Lower esophageal sphincter characteristics and esophageal acid exposure following partial or 360 degrees fundoplication: results of a prospective, randomized, clinical study

Analysis of Rates, Causes, and Risk Factors for 90-Day Readmission After Surgery for Large Hiatal Hernia: A Two-Center Study

Background: Hospital readmissions have become a more examined indicator of surgical care delivery and quality. There is scarcity of data in the literature on the rate, risk factors, and most common reasons of readmission following major hiatal hernia surgery. The primary endpoint was 90-day readmission after surgery for large hiatal hernia. Secondary endpoint was to examine which characteristics related with a higher risk of readmission. Methods: A retrospective review of two distinct institutional databases was performed for patients who had surgery for a large hiatal hernia between January 2012 and December 2019. Demographic, perioperative, and outpatient data were collected from the medical record. Results: A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria, most of them suffering from a type III hernia (66.2%). Mean operative time was 146 (±56.5) minutes and median length of stay (LOS) was 6 days (interquartile range = 3). The overall morbidity was 21.1% and the in-hospital mortality was 1.4%. The 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 7% and 8.5%, respectively. The mean time to readmission was 14.3 (±15.6) days. The reasons for 90-day hospital readmission were dysphagia (50%), pneumonia (16.7%), congestive heart failure (16.7%), and bowel obstruction (16.7%). Grade of esophagitis ≥2, presence of Barrett's esophagus, and LOS longer than 8 days were significant risk factors for unplanned readmission within 90 days. Conclusion: We observed that about 6 out of 71 patients who had surgery readmitted within 90 days (8.5%). Readmissions were most often linked to esophagitis ≥2, presence of Barrett's esophagus, and LOS longer than 8 days. These findings point to the necessity for focused treatments before, during, and after hospitalization to decrease morbidity and extra costs in this high-risk population.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Fundoplication is an essential step in para-oesophageal hernia (POH) repair, but which type minimizes postoperative mechanical complications is controversial.

Methods

This was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted between May 2009 and October 2018. Patients with symptomatic POH were allocated to either a total (Nissen) or a posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication after hernia reduction and crural repair. The primary outcome was dysphagia (Ogilvie dysphagia scores) at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were peri- and postoperative complications, swallowing difficulties assessed by the Dakkak dysphagia score, gastro-oesophageal reflux, quality of life (QoL), and radiologically confirmed hernia recurrence.

Results

A total of 70 patients were randomized to a Nissen (n = 32) or a Toupet (n = 38) fundoplication. Compared with baseline, Ogilvie dysphagia scores were stable at the 3- and 6-month follow-up in the Nissen group (P = 0.075 and 0.084 respectively) but significantly improved in the Toupet group (from baseline mean (s.d.): 1.4 (1.1) to 0.5 ( 0.8) at 3 months, and 0.5 (0.6) at 6 months; P = 0.003 and P = 0.001 respectively). At 6 months, Dakkak dysphagia scores were significantly higher in the Nissen group than in the Toupet group (mean (s.d.): 10.4 (7.9) versus 5.1 (7.2); P = 0.003). QoL scores improved throughout the follow-up. However, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the absolute median improvement (⍙) from preoperative values in the mental component scores of the Short Form-36 QoL questionnaire was significantly higher in the Toupet group (median (i.q.r.): 7.1 (−0.6 to 15.2) versus 1.0 (−5.4 to 3.3) at 3 months, and 11.2 (1.4 to 18.3) versus 0.4 (−9.4 to 7.5) at 6 months; (P = 0.010 and 0.003 respectively)). At 6 months, radiologically confirmed POH recurrence occurred in 11 of 24 patients (46 per cent) of the Nissen group and in 15 of 32 patients (47 per cent) of the Toupet group (P = 1.001).

Conclusions

A partial posterior wrap (Toupet fundoplication) showed reduced obstructive complications and improved QoL compared with a total (Nissen) fundoplication following POH repair.

Registration number: NCT04436159 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)

Tailoring Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains on the rise. Pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial, revolving around an incompetent esophagogastric junction as an antireflux barrier, with other comorbid conditions contributing to the disease. Proton pump inhibitors remain the most common treatment of GERD. Endoscopic therapy has gained popularity as a less invasive option. The presence of esophageal dysmotility complicates the choice of surgical fundoplication. Most literature demonstrates that fundoplication is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis and that postoperative dysphagia cannot be predicted by preoperative manometry parameters. More data are needed on the merits of endoluminal approaches to GERD.

Role and safety of fundoplication in esophageal disease and dysmotility syndromes

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is quite prevalent worldwide, especially in the western hemisphere. The pathophysiology of GERD is complex, involving an incompetent esophagogastric junction (EGJ) as an anti-reflux barrier, as well as other co-morbid conditions such as gastroparesis, hiatal herniation or hyper acid secretion. Esophageal dysmotility is also frequently encountered in GERD, further contributing to the disease in the form of fragmented peristalsis, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) or the more severe aperistalsis. The latter is quite common in systemic connective tissue disorders such as scleroderma. The main stay treatment of GERD is pharmacologic with proton pump inhibitors (PPI), with surgical fundoplication offered to patients who are not responsive to medications or would like to discontinue them for medical or other reasons. The presence of esophageal dysmotility that can worsen or create dysphagia can potentially influence the choice of fundoplication (partial or complete), or whether it is even possible. Most of the existing literature demonstrates that fundoplication may be safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis, and that post-operative dysphagia cannot be reliably predicted by pre-operative manometry parameters. In cases of complete aperistalsis (scleroderma-like esophagus), partial fundoplication can be offered in select patients who exhibit prominent reflux symptoms after a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is an alternative to fundoplication in patients with this extreme form of esophageal dysmotility, after careful consideration of the nutritional status.

Effects of omeprazole or anti-reflux surgery on lower oesophageal sphincter characteristics and oesophageal acid exposure over 10 years

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of anti-reflux surgery (ARS) versus proton pump inhibitor therapy on lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) function and oesophageal acid exposure in patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) over a decade of follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this randomised, prospective, multicentre study we compared LOS pressure profiles, as well as oesophageal exposure to acid, at baseline and at 1 and 10 years after randomisation to either open ARS (n = 137) or long-term treatment with omeprazole (OME) 20-60 mg daily (n = 108).

RESULTS

Median LOS resting pressure and abdominal length increased significantly and remained elevated in patients operated on with ARS, as opposed to those on OME. The proportion of total time (%) with oesophageal pH <4.0 decreased significantly in both the surgical and medical groups, and was significantly lower after 1 year in patients treated with ARS versus OME. After 10 years, oesophageal acid exposure was normalised in both groups, with no significant differences, and bilirubin exposure was within normal limits. After 10 years, patients with or without Barrett's oesophagus did not differ in acid reflux control between the two treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Open ARS and OME were both effective in normalising acid reflux into the oesophagus even when studied over a period of 10 years. Anatomically and functionally the LOS was repaired durably by surgery, with increased resting pressure and abdominal length.

