Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections

Intra-abdominal infections: the role of different classifications on the selection of the best antibiotic treatment

Background

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) represent a most frequent gastrointestinal emergency and serious cause of morbimortality. A full classification, including all facets of IAIs, does not exist. Two classifications are used to subdivide IAIs: uncomplicated or complicated, considering infection extent; and community-acquired, healthcare-associated or hospital-acquired, regarding the place of acquisition. Adequacy of initial empirical antibiotic therapy prescribed is an essential need. Inadequate antibiotic therapy is associated with treatment failure and increased mortality. This study was designed to determine accuracy of different classifications of IAIs to identify infections by pathogens sensitive to current treatment guidelines helping the selection of the best antibiotic therapy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study including all adult patients discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of IAI between 1st of January and 31st of October, 2016. All variables potentially associated with pre-defined outcomes: infection by a pathogen sensitive to non-pseudomonal cephalosporin or ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (ATB 1, primary outcome), sensitive to piperacillin-tazobactam (ATB 2) and hospital mortality (secondary outcomes) were studied through logistic regression. Accuracy of the models was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve and calibration was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.

Results

Of 1804 patients screened 154 met inclusion criteria. Sensitivity to ATB 1 was independently associated with male gender (adjusted OR = 2.612) and previous invasive procedures in the last year (adjusted OR = 0.424) (AUROC curve = 0,65). Sensitivity to ATB 2 was independently associated with liver disease (adjusted OR = 3.580) and post-operative infections (adjusted OR = 2.944) (AUROC curve = 0.604). Hospital mortality was independently associated with age ≥ 70 (adjusted OR = 4.677), solid tumour (adjusted OR = 3.127) and sensitivity to non-pseudomonal cephalosporin or ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (adjusted OR = 0.368).

The accuracy of pre-existing classifications to identify infection by a pathogen sensitive to ATB 1 was 0.59 considering place of acquisition, 0.61 infection extent and 0.57 local of infection, for ATB 2 it was 0.66, 0.50 and 0.57, respectively.

Conclusion

None of existing classifications had a good discriminating power to identify IAIs caused by pathogens sensitive to current antibiotic treatment recommendations. A new classification, including patients’ individual characteristics like those included in the current model, might have a higher potential to distinguish IAIs by resistant pathogens allowing a better choice of empiric antibiotic therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole compared with piperacillin/tazobactam as empiric therapy for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections based on the in-vitro surveillance of bacterial isolates in the UK

AIMS

An increase in the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative pathogens has been noted recently. A challenge in empiric treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) is identifying initial appropriate antibiotic therapy, which is associated with reduced length of stay and mortality compared with inappropriate therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam + metronidazole compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (commonly used in this indication) in the treatment of patients with cIAI in UK hospitals.

METHODS

A decision-analytic Monte Carlo simulation model was used to compare costs (antibiotic and hospitalization costs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of patients infected with gram-negative cIAI and treated empirically with either ceftolozane/tazobactam + metronidazole or piperacillin/tazobactam. Bacterial isolates were randomly drawn from the Program to Assess Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) database, a surveillance database of non-duplicate bacterial isolates collected from patients in the UK infected with gram-negative pathogens. Susceptibility to initial empiric therapy was based on the measured susceptibilities reported in the PACTS database.

RESULTS

Ceftolozane/tazobactam + metronidazole was cost-effective when compared with piperacillin/tazobactam, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £4,350/QALY and 0.36 hospitalization days/patient saved. Costs in the ceftolozane/tazobactam + metronidazole arm were £2,576/patient, compared with £2,168/patient in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm. The ceftolozane/tazobactam + metronidazole arm experienced a greater number of QALYs than the piperacillin/tazobactam arm (14.31/patient vs 14.21/patient, respectively). Ceftolozane/tazobactam + metronidazole remained cost-effective in one-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Economic models can help to identify the appropriate choice of empiric therapy for the treatment of cIAI. Results indicated that empiric use of ceftolozane/tazobactam + metronidazole is cost-effective vs piperacillin/tazobactam in UK patients with cIAI at risk of resistant infection. This will be valuable to commissioners and clinicians to aid decision-making on the targeting of resources for appropriate antibiotic therapy under the premise of antimicrobial stewardship.

Cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with piperacillin/tazobactam as empiric therapy based on the in-vitro surveillance of bacterial isolates in the United States for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections

Background

A challenge in the empiric treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) is identifying the initial appropriate antibiotic therapy (IAAT), which is associated with reduced length of stay and mortality compared with initial inappropriate antibiotic therapy (IIAT). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (one of the standard of care antibiotics), for the treatment of hospitalized patients with cUTI.

Methods

A decision-analytic Monte Carlo simulation model was developed to compare the costs and effectiveness of empiric treatment with either ceftolozane/tazobactam or piperacillin/tazobactam in hospitalized adult patients with cUTI infected with Gram-negative pathogens in the US. The model applies the baseline prevalence of resistance as reported by national in-vitro surveillance data.

