Low specificity of the bacterial index for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia by bronchoalveolar lavage

Effect of prior receipt of antibiotics on the pathogen distribution: a retrospective observational cohort study on 27,792 patients

Background

There have been no systematic studies of microbiological differences before and after antibiotics treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prior receipt of antibiotics on the microorganism distribution.

Methods

A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in a 3200-bed tertiary, referral, teaching hospital in eastern China. During a 2-year period, all hospitalized patients treated with antimicrobial agents were enrolled in this study. Among 48,692 patients evaluated, the 27,792 (57.1%) who were sampled within 2 days before or after administration of the first dose of antimicrobial agents were included. Distribution of clinical specimens and the microorganism were compared between before and after antibiotic drug treatment groups.

Results

Compared to specimens taken after antibiotics exposure, specimens taken before antibiotics exposure had a higher proportion of blood and urine specimens and a higher culture positive rate (all P < 0.001). Higher percentages of Staphylococcus aureus (9.9% vs. 8.5%, P = 0.041), non-fermenting bacteria (27.7% vs. 19.9%, P < 0.001), and fungi (8.4% vs. 4.0%, P < 0.001) were isolated from the group after antibiotics exposure, while the percentages of Streptococcus spp. (4.8% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001), Haemophilus influenzae (2.3% vs. 0.8%, P < 0.001), and Moraxella catarrhalis (0.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001) were higher in the group before antibiotics exposure. Further analysis found significant differences of microbes derived from respiratory secretions, blood or urine samples. We found, after antibiotics exposure, the separation rate of non-fermenting bacteria was significantly increased (all P < 0.05), and the separation rate of Candida spp. was higher, with statistical significance in airway secretion and urine samples (both P < 0.05), but the separation rate of Staphylococcus aureus among the three groups was not affected by antibiotics. In addition, the isolation rate of Streptococcus spp. in blood and urine samples decreased significantly (both P < 0.05) after antibiotics exposure. Interestingly, no statistical difference was found for microbes isolated from body fluid specimens between the two groups.

Conclusions

The outcome revealed that antibiotic-insensitive organisms such as non-fermentative bacteria and fungi were more frequently isolated after antibiotics exposure. However, this trend might be specimen dependent and was not obvious in body fluid specimens.

Accuracy and precision of quantitative calibrated loops in transfer of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid are important in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and calibrated loops are commonly used to set up these cultures. In this study, the performances of calibrated 0.010- and 0.001-ml loops in the transfer of BAL fluid were determined. Five loops of one lot from seven manufacturers were tested. Calibrations were performed by the gravimetric method (0.010-ml loops) and the colorimetric method (0.001-ml loops). Most of the 0.010-ml loops displayed a precision that was less than 10%, but six of them showed very poor accuracies as they transferred a deficiency (nichrome loops) or an excess (disposable loops) of BAL fluid that exceeded +/-10%. The mean maximum and minimum BAL fluid volumes delivered by the 0.010-ml loops differed by a factor 3. The 0.001-ml loops displayed acceptable precision. Five of them showed inaccuracies of </=+/-10%, and mean maximum and minimum BAL fluid volumes had a range of a factor of 2. For all loops, the volumes of BAL fluid sampled were larger than the volumes of reagent-grade water sampled. Results of the colony counting experiments confirmed these findings and revealed a high intra-assay variability for the 0.001-ml loops. We conclude that, when BAL fluid samples are cultured with calibrated loops, (i) proper verification of the calibration of these loops is mandatory, (ii) calibrations should be performed with BAL fluid as the test solution, and (iii) borderline quantitative culture results should be interpreted with knowledge of the inaccuracy values of these loops.