Bedside burr hole for intracranial pressure monitoring performed by intensive care physicians. A 5-year experience

Multimodal Neuromonitoring in Pediatric Neurocritical Care: Current Perspectives

Children with neurological illness in the critical care unit are always at higher risk of developing secondary brain injury (SBI). Brain insult can lead to changes in cerebral autoregulation, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral oxygenation, and metabolism. This can cause a raised ICP, cerebral ischemia, hypoxia, excitotoxicity, cellular energy failure, and nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Simultaneous and continuous assessment of these parameters will help to improve patient care and neurological outcomes. Even though clinical examination and neuroimaging can help in the initial diagnosis of the neurological illness, they may not be helpful in continuous monitoring of cerebral pathophysiological changes. The ideal single neuromonitoring device to detect these real-time changes is currently unavailable. However, a range of invasive and noninvasive monitors are available to monitor these cerebral functional parameters. Invasive monitoring techniques include invasive ICP monitoring, cerebral autoregulation monitoring, brain tissue partial oxygen pressure, and cerebral microdialysis. Noninvasive-monitoring techniques include pupillometry, brain and ocular ultrasonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, and electrophysiological monitoring. Multimodal (MM) neuromonitoring involves incorporating these techniques and tools for the early identification and treatment of primary and secondary brain insults. The utility and feasibility of most of these techniques are well described in adult neurocritical care. Even though the evidence on their usage in children is primarily available in pediatric traumatic brain injury, the emerging data help to further expand their utility in pediatric nontraumatic coma. MM neuromonitoring aims to provide clinical and pathophysiological information to the intensivists to improve their understanding of the child's neurological status and to formulate patient-specific treatment approaches.

Management of intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury: a best clinical practice adoption proposal for intracranial pressure monitoring and decompressive craniectomy. Joint statements by the Traumatic Brain Injury Section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch) and the Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care Study Group of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)

No robust evidence is provided by literature regarding the management of intracranial hypertension following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is mostly due to the lack of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the presence of studies containing extreme heterogeneously collected populations and controversial considerations about chosen outcome. A scientific society should provide guidelines for care management and scientific support for those areas for which evidence-based medicine has not been identified. However, RCTs in severe TBI have failed to establish intervention effectiveness, arising the need to make greater use of tools such as Consensus Conferences between experts, which have the advantage of providing recommendations based on experience, on the analysis of updated literature data and on the direct comparison of different logistic realities. The Italian scientific societies should provide guidelines following the national laws ruling the best medical practice. However, many limitations do not allow the collection of data supporting high levels of evidence for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with severe TBI. This intersociety document proposes best practice guidelines for this subsetting of patients to be adopted on a national Italian level, along with joint statements from "TBI Section" of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch) endorsed by the Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care Study Group of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). Presented here is a recap of recommendations on management of ICP and DC supported a high level of available evidence and rate of agreement expressed by the assemblies during the more recent consensus conferences, where members of both groups have had a role of active participants and supporters. The listed recommendations have been sent to a panel of experts consisting of the 107 members of the "TBI Section" of the SINch and the 111 members of the Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care Study Group of the SIAARTI. The aim of the survey was to test a preliminary evaluation of the grade of predictable future adherence of the recommendations following this intersociety proposal. The following recommendations are suggested as representing best clinical practice, nevertheless, adoption of local multidisciplinary protocols regarding thresholds of ICP values, drug therapies, hemostasis management and perioperative care of decompressed patients is strongly recommended to improve treatment efficiency, to increase the quality of data collection and to provide more powerful evidence with future studies. Thus, for this future perspective a rapid overview of the role of the multimodal neuromonitoring in the optimal severe TBI management is also provided in this document. It is reasonable to assume that the recommendations reported in this paper will in future be updated by new observations arising from future trials. They are not binding, and this document should be offered as a guidance for clinical practice through an intersociety agreement, taking in consideration the low level of evidence.

Direct cost comparison of minimally invasive punch technique versus traditional approaches for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices

Background

Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) was recently described as a new technique to facilitate the placement of percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.