Results

In a cohort of 1000 patients, treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam resulted in higher total costs compared with piperacillin/tazobactam ($36,413 /patient vs. $36,028/patient, respectively), greater quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (9.19/patient vs. 9.13/patient, respectively) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6128/QALY. Ceftolozane/tazobactam remained cost-effective at a willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY compared to piperacillin/tazobactam over a range of input parameter values during one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

Model results show that ceftolozane/tazobactam is likely to be cost-effective compared with piperacillin/tazobactam for the empiric treatment of hospitalized cUTI patients in the United States.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-017-2408-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Phase 2, Dose-Ranging Study of Relebactam with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Subjects with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

Relebactam (REL [MK-7655]) is a novel class A/C β-lactamase inhibitor intended for use with imipenem for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. REL restores imipenem activity against some resistant strains of Klebsiella and Pseudomonas In this multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial (NCT01506271), subjects who were ≥18 years of age with complicated intra-abdominal infection were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 250 mg REL, 125 mg REL, or placebo, each given intravenously (i.v.) with 500 mg imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) every 6 h (q6h) for 4 to 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of microbiologically evaluable (ME) subjects with a favorable clinical response at discontinuation of i.v. therapy (DCIV). A total of 351 subjects were randomized, 347 (99%) were treated, and 255 (73%) were ME at DCIV (55% male; mean age, 49 years). The most common diagnoses were complicated appendicitis (53%) and complicated cholecystitis (17%). Thirty-six subjects (13%) had imipenem-resistant Gram-negative infections at baseline. Both REL doses plus IMI were generally well tolerated and demonstrated safety profiles similar to that of IMI alone. Clinical response rates at DCIV were similar in subjects who received 250 mg REL plus IMI (96.3%) or 125 mg REL plus IMI (98.8%), and both were noninferior to IMI alone (95.2%; one-sided P < 0.001). The treatment groups were also similar with respect to clinical response at early and late follow-up and microbiological response at all visits. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulations show that imipenem exposure at the proposed dose of 500 mg IMI with 250 mg REL q6h provides coverage of >90% of carbapenem-resistant bacterial strains.

Management of Severe Sepsis of Abdominal Origin

Severe sepsis is a life-threatening condition that may occur as a sequela of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) of all types. Diagnosis of IAIs is predicated upon the combination of physical examination and imaging techniques. Diffuse peritonitis usually requires urgent surgical intervention. In the absence of diffuse peritonitis, abdominal computed tomography remains the most useful test for the diagnosis of IAIs, and is essential to both guide therapeutic interventions and evaluate suspected treatment failure in the critically ill patient. Parameters most consistently associated with poor outcomes in patients with IAIs include increased illness severity, failed source control, inadequate empiric antimicrobial therapy, and healthcare-acquired, as opposed to community-acquired infection. Whereas community-acquired IAI is characterized predominantly by enteric gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes that are susceptible to narrow-spectrum agents, healthcare-acquired IAI (e.g., anastomotic dehiscence, postoperative organ-space surgical site infection) frequently involves at least one multi-drug resistant pathogen, necessitating broad-spectrum therapy guided by both culture results and local antibiograms. The cornerstone of effective treatment for abdominal sepsis is early and adequate source control, which is supplemented by antibiotic therapy, restoration of a functional gastrointestinal tract (if possible), and support of organ dysfunction. Furthermore, mitigation of deranged immune and coagulation responses via therapy with recombinant human activated protein C may improve survival significantly in severe cases complicated by septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

Clinical and Economic Consequences of Failure of Initial Antibiotic Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

Objective.

To estimate the consequences of failure of initial antibiotic therapy for patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.

Design.

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting.

Large US multihospital database.

Patients.

We identified a total of 47,219 patients (age 18 years or older) who were admitted to the hospital for complicated skin and skin-structure infections from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2004, and who received intravenous antibiotics during the first 2 hospital-days (ie, initial antibiotic therapy). Failure of therapy was defined as drainage, debridement, or receipt of other intravenous antibiotics at any subsequent time (except for changes to narrower-spectrum agents or any therapy change immediately before discharge). Predictors of failure of antibiotic therapy and mortality were examined using multivariate logistic regression. Analysis of covariance was used to estimate the impact of treatment failure on duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy, length of stay, and total inpatient charges.

Results.

For 10,782 admitted patients (22.8%), there was evidence of failure of initial antibiotic therapy. In multivariate analyses, treatment failure was associated with receipt of vasoactive medications during the first 2 hospital-days (odds ratio [OR], 1.66 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.19-2.31]), initiation of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.28-1.84]), and the patient's Charlson comorbidity index (OR per 1-point increase, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.08]); treatment failure was also was associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality (OR, 2.91 [95% CI, 2.34-3.62]). Compared with patients for whom initial treatment was successful, patients who experienced treatment failure received intravenous antibiotic therapy for a mean of 5.7 additional days, were hospitalized for a mean of 5.4 additional days, and incurred a mean of $5,285 (in 2003 dollars) in additional inpatient charges (all P <.01).

Conclusion.

Failure of initial antibiotic therapy in the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections is associated with significantly worse clinical and economic outcomes.

The opposing forces of the intestinal microbiome and the emerging pathobiome

This article summarizes emerging concepts on the role of the intestinal microbiome in surgical patients. Revolutionary research over the past decade has shown that human beings live in close and constant contact with boundless communities of microbes. Recent innovations in the study of the human microbiome are reviewed. To demonstrate the applicability of these studies to surgical disease, the authors discuss what is known about the role of microbes in the pathogenesis of perioperative complications. Enhanced awareness of the human microbiome will empower clinicians to adopt novel practices in the prevention and treatment of a variety of surgical conditions.

Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in hospitalized patients with secondary peritonitis: pooled analysis of four randomized phase III trials

BACKGROUND

Secondary peritonitis is an advanced form of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) requiring hospitalization, surgical source control, and empiric antibiotic therapy against causative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

METHODS

This pooled analysis of four prospective, active-controlled randomized clinical trials compared the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin with that of comparator antibiotics in patients with confirmed secondary peritonitis. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical success rate at test-of-cure (TOC) between day 10 and 45 post-therapy in the per-protocol (PP) population. Safety and clinical efficacy were assessed also in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). Bacteriological success was assessed at TOC in the microbiologically-valid population as a secondary efficacy endpoint.

RESULTS

Overall clinical success rates at TOC were 85.3% (431 of 505 patients) in the moxifloxacin and 88.4% (459 of 519 patients) in the comparator treatment groups (PP population, point estimate for the difference in success rates: -3.0%; 95% CI -7.06%, 1.05%), respectively. Similar clinical success rates between moxifloxacin and comparators were observed by anatomical site of infection, and ranged from 80.6% to 100% for moxifloxacin and from 71.4% to 96.6% for comparators, respectively. Bacteriologic success rates were similar with moxifloxacin (82.4%) and comparators (86.8%), respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing any treatment-emergent adverse events was slightly higher with moxifloxacin (67.3%) versus comparators (59.8%). Rates of drug-related adverse events (20.9% versus 20.0%) and deaths (4.3% versus 3.4%) were similar in moxifloxacin and comparator groups; none of the deaths were drug-related.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggests that once-daily IV (or IV/PO) moxifloxacin has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to antibiotic regimens approved previously in the subgroup of patients with secondary peritonitis of mild-to-moderate severity.

Initial treatment failure in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections

BACKGROUND

Consequences of initial antibiotic failure in patients hospitalized for complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI) are not well understood.

METHODS

Using data from >100 hospitals in the United States, we identified all adults hospitalized for cSSSI between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2009. We defined "initial therapy" as all parenteral antibiotics administered <24 h of admission, and such therapy was assumed to have failed if the patient (1) received new antibiotic(s) subsequently (excluding similar/narrower spectrum antibiotics or those begun at discharge), or (2) underwent drainage/debridement/amputation>72 h after admission. We limited attention to the 40 most commonly used antibiotic regimens in 2009. We compared clinical and economic outcomes of patients who experienced initial treatment failure and those who did not.

RESULTS

The rate of initial treatment failure was 16.6% in acute infections (n=13,498), 34.1% in chronic/ulcerative infections (n=1,116), and 26.7% in surgical site infections (SSIs) (n=2,929). Treatment failure was associated with 4.1-7.3 additional days in the hospital and $11,995-$23,655 in additional inpatient charges; the case fatality rate was from 4- to 12-fold higher in patients who experienced treatment failure than in those who did not (all comparisons, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Initial treatment failure in patients hospitalized for cSSSI is associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes, longer hospital stays, and higher hospital charges than with successful initial treatment.

Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria

Combination antibiotic therapy for invasive infections with Gram-negative bacteria is employed in many health care facilities, especially for certain subgroups of patients, including those with neutropenia, those with infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, those with ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the severely ill. An argument can be made for empiric combination therapy, as we are witnessing a rise in infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. The wisdom of continued combination therapy after an organism is isolated and antimicrobial susceptibility data are known, however, is more controversial. The available evidence suggests that the greatest benefit of combination antibiotic therapy stems from the increased likelihood of choosing an effective agent during empiric therapy, rather than exploitation of in vitro synergy or the prevention of resistance during definitive treatment. In this review, we summarize the available data comparing monotherapy versus combination antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infections with Gram-negative bacteria.

Antimicrobial therapy of sepsis and septic shock--when are two drugs better than one?

In clinical practice, physicians frequently use combination therapy despite the conflicting evidence for its effectiveness. The results of recent studies have contributed to our understanding of this important issue. In this article, we examine the evidence for, or against, the use of combination drug therapy compared with monotherapy in the management of serious infections, sepsis, and septic shock.

Meropenem in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic with excellent activity against many pathogens associated with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). At least three studies have shown meropenem to have good clinical efficacy and to be well tolerated in the treatment of cSSTIs. Two open-label studies compared meropenem 500 mg every 8 hours (total evaluable n=146) with imipenem/cilastatin 500mg every 6 hours (n=147). Clinical efficacy rates in evaluable patients 7–14 days after end of treatment were similar, 92% and 100% in meropenem-treated groups versus 89% and 100% in groups receiving imipenem/cilastatin. An additional prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluated meropenem 500mg every 8 hours (261 evaluable patients) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg every 8 hours (287 patients). Clinical efficacy rates of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin 7–28 days after end of treatment were 86.2% and 82.9%, respectively. Meropenem was well tolerated in all studies. Carbapenems are currently recommended as appropriate for initial treatment of certain cSSTIs such as those likely to involve mixed and/or multidrug-resistant pathogens. Meropenem is an effective and safe alternative for monotherapy when used for appropriate types of cSSTIs. Higher doses (ie, 1 g every 8 hours) should be considered for treatment of cSSTIs in higher-risk patients where Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a suspected or documented pathogen.

The human microbiome and surgical disease

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review article is to summarize what is currently known about microbes associated with the human body and to provide examples of how this knowledge impacts the care of surgical patients.