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials to Compare Long-Term Outcomes of Nissen and Toupet Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Aim

In recent years, several studies with large sample sizes and recent follow-up data have been published comparing outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. It is now timely to be re-evaluated and synthesized long-term efficacy and adverse events of both total and partial posterior fundoplication.

Materials and Methods

Electronic searches for RCTs comparing the outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication were performed in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials. The data of evaluation in positive and adverse results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication were extracted and compared using meta-analysis.

Results

13 RCTs were ultimately identified involving 814 (52.05%) and 750 (47.95%) patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication, respectively. The operative time, perioperative complications, postoperative satisfaction, recurrence, and the rates of medication adoption or re-operation due to recurrence were not significantly different between two groups. The two types of fundoplication both reinforced the anti-reflux barrier and elevated the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. However, rates of adverse results involving dysphasia, gas-bloat syndrome, inability to belch and re-operation due to severe dysphasia were significantly higher after LNF. In the subgroup analysis of wrap length≤2cm, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia. However, in the subgroup wrap length>2cm, the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication might be the better surgery approach for gastroesophageal reflux disease with a lower rate of postoperative adverse results and equal effectiveness as Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Gastrointestinal motility and neurogastroenterology

Nordic research on gastrointestinal motility has since 1965 made substantial contributions to our current understanding of gastrointestinal function. During the last decade, the term neurogastroenterology has widened the concept of motility research into the study of gastrointestinal sensory-motor function, including the complex central nervous system interaction. The discovery of a non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) innervation of the gut in the sixties was made by considerable contributions from the Nordic countries with the Martinson group in Sweden as central innovators. Important discoveries regarding the intramural nerve ganglia as mediators of the autonomic nervous input has also been produced from this research. In clinical motility research, the study of the migrating motor complex in the small bowel has revealed its ability to act as a retroperistaltic pump in the proximal duodenum (Sweden) and its important role for gut microbial homeostasis (Norway). Also in the development of methodology to study gut sensory-motor function, the Nordic countries has contributed. Examples are the physical characteristics of the esophageal manometry catheter (Denmark), the use of ultrasound for assessment of gastric function (Norway), a temporary electrical stimulation method in patients with severe nausea and vomiting (Sweden), a rectal barostat method for clinical evaluation of recto-anal function and a colonic transit time method utilizing radio-opaque markers (Sweden). In later years, the research collaborations have increasingly become worldwide in a manner making it less easy to define pure Nordic contributions.

[The Mexican consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Part II]

OBJECTIVE

To update the themes of endoscopic and surgical treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) from the Mexican Consensus published in 2002.

METHODS

Part I of the 2011 Consensus dealt with the general concepts, diagnosis, and medical treatment of this disease. Part II covers the topics of the endoscopic and surgical treatment of GERD. In this second part, an expert in endoscopy and an expert in GERD surgery, along with the three general coordinators of the consensus, carried out an extensive bibliographic review using the Embase, Cochrane, and Medline databases. Statements referring to the main aspects of endoscopic and surgical treatment of this disease were elaborated and submitted to specialists for their consideration and vote, utilizing the modified Delphi method. The statements were accepted into the consensus if the level of agreement was 67% or higher.

RESULTS

Twenty-five statements corresponding to the endoscopic and surgical treatment of GERD resulted from the voting process, and they are presented herein as Part II of the consensus. The majority of the statements had an average level of agreement approaching 90%.

CONCLUSION

Currently, endoscopic treatment of GERD should not be regarded as an option, given that the clinical results at 3 and 5 years have not demonstrated durability or sustained symptom remission. The surgical indications for GERD are well established; only those patients meeting the full criteria should be candidates and their surgery should be performed by experts.

Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Although the high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the population, there is much controversy in this topic, especially in the surgical treatment. The decision to use of a total or partial fundoplication in the treatment of GERD is still a challenge to many surgeons because the few evidence found in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To bring more clear evidence in the comparison between total and partial fundoplication.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis with randomized controlled trials accessed from MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Controlled Trials Database was done. The outcomes remarked were: dysphagia, inability to belch, bloating, recurrence of acid reflux, heartburn and esophagitis. For data analysis the odds ratio was used with corresponding 95% confidence interval. Statistical heterogeneity in the results of the metaanalysis was assessed by calculating a test of heterogeneity. The software Review Manager 5 (Cochrane Collaboration) was utilized for the data gathered and the statistical analysis. Sensitive analysis was applied using only trials that included follow-up over 2 years.

RESULTS

Ten trials were included with 1003 patients: 502 to total fundoplication group and 501 to partial fundoplication group. The outcomes dysphagia and inability to belch had statistical significant difference (P = 0.00001) in favor of partial fundoplication. There was not statistical difference in outcomes related with treatment failure. There were no heterogeneity in the outcomes dysphagia and recurrence of the acid reflux.

CONCLUSION

The partial fundoplication has lower incidence of obstructive side effects.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic Nissen (posterior total) versus Toupet (posterior partial) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is currently considered the surgical approach of choice for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) has been said to reduce troublesome dysphagia and gas-related symptoms. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to compare LNF and LTF.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and ISI Web of Knowledge CPCI-S) were searched and the methodological quality of included trials was evaluated. Outcomes included recurrent pathological acid exposure, oesophagitis, dysphagia, dilatation for dysphagia and reoperation rate. Results were pooled in meta-analyses as risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences.

RESULTS

Seven eligible RCTs comparing LNF (n = 404) with LTF (n = 388) were identified. LNF was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of postoperative dysphagia (RR 1.61 (95 per cent confidence interval 1.06 to 2.44); P = 0.02) and dilatation for dysphagia (RR 2.45 (1.06 to 5.68); P = 0.04). There were more surgical reinterventions after LNF (RR 2.19 (1.09 to 4.40); P = 0.03), but no differences regarding recurrent pathological acid exposure (RR 1.26 (0.82 to 1.95); P = 0.29), oesophagitis (RR 1.20 (0.78 to 1.85); P = 0.40), subjective reflux recurrence, patient satisfaction, operating time or in-hospital complications. Inability to belch (RR 2.04 (1.19 to 3.49); P = 0.009) and gas bloating (RR 1.58 (1.21 to 2.05); P < 0.001) were more prevalent after LNF.

CONCLUSION

LTF reduces postoperative dysphagia and dilatation for dysphagia compared with LNF. Reoperation rate and prevalence of gas-related symptoms were lower after LTF, with similar reflux control. These results provide level 1a support for the use of LTF as the posterior fundoplication of choice for GORD.

Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux is extremely common in Western countries. For selected patients, there is an established role for the surgical treatment of reflux, and possibly an emerging role for endoscopic antireflux procedures. Randomized trials have compared medical versus surgical management, laparoscopic versus open surgery and partial versus total fundoplications. However, the evidence base for endoscopic procedures is limited to some small sham-controlled studies, and cohort studies with short-term follow-up. Laparoscopic fundoplication has been shown to be an effective antireflux operation. It facilitates quicker convalescence and is associated with fewer complications, but has a similar longer term outcome compared with open antireflux surgery. In most randomized trials, antireflux surgery achieves at least as good control of reflux as medical therapy, and these studies support a wider application of surgery for the treatment of moderate-to-severe reflux. Laparoscopic partial fundoplication is an effective surgical procedure with fewer side effects, and it may achieve high rates of patient satisfaction at late follow-up. Many of the early endoscopic antireflux procedures have failed to achieve effective reflux control, and they have been withdrawn from the market. Newer procedures have the potential to fashion a surgical fundoplication. However, at present there is insufficient evidence to establish the safety and efficacy of endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, and no endoscopic procedure has achieved equivalent reflux control to that achieved by surgical fundoplication.

