Optimal oxygen delivery in critically ill patients

The International Sepsis Forum's frontiers in sepsis: High cardiac output should not be maintained in severe sepsis

Abnormal oxygen utilisation is one of the features of septic shock. Some studies have observed that patients that survive septic shock tend to have higher cardiac output and oxygen delivery compared to those that do not. It has been proposed that higher than normal (or "supra-normal") levels of cardiac output and oxygen deliver should be the goal in the management of septic shock. However, randomised controlled trials have not been able to validate that such a goal provides a mortality or morbidity advantage. In this commentary we discuss the various reasons put forward by the proponents of this strategy and review the available evidence.

Preoperative cardiac preparation

Preoperative preparation of the cardiac patient is based on matching the cardiac reserve to the blood flow demands imposed by surgical stress and the underlying disease state. Evaluation must include functional assessment of any coronary artery disease or other organic cardiac disease that may place myocardial tissue at risk of ischemia as demand for cardiac output increases. Monitoring should be individualized based on anticipated problems and the risk assessment of the patient. Preoperative therapy should include maneuvers that reduce congestive heart failure, optimize volume status, and provide adequate cardiac output to deliver oxygen sufficient to meet or exceed demand. Underlying electrical and metabolic abnormalities should be corrected and controlled in the perioperative period. Long-term therapy should be evaluated and modified in the context of the anesthetic and surgical plan. Preventive interventions such as fluid loading and low-dose dopamine should be considered prior to surgery.

Treatment of sepsis and septic shock: a review

Septic shock is one of the leading causes of death in intensive care units, and its incidence is increasing. Mortality rates as high as 95% are reported, with rates of 60% or more even when diagnosed and treated promptly. This review examines the definition of septic shock, its pathogenesis, and supportive therapy, with particular attention to intervention during the septic shock cascade.

Effects of catecholamines on regional perfusion and oxygenation in critically ill patients

Multiple organ failure is the major cause of death in patients with sepsis. Bacterial translocation from the gut is considered to induce and maintain sepsis. Therefore, the splanchnic region plays an important role in the pathogenesis and treatment of sepsis. There is evidence for a very high risk of imbalance between oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption especially in the splanchnic region. Consequently, there is a crucial interest whether it is possible to influence the splanchnic perfusion by specific catecholamines. Unfortunately, only a few, conflicting studies have looked at the effects of the various catecholamines on regional blood flow. Therefore, a clear recommendation for a specific catecholamine regimen in septic shock is impossible. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the choice of a specific catecholamine in the treatment of septic shock affects the patient's outcome. In most patients, the use of vasopressors is indispensable because adequate haemodynamic perfusion pressure is not achieved with fluid therapy alone. The negative effects of vasopressors on splanchnic perfusion are known from studies carried out under non septic conditions. Norepinephrine and dopamine in doses of 10 micrograms/kg/min in septic animals are without negative effects on splanchnic perfusion. Preliminary results show Preliminary results show a decrease in splanchnic oxygenation in patients with septic shock treated with epinephrine. Catecholamines with beta mimetic effects are often used to increase DO2. The question as to whether dobutamine or dopamine should be used first in treatment of septic shock cannot be answered yet. Whether treatment with low dose dopamine or dopexamine actually improves renal function and splanchnic oxygenation is the purpose of ongoing studies.

Prevention and therapy of the adult respiratory distress syndrome

The complex pathophysiology of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) makes preventive and therapeutic concepts difficult. Ample experimental evidence indicates that ARDS can be prevented by blocking systemic inflammatory agents. Clinically, only heparin, for inhibition of coagulation phenomena, is presently used among this array of approaches. Corticosteroids have not proven to be beneficial in ARDS. Alternative antiinflammatory agents are being proposed and are under current clinical investigation (e.g. indomethacin, acetylcysteine, alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor, antitumor necrosis factor, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, platelet-activating factor antagonists). Symptomatic therapeutic strategies in early ARDS include selective pulmonary vasodilation (preferably by inhaled vasorelaxant agents) and optimal fluid balance. Transbronchial surfactant application, presently tested in pilot studies, may be available for ARDS patients in the near future and may have acute beneficial effects on gas exchange, pulmonary mechanics, and lung hemodynamics; its impact on survival cannot be predicted at the present time. Strong efforts should be taken to reduce secondary nosocomial pneumonia in ARDS patients and thus avoid the vicious circle of pneumonia, sepsis from lung infection, and perpetuation of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Optimal respirator therapy should be directed to ameliorate gas-exchange conditions acutely but at the same time should aim at minimizing potentially aggravating side effects of artificial ventilation (barotrauma, O2 toxicity). Several new techniques of mechanical ventilation and the concept of permissive hypercapnia address these aspects. Approaches with extracorporeal CO2 removal and oxygenation are being used in specialized centers.