BACKGROUND

Pioneering research over the past decade has demonstrated that human beings live in close, constant contact with dynamic communities of microbial organisms. This new reality has wide-ranging implications for the care of surgical patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Recent advances in the culture-independent study of the human microbiome are reviewed. To illustrate the translational relevance of these studies to surgical disease, we discuss in detail what is known about the role of microbes in the pathogenesis of obesity, gastrointestinal malignancies, Crohn disease, and perioperative complications including surgical site infections and sepsis. The topics of mechanical bowel preparation and perioperative antibiotics are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Heightened understanding of the microbiome in coming years will likely offer opportunities to refine the prevention and treatment of a wide variety of surgical conditions.

Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from intra-abdominal infections and molecular characterization of ertapenem-resistant isolates

A total of 2,841 clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae from intra-abdominal infections worldwide were collected in the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) during 2008 and 2009. Overall, 22.4% of isolates had extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). The most active antibiotics among the 11 tested were imipenem, amikacin, and ertapenem, though even these, like all other comparators, were less consistently active against ESBL-positive isolates than against ESBL-negative isolates. Globally, 6.5% of isolates were ertapenem resistant based on the June 2010 clinical breakpoints published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, with MICs of ≥1 μg/ml. Molecular characterization of 43 isolates with ertapenem MICs of ≥4 μg/ml showed that they variously produced CTX-M or SHV ESBLs combined with altered impermeability and/or had KPC (n = 28), OXA-48 (n = 3), or VIM (n = 1) carbapenemases. Further monitoring of ertapenem susceptibility and molecular characterization of ertapenem-resistant isolates are needed.

[What should and should not be covered in intraabdominal infection]

Despite improvements in our knowledge of the physiopathology of severe infection, diagnostic methods, antibiotic therapy, postoperative care and surgical techniques, a substantial number of patients with intraabdominal infection (IAI) will develop advanced stages of septic insult requiring admission to the intensive care unit. The success of treatment of IAI is multifactorial and the best antibiotic protocol may be insufficient unless adequate control of the focus of infection has been achieved. The present article discusses the appropriacy of empirical antibiotic therapy and the main pathogens associated with treatment failure. We also analyze the patients at risk of infection with microorganisms requiring broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage. However, excessive antibiotic treatment, in terms of either spectrum or duration, could jeopardize future patients in an environment already threatened by the scarcity of research and development into new molecules required for the emergence of pathogens resistant to current antibiotics.

Resistance and the management of complicated skin and skin structure infections: the role of ceftobiprole

Antimicrobial resistant bacteria are an increasing concern due to the resulting increase in morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs associated with the administration of inadequate or delayed antimicrobial therapy. The implications of inadequate antimicrobial therapy in complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) have gained more attention recently, most likely due to the recent emergence of community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the already high prevalence of MRSA in the nosocomial setting. Due to the continuous threat of resistance arising and the limitations of currently available agents for the treatment of cSSSIs, it is necessary to develop new antimicrobials for this indication. Ceftobiprole medocaril, the prodrug of ceftobiprole, is a parental investigational cephalosporin for the treatment of cSSSIs displaying a wide-spectrum of activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, including MRSA. Ceftobiprole displays noncomplex linear pharmacokinetics, is eliminated primarily by glomerular filtration, and distributes to extracellular fluid. Additionally, it has been shown that the extent of distribution to the site of action with regard to cSSSIs, ie, the extracellular space fluid of subcutaneous adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, is expected to be efficacious, as free concentrations meet efficacy targets for most pathogens. Similar to other beta-lactams, it displays an excellent safety and tolerability profile with the primary adverse events being dysgeusia in healthy volunteers, resulting from the conversion of the prodrug to the active, and nausea in patients. Ceftobiprole has demonstrated noninferiority in two large-scale pivotal studies comparing it to vancomycin, clinical cure rates 93.3% vs 93.5%, respectively, or vancomycin plus ceftazidime, clinical cure rates 90.5% vs 90.2%, respectively. Given the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, ceftobiprole is a promising new agent for the treatment of cSSSIs and has the potential to be used as a single agent for empiric treatment.

Prevalence of fecal carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in patients with acute surgical abdominal infections

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide. The aims of the current study were to determine the fecal carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic treatment in surgical patients admitted to hospital due to acute intra-abdominal infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight Swedish surgical units participated in this prospective multicenter investigation. Rectal swabs were obtained on admission to hospital. Cultures were performed on chromogenic agar and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-phenotype was confirmed by Etest.

RESULTS

Rectal samples were obtained and analyzed from 208 patients with intra-abdominal surgical infections. Surgery was performed in 134 patients (65%). Cephalosporins were the most frequently used empirical antibiotic therapy. The highest rates of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae were detected for ampicillin (54%), tetracycline (26%), cefuroxime (26%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (20%). The prevalence of decreased susceptibility (I + R) for the other antibiotics tested was for ciprofloxacin 20%, piperacillin-tazobactam 17%, cefotaxime 14%, ertapenem 12%, gentamicin 3% and imipenem 0%. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were found in samples from 10 patients (5%). Three patients had five E. coli isolates producing AmpC enzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a high rate of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae against antibiotics which are commonly used in Sweden and should have implications for the future choice of antibiotics for surgical patients.

