A randomized multicentric study comparing alternating combination chemotherapy (VCMP/VBAP) and melphalan-prednisone in multiple myeloma

Adoptive immunotherapy with antigen-specific T cells in myeloma: a model of tumor-specific donor lymphocyte infusion

Although partial remissions rates of up to 60% are obtained with conventional therapeutic regimens, multiple myeloma is essentially an incurable disease with a median survival of approximately 30 months. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) results in a high percentage of complete remissions (CRs), but it can be associated with significant treatment-related mortality. Recent clinical studies have shown that highly immunosuppressive, yet nonmyeloablative, doses of fludarabine-based chemotherapy can result in alloengraftment. However, even with a reduction in treatment-related mortality, success with allogeneic SCT is limited by the significant risk of relapse. The goal of the strategy described is to transfer tumor antigen-specific immunity induced in the stem cell donor to the allogeneic SCT recipient to reduce relapse. Donors are immunized with a well-defined vaccine, specific for the patient's tumor. The allogeneic SCT is performed with a conditioning regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, and the stem cell source is blood mobilized with filgrastim, which could potentially enhance the transfer of a larger number of tumor-specific T cells in the allograft, as compared to bone marrow. Donor immunization with myeloma idiotype protein in the setting of a nonmyeloablative SCT may represent a novel strategy for the treatment of myeloma.

Treatment of myeloma: recent developments

Melphalan was the first described treatment for patients with multiple myeloma in the 1960s and is still being used in clinical practice. However, the use of melphalan in combination with prednisone resulted in a median survival of only 2-3 years. Therefore, the dose of melphalan has been intensified since then (140-200 mg/m(2)). In order to diminish treatment-related morbidity and mortality due to severe myelosuppression induced by these regimens, high-dose melphalan is currently supported with autologous stem cells. Indications for high-dose therapy and the role of further intensification by performing second or allogeneic transplantations are discussed. Furthermore, new therapeutic modalities, such as inhibitors of angiogenesis, also showing direct antiproliferative, cytokine-related and immunomodulatory effects on plasma cells (thalidomide and its newer derivatives), inhibitors of the transcription factor NF-kappa B (proteasome inhibitors) and immunotherapy are described.

Dose-Intensive Melphalan With Stem Cell Support (MEL100) Is Superior to Standard Treatment in Elderly Myeloma Patients

A clinical relationship between dose-intensity of melphalan and response rate has been demonstrated in multiple myeloma. Promising results have been reported after 200 mg/m2 melphalan, especially in younger patients. It is uncertain whether 100 mg/m2 melphalan (MEL100) can offer similar results in older patients. To address this issue, patients were treated with 2 or 3 MEL100 courses followed by stem cell support. Seventy-one patients (median age, 64 years) entered the protocol at diagnosis. Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 71 pair mates (median age, 64 years) selected from patients treated at diagnosis with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) and matched for age and β2-microglobulin. Complete remission was 47% after MEL100 and 5% after MP. Median event-free survival was 34 months in the MEL100 group and 17.7 months in the MP group (P < .001). Median overall survival was 56+ months for MEL100 and 48 months for MP (P< .01). In a multivariate analysis, β2-microglobulin levels and MEL100 were independent risk factors associated with outcome: superior event-free and overall survival were observed in patients presenting low β2-microglobulin levels at diagnosis and receiving MEL100 as induction regimen. In conclusion, MEL100 was superior to MP in terms of complete remission rate, event-free survival, and overall survival.

Dose-Intensive Melphalan With Stem Cell Support (MEL100) Is Superior to Standard Treatment in Elderly Myeloma Patients

A clinical relationship between dose-intensity of melphalan and response rate has been demonstrated in multiple myeloma. Promising results have been reported after 200 mg/m2 melphalan, especially in younger patients. It is uncertain whether 100 mg/m2 melphalan (MEL100) can offer similar results in older patients. To address this issue, patients were treated with 2 or 3 MEL100 courses followed by stem cell support. Seventy-one patients (median age, 64 years) entered the protocol at diagnosis. Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 71 pair mates (median age, 64 years) selected from patients treated at diagnosis with oral melphalan and prednisone (MP) and matched for age and β2-microglobulin. Complete remission was 47% after MEL100 and 5% after MP. Median event-free survival was 34 months in the MEL100 group and 17.7 months in the MP group (P < .001). Median overall survival was 56+ months for MEL100 and 48 months for MP (P< .01). In a multivariate analysis, β2-microglobulin levels and MEL100 were independent risk factors associated with outcome: superior event-free and overall survival were observed in patients presenting low β2-microglobulin levels at diagnosis and receiving MEL100 as induction regimen. In conclusion, MEL100 was superior to MP in terms of complete remission rate, event-free survival, and overall survival.