The procedure has resulted in a simplification of the surgical steps and a dramatic reduction in surgical time while maintaining excellent patient outcomes. Given these developments, our group sought to move the procedure from the main operating suite where they have traditionally been performed. This study aims to test the null hypothesis that MIPS and open approaches have the same direct costs for the implantation of percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices in a Canadian public hospital setting.

Methods

A retrospective direct cost comparison of MIPS and open approaches for the implantation of bone conduction implants was conducted. Indirect and future costs were not included in the fiscal analysis.

A simple cost comparison of the two approaches was made considering time, staff and equipment needs. All 12 operations were performed on adult patients from 2013 to 2016 by the same surgeon at a single hospital site.

Results

MIPS has a total mean reduction in cost of CAD$456.83 per operation from the hospital perspective when compared to open approaches. The average duration of the MIPS operation was 7 min, which is on average 61 min shorter compared with open approaches.

Conclusion

The MIPS technique was more cost effective than traditional open approaches. This primarily reflects a direct consequence of a reduction in surgical time, with further contributions from reduced staffing and equipment costs. This simple, quick intervention proved to be feasible when performed outside the main operating room. A blister pack of required equipment could prove convenient and further reduce costs.

Cerebral Autoregulation-oriented Therapy at the Bedside

This comprehensive review summarizes the evidence regarding use of cerebral autoregulation-directed therapy at the bedside and provides an evaluation of its impact on optimizing cerebral perfusion and associated functional outcomes. Multiple studies in adults and several in children have shown the feasibility of individualizing mean arterial blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure goals by using cerebral autoregulation monitoring to calculate optimal levels. Nine of these studies examined the association between cerebral perfusion pressure or mean arterial blood pressure being above or below their optimal levels and functional outcomes. Six of these nine studies (66%) showed that patients for whom median cerebral perfusion pressure or mean arterial blood pressure differed significantly from the optimum, defined by cerebral autoregulation monitoring, were more likely to have an unfavorable outcome. The evidence indicates that monitoring of continuous cerebral autoregulation at the bedside is feasible and has the potential to be used to direct blood pressure management in acutely ill patients.

Predictors of Outcome With Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare cerebral autoregulation indices as predictors of patient outcome and their dependence on duration of monitoring.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic literature search and meta-analysis using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to October 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

We chose articles that assessed the association between cerebral autoregulation indices and dichotomized or continuous outcomes reported as standardized mean differences or correlation coefficients (R), respectively. Animal and validation studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors collected and assessed the data independently. The studies were grouped into two sets according to the type of analysis used to assess the relationship between cerebral autoregulation indices and predictors of outcome (standardized mean differences or R).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-three studies compared cerebral autoregulation indices and patient outcomes using standardized mean differences, and 20 used Rs. The only data available for meta-analysis were from patients with traumatic brain injury or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Based on z score analysis, the best three cerebral autoregulation index predictors of mortality or Glasgow Outcome Scale for patients with traumatic brain injury were the pressure reactivity index, transcranial Doppler-derived mean velocity index based on cerebral perfusion pressure, and autoregulation reactivity index (z scores: 8.97, 6.01, 3.94, respectively). Mean velocity index based on arterial blood pressure did not reach statistical significance for predicting outcome measured as a continuous variable (p = 0.07) for patients with traumatic brain injury. For patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, autoregulation reactivity index was the only cerebral autoregulation index that predicted patient outcome measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale as a continuous outcome (R = 0.82; p = 0.001; z score, 3.39). We found a significant correlation between the duration of monitoring and predictive value for mortality (R = 0.78; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Three cerebral autoregulation indices, pressure reactivity index, mean velocity index based on cerebral perfusion pressure, and autoregulation reactivity index were the best outcome predictors for patients with traumatic brain injury. For patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, autoregulation reactivity index was the only cerebral autoregulation index predictor of Glasgow Outcome Scale. Continuous assessment of cerebral autoregulation predicted outcome better than intermittent monitoring.

Bedside burr hole for intracranial pressure monitoring performed by pediatric intensivists in children with CNS infections in a resource-limited setting: 10-year experience at a single center

OBJECTIVE

Intracranial pressure monitoring can help in early identification of raised intracranial pressure and in setting more informed goals for treatment. We describe our 10-year experience of bedside burr holes performed by pediatric intensivists to establish intracranial pressure monitoring in children with CNS infections in a resource-limited setting and the technical difficulties and complications encountered.