Antibiotic susceptibility of intra-abdominal infection isolates from Indian hospitals during 2008

A total of 542 clinical isolates of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli from intra-abdominal infections were collected during 2008 from seven hospitals in India participating in the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART). Isolates were from various infection sources, the most common being gall bladder (30.1 %) and peritoneal fluid (31.5 %), and were mostly hospital-associated isolates (70.8 %) as compared to community-acquired (26.9 %). The most frequently isolated pathogens were Escherichia coli (62.7 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7 %) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.3 %). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) rates in E. coli and K. pneumoniae were very high, at 67 % and 55 %, respectively. Most isolates exhibited resistance to one or more antibiotics. The most active drugs were generally ertapenem, imipenem and amikacin. However, hospital-acquired isolates in general, as well as ESBL-positive isolates, exhibited lower susceptibilities than community-acquired isolates. Further surveillance monitoring of intra-abdominal isolates from India is recommended.

Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Evidence-based guidelines for managing patients with intra-abdominal infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace those previously published in 2002 and 2003. The guidelines are intended for treating patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them. New information, based on publications from the period 2003-2008, is incorporated into this guideline document. The panel has also added recommendations for managing intra-abdominal infection in children, particularly where such management differs from that of adults; for appendicitis in patients of all ages; and for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.

Diagnosis and Management of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection in Adults and Children: Guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Evidence-based guidelines for managing patients with intra-abdominal infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace those previously published in 2002 and 2003. The guidelines are intended for treating patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them. New information, based on publications from the period 2003–2008, is incorporated into this guideline document. The panel has also added recommendations for managing intra-abdominal infection in children, particularly where such management differs from that of adults; for appendicitis in patients of all ages; and for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.

Economic consequences of failure of initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections

BACKGROUND

Initial antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) usually is empiric. We explored the economic consequences of failure of such therapy in this patient population.

METHODS

Using a large U.S. multi-institutional database, we identified all hospitalized adults admitted between April 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004; who had any cIAI; underwent laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess ("surgery"); and received intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Initial therapy was characterized in terms of all IV antibiotics received, on the day of or one day before initial surgery. Antibiotic failure was designated on the basis of the need for reoperation or receipt of other IV antibiotics postoperatively. Switches to narrower spectrum agents and changes in regimen prior to discharge with no other evidence of clinical failure were not counted as antibiotic failures. Using multivariable linear regression, duration of IV antibiotic therapy, hospital length of stay, and total inpatient charges were compared between patients who did and did not fail initial therapy. Mortality was compared using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 6,056 patients who met the study entrance criteria, 22.4% failed initial antibiotic therapy. Patients who failed received an additional 5.6 days of IV antibiotic therapy (10.4 total days [95% confidence interval 10.1, 10.8] days vs. 4.8 total days [4.8, 4.9] for those not failing), were hospitalized an additional 4.6 days (11.6 total days [11.3, 11.9] vs. 6.9 total days [6.8, 7.0], respectively), and incurred $6,368 in additional inpatient charges ($16,520 [$16,131, $16,919] vs. $10,152 [$10,027, $10,280]) (all, p < 0.01). They also were more likely to die in the hospital (9.5% vs. 1.3%; multivariable odds ratio 3.58 [95% confidence interval 2.53, 5.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

Failure of initial IV antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with cIAIs is associated with longer hospitalization, higher hospital charges, and a higher mortality rate.

Progress in medical management of intra-abdominal infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intra-abdominal infection management remains debated and evidence-based recommendations are often lacking despite numerous studies. These controversies are mainly explained by the limited number of powered and well designed randomized controlled trials. This review focuses on recent studies on antibiotic therapy for intra-abdominal infections and in particular for the management of severe acute pancreatitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

For community-acquired intra-abdominal infection, early source control and antibiotic selection are well codified. In severe forms, every hour of delay between shock and antibiotherapy initiation reduces hospital survival. Antibiotics dose adjustment and continuous intravenous administration are suggested in critically ill patients and for difficult-to-treat pathogens. Shorter antibiotic treatment duration seems to offer similar clinical cure rates compared with prolonged therapy and could reduce emergence of resistance. For multidrug-resistant bacteria, the newly developed agents indications need to be better defined. In severe acute pancreatitis, antibiotic prophylaxis does not prevent necrosis infection nor does it reduce surgery requirement or mortality. Antibiotics should be given on demand. Infectious complications in pancreatitis are not reduced by probiotic prophylaxis and mortality is increased.

SUMMARY

There is a growing evidence to support early, dose-adjusted, antimicrobial therapy in severe intra-abdominal infection, together with shorter treatment duration if source control is achieved. This could reduce emergence of resistance without affecting clinical cure rates. In severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis, antibiotic and probiotic prophylaxis to reduce infection or mortality should be avoided.

Predictors of mortality in patients with pyogenic liver abscess

BACKGROUND

Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) is uncommon but potentially life-threatening. The objective of this study was to identify the prognostic factors for PLA.

METHODS

The medical records of 253 patients, 148 men and 105 women with a mean age of 56.4 years (SD : 15.0 years), who were hospitalised due to a PLA between January 1995 and June 2007 were reviewed. The underlying medical disorders, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory values, imaging studies, microbiological features, treatments, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Factors related to in-hospital case fatality were analysed.

