Pedicle origin and intervertebral compartment in the lumbar and upper sacral spine. A biometric study

Pathoanatomy of clinical findings in patients with sciatica: a magnetic resonance imaging study

OBJECT

Anatomical details of nerve root compression may explain the production of the signs and symptoms of sciatica. The authors of anatomical studies have offered many theories without clearly demonstrating the clinical relevance of the observations. Clinicoanatomical series are scarce and are affected to a great extent by selection bias.

METHODS

The authors created a schematic drawing of the lumbar anatomy based on both the literature and in vitro anatomical observations. A diagnosis was then made with the aid of detailed and standardized clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies in primary-care patients who presented with pain that radiated into the leg. Clinical and MR imaging findings were correlated. Finally, the anatomical drawing was compared with the clinical data. The higher the vertebral level of symptomatic disc herniations, the more likely the compression will be more laterally situated. Classic symptoms of sciatica (typically, dermatomal pain; increase in pain when coughing, sneezing, or straining; and testing positive for pain during straight leg raising) were most likely to occur with compression of the nerve root in the axilla and with mediolateral disc herniations.

CONCLUSIONS

The L-3, L-4, L-5, and S-1 nerve roots each tend to be compressed at different sites along the rostrocaudal course of the nerve root. Disc herniations become symptomatic at different sites for each disc level. The schematic drawing produced a priori could well be used to explain these findings. Expectations of particular clinical findings can be predicted by specific pathoanatomical findings.

Long-term follow up of patients surgically treated by the far-lateral approach for foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations

OBJECT

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term benefit in 202 patients who were surgically treated via a microsurgical far-lateral approach for foraminal or extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations.

METHODS

All patients underwent surgery at the authors' institute since 1987 and represented 6.5% of all lumbar spinal disc surgeries. There were 67 women and 135 men who ranged in age from 19 to 78 years (mean age 58 years). All patients had unilateral leg pain due to lumbar disc herniations into or lateral to the lateral interpedicular compartment. One patient underwent surgery at the L1-2 level, nine at L2-3, 48 at L3-4, 86 at L4-5, and 58 at the L5-S1 level. The mean follow-up period was 50 months (range 12-120 months). Outcome was defined as excellent (no pain), good (some back pain), fair (moderate radiculopathy), and poor (unchanged or worse) based on Macnab classification. Overall, excellent and good results were achieved in 62 (31%) and 85 (42%) patients, respectively, and fair and poor results in 40 (20%) and 15 (7%) patients, respectively. Of 11 recurrent disc herniations, four presented in an extreme-lateral position, five in a paramedian location, and two on the contralateral side. There were three minor complications related to surgery, seven general complications, and no case of spinal instability.

CONCLUSIONS

The far-lateral approach is a safe, effective procedure that avoids the risk of secondary spinal instability.

Microsurgical anatomy of the lateral approach to extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations

OBJECTIVE

During the "lateral" approach to extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations, the surgeon may be confronted with considerable variations in anatomy, making this approach extremely difficult in some patients. An anatomic study, therefore, was undertaken to examine the bony boundaries of the operative target, the medial intertransverse space.

METHODS

In 31 lumbar spine specimens taken from cadavers of people who had been between 30 and 93 years old at death, the relevant distances and proportions of the operative window were measured at the levels L1-L2 to L5-S1.

RESULTS

Measurements revealed that the operative window in a systematic fashion becomes progressively smaller as the approach moves from L1-L2 toward L5-S1: 1) from L1 to L5, the medial boundary, the isthmus laminae, gradually extends farther laterally and eventually covers the waist of the respective vertebral body; 2) the lower boundary, the facet joint, gradually overlaps the disc space in an upward and lateral direction; 3) the upper boundary, the transverse process, gradually moves downward. Anatomic variations and abnormalities are found particularly often at the L5-S1 level.

