caused by septic complications. The infection of pancreatic necrosis occurs in 8% to 12% of acute pancreatitis and in 30% to 40% of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Bacteriologic analysis of intraoperative smears and aspirates reveals predominantly gram-negative germs deriving from the intestine, most frequently Escherichia coli. It has been confirmed that after necrotizing pancreatitis a considerable large group of patients suffer long-lasting exocrine and endocrine insufficiency.

Acute pancreatitis: nonsurgical management

The care of patients with severe acute pancreatitis is complex. Although numerous medical therapies have been proposed, few interventions have been shown to be of benefit in patients with severe disease. This review summarizes the nonoperative management of patients with acute pancreatitis, including therapies shown to be of little value, the role of antibiotics in patients with acute pancreatitis, the importance of monitoring and supportive care, and the rationale of endoscopic and surgical intervention.

Classification and treatment of local septic complications in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

An international symposium on acute pancreatitis recently developed a clinical classification system for severe acute pancreatitis that classifies all local septic complications into three groups: infected necrosis (IN), sterile necrosis (SN), and pancreatic abscess (PA). Despite the appeal of having three distinct, well-defined labels for this complex process, the clinical utility of this schema has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic and therapeutic utility of applying this clinical classification system to a large group of surgical patients with local septic complication from acute pancreatitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the cases of 62 patients with complicated pancreatitis, classifying them into IN (n = 20), SN (n = 14), or PA (n = 28) groups. Ranson's score, APACHE II score, and computed tomography grading were calculated within the first 48 hours of admission. Information on patient demographics, etiology of pancreatitis, operative procedures, timing of intervention, bacteriology, blood loss, intensive care unit days, ventilator days, and morbidity and mortality were also accrued and analyzed.

RESULTS

Despite similar demographics and etiology of pancreatitis, patients with necrosis, both IN and SN, were more critically ill than were patients with PA (APACHE II score > 15, 21% versus 0%, respectively), required earlier operative intervention (mean 14 days versus 29 days, P = 0.02), required necrosectomy with drainage (65% versus 4%, P < 0.001) rather than simple drainage (3% versus 86%, P < 0.001), more reoperations (2.3 versus 1.1, P < 0.05), and had a significantly higher mortality rate (35% versus 4%, P < 0.05). In addition, patients with IN required significantly more hospital days, ventilator days, and blood transfusions than either patients with SN or PA (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that this classification system allows for the stratification of patients into three distinct groups--infected necrosis, sterile necrosis, and pancreatic abscess--and has both therapeutic and prognostic usefulness.

Indications for surgery in severe acute pancreatitis

The decision to operate on a patient with severe acute pancreatitis is often difficult and requires mature clinical judgment. Those indications that are widely accepted include: 1. For differential diagnosis, when the surgeon is concerned that the symptoms are the result of a disease other than pancreatitis for which operation is mandatory; 2. In persistent and severe biliary pancreatitis, when an obstructing gallstone that cannot be managed endoscopically is lodged at the ampulla of Vater; 3. In the presence of infected pancreatic necrosis; and 4. To drain a pancreatic abscess, if percutaneous drainage does not produce the desired result. Other indications that are less well defined and somewhat controversial are: 1. The presence of sterile pancreatic necrosis involving 50% or more of the pancreas; 2. When the pancreatitis persists in spite of maximal medical therapy; and 3. When the patient's condition deteriorates, often with the failure of one or more organ systems. For these latter three indications, guidelines have been presented that permit a logical approach to management, although uncertainty remains. Surgeons should strive to describe in precise terms the clinical state of their patients at the time that operation is performed, as well as the findings at and technical details of the surgery. This should allow further refinement in the management of this still vexing problem.

Pancreatic resection versus peritoneal lavage in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. A prospective randomized trial

Twenty-one patients with acute fulminant alcoholic pancreatitis were randomly allocated to either pancreatic resection group (11 patients) or nonoperative peritoneal lavage group (10 patients). Only patients under 50 years were included in the study to minimize the role of other severe disease. These patients represented the most severe cases of acute pancreatitis at our Department, constituting only 2% of all patients with acute pancreatitis during this period. The diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms and on signs indicating severely impaired systemic organ functions. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), which showed contrast enhancement below 30 Hounsfield units. In the operated cases, the diagnosis of necrotizing pancreatitis was verified histologically. All patients with conservative treatment had dark brown fluid at peritoneal puncture. There was a difference (nonsignificant) in mortality (3/11 and 1/10, respectively), complication rate, or in the need of reoperations between the groups. Nonoperative peritoneal lavage was followed with shorter treatment at the intensive care unit (16.2 versus 25.9 days, respectively). The hospital stay also was significantly shorter in the nonoperative group (44.3 versus 56.1 days). The results indicate that intensive conservative treatment is justified as an initial therapy even in the most severe cases of acute pancreatitis.