RESULTS

The mean Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at admission in patients with PLA was 8.7 points (SD 5.4 points). The most common co-existing disease was diabetes mellitus (41.9%), followed by biliary stone disorders (32.0%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequent pathogen, followed by Escherichia coli. The in-hospital case-fatality rate was 9.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed that gas-forming abscess (p=0.019), multi-drug resistant isolates (p=0.026), anaerobic infection (p=0.045), blood urea nitrogen level >7.86 mmol/l (p=0.004), and APACHE II score > or =15 (p= 0.004) were associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of PLA may depend chiefly on the severity of the basic physical condition and underlying pathology. As the primary treatment for PLA is not completely effective, a more aggressive approach should be considered, especially for patients with poor prognosis.

Meta-analysis: ertapenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections

BACKGROUND

Ertapenem is a new member of the carbapenem class of antibiotics, with a favourable pharmacokinetic profile, but a narrower spectrum of antimicrobial activity, compared with older representatives of this class.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ertapenem for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials identified in PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus that compared ertapenem with other antimicrobial regimens, in patients of all ages, with complicated intra-abdominal infections. The primary outcomes evaluated were clinical success (cure or improvement) in the modified intention-to-treat population and clinical adverse events.

RESULTS

Six randomized-controlled trials involving patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, mainly of mild-to-moderate severity (three with a double-blind design; one performed in children) that compared ertapenem treatment (once daily) against piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone plus metronidazole and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (in three, two and one randomized-controlled trials respectively) were included. No difference was found between adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections treated with ertapenem vs. comparators, regarding clinical success (five randomized-controlled trials, 2002 patients, fixed-effect model, odds ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-1.39); clinical adverse events (four randomized-controlled trials, 1530 patients, fixed-effect model, OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.61-1.20); microbiological success; mortality and withdrawals because of adverse events. Ertapenem was associated with more laboratory adverse events (four randomized-controlled trials, 1530 patients, fixed-effect model, OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.14-2.61), but none was reported as serious.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides additional evidence that ertapenem can be used as effectively and safely, as other recommended antimicrobial regimens, for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, particularly of mild-to-moderate severity.

Empiric therapy for secondary peritonitis: a pharmacodynamic analysis of cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline using Monte Carlo simulation

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate antibiotic therapy (ie, the selection of an empiric agent without activity against the responsible pathogen) of secondary peritonitis may result in poor patient outcomes. The selection of an appropriate agent can be challenging because of the emerging resistance of target organisms to commonly prescribed antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacodynamic analysis, using recent global surveillance data, of commonly prescribed antibiotic agents and a newer agent, tigecycline, indicated in 2005 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, to determine their probability for achieving microbiologic success against aerobic bacteria associated with secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

A 2-compartment model was constructed using pharmacokinetic data from critically ill patients and global surveillance data on MIC distributions for microorganisms encountered in secondary peritonitis. A Monte Carlo simulation of the modeled data was performed to determine drug-appropriate pharmacodynamic end points, including free-drug time above the MIC, steady-state concentration above the MIC, and AUC/MIC ratios. A cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against aerobic bacteria involved in secondary peritonitis was calculated for cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, levofloxacin, pip eracillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline. A CFR > or =90% was considered microbiologic success. The following treatment regimens, administered as 30-minute N infusions, were examined: cefepime 1 and 2 g q12h, ceftazidime 1 and 2 g q8h, ceftriaxone 1 and 2 g q24h, imipenem 500 mg q6h, levofloxacin 750 mg q24h, pip eracillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h, and tigecycline 50 mg q12h, after a loading dose of 100 mg.

RESULTS

A CFR > or =90% against nonenterococcal bacteria was predicted for imipenem 500 mg q6h (96.8%), cefepime 2 and 1 g q12h (95.3% and 92.4%, respectively), ceftazidime 2 g q8h (94.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h (91.2%). A CFR of 84.5% was predicted for tigecycline 50 mg q12h. Ceftriaxone and levofloxacin were predicted to have a CFR <80%. When enterococci were included in the model, the predicted CFRs for imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline were 93.4%, 88.4%, and 86.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

: MIC distribution and pathogen prevalence strongly influence the likelihood of microbiological success in secondary peritonitis; therefore, decisions regarding empiric therapy should consider local epidemiology. Using current global data, the following regimens are adequate choices if Enterococcus is not targeted: Combination therapy (with metronidazole) using cefepime 1 g or 2 g q12h, or ceftazidime 2 g q8h; or monotherapy with imipenem 500 mg q6h or piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g q6h. When Enterococcus is included in the epidemiologic mix, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline all appear to be viable monotherapeutic choices.

Tigecycline is efficacious in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections

BACKGROUND

Empiric treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) represents a clinical challenge because of the diverse bacteriology and the emergence of bacterial resistance. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline (TGC), a first-in-class, expanded broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, were compared with imipenem/cilastatin (IMI/CIS) in patients with cIAI.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, phase 3, multinational trial, patients were randomly assigned to intravenous (i.v.) TGC (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg every 12 h) or i.v. IMI/CIS (500/500 mg every 6 h) for 5-14 days. Clinical response was assessed at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (14-35 days after therapy) for microbiologically evaluable (ME) and microbiologically modified intent-to-treat (m-mITT) populations (co-primary efficacy endpoint populations in which cure/failure response rates were determined).