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Nissen and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

A prospective, randomized trial was performed to evaluate the long-term outcome and patient satisfaction of laparoscopic complete 360 degrees fundoplication compared with partial posterior 270 degrees fundoplication. Partial fundoplication is purported to have fewer side effects with a higher failure rate in controlling gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), while complete fundoplication is thought to result in more dysphagia and gas-related symptoms.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to either laparoscopic Nissen (LN) or laparoscopic Toupet (LT) fundoplication. Esophageal manometry, 24-h pH studies, a detailed questionnaire, and a visual analog symptom (VAS) score were completed before and after surgery. A final global outcome questionnaire was performed. Failure was defined as recurrent GERD requiring revision surgery, maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, or surgery for postoperative dysphagia.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were randomized to LN (50) or LT (50). There were no differences between LN and LT with respect to postoperative symptoms and physiological variables except a higher wrap pressure in the LN group (15.2 vs. 12.0 mmHg). Dysmotility improved in 8/14 (57%) and 6/11 (54%) patients in the LN group and the LT group, respectively, after surgery. There was no correlation between dysmotility and dysphagia both pre- and post surgery in the two groups. Recurrent symptoms of GERD occurred in 8/47 (17.0%) and 8/48 (16.6%) in the LN group and the LT group, respectively. Outcome of patients with dysmotility was similar to those with normal motility in both groups. At final follow-up (59.76 + or - 24.23 months), in the LN group, 33/37 (89.1%) would recommend surgery to others, 32/37 (86.4%) would have repeat surgery, and 34/37 (91.8%) felt they were better off than before surgery. The corresponding numbers for the LT group (follow-up = 55.18 + or - 25.97 months) were 35/36 (97.2%), 30/36 (83.3%), and 33/36 (91.6%).

CONCLUSION

LN and LT are equally effective in restoring the lower esophageal sphincter function and provide similar long-term control of GERD with no difference in dysphagia. Esophageal dysmotility had no influence on the outcome of either operation.

Influence of wrap length on the effectiveness of Nissen and Toupet fundoplication: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Incontinence or hypercontinence of the fundic wrap depends primarily on the length of the valve or the type of procedure. Much less attention has been paid to the fundic wrap length. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two different wrap lengths among the patients undergoing partial or total fundoplication.

METHODS

For this study, 153 patients were randomized to either Nissen (1.5- or 3-cm wrap) or Toupet (1.5- or 3-cm wrap) laparoscopic fundoplication. The groups were compared according to intensity of dysphagia, esophageal manometry data, ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring data, postoperative esophagitis rate, and overall treatment failure rate.

RESULTS

In all the groups, the tone of the lower esophageal sphincter was significantly increased and the DeMeester score significantly decreased, reaching normal levels. At 6 months after surgery, the Toupet 1.5-cm group had significantly more cases of esophagitis than the 3-cm wrap group (24.2% vs 3.3%; p<0.05). At 12 months after surgery, only one patient in the Nissen 3-cm group had moderate to severe dysphagia. In all cases, failures were associated with persistent erosive esophagitis. At the 12-month follow-up assessment, treatment failures were significantly more common in Toupet 1.5-cm group than in the Toupet 3-cm group (17.5% vs 2.7%; p<0.05). However, such differences were not observed in the Nissen groups (7.8% for 1.5 cm and 15.6% for 3 cm; p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of the treatment results suggests that the wrap length is important in partial Toupet fundoplication to avoid treatment failures. The 3-cm wrap is superior to the 1.5-cm wrap in cases of partial posterior Toupet fundoplication. The influence of wrap length on treatment failure remains unconfirmed for the Nissen procedure.

Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of preoperative esophageal motility on clinical and objective outcome of the Toupet or Nissen fundoplication and to evaluate the success rate of these procedures. Nissen fundoplication (360 degrees ) is the standard operation in the surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In order to avoid postoperative dysphagia it has been proposed to tailor antireflux surgery according to pre-existing esophageal motility. Postoperative dysphagia is thought to occur more commonly in patients with esophageal dysmotility and it has been recommended to use the Toupet procedure (270 degrees ) in these patients. We performed a randomized trial to evaluate this tailored concept and to compare the two operative techniques concerning reflux control and complication rate (dysphagia).

METHODS

200 patients with GERD were included in a prospective, randomized study. After preoperative examinations (clinical interview, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-metry and esophageal manometry) 100 patients underwent either a laparoscopic Nissen procedure (50 with and 50 without motility disorders), or Toupet (50 with and 50 without motility disorders). Postoperative follow-up after two years included clinical interview, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-metry, and esophageal manometry.

RESULTS

After two years 85% (Nissen) and 85% (Toupet) of patients were satisfied with the operative result. Dysphagia was more frequent following a Nissen fundoplication compared to Toupet (19 vs. 8, p < 0.05) and did not correlate with preoperative motility. Concerning reflux control the Toupet proved to be as good as the Nissen procedure.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring antireflux surgery according to the esophageal motility is not indicated, as motility disorders are not correlated with postoperative dysphagia. The Toupet procedure is the better operation as it has a lower rate of dysphagia and is as good as the Nissen fundoplication in controlling reflux.

Seven-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing proton-pump inhibition with surgical therapy for reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

This randomized clinical trial compared long-term outcome after antireflux surgery with acid inhibition therapy in the treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

METHODS

Patients with chronic GORD and oesophagitis verified at endoscopy were allocated to treatment with omeprazole (154 patients) or antireflux surgery (144). After 7 years of follow-up, 119 patients in the omeprazole arm and 99 who had antireflux surgery were available for evaluation. The primary outcome variable was the cumulative proportion of patients in whom treatment failed. Secondary objectives were evaluation of the treatment failure rate after dose adjustment of omeprazole, safety, and the frequency and severity of post-fundoplication complaints.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients in whom treatment did not fail during the 7 years was significantly higher in the surgical than in the medical group (66.7 versus 46.7 per cent respectively; P=0.002). A smaller difference remained after dose adjustment in the omeprazole group (P=0.045). More patients in the surgical group complained of symptoms such as dysphagia, inability to belch or vomit, and rectal flatulence. These complaints were fairly stable throughout the study interval. The mean daily dose of omeprazole was 22.8, 24.1, 24.3 and 24.3 mg at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chronic GORD can be treated effectively by either antireflux surgery or omeprazole therapy. After 7 years, surgery was more effective in controlling overall disease symptoms, but specific post-fundoplication complaints remained a problem. There appeared to be no dose escalation of omeprazole with time.