DESIGN

Descriptive study of prospectively recorded data.

SETTING

PICU of a tertiary care academic institute.

PATIENTS

Consecutive comatose patients with raised intracranial pressure who underwent intracranial pressure monitoring from 2004 to 2013.

INTERVENTION

An intraparenchymal (1.2 mm) or an intraventricular transducer (3.4 mm) (Codman) was placed by a pediatric intensivist through a micro burr hole using a standard protocol. Technical difficulties during the procedure and complications were recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Over 10 years, 265 intracranial pressure catheters were placed in 259 patients, mainly for acute CNS infections (n = 242, 93.4%). Median age of patients was 4.8 years, youngest being 6 weeks; 21 patients (8.1%) were younger than 1 year. Intraparenchymal transducer was used in 252 patients (97.3%). Median (interquartile range) duration of intracranial pressure monitoring was 96 hours (72-144 hr). Complications were seen in 3.5% of patients (n = 9/259); the incidence was 0.28 per 1,000 hours of intracranial pressure monitoring. Procedure-related ventriculitis occurred in three of seven patients (42.8%) with intraventricular catheter, in contrast to none in patients with intraparenchymal transducer. Overall mortality was 32.8% (n = 85). On Cox-regression analysis, "blood component therapy" was an independent predictor of poor outcome defined as death or severe neurodisability (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.16-2.16; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In a resource-limited setting, pediatric intensivists can safely and successfully perform burr holes at bedside for establishing intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitoring in children with acute CNS infections. However, our data do not support placement of ventriculostomy catheters by pediatric intensivists in similar settings.

Clinical and radiological findings in long-term intracranial pressure monitoring

BACKGROUND

Advantages of telemetric devices for long-term intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement have been mentioned several times in the literature. However, descriptions of associated complications are lacking. Therefore, the presented observational study focused on clinical and radiological findings after insertion of an intraparenchymal telemetric ICP monitor.

METHODS

Between April 2010 and February 2013, 185 telemetric ICP catheters were implanted for diagnostic purposes. All patients were clinically followed. Radiological, microbiological and clinical data were analysed.

RESULTS

One brain abscess (0.5 %) and two cutaneous infections (1.1 %) occurred in 185 patients. Staphylococcus spp. could be detected in all cases. Six patients (3.2 %) suffered from single new-onset seizures and one patient (0.5 %) from a temporary hemiparesis. Intracerebral haemorrhages occurred in 15.6 %, most of the time as small punctate bleedings. Perifocal oedematous reactions surrounding inserted telemetric catheters could be observed in 46.9 %. Multiple imaging studies revealed a tendency of complete oedema resolution over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Infectious as well as haemorrhagic complication rates are well comparable with the common literature. The long-term implantation of an ICP probe does not seem to increase the risk of wound infections or brain abscess formation. Surprisingly, very high numbers of oedematous reactions after insertion of the intraparenchymal ICP monitor were seen. Reasons therefore could only be speculated upon.

The effectiveness of specialist neuroscience care in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

UK trauma services are currently undergoing reconfiguration, but the optimum management pathway for head-injured patients is uncertain. We therefore performed a systematic review to assess the effects of routine inter-hospital transfer and specialist neuroscience care on mortality and disability in patients with non-surgical severe traumatic brain injury injured nearest to a non-specialist acute hospital.

METHODS

A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42012002021) and review methodology followed Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. A peer reviewed search strategy was implemented in an exhaustive range of information sources, including all major bibliographic databases, between 1973 and July 2013. Selection of eligible studies, extraction of relevant data and bias assessment were then performed by two independent reviewers. In the absence of homogeneous effect estimates at low risk of bias a narrative synthesis was pre-specified.

RESULTS

Four cohort studies, including a total of 4688 patients, were identified as potentially eligible after screening and bias assessment. Confounding by indication, arising from selective transfer of less severely injured patients, was the main limitation of included studies, with overall risk of bias rated as high for both mortality and disability effect estimates. Adjusted odds ratios for mortality favoured secondary transfer, ranging from 1.92 (95% CI 1.25-2.95) to 2.09 (95% CI 1.59-2.74). No convincing association was observed between non-specialist care and unfavourable outcome with a conditional odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI 0.36-3.6).

