Lymphography of the breast as an accessory in the early diagnosis and detection of carcinoma of the breast: lymphography as a prognostic tool

Gamma probe-guided sentinel node biopsy--optimal timing for injection

AIMS

We initiated a Phase I feasibility study using a gamma-detecting probe (GDP) and radiolabelled colloid to localize the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer. The aim of the study was to establish the ideal timing for injection and examine any possible exclusion criteria for this method.

METHODS

Thirty breast cancer patients diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA) were included in this study. All were injected with 60 MBq rhenium colloid labelled with 99mTc (Tck-17). Scintigraphy was done 20 min, 2, 6 and 25 hours post-injection. Patients were then taken to surgery where they were injected with patent blue dye. During surgery, the SLN was located with a GDP (Neoprobe Model 1000). In 28 patients, the SLN was identified by scintigraphy 2 hours after injection, identical to the images seen after 24 hours.

RESULTS

In all 28 patients, the SLN was found by the GDP during surgery. In 26 patients the SLN was dyed blue. The two patients with no SLN localization had received prior radiation. Pathology disclosed SLNs with metastases in seven patients. Two patients had a negative SLN but had an axillary lymph node replaced by tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

Two to 24 hours prior to surgery is suitable timing for injection. Previous radiotherapy predicts failure for this procedure. Further studies are needed to find the exact false-negative rate of this method for breast cancer.

Axillary lymph nodes and breast cancer: a review

BACKGROUND

The value of surgical staging and treatment of the axillary lymph nodes with either surgery or radiotherapy in the initial management of patients with Stage I or II invasive breast cancer is controversial.

METHODS

A review of retrospective and prospective clinical studies was performed to assess the risks of axillary lymph node involvement and the effectiveness and morbidity of various treatment options.

RESULTS

The risk of axillary lymph node involvement is substantial for most patients, even those with small tumors. The morbidity resulting from a careful Level I/II axillary dissection or moderate-dose axillary radiotherapy is limited. Such treatment is highly effective in preventing axillary recurrence. The symptoms resulting from axillary failure can be controlled in many, but not all, patients. The available data suggest, but do not prove, that the initial use of effective axillary treatment may result in a small improvement in long term outcome in some patient subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients should be treated with either axillary surgery or irradiation. Highly selected subgroups of patients may have such low risks of involvement that specific axillary treatment is of little value. However, such subgroups have not yet been well defined. Treatment approaches that do not involve specific axillary treatment should be considered investigational at present, and the patients should be informed as to their potential risks. Prospective clinical studies of these issues should be pursued.