Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in hyperlipidaemic long-term survivors of heart transplantation. Lack of interaction with the lipid-lowering agent, fenofibrate

Cardiovascular risk factors following orthotopic liver transplantation: predisposing factors, incidence and management

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the standard of care for acute and chronic causes of end-stage liver disease. Advances in medical therapy and surgical techniques have led to improvement of patient and graft survival rates following orthotopic liver transplantation. However, the prevalence of post-transplant cardiovascular complications has been rising with increased life expectancy after liver transplantation.

AIMS

To determine the incidences, risk factors, and treatment for hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, and obesity in the post-liver transplantation population.

METHODS

We performed a review of relevant studies available on the PubMed database that provided information on the incidence, risk factors and treatment for cardiovascular complications that develop in the post-liver transplantation population.

RESULTS

Current immunosuppressive agents have improved patient and graft survival rates. However, long-term exposure to these agents has been associated with development of systemic and metabolic complications including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Cardiovascular disease remains one of the most common causes of death in liver transplant patients with functional grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant recipients have a higher risk of cardiovascular complications compared with the nontransplant population. Post-transplant cardiac risk stratification and aggressive treatment of cardiovascular complications, including modification of risk factors and tailoring of immunosuppressive regimen, is imperative to prevent serious complications.

Reducing the risks of cardiovascular disease in liver allograft recipients

Liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of death from cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. We propose the following strategy of risk-reduction, based on currently available literature. Lifestyle: standard advice should be given (avoidance of smoking, excess alcohol and obesity, adequate exercise, reduction of excess sodium intake). Hypertension: target blood pressure should be 140/90 mmHg or lower, but for those with diabetes or renal disease, 130/80 mmHg or lower. For patients without proteinuria, antihypertensive therapy should be initiated with a calcium channel blocker and for those with proteinuria, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. If monotherapy fails to achieve adequate response, calcium channel blockers and ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be combined. If hypertension remains uncontrolled, an alpha-blocker may be added. Consideration should be given to changing immunosuppression and avoiding use of calcineurin inhibitors. Diabetes: recipients should be regularly screened for diabetes. For patients with new-onset diabetes after transplant, stepwise therapy should be guided by HbA1c concentrations, as with type II diabetes mellitus. Hyperlipidemia: annual screening of lipid profile should be undertaken, with treatment thresholds and targets based on those advocated for the high risk general population. Dietary intervention is appropriate for all patients. A statin should be considered as the first line treatment to achieve specified targets. In patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor, Pravastatin should be commenced at a dose of 10 mg/day. In patients receiving other forms of immunosuppression, pravastatin may be commenced at a dose of 20 mg/day. Liver tests should be monitored and patients warned to report myalgia. If monotherapy is inadequate, ezetimibe or a fibrate may be added. Consideration may be given to change in immunosuppression if combination lipid-lowering therapy proves inadequate.

Bezafibrates Cause Moderate, Reversible Impairment in Renal Function in Patients without Prior Renal Disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine whether bezafibrates have adverse effects on renal function.

METHODS

(1) A 3-year retrospective survey of 526 patients who were on bezafibrate for a while and 614 controls following fluctuations of serum creatinine levels. (2) A prospective study on 33 patients with previous evidence of bezafibrate-induced elevation in serum creatinine. The patients were examined after 3 months on bezafibrate 400 mg/day and then after 3 months without bezafibrate. Eight patients repeated the tests after 3 months on bezafibrate 200 mg/day.

RESULTS

Retrospective: 295 bezafibrate-treated patients (56%) and 67 controls (11%) demonstrated fluctuations > or = 0.2 mg/dl in serum creatinine levels (p < 0.001); 113 patients (21%) and 16 controls (3%) showed fluctuations > or = 0.3 mg/dl (p < 0.001). Prospective: bezafibrate 400 mg/dl increased serum creatinine from 1.16 +/- 0.19 to 1.42 +/- 0.2 mg/dl (p < 0.001) and urea from 37 +/- 8 to 44 +/- 8 mg/dl (p < 0.001); creatinine clearance (Ccr) decreased from 104 +/- 23 to 82 +/- 27 ml/min (p < 0.001). CPK increased from 82 +/- 32 to 130 +/-58 mg/dl (p < 0.0001) and urinary myoglobin increased from 95.4 +/- 21 to 199 +/- 99 mg/dl (p < 0.0001). The 8 patients given bezafibrate 200 mg/dl experienced similar dose-dependent changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Bezafibrate causes quiet common, dose-dependent and reversible changes in serum creatinine in patients with normal renal function, associated with a significant increase in serum CPK and urine myoglobin, suggestive of drug-induced mild subclinical skeletal muscle injury compromising renal function.

