Induction of thrombolysis and prevention of thrombus formation by local drug delivery with a double-occlusion balloon catheter

2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review available evidence and establish guidelines related to the use of thrombolytics for the management of small animals with suspected or confirmed thrombosis.

DESIGN

PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome) questions were formulated, and worksheets completed as part of a standardized and systematic literature evaluation. The population of interest included dogs and cats (considered separately) and arterial and venous thrombosis. The interventions assessed were the use of thrombolytics, compared to no thrombolytics, with or without anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Specific protocols for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were also evaluated. Outcomes assessed included efficacy and safety. Relevant articles were categorized according to level of evidence, quality, and as to whether they supported, were neutral to, or opposed the PICO questions. Conclusions from the PICO worksheets were used to draft guidelines, which were subsequently refined via Delphi surveys undertaken by the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) working group.

RESULTS

Fourteen PICO questions were developed, generating 14 guidelines. The majority of the literature addressing the PICO questions in dogs is experimental studies (level of evidence 3), thus providing insufficient evidence to determine if thrombolysis improves patient-centered outcomes. In cats, literature was more limited and often neutral to the PICO questions, precluding strong evidence-based recommendations for thrombolytic use. Rather, for both species, suggestions are made regarding considerations for when thrombolytic drugs may be considered, the combination of thrombolytics with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs, and the choice of thrombolytic agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial additional research is needed to address the role of thrombolytics for the treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis in dogs and cats. Clinical trials with patient-centered outcomes will be most valuable for addressing knowledge gaps in the field.

Pharmacological interventions for stroke: failures and future

Given the few options currently available for patients following ischaemic stroke, the recent disappointing failures of several large-scale Phase III clinical trials has made the search for novel therapeutic approaches even more critical. Experimental evidence has suggested that the majority of stroke patients have a slow evolution of brain injury which can occur over several hours. Progressive microcirculatory failure following the initial onset of ischaemia may contribute to the expansion of brain injury. Included among the pathophysiological changes that are speculated to occur as a secondary response to the initial ischaemia are free radical production, excitotoxicity (for example, glutamate) disruption of ionic homeostasis (for example, sodium and calcium influx), enzymatic changes, stimulation of the inflammatory process, endothelin release, activation of platelets and leukocytes, delayed coagulation and endothelial dysfunction. All of these pathophysiological reactions could contribute to an increase in local vascular resistance and therefore cause progressive hypoperfusion of the brain following the onset of stroke. The scope of this review will focus on recent clinical failures in addition to agents currently in clinical development, comparing vascular targets to the common neuroprotective strategies.