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence supporting a strategy of secondary transfer of severe non-surgical traumatic brain injury patients to specialist neuroscience centres. Randomised controlled trials powered to detect clinically plausible treatment effects should be considered to definitively investigate effectiveness.

Local skull trephination before transfer is associated with favorable outcomes in cerebral herniation from epidural hematoma

OBJECTIVES

The patient with epidural hematoma and cerebral herniation has a good prognosis with immediate drainage, but a poor prognosis with delay to decompression. Such patients who present to nonneurosurgical hospitals are commonly transferred without drainage to the nearest neurosurgical center. This practice has never been demonstrated to be the safest approach to treating these patients. A significant minority of emergency physicians (EPs) have advised and taught bedside burr hole drainage or skull trephination before transfer for herniating patients. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of nonneurosurgeon drainage on neurologic outcome in patients with cerebral herniation from epidural hematoma.

METHODS

A structured literature review was performed using EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Emergency Medicine Abstracts database.

RESULTS

No evidence meeting methodologic criteria was found describing outcomes in patients transferred without decompressive procedures. For patients receiving local drainage before transfer, 100% had favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the total number of patients is small and the population highly selected, the natural history of cerebral herniation from epidural hematoma and the best available evidence suggests that herniating patients have improved outcomes with drainage procedures before transport.

What is the Best Outcome from Severe Head Injury?

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains the commonest cause of death in the first four decades of life, accounting for 15–20% of deaths between 5 and 35 years.1 There is a ten-fold greater mortality in trauma patients with a head injury compared to those without.2 The effects of head injury for survivors, their families and for society can be devastating; TBI is the cause of severe disability for 150–200 people per million annually.3,4 Perhaps it is better if we do nothing, don't contact the neurosurgeons, don't admit them to specialist units, don't treat the pneumonia that develops – keep them comfortable, allow them some dignity? Or is this a situation where therapeutic nihilism leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy of poor outcome?

Intracranial pressure monitoring

Recent studies have demonstrated that bedside cranial burr hole and insertion of intraparenchymal catheters for intracranial pressure monitoring performed by intensive care physicians is a safe procedure, with a complication rate comparable to other series published by neurosurgeons. The overall morbidity rate is comparable to, or even lower than, that caused by central vein catheterization. The procedure is also quite simple and modern disposable intracranial procedural kits are available. After the skin is prepped the landmark for skin incision, called the 'Kocher's point', located about 2-4 cm lateral to the midline (mid-pupillary line) and 2-3 cm anterior to the coronal suture, is found. Then the surgical field is prepared with the sterile drapes and the skin infiltrated with local anaesthetic (0.5% lidocaine with 1 : 200000 epinephrine). After skin incision and retraction of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, the periosteum should be scraped off in order expose the skull. The skin is then divaricated, exposing the underlying bone. The hole is drilled with either an electric drill or a twist drill (the drilling procedure must be performed with the drill held within 10 degrees of the perpendicular position to the incision site). The hole is then irrigated with sterile saline and an 18-G spinal needle may be used to open the dura (exercise caution when perforating the dura so as to avoid damage to the underlying structures). Following opening of the dura, the Bolt, containing a stylet, is screwed manually into the skull at approximately 5 mm to 1 cm for adults. The stylet is then removed after the bolt has been screwed in, after which the bolt should be filled with saline. Finally, the zeroing of the transducer is performed by simply holding the tip in air while zeroing on the monitor. The transducer is inserted inside the bolt and the screw tightened. The intracranial pressure value can then be read.

A survey of ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitor placement practices

BACKGROUND

Over the past 3 decades, the incidence of ICP monitoring has consistently increased and the indications for placement have expanded. Although ventriculostomy and ICP monitor placement are among the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures, few studies have examined the current practice patterns of these procedures.

METHODS

A 10-question survey was sent to 3100 practicing neurosurgeons and a similar 11-question survey to 720 neurosurgery residents. Basic demographic information and estimated rates of proper ventriculostomy placement were sought.