Open vs laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication. A prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

This study compares outcomes following open and laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease concerning perioperative course, postoperative complications, symptomatic relief, recurrent disease, and the need for reinterventional surgery.

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial was performed. Pre- and postoperative testing included endoscopy, esophageal function testing, patient questionnaire, and clinical assessment. Patients were followed for three years.

MATERIALS

Ninety-three patients were randomized to open and 99 to laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

Complication rates were higher, and length of stay (LOS) [5 (3-36) vs 3 (1-12) days] and time off work [42 (12-76) vs 28 (0-108) days] was longer in the open group (p < 0.01). Early side effects and recurrences were more common (p < 0.05) in the laparoscopic group. One patient in the open group and 8 patients in the laparoscopic group required surgery for recurrent disease and 7 patients required surgery for incisional hernias after open surgery. Overall, at one and three years, there were no differences in patient-assessed satisfactory outcome (93.5/93.5 vs 88.8/90.8%) or reflux control (p = 0.53) between the open and laparoscopic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of fewer general complications, shorter length of stay and recovery, similar need for reoperations, and comparable 3-year outcomes, makes the laparoscopic approach the primary choice when considering surgical options for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Eletromanometria esofágica e pHmetria de 24 horas na avaliação pós-operatória da hiatoplastia e válvula anti-refluxo total laparoscópica

RACIONAL: A operação de "short floppy Nissen" tem como objetivo tratar o refluxo gastroesofágico. Avaliações clínicas e endoscópicas de sua eficiência têm sido demonstradas por diferentes autores, porém estudos comparando pHmetria ácida de 24 horas com exames realizados no pré e pós-operatório têm sido pouco freqüentes. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar os resultados da hiatoplastia e válvula anti-refluxo total laparoscópica no tratamento da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico não complicada através de estudo comparativo pré e pós-operatório de aspectos manométricos e pHmétricos. MÉTODOS: Cinqüenta e nove indivíduos com sintomas típicos de refluxo gastroesofágico submetidos a cirurgia de "short floppy Nissen" por laparoscopia foram estudados prospectiva e consecutivamente no período de março de 2002 a agosto de 2003. Realizou-se no período pré e pós-operatório, em um tempo mínimo de 3 meses, endoscopia digestiva alta, manometria esofágica e pHmetria ácida de 24 horas. RESULTADOS: Dezoito (30,5%) doentes eram do sexo masculino e 41 (69,5%) do feminino, com idade média de 43,8 anos. Houve diferença nos seguintes achados manométricos, quando comparados no período pré e pós-operatório: localização do esfíncter inferior do esôfago em relação à borda nasal; extensão do esfíncter inferior do esôfago; pressão de repouso do esfíncter inferior do esôfago; pressão do corpo esofágico. Houve diferença nos seguintes achados pHmétricos quando comparados no período pré e pós-operatório: redução do número de refluxo ácidos totais; número de refluxos ácidos prolongados; número de refluxos ácidos prolongados em decúbito dorsal; número de refluxos ácidos prolongados em posição ereta; fração de tempo de acidificação em minutos; índice de DeMeester. CONCLUSÕES: A eletromanometria e a pHmetria esofágicas mostraram melhora em cada um dos seus parâmetros com significância estatística entre os pacientes no período pré e pós-operatório de hiatoplastia e válvula anti-refluxo, demonstrando a eficiência do procedimento operatório quando avaliado por esses exames.

[Laparoscopic fundoplication: current data]

Laparoscopic fundoplication is as effective as its open counterpart, allowing reduced morbidity, shorter hospital stay and recovery, lower consumption of analgesics, and very low mortality, with no significant differences in early functional outcome. Rate of early recurrence is similar after partial and total fundoplication, but but the partial approach has a significantly reduced rate of reoperation for failure, mainly due to postoperative dysphagia. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate dysphagia and quality-of-life.

[Conventional and minimally invasive surgical methods for gastroesophageal reflux]

The introduction of minimally invasive techniques has had great influence on the indication and surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. This analysis is an overview of the current evidence-based status and a critical reprisal of open and laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

RESULTS

The analysis of randomized trials showed an advantage for patients after laparoscopy for total and partial fundoplication because of reduced morbidity, shorter postoperative hospitalization due to faster recovery, and significantly fewer scar and wound problems. The functional results of open and laparoscopic techniques were similar. Five-year follow-up results for the latter showed effective reflux control in at least 85% of patients. Randomized trials regarding technical variations did not show an advantage for division of the short gastric vessel. A bougie for the cardia calibration can prevent postoperative dysphagia after fundoplication.

Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the current available evidence in antireflux surgery through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Laparoscopic fundoplication is currently suggested as the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, but many controversies are still open concerning the influence of some technical details on its results.

METHODS

Papers related to RCTs identified via a systematic literature search were evaluated according to standard criteria. Data regarding the patient sample, study methods, and outcomes were abstracted and summarized across studies. Defined outcomes were examined for 41 papers published from 1974 to 2002 related to 25 RCTs. A meta-analysis was performed pooling the results as odds ratios (OR), rate differences (RD), and number needed to treat (NNT). Data given as mean and/or median values were pooled as a mean +/- SD (SD).

RESULTS

No perioperative deaths were found in any of the RCTs. Immediate results showed a significantly lower operative morbidity rate (10.3% versus 26.7%, OR 0.33, RD -12%, NNT 8), shorter postoperative stay (3.1 versus 5.2 days, P = 0.03), and shorter sick leave (20.1 versus 35.8 days, P = 0.03) for laparoscopic versus open fundoplication. No significant differences were found regarding the incidence of recurrence, dysphagia, bloating, and reoperation for failure at midterm follow-up. No significant differences in operative morbidity (13.1% versus 9.4%) and in operative time (90.2 versus 84.2 minutes) were found in partial versus total fundoplication. A significantly lower incidence of reoperation for failure (1.6% versus 9.6%, OR 0.21, RD -7%, NNT 14) was found after partial fundoplication, with no significant differences regarding the incidence of recurrence and/or dysphagia. Routine division of short gastric vessels during total fundoplication showed no significant advantages regarding the incidence of postoperative dysphagia and recurrence when compared with no division. The use of ultrasonic scalpel compared with clips or bipolar cautery for the division of short gastric vessels showed no significant effect on operative time, postoperative complications, and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is at least as safe and as effective as its open counterpart, with reduced morbidity, shortened postoperative stay, and sick leave. Partial fundoplication significantly reduces the risk of reoperations for failure over total fundoplication. Routine versus no division of short gastric vessels showed no significant advantages. A word of caution is needed when implementing these results derived from RCTs performed in specialized centers into everyday clinical practice, where experience and skills may be suboptimal.

Laparoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is now well established as a treatment of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. It is indicated for patients with reflux symptoms who have not responded fully to medical therapy or who do not wish to continue medication for the rest of their lives. The evidence base for the determination of appropriate practice has expanded considerably in recent years with the publication of several important randomized trials. These trials have confirmed the superiority of fundoplication compared to medical therapy for the treatment of these patients. They have also demonstrated that the laparoscopic approach achieves an improved short-term outcome compared to the equivalent open approach. Additional trials suggest that the routine application of partial fundoplication procedures achieves equivalent reflux control and fewer side-effects than total fundoplication. Longer-term outcome studies have also been reported recently, with success rates of approximately 90% claimed at 5-8 years. Hence, laparoscopic fundoplication is now the 'gold standard' for the management of patients with more severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. New endoscopic treatments for reflux will need to achieve similar outcomes before they can replace the laparoscopic approach.

Efficacy of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) corrects significant physiologic and anatomic abnormalities in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, debate exists whether LARS prevents recurrent symptoms and malignant transformation in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). This study compared clinical outcomes after LARS in patients with and without BE.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2001, 448 patients who underwent LARS were studied. Of these, 68 (15%) had preoperative evidence of BE with low-grade dysplasia in 3 (4%), and 380 (85%) were without BE. Mean postoperative follow-up was more than 30 months in each group.

RESULTS

After LARS, there was equivalent reduction in acid reduction medication use and typical GERD symptoms in both groups. Anatomic failures developed in 12% of patients with BE and in 5% of those without BE (P = 0.05). Upper endoscopy with biopsies was obtained in 50 of 68 patients (74%) with BE at 37 +/- 22 months postoperatively. Intestinal metaplasia was no longer present in 7 of 50 (14%) BE patients, and low-grade dysplasia regressed to nondysplastic Barrett's in 2 of 3 patients. New low-grade dysplasia developed in 1 BE patient (2%) at postoperative endoscopic surveillance. No BE patients developed high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

After LARS, patients with BE have symptomatic relief and reduction in medication use equivalent to non-BE patients. Regression of intestinal metaplasia and the absence of progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma suggest that LARS is an effective approach for the management of patients with Barrett's esophagus. The higher failure rate of LARS in BE is of concern and mandates ongoing follow-up of these patients.

Effect of laparoscopic partial fundoplication on reflux mechanisms

OBJECTIVES

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the main mechanism causing gastroesophageal reflux. Since 1994 we have performed laparoscopic partial instead of complete fundoplication as standard surgical treatment for therapy resistant reflux disease to minimize postoperative dysphagia. To better understand the management of gastroesophageal reflux, we conducted a prospective study of the effects of laparoscopic partial fundoplication on TLESRs and other reflux mechanisms.

METHODS

From 1994 to 1999, 65 patients underwent laparoscopic partial fundoplication (180-200 degrees) and 28 of these patients (16 female, 12 male, mean age 43 +/- 2 yr [range, 26-66 yr]) agreed to participate in this prospective study on reflux mechanisms. Before and 6 months after surgery, all patients were evaluated by simultaneous recording of pH and lower esophageal sphincter characteristics, using sleeve manometry.

RESULTS

After partial fundoplication basal LES pressure increased significantly (p < 0.05), from 14.3 +/- 1.2 mm Hg to 17.8 +/- 1 mm Hg. Partial fundoplication significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the number of TLESRs, from 3.4 +/- 0.8 to 1.6 +/- 0.3 per hour in the fasting period, and from 4.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.9 +/- 0.3 per hour postprandially. The percentage of TLESRs associated with reflux also decreased significantly (p < 0.05), from 45 +/- 7% to 27 +/- 6% after operation. The number of reflux episodes decreased significantly (p < 0.05), from 4.1 +/- 0.7 to 1.3 +/- 0.3 per hour postoperatively. The majority of these episodes were associated with TLESRs: 57% and 46%, pre- and postoperatively, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic partial fundoplication significantly increased fasting and postprandial LES pressure and significantly decreased TLESR frequency. This resulted in a significant reduction in esophageal acid exposure, with preservation of postprandial LES characteristics.

Long-term efficacy of total (Nissen-Rossetti) and posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication: results of a randomized clinical trial

The efficacy of fundoplication operations in the long-term management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been documented. However, only a few prospective controlled series support the long-term (>10 years) efficacy of these procedures, and further data are required to also determine whether the type of fundoplication affects the frequency of postfundoplication complaints. The aim of this study was to conduct a randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the long-term symptomatic outcome of a partial posterior fundoplication as compared to a total fundic wrap. During the years 1983 to 1991, a total of 137 patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease were enrolled in the study; 72 were randomized to semifundoplication (Toupet) and 65 to total fundoplication (Nissen-Rossetti). A standardized symptom questionnaire was used for follow-up of these patients. A total of 110 patients completed a median follow-up of 11.5 years; 54 had a total wrap and 56 underwent a partial posterior fundoplication. During this period, seven patients required reoperation (Nissen-Rossetti in 5 and Toupet in 2), 11 patients died, and nine patients were lost to follow-up or did not comply with the follow-up program. Control of heartburn (no symptoms or mild, intermittent symptoms) was achieved in 88% and 92% in the total and partial fundoplication groups, respectively, and the corresponding figures for control of acid regurgitation were 90% and 94%. We observed no difference in dysphagia scoring between the two groups, although odynophagia was somewhat more frequently reported in those undergoing a total fundoplication. On the other hand, a significant difference was observed in the prevalence of rectal flatus and postprandial fullness, which were recorded significantly more often in those undergoing a total fundoplication (P < 0.001 and P < 0.03, respectively). Posterior partial fundoplication seems to maintain the same high level of reflux control as total fundoplication. Earlier observations demonstrating the advantages of a partial fundoplication, which included fewer complaints associated with gas-bloat, continue to be valid after more than 10 years of follow-up.

André Toupet: surgeon technician par excellence

André Toupet is best known for the posterior fundoplication that bears his name, currently used for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or completing Heller's myotomy and subject today to intense discussions. This was not different in 1963, when Toupet proposed his technique at a time when the Nissen fundoplication was emerging as the treatment of choice for GERD. Behind the procedure, we discover a man with great surgical talent and meticulous attention to technical details who opposed criticism with hard work and strong family values.

[Hiatus calibration decreases postoperative dysphagia after laparoscopic fundoplication: case-report study]

STUDY AIM

The risk of dysphagia after antireflux surgery seems to be increased with laparoscopy compared with open surgery. Calibration of the hiatus is usually done by the surgeon's finger during open surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the results of laparoscopic calibration with a Fogarty balloon catheter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2001, 21 patients had a laparoscopic Toupet 240 degrees fundoplication with hiatus calibration using a 4 ml-inflated 8G Fogarty balloon catheter. These patients were compared with a group of 21 patients without hiatus calibration, matched for age, sex, preoperative dysphagia and esophageal dysmotility. Judgment criteria was early and/or late postoperative dysphagia (> 3 months).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 13 months. The rate of early dysphagia with and without calibration were 66% and 48% respectively (NS). Median duration of early dysphagia with and without calibration were 25 and 43 days respectively (p = 0.05). No patient with calibration had late dysphagia. One patient (5%) without calibration had unexplained late dysphagia for 2 years. He had preoperative esophageal dysmotility without oesophagitis.

