Extracranial vascular disease: advances in operative indications and technique

[Advantages of minimally invasive approach for carotid endarterectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To identify the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches for carotid endarterectomy (conventional, longitudinal and transverse incision).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 58 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on surgical approach. Group 1 (n=37) - minimal skin incision (less than 5 cm). There were subgroup 1A (transverse minimal skin incision along the natural skin wrinkle, n=17) and subgroup 1B (longitudinal minimal skin incision, n=20). Group 2 (n=21) - conventional longitudinal incision. Surgical outcomes were analyzed after 1 month and 1 year. End-points were mortality, stroke, TIA, cranial nerve neuropathy. Cosmetic effect was evaluated using POSAS scale (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Draaijers, 2004).

RESULTS

Mortality, stroke and TIA were absent after 1 month. Cranial nerve neuropathy was not observed in subgroup 1A and diagnosed in 2 (10%) patients of subgroup 1B and 6 (28.5%) patients of group 2. Cosmetic effect: subgroup 1A - 48.4±9.5 scores, subgroup 1B - 52.4±9.2, group 2 - 63.1±11.1 (p<0.05). The outcomes after 12 months: mortality was absent in subgroups 1A and 1B, 2 patients died in group 2 from AMI. Stroke was absent in subgroups 1A and 1B, group 2 - 1 patient. Cranial nerve neuropathy was absent in 1A and 1B subgroups and diagnosed in 4 (21%) patients of group 2. Cosmetic effect: subgroup 1A - 37.2 scores, subgroup 1B - 40.0 scores, group 2 - 55.1 scores. Physical component of QOL: subgroup 1A - 51.63±6.31 scores, subgroup 1B - 46.01±7.53 scores, group 2 - 38.85±5.33 scores. Psychological component of QOL: subgroup 1A - 49.64±6.72 scores, subgroup 1B - 45.68±5.63 scores, group 2 - 48.6±7.36 scores (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Transverse minimal skin incision for carotid endarterectomy is a safe alternative to classic longitudinal incision and reduces the risk of postoperative complications with significant cosmetic effect.

Carotid Endarterectomy: Experience in 5425 Cases

From 1992 to December 2002, 3967 patients (2619 males; 1348 females) with a mean age of 68.4A years (range 32-92) underwent 5425 carotid endarterectomy (CE) procedures at our institute. Neurological history was positive for stroke in 1130 cases (21%) and for transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 2121 cases (39%). In 2174 cases (40%) patients were neurologically asymptomatic or presented nonspecific symptoms. Our current clinical protocol has been designed to optimize resources and reduce complications. Some of the major features, along with the respective percentages in this series, are as follows. Duplex scanning was performed at a validated laboratory as the principal preoperative exam (86.9%). Locoregional anesthesia and neurological monitoring were performed during carotid cross-clamping (96.3%). Selective shunting was carried out with a Javid shunt (10.7%). The choice of surgical technique was made according to carotid anatomy and cerebral tolerance of cross-clamping. Those used were a standard technique (now abandoned, 12.1%), synthetic patching (46.4%), and eversion endarterectomy (41.5%). Intraoperative completion arteriography was routinely performed for eversion endarterectomy and only in dubious cases with other techniques. The option of staying in an postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) was available (selective use, 2%). In uncomplicated cases, early discharge (after 1.5 postoperative days) was considered safe. The overall perioperative mortality was 0.37% (20/5425). Causes of death were myocardial infarction in seven cases, ischemic stroke in six cases, hemorrhagic stroke in five cases, respiratory failure caused by cervical hematoma in one case, and wound infection in one case. Perioperative neurological morbidity was 1.31% (71/5425); there were 43 major and 28 minor strokes. In conclusion, CE is effective for stroke prevention when there is significant symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, as low mortality and morbidity may be achieved in an experienced center. At our institute, the reduction of costs did not have negative consequences on the quality of the surgical care.

A comparison of regional and general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

The optimal anesthetic for use during carotid endarterectomy is controversial. Advocates of regional anesthesia suggest that it may reduce the incidence of perioperative complications in addition to decreasing operative time and hospital costs. To determine whether the anesthetic method correlated with the outcome of the operation, a retrospective review of 3975 carotid operations performed over a 32-year period was performed.

METHODS

The records of all patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy at our institution from 1962 to 1994 were retrospectively reviewed. Operations performed with the patient under regional anesthesia were compared with those performed with the patient under general anesthesia with respect to preoperative risk factors and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Regional anesthesia was used in 3382 operations (85.1%). There were no significant differences in the age, gender ratio, or the rates of concomitant medical illness between the two patient populations. The frequency of perioperative stroke in the series was 2.2%; that of myocardial infarction, 1.7%; and that of perioperative death, 1.5%. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death on the basis of anesthetic technique. A trend toward higher frequencies of perioperative stroke (3.2% vs 2.0%) and perioperative death (2.0% vs 1.4%) in the general anesthesia group was noted. In examining operative indications, however, there was a significant increase in the percentage of patients receiving general anesthesia who had sustained preoperative strokes when compared with the regional anesthesia patients (36.1% vs 26.4%; p < 0.01). There was also a statistically significant higher frequency of contralateral total occlusion in the general anesthesia group (21.8% vs 15.4%; p = 0.001). The trend toward increased perioperative strokes in the general anesthesia group may be explicable either by the above differences in the patient populations or by actual differences based on anesthetic technique that favor regional anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective review of a large series of carotid operations, regional anesthesia was shown to be applicable to the vast majority of patients with good clinical outcome. Although the advantages over general anesthesia are perhaps small, the versatility and safety of the technique is sufficient reason for vascular surgeons to include it in their armamentarium of surgical skills. Considering that carotid endarterectomy is a procedure in which complication rates are exceedingly low, a rigidly controlled, prospective randomized trial may be required to accurately assess these differences.

The role of transcranial Doppler in carotid artery surgery

In order to evaluate the usefulness of transcranial Doppler (TCD) in carotid artery surgery, 90 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy were studied. Transcranial Doppler was performed preoperatively with digital compression of the carotid artery and intraoperatively at the time of cross-clamping, together with routine EEG monitoring. The percentage residual middle cerebral artery velocity (%MCAV) during carotid artery compression or cross-clamping was considered. The intraoperative %MCAV at cross-clamping was compared with the values obtained in the preoperative examination during the compression test and with the EEG data; the EEG records were blindly reviewed by a neurologist and divided into three groups: group A, normal; group B, moderate anomalies and group C, major anomalies. There were no significant differences between preoperative %MCAV (compression test) and intraoperative %MCAV (cross-clamping) by separate analysis of the data related to systolic, diastolic and mean velocity. The systolic, diastolic, mean %MCAV and the Gosling index after cross-clamping were then compared with the EEG data: no significant differences were seen between groups A and B; on the other hand, in all patients with major EEG anomalies (group C) the %MCAV at TCD was reduced to 0. In conclusion, preoperative TCD associated with carotid artery compression appears a safe and useful way of identifying patients at risk of cerebral ischaemia during carotid artery cross-clamping. Patients with no residual flow at intraoperative TCD need to be considered as presenting a very high risk of ischaemia and in this group the use of a shunt is mandatory.