Airway resistance--an old friend re-visited

The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory system mechanics and hemodynamics in postoperative cardiac surgery patients

We prospectively evaluated the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the respiratory mechanical properties and hemodynamics of 10 postoperative adult cardiac patients undergoing mechanical ventilation while still anesthetized and paralyzed. The respiratory mechanics was evaluated by the inflation inspiratory occlusion method and hemodynamics by conventional methods. Each patient was randomized to a different level of PEEP (5, 10 and 15 cmH2O), while zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) was established as control. PEEP of 15-min duration was applied at 20-min intervals. The frequency dependence of resistance and the viscoelastic properties and elastance of the respiratory system were evaluated together with hemodynamic and respiratory indexes. We observed a significant decrease in total airway resistance (13.12 +/- 0.79 cmH2O l-1 s-1 at ZEEP, 11.94 +/- 0.55 cmH2O l-1 s-1 (P<0.0197) at 5 cmH2O of PEEP, 11.42 +/- 0.71 cmH2O l-1 s-1 (P<0.0255) at 10 cmH2O of PEEP, and 10.32 +/- 0.57 cmH2O l-1 s-1 (P<0.0002) at 15 cmH2O of PEEP). The elastance (Ers; cmH2O/l) was not significantly modified by PEEP from zero (23.49 +/- 1.21) to 5 cmH2O (21.89 +/- 0.70). However, a significant decrease (P<0.0003) at 10 cmH2O PEEP (18.86 +/- 1.13), as well as (P<0.0001) at 15 cmH2O (18.41 +/- 0.82) was observed after PEEP application. Volume dependence of viscoelastic properties showed a slight but not significant tendency to increase with PEEP. The significant decreases in cardiac index (l min-1 m-2) due to PEEP increments (3.90 +/- 0.22 at ZEEP, 3.43 +/- 0.17 (P<0. 0260) at 5 cmH2O of PEEP, 3.31 +/- 0.22 (P<0.0260) at 10 cmH2O of PEEP, and 3.10 +/- 0.22 (P<0.0113) at 15 cmH2O of PEEP) were compensated for by an increase in arterial oxygen content owing to shunt fraction reduction (%) from 22.26 +/- 2.28 at ZEEP to 11.66 +/- 1.24 at PEEP of 15 cmH2O (P<0.0007). We conclude that increments in PEEP resulted in a reduction of both airway resistance and respiratory elastance. These results could reflect improvement in respiratory mechanics. However, due to possible hemodynamic instability, PEEP should be carefully applied to postoperative cardiac patients.

Changes in ventilatory mechanics and diaphragmatic function after lung volume reduction surgery in patients with COPD

BACKGROUND

Lung volume reduction (LVR) has recently been used to treat severe emphysema. About 25% of the volume of each lung is removed with this method. Little is known about the mechanism of functional improvement so a study was undertaken to investigate the changes in ventilatory mechanics and diaphragmatic function in eight patients after LVR.

METHODS

Measurements of work of breathing (WOB), intrinsic positive end expiratory pressure (PEEPi), dynamic compliance (Cdyn), and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) were performed on the day before surgery and daily for seven days after surgery, as well as one, three, and six months after surgery. All measurements were performed on spontaneously breathing patients, simultaneously assessing oesophageal pressure via an oesophageal balloon catheter and air flow via a tightly adjusted mask. Diaphragmatic function was evaluated by measuring oesophageal and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) preoperatively and at one, three, and six months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 23 (3.6)% predicted, and all patients were oxygen dependent before the-operation. One day after LVR the mean decrease in WOB was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 1.40) joule/l, the mean decrease in PEEPi was 0.61 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.87) kPa, and the mean increase in Cdyn was 182.5 (95% CI 80.0 to 284.2) ml/kPa. Similar changes were found seven days and six months after surgery. PaCO2 was higher on the day after the operation but was significantly reduced six months later. Pdi was increased three and six months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilatory mechanics improved immediately after LVR, probably by decompression of lung tissue and relief of thoracic distension. An improvement in diaphragmatic function three and six months postoperatively also contributes to improved respiratory function after LVR.

Patient-ventilator interactions

Patient-ventilator synchrony is important in the management of the ventilator-dependent patient. Factors inherent to the patient and the ventilator influence patient-ventilator synchrony. Detection of patient-ventilator synchrony may require monitoring of airway pressure and flow waveforms.