CONCLUSION

Hiatus calibration with a Fogarty balloon catheter decreased early postoperative dysphagia duration after Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication. This easily reproducible technical point standardizes the hiatus closure and should be recommended.

[Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults]

Pathological gastroesophageal reflux is common. The aim of this review was to compare the results of different surgical techniques. Papers were selected on Medline from 1990 to April 2001. A critical analysis was performed, concerning definitions of included patients, surgical techniques, and criteria of evaluation. For comparison, the results of 23 randomized studies were mainly selected. Their heterogeneity has not allowed a meta-analysis. A few techniques had poorer results than others: simple closure of His angle, Hill operation, Belsey Mark IV technique, and Angelchik prosthesis. In most studies, results of partial fundoplication on reflux were as good as those of total Nissen fundoplication and fewer patients had postoperative dysphagia. In a double blind trial, immediate advantages of laparoscopic approach were less important than those observed in non comparative studies. Another trial was interrupted after inclusion of 103 patients because of the higher rate of side-effects in the laparoscopic group. These results may help the surgeon in the choice of a technique. Patients have to be informed of potential adverse effects of the different techniques chosen by their surgeon.

Complications of laparoscopic antireflux surgery

Over the last decade, the laparoscopic approach to antireflux surgery has been widely applied, resulting in improved early outcomes and greater patient acceptance of surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, although short-term outcomes are probably better overall than those following open surgery, it has become apparent that the laparoscopic approach is associated with an increased risk of some complications, and as well as the occurrence of new complications specific to the laparoscopic approach. Significant complications include acute paraesophageal hiatus herniation, severe dysphagia, pneumothorax, vascular injury, and perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence of some of these complications decreases as surgeons gain experience; others can be minimized by using an appropriate operative technique. In addition, laparoscopic reintervention is usually straightforward in the 1st postoperative week. For this reason, the surgeon should have a low threshold for early laparoscopic reexploration, facilitated by early radiological contrast studies, in order to reduce the likelihood that problems will arise later.

Dysphagia after antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is experienced by many patients after antireflux surgery. This literature review examines factors associated with the development, prediction and management of postoperative dysphagia.

METHODS

Published studies examining issues related to dysphagia, gastro-oesophageal reflux and fundoplication were reviewed.

RESULTS

Postoperative dysphagia is usually temporary but proves troublesome for 5--10 per cent of patients. Technical modifications, such as a partial wrap, division of short gastric vessels and method of hiatal closure, have not conclusively reduced its incidence. There is no reliable preoperative test to predict dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

It is uncertain whether postoperative dysphagia arises from patient predilection or is largely a consequence of mechanical changes created by fundoplication. Anatomical errors account for a significant proportion of patients referred for correction of dysphagia but these are uncommon in large single-institution studies. Abnormal manometry cannot predict dysphagia and, on current evidence, 'tailoring' the operation does not prevent its occurrence.

Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of antireflux surgery (ARS) and proton pump inhibitor therapy in the control of gastroesophageal reflux disease is well established. A direct comparison between these therapies is warranted to assess the benefits of respective therapies.

STUDY DESIGN

There were 310 patients with erosive esophagitis enrolled in the trial. There were 155 patients randomized to continuous omeprazole therapy and 155 to open antireflux surgery, of whom 144 later had an operation. Because of various withdrawals during the study course, 122 patients originally having an antireflux operation completed the 5-year followup; the corresponding figure in the omeprazole group was 133. Symptoms, endoscopy, and quality-of-life questionnaires were used to document clinical outcomes. Treatment failure was defined to occur if at least one of the following criteria were fulfilled: Moderate or severe heartburn or acid regurgitation during the last 7 days before the respective visit; Esophagitis of at least grade 2; Moderate or severe dysphagia or odynophagia symptoms reported in combination with mild heartburn or regurgitation; If randomized to surgery and subsequently required omeprazole for more than 8 weeks to control symptoms, or having a reoperation; If randomized to omeprazole and considered by the responsible physician to require antireflux surgery to control symptoms; If randomized to omeprazole and the patient, for any reason, preferred antireflux surgery during the course of the study. Treatment failure was the primary outcomes variable.

RESULTS

When the time to treatment failure was analyzed by use of the intention to treat approach, applying the life table analysis technique, a highly significant difference between the two strategies was revealed (p < 0.001), with more treatment failures in patients who originally were randomized to omeprazole treatment. The protocol also allowed dose adjustment in patients allocated to omeprazole therapy to either 40 or 60 mg daily in case of symptom recurrence. The curves subsequently describing the failure rates still remained separated in favor of surgery, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.088). Quality of life assessment revealed values within normal ranges in both therapy arms during the 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized multicenter trial with a 5-year followup, we found antireflux surgery to be more effective than omeprazole in controlling gastroesophageal reflux disease as measured by the treatment failure rates. But if the dose of omeprazole was adjusted in case of relapse, the two therapeutic strategies reached levels of efficacy that were not statistically different.

Anti-reflux surgery in the laparoscopic era

The introduction of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery has led to a renewed interest in the operative treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Three groups of patients can be identified who are particularly suited to laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Failure to respond to medical treatment has been historically the main determinant for those referred for anti-reflux surgery. With the availability of modern anti-secretory drugs most patients with chronic GORD can control their symptoms adequately by these means. Even effective medical therapy, however, is not without problems. In many patients rapid and consistent relapse of symptoms and oesophagitis occurs on cessation of therapy. Some of these patients do not want to be reliant on a form of medication that has yet to firmly establish its record for safety over many years of continued use. A second readily identifiable group of patients are those who are often described as 'volume refluxers'. They are bothered by persistent fluid regurgitation despite adequate control of their heartburn with acid suppressive drugs. Third there are those individuals who develop oesophageal strictures and those with Barrett's oesophagus and concomitant reflux symptoms and also those with respiratory complications associated with presumed aspiration of gastric juice into the pharynx and into the respiratory tree. The low morbidity associated with laparoscopic surgery that has been achieved in the best modern series means that the pendulum may swing back to surgery and therefore it is even more important that the right operation (fundoplication) is done for the right patient. Failure to create an adequate crural repair behind the wrap is associated with a risk of early post-operative para-oesophageal herniation and proximal wrap migration. The question of tailored anti-reflux surgery based on the pre-operative motor function of the body of the oesophagus is widely applied, although the scientific basis for these selective approaches is rather weak. Partial fundoplication seems to be associated with very low rates of dysphagia and of gas bloat. Assessment of the post-operative result should ideally be done by an independent observer and should consider not only traditional outcome measures but also the impact of surgery on the quality of the patient's life. Investigations on the cost effectiveness of these surgical therapeutic strategies suggest important benefits of surgery, which should be incorporated into the clinical decision process when assessing different long-term management alternatives for patients with chronic GORD.

Belching and bloating: facts and fantasy after antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Fundoplication is commonly complicated by belching difficulty and abdominal bloating. Postoperative belching ability, however, is difficult to assess; subjective patient reporting is often used but may be unreliable. Manometric measurement of the gastro-oesophageal 'common cavity' is an objective marker of gastro-oesophageal gas reflux.

