Five French versus eight French catheters and the Judkins technique. Advantages and limitations for studying coronary artery disease

A 5Fr Catheter Approach Reduces Patient Discomfort during Transradial Coronary Intervention Compared with a 6Fr Approach: A Prospective Randomized Study

Smaller guiding catheters can help reduce local complications and patient morbidity during transradial coronary intervention (TRI). This study was designed to compare the patient's morbidity, success rate, and the operator's convenience between 5-French (5Fr) and 6-French (6Fr) TRIs. This is a single-center prospective randomized study. Patients who underwent TRI, in 2003, were prospectively randomized to either 5Fr or 6Fr catheter groups (100 patients in each group). Procedure-related patient morbidity as well as clinical and procedural characteristics was scored and analyzed. Procedural success rate was not significantly different between the groups. The number of unsatisfactory supports (6% in 5Fr group, 3% in 6Fr group; P=0.31) and the incidence of local wound complications were not significantly different between the groups. Local wound pain scores were significantly lower in the 5Fr group compared with the 6Fr group, particularly during sheath insertion and removal, and during procedures. Pain scores were higher in female patients than in male patients during sheath removal (male: 1.3+/-1.3, female: 1.7+/-1.5; P=0.049). Radial artery diameter was well correlated with local pain score during sheath removal (r=0.31, P<0.001), and with the height and weight of the patients (height: r=0.33, P<0.001; weight: r=0.27, P<0.001). In conclusion, using a 5Fr catheter during TRI reduce, local access site pain, particularly in female patients with smaller body size, whereas the success and local complication rates were similar to a 6Fr approach.

A randomised comparison of the use of 4 and 6 French diagnostic catheters: the limits of downsizing

BACKGROUND

The use of small catheters for coronary angiography can reduce the risk of vascular complications and allow early ambulation, but excessive downsizing may lead to poor quality imaging. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing coronary angiography using 4 French (4 F) femoral catheters.

METHODS

In total, 400 consecutive elective patients were randomised to undergo coronary angiography with 4 F or 6 F catheters. The puncture site was manually compressed and inspected before and after ambulation, and 24 h later. The handling difficulty of the catheters was semi-quantitatively evaluated using a three grade scoring system; angiogram quality was evaluated by two independent physicians.

RESULTS

No major procedure-related complications were observed. Coronary arteriography with 4 F catheters was possible in all of the attempted cases. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of procedural or fluoroscopy time, the amount of contrast medium used, or the incidence of vascular complications, while compression time was significantly shorter in the patients studied using the smaller catheter (3.4 vs. 9.9 min; P<0.0001). Catheter stability was similar in the two groups, whereas catheter torque and the quality of the coronary angiograms were statistically better in the patients studied using six French catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary angiography with 4 F catheters is technically feasible and permits early ambulation after the procedure. Although the radiological resolution of the images obtained using 4 F catheters was always adequate for clinical decision-making, the angiogram quality and catheter handling were significantly better using the 6 F system.

Five French (5 Fr) guiding catheters for percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stent placement: An initial feasibility study

Thirty patients were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a 5 Fr guiding catheter. A recently developed, mechanically advantaged hand injector was used to deliver contrast and achieved excellent visualization through the 5 Fr system. Stent sizes ranged from 2.25 to 4.00 mm in diameter and from 8 to 24 mm in length. All primary lesions were successfully treated. The average contrast use was 70 cc per case. There were no major complications and only one minor femoral hematoma. In selected patients, a balloon angioplasty and stent placement can be performed safely and successfully with 5 Fr guiding catheters using currently available products. This technique creates a smaller arterial puncture site, which may obviate the need for a closure device and allow early and safe ambulation. With 5 Fr systems, it appears that contrast usage is reduced, thereby potentially decreasing cost and morbidity. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 51:352-357, 2000.

Percutaneous right brachial artery approach with 5F catheters for studying coronary artery disease

We prospectively studied 60 ischemic patients with 5F catheters (Pigtail and Amplatz) using the percutaneous right brachial artery approach (group I), in order to compare this technique with two groups of 100 patients each randomly studied by the femoral route with either 5F (group II) or 8F (group III) catheters (Pigtail and Judkins). The following parameters were analyzed: need to change the initially elected catheter diameter or/and artery approach; technical difficulty for obtaining LV, LCA, and RCA angiograms; total time of X-ray exposure; quality image of LV, LCA, and RCA angiograms; incidence of arterial puncture related hematomas or total arterial occlusion; and duration of local compression after sheath removal. There were no differences between 5F brachial and femoral approaches except for the arterial compression time (p less than 0.01) and the X-ray exposure time (p = 0.03) which were longer with the brachial approach. Whatever the route used, 5F showed a mild increase difficulty (brachial p = 0.001; femoral p = 0.01) and a mild decreased quality image for LCA (branchial p = 0.006; femoral p less than 0.05). Mild hematomas were more frequent with 8F catheters (p less than 0.05). The procedure could be completed by the elected first artery and type of catheter (5F or 8F) in 57/60 patients in group I, in 95/100 in group II, and in 96/100 in group III (nonsignificant differences). Thus, the percutaneous right brachial artery approach using 5F catheters is similar to the femoral artery approach with the same catheters. Although both of them showed a mild increased technical difficulty and a mild decreased quality image compared to 8F, mainly for LCA angiograms, they allowed complete and reliable angiograms reading and analysis.