CONCLUSION

The anatomic findings led to important conclusions regarding the microsurgical approach to extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations; at levels L1-L2 to L3-L4, the midline approach with lateral retraction of the paraspinal muscles allows for efficient exposure of the lateral neural foramen and avoidance of trauma to the facet joint. Often at level L4-L5, and nearly always at level L5-S1, a tangential route through a paramedian transmuscular approach offers many advantages.

Microsurgical anatomy and operative technique for extreme lateral lumbar disc herniations

The anatomy of the lateral aspect of the lumbar spine and our lateral microsurgical technique for extreme lateral lumbar disc herniations (ELLDH) is described. This study was based on the microdissection of 4 cadavers, on the morphometric evaluation of these as well as 6 dried cadaver spines and 8 lumbar CT scans, and on the use of this technique on over 200 cases. Level dependent changes in the posterior arch cause a shift of the disc space distally relative to the facet joint, an increasing amount of bone to overlie the intervertebral foramen, and a decreasing amount of working space within the exposure in the caudal direction. Therefore, more bone removal from the lateral aspect of the pars interarticularis and supero-lateral aspect of the facet joint is required in the lower lumbar spine. When the exposed ligamentum flavum is resected, the dorsal root ganglion is seen and access to the herniation and disc space is achieved. Level dependent changes in the pedicles and transverse processes lead to an alteration in the course and relationships of the nerves, thereby influencing the pathophysiology of and surgical technique for the ELLDH. The operative target is the lateral aspect of the pars interarticularis and not the intertransverse space as has been previously described. Our techniques allows for the early identification of the nerve with minimal risks of injury to it, to the adjacent vessels and to the structural integrity of the facet joint and pars interarticularis.

Are there typical localisations of lumbar disc herniations? A prospective study

A prospective intra-operative analysis of the location of lumbar disc herniation was performed in 131 patients with verified 54% contained (incomplete) and 46% non-contained (complete) lumbar disc herniations. Bulging discs or protrusions are not included in this study. Complete disc herniations occurred more frequently in the upper lumbar spine. The localization of the lumbar disc herniations within its segment showed no correlation to the affected level. 64% of the disc herniations were located medio-laterally, 20% laterally, 12% within or lateral of the intervertebral compartment and 5% in the midline. Nearly one third of all herniations were found at the level of the disc space. Medio-lateral disc herniations were displaced more often in a caudal direction, lateral herniations were found displaced upwards and downwards with similar frequency while extraforminal herniations migrated significantly more often in a cranial direction. The pathomechanism and anatomical pathways of disc fragment migration are discussed on the basis of a new concept of the anterior extradural space.

CT-observations of the intra- and extracanalicular disc herniation

A retrospective analysis of 45 patients with intra- and extracanalicular lumbar disc herniations (ICDH, ECDH), collected over a 3 year period, is presented. When an intra- or extracanalicular DH was suspected, 1.5 mm axial cuts were made with a GE9800 from the cranial pedicle through the intervertebral canal to the pedicle of the lower vertebral body. Constructions were then made in coronal and paraxial planes to identify the pathology and its relation to the nerve root. 47% of all ICDH and ECDH were found at the level L4/5, 24% each at the levels L3/4 and L5/S1 respectively and 4% at the level L2/3. In 78% of our patients, the disc fragment was extruded and found well above the level of the disc space, in 22% at the level of the disc space. The coronal reformated views were in general better for demonstrating the course of the compressed nerve root at the levels L2/3-L4/5, while at L5/S1 the paraxial reformated view may yield better images. The distance from the midline of the spinal canal to the medial and lateral edge of the ECDH averages 16.4 +/- 3.4 and 33.3 +/- 3.6 mm and in some cases the lateral edge was found 39-44 mm from the midline. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of ECDH may be caused by scar tissue, sometimes by an upwardly displaced nerve root or ganglion and, very rarely, by a neurinoma. Pitfalls in therapy, i.g. false negative intraspinal exploration in cases of intra- or extracanalicular disc herniations or exploration of the wrong intervertebral canal, may result due to insufficient neuroradiological analysis or from insufficient consideration of the anatomical situation by the neurosurgeon.