METHODS

Twenty patients who had undergone Nissen fundoplication and 11 healthy controls underwent oesophageal manometry at rest and during gastric distension for 10 min with 750 ml of gas.

RESULTS

Half of the patients reported an inability to belch; the other half reported varying degrees of belching difficulty, most of whom were rarely able to relieve bloating by belching. During gastric distension, none of the patients had transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation, while the controls had a median of 1 (range 0-1). Patients had fewer common cavities than controls; however, none of the belch urges experienced during gastric distension in patients was associated with a common cavity, compared with 48 per cent in controls.

CONCLUSION

After fundoplication, patients do not belch as a result of gastro-oesophageal gas reflux; rather it may be due to oesophagopharyngeal reflux of swallowed air. Subjective reporting of belching ability is inaccurate and manometric measurement of common cavities provides a better means of assessment.

Partial fundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease: indications and current status

The Nissen fundoplication, and in particular the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, has received widespread acceptance as the most definitive therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. There remains, however, certain patients who do better with a less aggressive surgical augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Partial fundoplications originated in the early 1960s as an alternative procedure to the Nissen, which was associated with moderately high rates of postoperative side effects. These "more physiologic" procedures have proved successful in the treatment of reflux disease in patients with poor or no esophageal motility. In particular, the use of partial fundoplications in association with Heller's myotomy for achalasia has been demonstrated to be well tolerated and to reduce the risk of late dysphasia resulting from uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux (GER). The use of partial fundoplications in GER patients with normal motility, however, has been less successful. High recurrence rates are documented by many centers with the main cause appearing to be related to a less competent neo-lower esophageal sphincter and a higher rate of wrap herniation. This has led to the current practice of a "tailored approach" to reflux disease, in which all patients receive a thorough preoperative physiologic evaluation to determine the best antireflux procedure for the individual. This is generally a Nissen repair for those with normal motility and either an extrashort "floppy" Nissen or a partial wrap for those with impaired peristalsis.

Advances in minimally invasive esophageal surgery

Advances in minimally invasive techniques have substantially expanded the role of surgery in the treatment of esophageal disease. In many cases this expansion has made more effective treatment available to a larger number of patients. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, paraesophageal hernias, and achalasia are now routinely treated laparoscopically, and laparoscopy is beginning to be used for total esophagectomy as well. The introduction of this technology has created new controversies and revitalized existing ones in the surgical treatment of esophageal disease. The indications, techniques, and outcomes of videoendoscopic approaches to the esophagus, as well as the controversies surrounding them, are discussed in this review.

Prospective randomized double-blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication

BACKGROUND

In the operative management of gastro-oesophageal reflux, a balance must be achieved between adequate control of reflux and excessive dysphagia. The ideal technique is not known. A randomized study was performed to determine whether laparoscopic anterior fundoplication is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia than laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, while achieving equivalent control of reflux.

METHODS

Patients presenting for laparoscopic antireflux surgery were randomized to undergo either a Nissen fundoplication (n = 53) or an anterior 180 degrees hemifundoplication (n = 54). Patients were blinded to which procedure had been performed, and follow-up was obtained by a blinded independent investigator. Standardized clinical grading systems were used to assess dysphagia, heartburn and patient satisfaction 1, 3 and 6 months after operation. Objective measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, oesophageal emptying time, distal oesophageal acid exposure and endoscopic healing of oesophagitis was also performed.

RESULTS

Operating time was similar for the two procedures (58 min for the Nissen procedure versus 60 min for anterior fundoplication). Resting and residual lower oesophageal sphincter pressures were lower following anterior fundoplication (29 versus 18 mmHg, and 13 versus 6 mmHg), and oesophageal emptying times were faster (92 versus 116 s). Acid exposure times and ability to heal oesophagitis were similar. At 3 months' follow-up clinical outcomes were similar for the two procedures. At 6 months, however, patients who had undergone anterior fundoplication experienced significantly less dysphagia for solid food and were more likely to be satisfied with the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic anterior fundoplication achieved equivalent control of reflux, more physiological postoperative manometry parameters, and an improved clinical outcome at 6 months. Continued follow-up remains necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of the partial fundoplication procedure.

Antireflux surgery in the laparoscopic era

BACKGROUND

The recent development of laparoscopic techniques for fundoplication has created renewed interest in surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, leading to reports of large clinical series from many centres. However, controversy remains about technical aspects of laparoscopic antireflux surgery, with no consensus yet reached about a standard operative technique. It is important, therefore, to reassess critically the results of laparoscopic surgery for reflux disease, so that its current status can be determined.

METHODS

Published outcome studies for laparoscopic antireflux surgery, as well as selected studies from the era of open antireflux surgery, were reviewed to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

The results of case series for laparoscopic antireflux surgery with short- and medium-term follow-up, as well as the early results of randomized trials, confirm that this approach reduces the early overall morbidity of surgery for reflux disease. However, certain complications may be more common, for instance paraoesophageal hiatus herniation, pneumothorax and oesophageal perforation, requiring surgeons to use specific strategies which can help to avoid these problems. Published studies and trials do not support the routine or selective application of a posterior partial fundoplication technique or routine division of the short gastric vessels during Nissen fundoplication.

CONCLUSION

At present, a short loose Nissen fundoplication performed laparoscopically, with or without division of the short gastric vessels, is an appropriate surgical approach for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, long-term outcomes following laparoscopic antireflux surgery will not be available for some years, and must be awaited before the final status of the various laparoscopic techniques can be confirmed.

Gastroesophageal reflux in morbidly obese patients treated with gastric banding or vertical banded gastroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To compare gastric banding (GB) and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) with respect to postsurgical gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and to investigate the role of preexisting hiatus hernia.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

GB and VBG have for a long time been used in the treatment of morbidly obese patients. The introduction of laparoscopic techniques has renewed the interest in these operations. The long-term results after GB have, however, been poor. VBG was suggested to have antireflux properties because it involves repositioning and retaining the gastroesophageal junction within the abdomen and constructing an elongated intraabdominal tube.

METHODS

Forty-three morbidly obese patients accepted for GB or VBG were evaluated for GER before and at regular intervals after surgery. All patients were questioned about adverse symptoms and need for antireflux medication. Both before and after surgery, 24-hour pH measurement and upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of heartburn and acid regurgitation among patients treated with GB increased from 14% and 13% to 63% and 69%, respectively. Heartburn and acid regurgitation were present before surgery in 32% and 23% of patients treated with VBG, percentages unchanged by the procedure. The 24-hour reflux time increased significantly from 6.4% to 30.9% in patients treated with GB but was essentially unchanged in patients treated with VBG. The prevalence of esophagitis after GB and VBG was 75% and 20%. Acid inhibitors were needed in 81% of patients after GB and 29% of patients after VBG.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of GER was unchanged by VBG, but VBG did not demonstrate antireflux properties. The incidence of GER increased markedly after GB.