Influence of lipid lowering fibrates on P-glycoprotein activity in vitro

Statin/fibrate combinations are frequently used to treat mixed dyslipidemia. However, these combinations may cause life-threatening drug interactions (e.g. rhabdomyolysis) possibly induced by modifications of cytochrome P450 isozyme activities. Some statins are also transported by P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and may act as inhibitors of this drug efflux pump. So far, nothing is known about possible Pgp modulating effects of fibrates. We tested whether gemfibrozil, fenofibrate, fenofibric acid, and bezafibrate inhibit Pgp in vitro using a calcein acetoxymethylester (calcein-AM) uptake assay and confocal laser scanning microscopy with bodipy-verapamil as substrate in L-MDR1 cells, which overexpress human Pgp. In uptake assays in cells with (L-MDR1) and without (LLC-PK1) human Pgp we also investigated whether these compounds are transported by Pgp. Intracellular concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Of the tested fibrates, only fenofibrate increased calcein-AM uptake into cells indicating an inhibition of Pgp mediated transport by this compound. The potency of fenofibrate (mean+/-SD: 7.1+/-3.2 microM), evaluated by calculating the concentration needed to double baseline fluorescence (f2), was similar to that of simvastatin (5.8+/-1.5 microM), lovastatin (10.1+/-1.0), and verapamil (4.7+/-0.8 microM). For simvastatin and fenofibrate Pgp inhibition was confirmed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Fenofibrate, fenofibric acid, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate showed no difference in the cellular uptake between LLC-PK1 and L-MDR1, indicating that the tested fibrates are not Pgp substrates. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that fenofibrate inhibits Pgp in vitro with a potency similar to simvastatin.

Clinical practice guidelines for managing dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients: a report from the Managing Dyslipidemias in Chronic Kidney Disease Work Group of the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative

The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is very high in patients with chronic kidney (CKD) disease and in kidney transplant recipients. Indeed, available evidence for these patients suggests that the 10-year cumulative risk of coronary heart disease is at least 20%, or roughly equivalent to the risk seen in patients with previous CVD. Recently, the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) published guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD, including transplant patients. It was the conclusion of this Work Group that the National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines are generally applicable to patients with CKD, but that there are significant differences in the approach and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD compared with the general population. In the present document we present the guidelines generated by this workgroup as they apply to kidney transplant recipients. Evidence from the general population indicates that treatment of dyslipidemias reduces CVD, and evidence in kidney transplant patients suggests that judicious treatment can be safe and effective in improving dyslipidemias. Dyslipidemias are very common in CKD and in transplant patients. However, until recently there have been no adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials examining the effects of dyslipidemia treatment on CVD in patients with CKD. Since completion of the K/DOQI guidelines on dyslipidemia in CKD, the results of the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) Study have been presented and published. Based on information from randomized trials conducted in the general population and the single study conducted in kidney transplant patients, these guidelines, which are a modified version of the K/DOQI dyslipidemia guidelines, were developed to aid clinicians in the management of dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients. These guidelines are divided into four sections. The first section (Introduction) provides the rationale for the guidelines, and describes the target population, scope, intended users, and methods. The second section presents guidelines on the assessment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 1-3), while the third section offers guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 4-5). The key guideline statements are supported mainly by data from studies in the general population, but there is an urgent need for additional studies in CKD and in transplant patients. Therefore, the last section outlines recommendations for research.

Fenofibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a review of the data as they relate to the new suprabioavailable tablet formulation

BACKGROUND

The fibric acid derivative fenofibrate is indicated as an adjunct to dietary modification in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia (types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia, Fredrickson classification) to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and apolipoprotein (apo) B, and to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A. It is also indicated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia (types IV and V hyperlipidemia). Initially approved in the United States in a micronized capsule formulation, fenofibrate is now available in a new "suprabioavailable" tablet formulation that has increased bioavailability, achieving equivalent plasma concentrations at lower doses. The 67- and 200-mg micronized capsules can be considered equivalent to the 54- and 160-mg suprabioavailable tablets, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the pharmacologic properties, clinical usefulness, and safety profile of fenofibrate in the management of dyslipidemias.

METHODS

Recent studies, abstracts, reviews, and consensus statements published in the English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-January 2002), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2002), and PharmaProjects (1990-January 2002) using the search terms fenofibrate, fibrates, hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and dyslipidemia.

RESULTS

Fenofibrate is well absorbed after oral administration, with peak plasma levels attained in 6 to 8 hours. The absolute bioavailability of fenofibrate cannot be determined due to its being virtually insoluble in aqueous media suitable for injection; however, after oral administration of a single dose of radiolabeled fenofibrate, approximately 60% of the dose appeared in urine, primarily as fenofibric acid and its glucuronated conjugate, and approximately 25% was excreted in the feces. The apparent volume of distribution is 0.89 L/kg in healthy volunteers, and protein binding is approximately 99% in healthy and hyperlipidemic patients. Neither fenofibrate nor fenofibric acid appears to undergo significant oxidative metabolism in vivo. Fenofibric acid has a half-life of 20 hours. Fenofibrate is effective in lowering TG levels and increasing HDL-C levels. Its LDL-C-lowering effect is greater than that of gemfibrozil. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates, including gastrointestinal symptoms, cholelithiasis, hepatitis, myositis, and rash. Fenofibrate therapy has been associated with increases in serum aminotransferase levels, and clinical monitoring of these markers of liver function should be performed regularly.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate is effective in reducing levels of TG, TC, and LDL-C, and increasing levels of HDL-C in patients with dyslipidemias. Its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and combined hyperlipidemia have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. Its use is accompanied by a low incidence of adverse effects and laboratory abnormalities. Fenofibrate protects against coronary heart disease not only through its effects on lipid parameters but also by producing alterations in LDL structure and, possibly, alterations in the various hemostatic parameters. Its uricosuric property may prove to be a useful adjunctive attribute.

Distribution of cyclosporin in organ transplant recipients

Cyclosporin is an immunosuppressive agent with a narrow therapeutic index. The total concentration of cyclosporin in blood is usually monitored to guide dosage adjustment and to compensate for substantial interindividual and intraindividual variability in cyclosporin pharmacokinetics. Cyclosporin is a highly lipophilic molecule and widely distributes into blood, plasma and tissue components. It mainly accumulates in fat-rich organs, including adipose tissue and liver. In blood, it binds to erythrocytes in a saturable fashion that is dependent on haematocrit, temperature and the concentration of plasma proteins. In plasma, it binds primarily to lipoproteins, including high-density, low-density and very-low-density lipoprotein, and, to a lesser extent, albumin. The unbound fraction of cyclosporin in plasma (CsA(fu)) expressed as a percentage is approximately 2%. It has been shown that both the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cyclosporin are related to its binding characteristics in plasma. Furthermore, there is some evidence to indicate that the unbound concentration of cyclosporin (CsA(U)) has a closer association with both kidney and heart allograft rejection than the total (bound + unbound) concentration. However, the measurement of CsA(fu) is inherently complex and cannot easily be performed in a clinical setting. Mathematical models that calculate CsA(fu), and hence CsA(U), from the concentration of plasma lipoproteins may be a more practical option, and should provide a more accurate correlate of effectiveness and toxicity of this drug in transplant recipients than do conventional monitoring procedures. In conclusion, the distribution characteristics of cyclosporin in blood, plasma and various tissues are clinically important. Further investigations are needed to verify whether determination of CsA(U) improves the clinical management of transplant recipients.

Fibrate-induced increase in blood urea and creatinine: is gemfibrozil the only innocuous agent?