RESULTS

Of 817 mITT patients (i.e., received > or = 1 dose of study drug), 641 (78%) comprised the m-mITT cohort (322 TGC, 319 IMI/CIS) and 523 (64%) were ME (266 TGC, 256 IMI/CIS). Patients were predominantly white (88%) and male (59%) with a mean age of 49 years. The primary diagnoses for the mITT group were complicated appendicitis (41%), cholecystitis (22%), and intra-abdominal abscess (11%). For the ME population, clinical cure rates at TOC were 91.3% (242/265) for TGC versus 89.9% (232/258) for IMI/CIS (95% CI -4.0, 6.8; P<0.001). Corresponding clinical cure rates within the m-mITT population were 86.6% (279/322) for TGC versus 84.6% (270/319) for IMI/CIS (95% CI -3.7, 7.5; P<0.001 for noninferiority TGC versus IMI/CIS). The most commonly reported adverse events for TGC and IMI/CIS were nausea (17.6% TGC versus 13.3% IMI/CIS; P=0.100) and vomiting (12.6% TGC versus 9.2% IMI/CIS; P=0.144).

CONCLUSIONS

TGC is efficacious in the treatment of patients with cIAIs and TGC met per the protocol-specified statistical criteria for noninferiority to the comparator, IMI/CIS.

Consequences of inappropriate initial empiric parenteral antibiotic therapy among patients with community-acquired intra-abdominal infections in Spain

To assess the association between inappropriate antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes for complicated community-acquired intra-abdominal infections in Spain, patient records from October 1998 to August 2002 in 24 hospitals were reviewed. Initial empiric therapy was classified appropriate if all isolates were sensitive to at least 1 of the antibiotics administered. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess associations between appropriateness of therapy and patient outcomes. Healthcare resource use was measured as hospital length of stay (LOS) and d on intravenous antibiotic therapy. A total of 425 patients were included. Of these, 387 (91%) received appropriate initial empiric therapy. Patients on inappropriate therapy were less likely to have clinical success (79% vs 26%, p<0.001), more likely to require additional antibiotic therapy (40% vs 7%, p<0.01) and more likely to be re-hospitalized within 30 d of discharge (18% vs 3%, p<0.01). Multivariate analyses also showed that inappropriate therapy was associated with an almost 16% increase in LOS (p<0.05) and 26% in d of intravenous antibiotic therapy compared with appropriate therapy (p<0.05). Inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy was associated with a significantly higher proportion of unsuccessful patient outcomes (including death, re-operation, re-hospitalization or additional parental antibiotic therapies), increased length of stay and length on therapy.

Predictors of efficacy and health resource utilization in treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: evidence for pooled clinical studies comparing tigecycline with imipenem-cilastatin

BACKGROUND

Duration of intravenous (IV) treatment, surgical/radiologic interventions for infection control, and hospital length of stay (LOS) are important cost considerations in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs).

METHODS

Data were pooled from two multinational, double-blind studies conducted in hospitalized adults with cIAIs who were randomized (1:1) to receive tigecycline (100 mg IV initial dose then 50 mg IV every 12 h) or imipenem-cilastatin (500 mg IV every 6 h) for 5 to 14 days in order to assess tigecycline safety and efficacy. This report focuses on developing predictors of cure and health care resource utilization, including the need for repeat surgical/radiologic interventions, duration of IV antibiotic therapy, and hospital LOS. Multiple regression models were applied for each of the above outcomes, incorporating both baseline and on-treatment potential covariates. Logistic modeling was used for categorical outcomes (cure; repeat surgical/radiologic interventions) and least squares modeling for continuous outcomes (duration of IV antibiotic therapy; LOS). Stepwise selection was used to retain only those predictors found to be significant (p < 0.05) independent risk factors.

RESULTS

The most common causative pathogen was Escherichia coli (63.0%), with 63.3% of the patients exhibiting polymicrobial infections. The most common cIAI diagnosis was complicated appendicitis (51.9%). Lack of clinical cure (+ 6.1 days; p < 0.0001), perforation of the intestine (+3.7 days; p < 0.0001), an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score >15 (+3.1 days; p=0.039), abnormal plasma sodium concentration (+3.7 days; p=0.026), and repeat surgical/radiologic intervention (+2.2 days; p=0.0097) were identified as key risk factors for longer LOS. Inadequate source control was associated with reduced odds of cure, longer IV treatment duration (+1.5 days; p=0.007), and longer LOS. The treatment groups did not differ in terms of LOS, IV treatment duration, or clinical cure.

CONCLUSION

Tigecycline was similar to imipenem-cilastatin in terms of both efficacy and health resource utilization. Risk factors identified in this study for both outcome measures are offered as support for guiding clinical practice.

Evaluating Empiric Treatment Options for Secondary Peritonitis Using Pharmacodynamic Profiling

BACKGROUND

Selecting an appropriate agent for empiric antibiotic therapy for secondary peritonitis is challenging. The pathogens responsible, aerobic gram-negative bacilli in particular, are becoming more resistant to antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to predict the ability of common antimicrobial regimens to achieve optimal pharmacodynamic exposure against aerobic bacteria implicated in secondary peritonitis, while considering current national resistance trends.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulation was used to model pharmacodynamic endpoints and compare the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin against isolates of species associated with secondary peritonitis. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions for isolates collected in North America were obtained from the 2004 MYSTIC database. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the literature; the endpoints evaluated included free drug time above the MIC (fT(>MIC)) and the area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (AUC:MIC).