RESULTS

Nine hundred thirty-four practicing neurosurgeons and 100 neurosurgery residents responded to our survey. Respondents estimated a mean of 1.4 passes per ventriculostomy procedure for practicing neurosurgeons, 1.4 for senior residents, and 2.4 for junior residents. Estimated rate of successful cannulation of the ipsilateral ventricle ranged from 72% to 84% for these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey gives a sketch of the current state of practice and the attitudes of practitioners toward the placement procedure. Both residents and practicing neurosurgeons admit to frequently using multiple passes and frequent catheter placement outside the ipsilateral frontal horn. Despite these imperfections, survey respondents were reluctant to embrace technology that could improve placement accuracy if it increased procedure time. Intracranial pressure monitor placement is an ideal topic for prospective study. The prevalence of the procedure would allow the morbidity associated with various monitors and emerging technologies to be quickly and accurately established. Results of such study could be applied to the tens of thousands of patients undergoing these procedures annually.

A Crisis in the Delivery of Care to Patients With Brain Injuries in South Texas

BACKGROUND

To determine the opinions of neurosurgeons regarding the care of the injured and to assess the impact of these attitudes on the care of the patients with brain injuries.

METHODS

A survey was sent to the 2,465 active members of the American Association of Neurologic Surgeons. A manpower assessment of neurosurgical coverage of South Texas was also performed.

RESULTS

In total, 872 surveys were returned (35%). Seventy-one percent of the respondents were over the age of 44. Eighty-seven percent of neurosurgeons stated that they currently provide trauma care: 74% at Level I or II trauma centers. The majority of neurosurgeons treated <5 trauma patients per week, 80% placed 2 or fewer intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors per month. Fifty-nine percent of the respondents preferred not to treat trauma patients because of (1) perceived increased medicolegal risk (80%), (2) conflict with elective practice (75%), (3) time required (70%), and (4) inadequate compensation (65%). Fifty-six percent received no compensation for trauma call. The majority of neurosurgeons indicated that no personnel other than neurosurgeons should be allowed to perform trauma craniotomies (90%) or insert ICP monitors (76%). However, 61% thought that non-neurosurgeons should be able to perform neuro-critical care. A maldistribution of neurosurgeons was identified in South Texas, with much of the population uncovered for trauma care. Significant delays in definitive neurosurgical care were identified as a result of this maldistribution.

CONCLUSIONS

One-half of neurosurgeons prefer not to care for trauma patients because of perceived added time commitment, conflicts with elective practice, lack of compensation, and perceived medicolegal risk. But, they thought that only neurosurgeons should provide emergency neurosurgical procedures. These attitudes appear to impinge on the care of the patients with brain injuries in South Texas.

Intracranial pressure monitoring: why monitor?

Evidence suggests that the mortality and morbidity of acquired brain injury could be reduced if clinicians used an aggressive intracranial pressure guided approach to care. Despite nearly 50 years of evidence that intracranial pressure monitoring benefits patient care, only about half of the patients who could benefit are monitored. Some clinicians express concerns regarding risks such as bleeding, infections, and inaccuracy of the technology. Others cite cost as the reason. This article discusses the risks and benefits of intracranial pressure monitoring and the current state of evidence of why patients should be monitored.

Placement of Intracranial Pressure Monitors: Are ???Normal??? Coagulation Parameters Necessary?

INTRODUCTION

Patients with head injuries frequently have abnormal coagulation studies. Monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) in head injured patients is common practice, but no best practice guidelines exist for coagulation parameters for ICP monitor placement.

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that hemorrhagic complication rates from ICP monitor placement are low and that the use of FFP to correct coagulation parameters to "normal" is not indicated.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 3 year period, who underwent fiberoptic intraparenchymal ICP monitoring was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were coagulation studies (prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), international normalized ratio (INR), platelet count) before ICP monitor placement and head CT scans to assess for hemorrhage before and after monitor placement. Data collected included age, Glasgow coma score (GCS), head region abbreviated injury score (H_AIS), time to ICP monitor placement, complications and outcomes.