BACKGROUND

Some reports indicate that fibrates can induce renal dysfunction. However, the clinical characteristics of these episodes, and the respective nephrotoxicity of the four main fibrates used-namely, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, and gemfibrozil-remain ill defined.

METHODS

To better characterize this side-effect, we first reviewed the charts of 27 patients from our institution who developed an impairment of renal function during fibrate therapy. We next analysed the articles (n=24) that contained data on renal function in patients taking fibrates (n=2676).

RESULTS

Among our 27 patients, 25 were on fenofibrate therapy, one was taking bezafibrate, and one ciprofibrate. Nineteen were recipients of solid-organ transplants (kidney recipients, n=15; heart or heart-lung recipients, n=4), and eight were non-transplanted patients with some impairment of renal function. Baseline plasma creatinine ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mg/dl. It increased by a mean of 40% after the start of fibrate therapy. There was a concomitant increase of blood urea values (mean 36%) in most of the patients. Renal function returned to baseline in 18/24 patients after fibrate discontinuation. However, six patients, all transplant recipients, experienced a permanent increase in plasma creatinine. The incidence of fibrate-induced renal dysfunction among our series of kidney transplant recipients was 60%, as it occurred in 15 of the 25 patients who had ever taken fibrates. An increase of mean creatinine values during therapy was described in all papers on fenofibrate (n=7) and bezafibrate (n=8) (range 8-18% and 8-40% respectively), and in three of four papers dealing with ciprofibrate (range 6-16%). No significant renal impairment was described in any of the eight articles reporting data on gemfibrozil therapy.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and ciprofibrate may induce renal dysfunction. Gemfibrozil appears to be devoid of this side-effect.

Micronized fenofibrate: a new fibric acid hypolipidemic agent

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in the management of hyperlipidemias.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1974-October 1998), Current Contents search, additional references from article bibliographies, and the package insert from the manufacturer were used to identify data for evaluation. Studies evaluating fenofibrate (peer-reviewed publications, package insert data) were considered for inclusion. Abstracts and data on file with the manufacturer were not considered for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language literature was reviewed to evaluate the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, and tolerability of fenofibrate. Data from animals and in vitro systems were included only when necessary to explain the drug's pharmacology.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Micronized fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 1998 for the treatment of types IV and V hyperlipidemia. Data from the peer-reviewed literature also support the use of fenofibrate in types IIa, IIb, and III hyperlipidemias. Micronized fenofibrate 67-201 mg/d is useful as monotherapy or as an adjunct to other hypolipidemics and dietary therapy. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, regular formulation fenofibrate 300-400 mg/d lowered serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations by 24-55%, total cholesterol by 9-25%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations by 6-35%, and raised high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations by 8-38%. Few comparative data exist regarding fenofibrate versus clofibrate and gemfibrozil. In noncomparative and comparative clinical trials, fenofibrate appeared to be well tolerated. The most common causally related adverse events were digestive, musculoskeletal, and dermatologic in nature. Concurrent use of fenofibrate and a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A inhibitor may increase the risk of myopathy and/or rhabdomyolysis, although recent data suggest that concurrent use of fenofibrate with low-dose simvastatin or pravastatin is safe. Fenofibrate may enhance the effect of oral anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate reduces serum TG, total cholesterol, and LDL-C, and raises HDL-C to clinically relevant degrees. Its spectrum of activity appears to exceed that recommended for types IV and V hyperlipidemia to encompass types IIa, IIb, and III hyperlipidemias as well. To this extent, it may be considered a broader-spectrum fibrate than is indicated by its FDA approval. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates and require routine monitoring (clinical, liver function). Long-term safety data are readily available from drug registries in many countries where the product has been available for nearly two decades. Cost-effectiveness studies comparing fenofibrate with other hypolipidemics demonstrate benefits of fenofibrate over simvastatin in types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia. The need for dosage titration of the micronized preparation from 67 mg/d upward to a final dose of 200 mg/d is also not supported by peer-reviewed literature (except in the case of renal impairment). Although preliminary data on plaque regression are encouraging, published clinical studies evaluating the impact of fenofibrate on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are awaited. Micronized fenofibrate is worthy of formulary inclusion.