The effect of mosapride, a novel prokinetic, on acid reflux variables in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Mosapride is a novel prokinetic agent facilitating acetylcholine release from the enteric cholinergic neurones through a selective 5-HT4 receptor agonistic action. It is also active through its main metabolite M1, which is a 5-HT3 antagonist. The importance of motor dysfunction in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) makes it interesting to examine the effect of mosapride on oesophageal acid exposure.

METHODS

The effect of mosapride on oesophageal 24-h acid reflux variables was studied in 21 patients with GERD symptoms and a pre-entry total acid exposure time (pH < 4) of more than 5%. Ambulatory pH monitoring was performed after treatment with 40 mg mosapride citrate or placebo q.d.s. for 2 days in random order, using a double-blind crossover technique, with a washout period of at least 5 days.

RESULTS

Mosapride was significantly more effective than placebo in decreasing the total number of reflux episodes, the total number of reflux episodes lasting more than 5 min and the total time, as well as the amount of day time, of intra-oesophageal pH below 4. Consequently, mosapride also significantly improved total acid clearance time.

CONCLUSION

Mosapride 40 mg q.d.s. is effective in decreasing acid reflux in the oesophagus in patients with GERD and therefore has the potential to be effective in the treatment of this disease.

Oesophageal function testing and antireflux surgery

Despite the increasing emphasis that is placed on both pH measurement and oesophageal manometry, there is little consensus about their usefulness in the clinical setting. These tests are far from infallible and it is difficult to support their universal application in patients with gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Nevertheless, these imperfect tests are useful in certain situations and clinicians must strive to use them intelligently for those most likely to benefit.

Quality of life assessment after laparoscopic and open fundoplications. Results of a prospective, clinical study

BACKGROUND

In the evaluation of different treatment alternatives, assessment of the patients' own perceived situation can give important clinical information in addition to the conventional efficacy variables used.

METHODS

Fifty patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were operated on with either an open fundoplication (n = 25; 17 men; mean age, 51.5 years) or with a fundoplication through the laparoscope (n = 25; 16 men; mean age, 49.8 years). In each case adequate control of the GERD was achieved with the operation, also when objectively assessed. Twelve months after surgery the quality of life was studied by using a battery of self-administered questionnaires (the Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), and a visual analogue scale, depicting specific reflux-related symptoms (RVAS).

RESULTS

After antireflux surgery the overall PGWB scores were normalized with no obvious difference between the two procedures. In the GSRS scale, however, differences were shown between the two procedures, with more dyspeptic and indigestion symptoms in patients having a laparoscopic total fundic wrap.

CONCLUSION

These data emphasize the clinical efficacy of antireflux surgery, with normalization of the quality of life in terms of well-being after these procedures. It should be noted that these instruments are sensitive enough to pick up significant differences between different antireflux procedures and should therefore be frequently used in the attempt to refine and optimize long-term therapeutic alternatives in reflux disease.

Long-term results of a prospective randomized comparison of total fundic wrap (Nissen-Rossetti) or semifundoplication (Toupet) for gastro-oesophageal reflux

The importance of the extent of the fundic wrap that encircles the distal oesophagus for the establishment of long-term control of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and for the risk of symptoms after fundoplication was evaluated in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Of 137 consecutive patients with GORD, 72 were allocated to a semifundoplication (180-200 degrees, Toupet) and 65 to a total fundoplication (360 degrees, Nissen-Rossetti). Dysphagia was more common in the early postoperative period after a total fundic wrap, a difference which disappeared with time. This corresponded to a higher resting tone in the lower oesophageal sphincter area. Seven patients (5 per cent) experienced relapse of GORD during follow-up of more than 3 years. Although no difference in the cumulative relapse rate (5 per cent for Nissen-Rossetti versus 6 per cent for Toupet) was found between the two study groups, the total failure rate was higher (P < 0.05) among patients who had a Nissen-Rossetti procedure because of a procedure-specific complication: intrathoracic herniation of the fundoplication in five patients caused obstructive symptoms without reflux (four had no posterior crural repair). In addition, symptoms in the form of flatulence were more frequently seen after Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication (P < 0.05 at 2 years and P < 0.01 at 3 years). Both Nissen-Rossetti and Toupet fundoplication equally well and durably controlled GORD. Fewer symptoms occurred in those having a semifundoplication, both in the early and late postoperative period.

Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication: analysis of 100 consecutive cases

Performance of a laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication (LPPF) for severe gastroesophageal reflux disease may have significant advantages. These include a low incidence of postop dysphagia, maintenance of the ability to belch, excellent antireflux effects, and the ease of performance of the surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this antireflux procedure for these advantages to determine both its safety and effectiveness. Over 200 LPPFs have been performed by the authors in a community setting. One hundred consecutive cases are evaluated for indications, preop, and postop studies (EGD, manometry, 24 h pH), time of operation, hospital stay, complications, and conversions to an open procedure. Our technique of LPPF is presented in detail. All patients maintained the ability to belch. Postop dysphagia resolved totally in 4 patients by 7 days. Four pneumothoraces occurred; 1 patient required bilateral chest tube placement. There were no esophageal, stomach, or splenic injuries. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Postop 24 h pH studies revealed resolution of the esophageal reflux. Postop manometric studies show a median increase of 9.2 mm Hg for the LES pressure. No patients have resumed antireflux medication. No short gastric vessels were divided and no esophageal sutures were placed. There were no conversions to a laparotomy. Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication is a safe and effective antireflux procedure.

Is motility impaired in the entire upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease?

BACKGROUND

Although the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is multifactorial, abnormal function of the lower oesophageal sphincter has been established, and in some cases motility defects in the oesophageal body has been described. In some patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease delayed gastric emptying has also been observed.

METHODS

Oesophageal and gastric motor function, as evaluated by use of scintigraphy and manometry, were studied concomitantly in 105 patients with chronic, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease before and after antireflux surgery. In a subgroup of these patients (n = 29) similar data were retrieved also at 2.7 years after antireflux surgery.

RESULTS

Impaired oesophageal motor function expressed as delayed transit of a labelled bolus was closely associated with motor dysfunction also recorded in the stomach as determined by delayed emptying of labelled solid food items. A similar relationship was found when oesophageal motor dysfunction was characterized as the frequency of failed primary peristalses after water swallows during manometry. When the 105 patients were studied half a year after an antireflux operation, noncorrelation between oesophageal and gastric motor function could be recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

These data further substantiate the view that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is associated with a disturbed motor function within the entire upper gastrointestinal tract.

Pathophysiology in gastroesophageal reflux disease: the surgeon's view

Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are common in the general population. Pathophysiological factors of importance include esophageal and gastric motility, hiatal hernia, acid secretion as well as anatomical and hormonal factors. In the eye of the surgeon several of the most important factors for severe reflux can be corrected surgically. These include lower esophageal sphincter pressure, esophageal intra-abdominal length and hiatal hernia. The result of surgery is dependent on whether the patient has symptoms related to gastroesophageal reflux or not. It is important that disease history symptoms and pathophysiological findings at investigations match. We have found that not all physiological investigations have to be pathological. Symptomatic response to profound acid inhibition is essential, however, and patients not responding to a high dosage of proton-pump inhibitors should be reconsidered.