RESULTS

From 8/1/00 through 7/31/03, 5163 trauma patients were admitted, and 157 met inclusion criteria. Patients were stratified by INR, at the time of ICP placement as normal (0.8-1.2, 103 patients), borderline (1.3-1.6, 42 patients) and increased (>/=1.7, 12 patients). There was no difference between the groups in age, gender or H_AIS. Twenty two patients had component therapy to correct coagulopathy before ICP insertion, but 10 had INRs in the borderline group and 12 remained with INRs >/=1.7. Eleven patients had platelet counts 50,000-100,000 at ICP monitor placement, despite platelet transfusions. Time from admission to ICP monitor placement was significantly longer in patients who received component therapy (19.2 +/- 19.7 hours versus 8.8 +/- 13.9 hours, p < 0.002). Three patients had clinically insignificant, petechial hemorrhages (1.9%); one in each group, with INRs of 1.2, 1.3, and 2.5, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with INR </=1.6, hemorrhagic complications after ICP monitor placement were infrequent. The use of FFP to "normalize" INR below this threshold is not supported by this data and delays monitor placement.

Neurosurgical aspects of critical care neurology

The management of the pediatric neurosurgical patient requires a detailed understanding of the diagnosis and management of disorders of ICP. Frequently the care of these patients will require collaboration between several different teams of physicians. Most important, frequent and clear communication between the ICU physician and the neurosurgeon will facilitate the delivery of the best-quality care to these children. This chapter will identify and discuss issues relevant to neurosurgeons and intensive care physicians taking care of children with complex problems related increased intracranial pressure.

Training Protocol for Intracranial Pressure Monitor Placement by Nonneurosurgeons: 5-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

This report evaluates a protocol for training nonneurosurgeon medical staff to perform ventricular catheter placement for ICP monitoring in traumatic brain injury and other appropriate patients under the guidance of neurosurgeons.

METHODS

Eleven neurosurgery house officers were enrolled in the program to be certified for ventricular catheter placement. The training program using the Ghajar Guide is described as well as the preprocedural checklist. The results of these certified house officers were tracked over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Ten house officers successfully completed the certification process for ventricular catheter placement in a total of 106 patients. The majority of ventricular catheters were placed at the bedside. The reported results and the complication rates of catheter-related infections and intracranial hemorrhage are similar to that of neurosurgeons or neurosurgeons in training.

CONCLUSION

House officers under the guidance of neurosurgeons can be trained to successfully and safely place ventricular catheters for ICP monitoring in patients needing ICP monitoring.

Drug-induced iatrogenic intraparenchymal hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage is bleeding into the brain parenchyma with possible extension into the ventricles and subarachnoid space. Each year, approximately 37,000 to 52,400 people suffer from intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) in the United States. This rate is expected to rise dramatically in the next few decades as a result of the increasing age of the population and a change in racial demographics. IPH accounts for 8% to 13% of all stroke cases and is associated with the highest mortality rate.

Bedside invasive monitoring techniques in severe brain-injured patients

In patients with severe brain injury, brain edema, elevated intracranial pressure, and cerebral ischemia are accountable for a significant morbidity and mortality. New invasive methods of monitoring attempt to foresee the physiopathological mechanisms responsible for the production of secondary brain injuries. The available methods for monitoring severely brain-injured patients, their potential usefulness, advantages, and disadvantages are reviewed.

How well do neurosurgeons care for trauma patients? A survey of the membership of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the trauma community's perceptions about neurosurgeons' involvement in trauma.

METHODS

Mail survey of the membership of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

