The fragmentation of incoming Semliki Forest virus nucleocapsids in mosquito (Aedes albopictus) cells might be coupled to virion uncoating

Tissue Barriers to Arbovirus Infection in Mosquitoes

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) circulate in nature between arthropod vectors and vertebrate hosts. Arboviruses often cause devastating diseases in vertebrate hosts, but they typically do not cause significant pathology in their arthropod vectors. Following oral acquisition of a viremic bloodmeal from a vertebrate host, the arbovirus disease cycle requires replication in the cellular environment of the arthropod vector. Once the vector has become systemically and persistently infected, the vector is able to transmit the virus to an uninfected vertebrate host. In order to systemically infect the vector, the virus must cope with innate immune responses and overcome several tissue barriers associated with the midgut and the salivary glands. In this review we describe, in detail, the typical arbovirus infection route in competent mosquito vectors. Based on what is known from the literature, we explain the nature of the tissue barriers that arboviruses are confronted with in a mosquito vector and how arboviruses might surmount these barriers. We also point out controversial findings to highlight particular areas that are not well understood and require further research efforts.

The regulation of disassembly of alphavirus cores

Alphaviruses are used as model viruses for structure determination and for analysis of virus entry. They are used also as vectors for protein expression and gene therapy. Virus particles are assembled by budding, using preformed cores and a modified cellular membrane. During entry, alphaviruses release the viral core into the cytoplasm. Cores are disassembled during virus entry and accumulate in the cytoplasm during virus multiplication. The regulation of core disassembly is the subject of this review. A working model compatible with all experimental data is formulated. This model comprises the following steps: (1) The incoming core is present in the cytoplasm in a metastable state, primed for disassembly. A core structure containing the so-called linker region of the core protein in an exposed position susceptible to proteolytic cleavage on the core surface might represent the primed state. (2) The primed core allows access of cellular proteins to the viral genome RNA, e.g. initiation factors of protein synthesis. (3) In a following step, ribosomal 60S subunits bind to the complex and lead to core disassembly with a concomitant transfer of core protein or of core protein fragments to the 28S rRNA. The linker region may be involved in this transfer. (4) During the later stages of virus multiplication, cellular components involved in step (2) and/or in step (3) are inactivated. This inactivation might involve the binding of newly synthesised core protein to 28S rRNA. (5) Unprimed cores, e.g. core particles containing the linker region in an unexposed position, are assembled during virus multiplication. Priming of cores and inactivation of host-cell factors each represent a complete mechanism of regulation of core disassembly. Future experiments will show whether or not both processes are actually used. Since alphaviruses, e.g. Chikungunya virus, Ross River virus, Semliki Forest virus, and Sindbis virus, are human pathogens, these experiments are of practical relevance, since they might identify targets for antiviral chemotherapy.

Virus membrane proteins and proteinaceous pores

Enveloped viruses penetrate the host cells by fusion of the viral envelope with a cellular target membrane. One of the best studied viruses with respect to its penetration and uncoating is the alphavirus Semliki Forest virus that is taken up by endocytosis. The alphavirus membrane glycoprotein E1 harbors a so-called fusion peptide, which is responsible for interaction with the endosomal membrane, leading to fusion. Besides this fusion process, cell infection by alphaviruses is accompanied by membrane permeability changes, thus implying some form of pore across the membrane. However, the ability of E1 protein to form ion pores has not been widely accepted. This review provides an overview of studies that confirm earlier results predicting the formation of a proteinaceous pore by the alphavirus spike proteins. Furthermore, different models to explain this pore formation during virus entry are discussed.

Japanese encephalitis virus infection in Vero cells: the involvement of intracellular acidic vesicles in the early phase of viral infection was observed with the treatment of a specific vacuolar type H+-ATPase inhibitor, bafilomycin A1

The involvement of intracellular acidic vesicles in the early phase of Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus infection in Vero cells was observed by adding a specific vacuolar type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) inhibitor (bafilomycin A1) in the cell culture medium. Studies with the detection of viral envelope (E) protein suggested that bafilomycin A1 inhibited virus infection in the cells. Subcellular distribution of incoming biotinylated virions and 3H-uridine-labeled viral RNA were observed in fractions of a Percoll density gradient. At 10 min of the chasing period, virions and viral RNA were found mainly in fractions with a mean density of 1.04 g/ml corresponding to the endosome both in the control and bafilomycin A1-treated cells. At 60 min of the chasing period, the peak of biotin activity was detected in fractions with a mean density of 1.08 g/ml corresponding to the lysosome, whereas the peak of radioactivity did not run parallel with that of biotin and shifted to fractions with a mean density of 1.05 g/ml and higher than 1.084 g/ml, respectively. At 60 min of the chasing period in bafilomycin A1-treated cells, the peak of biotin and radioactivity were still found mainly in the fraction with a density of 1.04 g/ml, representing the endosome. Subcellular fractionation by a Percoll density gradient revealed that bafilomycin A1 treatment resulted in the accumulation of virions in the endosome fraction and suggested the prevention of intracellular translocation of the virions which occurs during the early entry process of an infecting virus to the cells.