A clinical comparison of ampicillin, ampicillin esters (bacampicillin and pivampicillin) and amoxycillin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Azithromycin versus pivampicillin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a single-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study

This single-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study compared oral azithromycin, administered as tablets, 500 mg once daily for 3 days, versus oral pivampicillin, 700 mg twice daily for 10 days, in adults with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (not needing parenteral antibiotic therapy, hospitalization or oxygen support). Clinical success (cure + improvement) rates were similar for both groups at the end of treatment (day 10; azithromycin, 124 of 133 [93%]; pivampicillin, 79 of 92 [86%]) and at follow-up (day 52; 98 of 126 [78%] versus 66 of 81 [81%]). The treatments produced similar levels of pathogen eradication at the end of treatment (49 of 54 [91%] versus 32 of 37 [86%]). Azithromycin-treated patients had significantly reduced chest discomfort at the end of treatment, and a trend towards improved lung function. The two groups were similar with respect to improvements in other clinical symptoms and patient well-being, and to the incidences of adverse events and treatment discontinuations. This oral azithromycin regime is an effective treatment for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, similar in efficacy to the longer pivampicillin regime and may offer superior patient compliance.

Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: state of the art

Effective treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABE) reduces the number of such exacerbations in such patients and may decrease or eliminate background symptoms and improve pulmonary function. The pathologic and physiologic abnormalities of the bronchial system in chronic bronchitis that predispose to bacterial infection probably include impaired mucociliary clearance, obstructed bronchioles, and bacterial infections of the bronchial epithelium. Exacerbations of bronchopulmonary symptoms are usually observed with ABE, although these symptoms are not unique to ABE. While culture and sensitivity testing is not usually required, microscopic examination of sputum is critical to determine the presence of bacterial infection. Bacteria in numbers significantly above the levels present when the patient's condition is stable and at least a doubling of the sputum neutrophil inflammatory level are essential criteria. Bacterial species observed with ABE include Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Neisseria species, with a lesser incidence of Klebsiella and Pseudomonas species. One or more elements of background therapy for ABE should accompany antimicrobial therapy, for example, physiotherapy, bronchodilators, and so forth. Ampicillin is effective, safe, economical, and thus remains the drug of choice for ABE. Quinolones are an effective alternative when ampicillin cannot be tolerated or if organisms are resistant. Dosing is at the upper range of recommendations, and the chosen drug should be given for a 10-14-day regimen. Patients should be reevaluated if symptoms and physical findings do not return to baseline after 5-7 days.

A comparative study of amoxycillin and pivampicillin in persistent Haemophilus influenzae infection of the lower respiratory tract in children with chronic lung disease

A double-blind cross-over study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of amoxycillin and pivampicillin on Haemophilus influenzae infection of the lower respiratory tract in children. 20 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to other causes were included in the study. All patients had a history of regularly harbouring H. influenzae in sputum and repeated treatment failures with pivampicillin. 18 completed two 14-day courses in random order with equimolar doses of pivampicillin (80 mg/kg/day) and amoxycillin (62 mg/kg/day). Both drugs were well tolerated with no serious side effects, but pivampicillin was associated with more pronounced nausea. In steady state the mean serum concentrations of antibiotics 2 and 4 h after medication were 9.7 and 3.7 micrograms/ml for pivampicillin and 19.1 and 7.9 micrograms/ml for amoxycillin (p less than 0.01). Eradication of H. influenzae and clinical improvement was seen in one-third of the courses with both drugs. Betalactamase producing ampicillin-resistant strains emerged during 58% of the amoxycillin courses, but only in 16% of the pivampicillin courses (p less than 0.001). The high number of treatment failures and the development of resistant strains indicate that betalactamase inhibitors may possibly improve the efficacy of these drugs, especially of amoxycillin, in these patients.

The aminopenicillins: development and comparative properties

In this review we have compared and contrasted the antibacterial and pharmacological properties of the aminopenicillins currently available. It is apparent that there is little hard evidence (except in the case of thphoid fever) that either amoxycillin or the pro-drug esters of ampicillin are significantly more effective than ampicillin itself, despite their better absorption and higher serum levels. However, amoxycillin and the ampicillin pro-drug esters do cause fewer bowel side-effects than ampicillin, which may justify their use despite the extra cost involved. The problem of susceptibility to penicillinases is unlikely to be solved by modification of the aminopenicillin molecule. A more likely solution is administration of these substances with beta-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid. Trials with such combinations are already under way.

Studies on aminopenicillin developments. Proceedings of a symposium. Concluding remarks

This symposium has focused on the bacteriological, pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, and adverse effects of the aminopenicillins. The compounds which are currently being assessed are primarily amoxycillin, ampicillin, bacampicillin, pivampicillin, and talampicillin. The three last mentioned are prodrugs which upon gastrointestinal absorption are rapidly split to yield circulating ampicillin. Pharmacokinetics and side-effects are reasons why one may narrow the selection of most suitable compounds within this group down to three. Ampicillin and amoxycillin are primary choices for parenteral dosage, and amoxycillin and bacampicillin the most suitable for oral therapy.