Diagnosis, prognosis, and standard treatment of multiple myeloma

The diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is often difficult; most patients present with asymptomatic gammopathy. The only findings that confirm a diagnosis of MM are an elevation in the M-component or extension of the lytic bone lesions that are the hallmark of the disease. Tests that delineate plasma cell biology, such as plasma cell proliferation rate, are helpful; magnetic resonance imaging can disclose bone marrow lesions leading to subsequent osteolytic disease. After the diagnosis of MM has been established and prognostic factors identified, the appropriate therapy can be determined. Melphalan and prednisone are no longer considered to be the "gold standard" of therapy. In fact, this approach is suitable for less than half of patients with myeloma. This article presents guidelines for standard treatment options and examines the efficacy of new high-dose chemotherapy approaches.

Treatment of melphalan-resistant multiple myeloma with vincristine, BCNU, doxorubicin, and high-dose dexamethasone (VBAD)

A total of 65 patients (35 male/30 female) with multiple myeloma primarily (33) or secondarily (32) resistant to melphalan and prednisone were treated with vincristine, carmustine (BCNU), doxorubicin, and high-dose dexamethasone (VBAD) at 4-week intervals. Among 60 evaluable patients the overall response was 36.6% (21.6% objective response plus 15% improvements). The response rate was significantly higher in primarily resistant patients than in those becoming resistant after a prior response (48.4 vs. 24.1%, P < 0.05). The median duration of response was 17.5 months. When survival of responders and non-responders were compared by the conventional method, a highly significant difference was observed (P < 0.001). However, using the Mantel and Byar procedure and the landmark method, only a trend for longer survival in the responders was registered. These results indicate that although VBAD is effective in at least one third of patients with advanced multiple myeloma resistant to melphalan, its impact on survival is limited.

Combined chemotherapy with ABCM versus melphalan for treatment of myelomatosis. The Medical Research Council Working Party for Leukaemia in Adults

Both melphalan and cyclophosphamide increase life expectancy in patients with myelomatosis, but few large randomised studies have compared combination chemotherapy regimens with these single agents. In the Vth MRC myelomatosis trial, the survival of 314 patients randomised to receive ABCM (adriamycin, BCNU, cyclophosphamide, and melphalan) as first-line treatment was significantly longer than that of 316 patients given intermittent melphalan (M7) (p = 0.0003). The 75%, median, and 25% survivals were 7, 24, and 42 months, respectively, with M7 and 10, 32, and 56 months, respectively, with ABCM. Stable disease with few symptoms (plateau) was achieved by 61% of patients given ABCM and 49% of those given M7 (p = 0.004). Myelotoxicity was comparable between regimens. Cross-trial analysis suggests that M7 is comparable to melphalan and prednisone or melphalan, prednisone, and vincristine; that the efficacy of ABCM in the Vth trial and VIth MRC trials is comparable; and that ABCM gave better survival than intermittent melphalan regimens in the prognostic groups analysed. The results indicate that ABCM is an acceptable regimen that is more effective than melphalan, with or without prednisone, for first-line treatment of myelomatosis.

The clinical pharmacology and use of antimicrotubule agents in cancer chemotherapeutics

Although there has been a rapid expansion of the number of classes of compounds with antineoplastic activity, few have played a more vital role in the curative and palliative treatment of cancers than the antimicrotubule agents. Although the vinca alkaloids have been the only subclass of antimicrotubule agents that have had broad experimental and clinical applications in oncologic therapeutics over the last several decades, the taxanes, led by the prototypic agent taxol, are emerging as another very active class of antimicrotubule agents. After briefly reviewing the mechanisms of antineoplastic action and resistance, this article comprehensively reviews the clinical pharmacology, therapeutic applications, and clinical toxicities of selected antimicrotubule agents.