Sepsis and septic shock. II. Treatment

Mortality from septic shock is considerable despite the advantages of cardiovascular support and antibiotic therapy. This article reviews current therapy of septic shock including immunotherapy and further possibilities of septic shock treatment. The role of cytokines, their inhibitors and antibodies to endotoxin is mentioned. Although these treatments hold much promise for the future, careful evaluation of both the benefits and complications of therapy is needed before widespread clinical use can be recommended.

[Continuous monitoring of mixed venous blood oxygen saturation]

Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), measured on pulmonary artery blood, is a convenient indicator of matching between O2 transport (TaO2) and O2 body consumption (VO2). The measurement technique is based on the haemoglobin reflection spectrophotometry principle using two or three wave lengths. The Fick principle points out that SvO2 depends on five parameters: SvO2 = SaO2 - (VO2/CI x Hb x PO) where SaO2, CI and PO respectively represent arterial O2 saturation, cardiac index and O2 affinity. SvO2 does not always reflect tissue O2 tension: when considering a given value of SvO2, PvO2 will depend upon the position of the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve. It is impossible to establish in the absolute a "normal" value of SvO2. However, in most clinical circumstances, an SvO2 ranging from 60 to 80% attests that O2 tissue delivery is appropriate. Under certain conditions a continuous monitoring of SvO2 allows to assess another index such as ventilation-perfusion index or the O2 tissue extraction index. Usually SvO2 variations are more informative than the absolute SvO2 value. However, their interpretation should be cautious. First and foremost, the ability of each of the four main SvO2 determinants to influence the SvO2 is unequal as the numerical ranges of variation of these determinants are very different. Moreover, the attribution of a variation of SvO2 to one of its determinants implies that each of them is independent from the others, a feature which is very rarely seen in clinical practice. Finally as the mathematical relationship between SvO2 and its determinants is linear (SaO2 and VO2), or hyperbolic (CI and Hb), the weight of SaO2 or VO2 is independent of their absolute value, whereas CI or Hb weights will depend on their value. The limits of SvO2 monitoring are linked first to the occurrence of an anaerobic metabolism state when TaO2 becomes too low; SvO2 then just provides informations on the aerobic part of the metabolism. Moreover, SvO2 is just a global indicator for tissue O2 oxygenation status which does not give any indication about regional flow distribution. Therefore, SvO2 enables systemic imbalance supervision only. Finally, the existence of a right-to-left shunt will modify the SvO2 values through various mechanisms. However the SvO2 measured, in the pulmonary artery, remains reliable, whereas the presence of a left-to-right shunt will highly alter SvO2 basal value, only its time course remaining significant. SvO2 monitoring, element of diagnosis and monitoring, as well as a warning signal, has a priori specific indications poorly assessed, so far. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Right ventricular function in early septic shock states

OBJECTIVES

To define a variable which could reliably predict when fluid resuscitation as monotherapy is not expected to improve organ perfusion pressure, owing to limitations in cardiac output responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled trial.

SETTING

Anesthesiological ICU in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty seven patients in early septic shock states (MAP < 60 mmHg).

INTERVENTIONS

Infusion therapy was titrated until no further increase in cardiac index and mean arterial pressure could be achieved. Fluid resuscitation as monotherapy was deemed unsuccessful at the end of 2 h if inotropic or vasoactive pharmacologic support was required to maintain a mean arterial pressure > 60 mmHg.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We investigated the hemodynamic course during fluid resuscitation (2850 +/- 210 ml crystalloids) with special emphasis on right heart function using the thermodilution technique. Eleven patients (group A) had a right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction below 45%. In this group positive inotropic and/or vasoactive drugs were obligatory to achieve and maintain a sufficient perfusion pressure (MAP > 60 mmHg) after fluid challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

In 27 septic shock patients investigated, we diagnosed right ventricular dysfunction in 41%. In this specific patient population fluid replacement alone did not succeed in stabilizing hemodynamic variables, therefore necessitating catecholamine therapy.