RESULTS

The simulation predicted that several compounds would have a superior probability of providing appropriate coverage of aerobic bacteria: Imipenem-cilastatin (98.6% CFR at 1 g q8h), meropenem (98.2% CFR at 1 g q8h), ertapenem (91.7% CFR at 1 g q24h), piperacillin/ tazobactam (93.7% CFR at 3.375 g q6h), ceftazidime (91.1% CFR at 2 g q8h), and cefepime (92.9% CFR at 1 g q12h and 95.8% CFR at 2 g q12h). Ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin exhibited CFRs < 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering contemporary susceptibility data for aerobic bacteria, monotherapy with any of the three carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h would provide optimal exposure for the pathogens commonly encountered in secondary peritonitis. Cefepime (in combination with metronidazole to provide anti-anaerobic coverage) also would be an acceptable choice, as would ceftazidime given at 2 g q8h (again in combination with metronidazole). Despite the popularity of combination therapy based on ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or ceftriaxone with metronidazole, these choices appear to be inferior to the other options because of emerging antibiotic resistance, particularly in E. coli.

Intra-abdominal infections: considerations for the use of the carbapenems

Intra-abdominal infection remains a common and frequently severe medical condition, carrying with it significant morbidity and mortality. These infections are almost always polymicrobial in nature as they are caused by mixed aerobic/anaerobic intestinal flora. Despite substantial improvements in both the medical and surgical management of these infections over the last several decades, there remains an opportunity to further enhance the utilization of adjunctive antibiotic therapy. As a result of the epidemiology and the current resistance profile of the infecting pathogens, the carbapenems represent a class of antibiotics that are considered appropriate for the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. This review will discuss the classification and microbiology of these infections and emerging resistance in the pathogens of interest. The review also and focuses on the role of the carbapenems in the management of the constellation of diseases known as intra-abdominal infection.

[Selection and use of anti-infective agents for intra-abdominal infections]

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal infections are common and are associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. The microorganisms that cause intra-abdominal infections are usually from the gastrointestinal flora, mainly E. coli and Bacteroides fragilis.

AIM

To present a review of the selection and use of antibiotics in intra-abdominal infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate use of antibiotics is essential to control infection and to reduce treatment failure. Antibiotics are initiated whenever intra-abdominal infection is suspected and the antimicrobial agents are selected based on the most common microorganisms involved. In addition, efficacy, cost, safety, and posologic regimen are considered for an appropriated selection. Antibiotic regimen is different whether the infection is acquired in the community or at hospital due to the more resistant flora in the latter.

Ciprofloxacin/metronidazole versus β-lactam-based treatment of intra-abdominal infections: a meta-analysis of comparative trials

Intra-abdominal infections are polymicrobial and result in substantial morbidity and mortality. The combination of ciprofloxacin/metronidazole as well as several beta-lactam-based regimens are among the commonly used regimens for the treatment of patients with such infections. Thus, we sought to review the evidence from available comparative clinical trials studying ciprofloxacin/metronidazole versus broad-spectrum beta-lactam-based regimens in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Studies for the meta-analysis were retrieved from searches of the PubMed database. Five available comparative trials (four randomised controlled trials and one non-randomised comparative trial) including 1431 patients with intra-abdominal infections were included in the meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant difference between the compared arms with regard to cure in favour of the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole combination (odds ratio (OR)=1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.39). There was no statistically significant difference between the compared arms with regard to total mortality (OR=1.10, 95% CI 0.71-1.69), mortality attributable to infection (OR=1.42, 95% CI 0.66-3.06) and toxicity (OR=1.25, 95% CI 0.66-2.35). In conclusion, pooled data from the available comparative trials suggest that the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole combination may be superior to beta-lactam-based therapeutic regimens in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections with regard to cure of infections, although no difference in mortality was found.

Randomized controlled trial of moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of sequential intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) moxifloxacin treatment against a standard antimicrobial regimen of IV piperacillin-tazobactam followed by PO amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

cIAIs are commonly due to mixed aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and require both source control and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase III comparative trial. Patients with cIAI were stratified by disease severity (APACHE II score) and randomized to either IV/PO moxifloxacin (400 mg q24 hours) or comparator (IV piperacillin-tazobactam [3.0/0.375 g q6 hours] +/- PO amoxicillin-clavulanate [800 mg/114 mg q12 hours]), each for 5 to 14 days. The primary efficacy variable was clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit (days 25-50). Bacteriologic outcomes were also determined.

RESULTS

: Of 656 intent-to-treat patients, 379 (58%) were valid to assess efficacy (183 moxifloxacin, 196 comparator). Demographic and baseline medical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Clinical cure rates at test-of-cure were 80% (146 of 183) for moxifloxacin versus 78% (153 of 196) for comparator (95% confidence interval, -7.4%, 9.3%). The clinical cure rate at test-of-cure for hospital-acquired cIAI was higher with moxifloxacin (82%, 22 of 27) versus comparator (55%, 17 of 31; P = 0.05); rates were similar for community-acquired infections (80% [124 of 156] versus 82% [136 of 165], respectively). Bacterial eradication rates were 78% (117 of 150) with moxifloxacin versus 77% (126 of 163) in the comparator group (95% confidence interval, -9.9%, 8.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Once daily IV/PO moxifloxacin monotherapy was as least as effective as standard IV piperacillin-tazobactam/PO amoxicillin-clavulanate dosed multiple times daily for the treatment of cIAIs.