RESULTS

The response rate was 33.6% (280 of 833 mailings). Eighty-four percent of respondents practiced in an academic setting, and 51% reported that neurosurgery residents were available in their hospitals at night and on weekends. Approximately 60% reported that neurosurgeons were in charge of the care of adults with isolated head injuries (HIs) who had been operated on. A similar percentage thought that neurosurgeons should be in charge of such patients' care. Only 31.5% indicated that neurosurgeons were in charge if no operation had been performed (P < 0.001 versus patients who had been operated on), but 42.1% thought that neurosurgeons should be in charge of patients who had not been operated on (P < 0.001 versus neurosurgeons who actually were in charge of such patients). The same question was asked with regard to adults with both HIs and systemic injuries and with regard to children with HIs with and without systemic injuries. In general, the actuality of a leadership role for neurosurgeons depended on whether a craniotomy had been performed, and it was believed that more neurosurgeons should be in charge than actually were in charge of patients with HIs. Reluctance to insert intracranial pressure monitors was the most commonly reported problem (44.8% of respondents) with regard to neurosurgeons' care of patients with HIs. All problems were reported to be significantly more common when in-house neurosurgery residents were not available. More than 40% of respondents indicated that non-neurosurgeons should be allowed to insert intracranial pressure monitors, and 14% thought that non-neurosurgeons should be allowed to perform trauma craniotomies. These opinions were strongly associated with the reporting of problems in neurosurgeons' performance in these areas (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Neurosurgeons frequently yield responsibility for managing patients with HIs to other specialists, but more frequent leadership of neurosurgeons in this area would be welcome. Reported problems with neurosurgical care of trauma patients may be related to a lack of immediate availability of neurosurgeons, such as the absence of in-house neurosurgery residents at night. Failure of neurosurgeons to address perceived deficiencies in their care of trauma patients may lead to serious erosion of the central role of neurosurgeons in managing patients with HIs.

Limits of intermittent jugular bulb oxygen saturation monitoring in the management of severe head trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a prospective, observational study, whether bilateral monitoring of jugular bulb oxyhemoglobin saturation (SjO2), in addition to standard monitoring, results in modification of the management of severe head trauma.

METHODS

The patients underwent bilateral jugular bulb cannulation and observation at 8-hour intervals, during which SjO2 was measured and the neurological condition and physiological variables were assessed. The study group was responsible for evaluating whether the physician's decision-making process was influenced by the detection of SjO2 abnormalities. The SjO2 discrepancy in simultaneous bilateral samples was also evaluated to determine whether it interfered with the interpretation of data and with clinical decision-making. The SjO2-related complications were monitored.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent 319 observations. In 96% of patients, SjO2 was normal or high and had no influence on the diagnostic or therapeutic strategies. Treatment decisions were dictated by changes in clinical status and in intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure. When these parameters were abnormal, treatment was administered, even if SjO2 was normal (101 observations). Conversely, when SjO2 was the only detected abnormality (34 observations), no treatment was administered. Abnormally low SjO2 values, caused by hypovolemia and hypocapnia, were detected in 3.4% of observations and actually modified the management. The discrepancies in simultaneous bilateral samples were substantial and gave rise to relevant interpretation problems. Fifteen percent of jugular catheters showed evidence of bacterial colonization.

CONCLUSION

Intermittent SjO2 monitoring did not substantially influence the management of severe head trauma. Therefore, recommendation for its routine use in all patients seems inadvisable, and indications for this invasive method should no longer be defined on the basis of experts' opinions, but rather on randomized, prospective studies.

[Analysis of indications fo interhospital transfer]

In France there are no clear guidelines for the transfer of severely head-injured patients, due to the difficulties of combining the requirements of a safe transfer with the necessity of a rapid, adapted and specialized management. These various aspects are discussed in order to facilitate the definition of local strategies for the initial orientation of severely head-injured patients to a centre adapted for severe head trauma management.

Management and outcomes of patients with brain trauma in a tertiary referral trauma hospital without neurosurgeons on site

Waikato Hospital is a tertiary hospital of over 700 beds receiving large numbers of trauma patients, but has no neurosurgeon closer than 130 kilometres. Over the 10 years ending July 1997, 831 cases of brain trauma were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Of these, 191 died before leaving hospital (overall mortality 23%). Of the 547 who had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) < or = 8, 173 died (mortality 32%). Of the children who were < 15 years of age and had a GCS < or = 8, there was a 23% mortality. These mortality rates are acceptable when compared with other reports (average 37%, over 12 adult series). Using brain AIS scores, our mortality figures also compared favorably with those in the literature, and suggest that the quality of brain trauma care is adequate in this non-neurosurgical centre with intensive care, backed by CT scanning and general surgeons able to do urgent burr holes. Six percent of the brain trauma patients (approximately five per year), required interhospital transfer for definitive neurosurgical care.